1. Ecology
Download icon

Little evidence that Eurasian jays protect their caches by responding to cues about a conspecific's desire and visual perspective

  1. Piero Amodio  Is a corresponding author
  2. Benjamin G Farrar
  3. Christopher Krupenye
  4. Ljerka Ostojic
  5. Nicola S Clayton
  1. Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Italy
  2. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  3. Johns Hopkins University, United States
  4. University of Rijeka, Croatia
Research Article
  • Cited 0
  • Views 466
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2021;10:e69647 doi: 10.7554/eLife.69647

Abstract

Eurasian jays have been reported to protect their caches by responding to cues about either the visual perspective or current desire of an observing conspecific, similarly to other corvids. Here, we used established paradigms to test whether these birds can - like humans - integrate multiple cues about different mental states and perform an optimal response accordingly. Across five experiments, which also include replications of previous work, we found little evidence that our jays adjusted their caching behaviour in line with the visual perspective and current desire of another agent, neither by integrating these social cues nor by responding to only one type of cue independently. These results raise questions about the reliability of the previously reported effects and highlight several key issues affecting reliability in comparative cognition research.

Data availability

Data and analyses of all experiments are available at http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4636561

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Piero Amodio

    Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Napoli, Italy
    For correspondence
    piero.amodio@cantab.net
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9408-2902
  2. Benjamin G Farrar

    University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Christopher Krupenye

    Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ljerka Ostojic

    University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Nicola S Clayton

    University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Leverhulme Trust (Study Abroad Scholarship,SAS-2020-004\10)

  • Piero Amodio

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Doctoral Training Programme,BB/M011194/1)

  • Benjamin G Farrar

European Commission (Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellowship MENTALIZINGORIGINS,Grant reference: 752373)

  • Christopher Krupenye

FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (ERC Grant Agreement N 3399933)

  • Nicola S Clayton

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were approved by the University of Cambridge Animal Ethics Committee (reference n. ZOO35/17).

Reviewing Editor

  1. Detlef Weigel, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Germany

Publication history

  1. Received: April 21, 2021
  2. Accepted: September 9, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 10, 2021 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2021, Amodio et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 466
    Page views
  • 48
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    Brendan Cornwell et al.
    Short Report Updated

    Climate change is dramatically changing ecosystem composition and productivity, leading scientists to consider the best approaches to map natural resistance and foster ecosystem resilience in the face of these changes. Here, we present results from a large-scale experimental assessment of coral bleaching resistance, a critical trait for coral population persistence as oceans warm, in 221 colonies of the coral Acropora hyacinthus across 37 reefs in Palau. We find that bleaching-resistant individuals inhabit most reefs but are found more often in warmer microhabitats. Our survey also found wide variation in symbiont concentration among colonies, and that colonies with lower symbiont load tended to be more bleaching-resistant. By contrast, our data show that low symbiont load comes at the cost of lower growth rate, a tradeoff that may operate widely among corals across environments. Corals with high bleaching resistance have been suggested as a source for habitat restoration or selective breeding in order to increase coral reef resilience to climate change. Our maps show where these resistant corals can be found, but the existence of tradeoffs with heat resistance may suggest caution in unilateral use of this one trait in restoration.

    1. Ecology
    Line K Bay, Emily J Howells
    Insight

    The ability of corals to adapt to global warming may involve trade-offs among the traits that influence their success as the foundational species of coral reefs.