MicroRNA 3′-compensatory pairing occurs through two binding modes, with affinity shaped by nucleotide identity and position

  1. Sean E McGeary
  2. Namita Bisaria
  3. Thy M Pham
  4. Peter Y Wang
  5. David P Bartel  Is a corresponding author
  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs), in association with Argonaute (AGO) proteins, direct repression by pairing to sites within mRNAs. Compared to pairing preferences of the miRNA seed region (nucleotides 2-8), preferences of the miRNA 3′ region are poorly understood, due to the sparsity of measured affinities for the many pairing possibilities. We used RNA bind-n-seq with purified AGO2-miRNA complexes to measure relative affinities of >1,000 3′-pairing architectures for each miRNA. In some cases, optimal 3′ pairing increased affinity by >500-fold. Some miRNAs had two high-affinity 3′-pairing modes-one of which included additional nucleotides bridging seed and 3′ pairing to enable high-affinity pairing to miRNA nucleotide 11. The affinity of binding and the position of optimal pairing both tracked with the occurrence of G or oligo(G/C) nucleotides within the miRNA. These and other results advance understanding of miRNA targeting, providing insight into how optimal 3′ pairing is determined for each miRNA.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO; accession GSE196458, and can be accessed with the reviewer token mtotysyidzwptef.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sean E McGeary

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5343-6447
  2. Namita Bisaria

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Thy M Pham

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Peter Y Wang

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. David P Bartel

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    For correspondence
    dbartel@wi.mit.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3872-2856

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM118135)

  • David P Bartel

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM123719)

  • Namita Bisaria

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • David P Bartel

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, McGeary et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,122
    views
  • 502
    downloads
  • 50
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Citations by DOI

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sean E McGeary
  2. Namita Bisaria
  3. Thy M Pham
  4. Peter Y Wang
  5. David P Bartel
(2022)
MicroRNA 3′-compensatory pairing occurs through two binding modes, with affinity shaped by nucleotide identity and position
eLife 11:e69803.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69803

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69803