The nematode worm C. elegans chooses between bacterial foods as if maximizing economic utility

  1. Abraham Katzen
  2. Hui-Kuan Chung
  3. William T Harbaugh
  4. Christina Della Iacono
  5. Nicholas Jackson
  6. Elizabeth E Glater
  7. Charles J Taylor
  8. Stephanie K Yu
  9. Steven W Flavell
  10. Paul Glimcher
  11. James Andreoni
  12. Shawn R Lockery  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Oregon, United States
  2. New York University, United States
  3. Pomona College, United States
  4. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
  5. University of California, San Diego, United States

Abstract

In value-based decision making, options are selected according to subjective values assigned by the individual to available goods and actions. Despite the importance of this faculty of the mind, the neural mechanisms of value assignments, and how choices are directed by them, remain obscure. To investigate this problem, we used a classic measure of utility maximization, the Generalized Axiom of Revealed Preference, to quantify internal consistency of food preferences in Caenorhabditis elegans, a nematode worm with a nervous system of only 302 neurons. Using a novel combination of microfluidics and electrophysiology, we found that C. elegans food choices fulfill the necessary and sufficient conditions for utility maximization, indicating that nematodes behave as if they maintain, and attempt to maximize, an underlying representation of subjective value. Food choices are well-fit by a utility function widely used to model human consumers. Moreover, as in many other animals, subjective values in C. elegans are learned, a process we find requires intact dopamine signaling. Differential responses of identified chemosensory neurons to foods with distinct growth potentials are amplified by prior consumption of these foods, suggesting that these neurons may be part of a value-assignment system. The demonstration of utility maximization in an organism with a very small nervous system sets a new lower bound on the computational requirements for utility maximization and offers the prospect of an essentially complete explanation of value-based decision making at single neuron resolution in this organism.

Data availability

Data of Figures 2, 4, 5-9 are available as Source Data files associated with this publication.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Abraham Katzen

    Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Hui-Kuan Chung

    Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. William T Harbaugh

    Department of Economics, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Christina Della Iacono

    Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Nicholas Jackson

    Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Elizabeth E Glater

    Department of Neuroscience, Pomona College, Claremont, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0205-8209
  7. Charles J Taylor

    Department of Chemistry, Pomona College, Claremont, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Stephanie K Yu

    Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Steven W Flavell

    Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9464-1877
  10. Paul Glimcher

    Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. James Andreoni

    Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Shawn R Lockery

    Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States
    For correspondence
    shawn.lockery@nemametrix.com
    Competing interests
    Shawn R Lockery, is co-founder and Chief Technology Officer of InVivo Biosystems, Inc., which manufactures instrumentation for recording electropharyngeograms..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8535-7989

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (MH051383)

  • Shawn R Lockery

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM129576)

  • Shawn R Lockery

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Katzen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,618
    views
  • 243
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Abraham Katzen
  2. Hui-Kuan Chung
  3. William T Harbaugh
  4. Christina Della Iacono
  5. Nicholas Jackson
  6. Elizabeth E Glater
  7. Charles J Taylor
  8. Stephanie K Yu
  9. Steven W Flavell
  10. Paul Glimcher
  11. James Andreoni
  12. Shawn R Lockery
(2023)
The nematode worm C. elegans chooses between bacterial foods as if maximizing economic utility
eLife 12:e69779.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69779

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69779

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Maren Klingelhöfer-Jens, Katharina Hutterer ... Tina B Lonsdorf
    Research Article

    Childhood adversity is a strong predictor of developing psychopathological conditions. Multiple theories on the mechanisms underlying this association have been suggested which, however, differ in the operationalization of ‘exposure.’ Altered (threat) learning mechanisms represent central mechanisms by which environmental inputs shape emotional and cognitive processes and ultimately behavior. 1402 healthy participants underwent a fear conditioning paradigm (acquisition training, generalization), while acquiring skin conductance responses (SCRs) and ratings (arousal, valence, and contingency). Childhood adversity was operationalized as (1) dichotomization, and following (2) the specificity model, (3) the cumulative risk model, and (4) the dimensional model. Individuals exposed to childhood adversity showed blunted physiological reactivity in SCRs, but not ratings, and reduced CS+/CS- discrimination during both phases, mainly driven by attenuated CS+ responding. The latter was evident across different operationalizations of ‘exposure’ following the different theories. None of the theories tested showed clear explanatory superiority. Notably, a remarkably different pattern of increased responding to the CS- is reported in the literature for anxiety patients, suggesting that individuals exposed to childhood adversity may represent a specific sub-sample. We highlight that theories linking childhood adversity to (vulnerability to) psychopathology need refinement.

    1. Neuroscience
    William T Redman, Santiago Acosta-Mendoza ... Michael J Goard
    Research Article

    Although grid cells are one of the most well-studied functional classes of neurons in the mammalian brain, whether there is a single orientation and spacing value per grid module has not been carefully tested. We analyze a recent large-scale recording of medial entorhinal cortex to characterize the presence and degree of heterogeneity of grid properties within individual modules. We find evidence for small, but robust, variability and hypothesize that this property of the grid code could enhance the encoding of local spatial information. Performing analysis on synthetic populations of grid cells, where we have complete control over the amount heterogeneity in grid properties, we demonstrate that grid property variability of a similar magnitude to the analyzed data leads to significantly decreased decoding error. This holds even when restricted to activity from a single module. Our results highlight how the heterogeneity of the neural response properties may benefit coding and opens new directions for theoretical and experimental analysis of grid cells.