Fascin limits Myosin activity within Drosophila border cells to control substrate stiffness and promote migration

  1. Maureen C Lamb
  2. Chathuri P Kaluarachchi
  3. Thiranjeewa I Lansakara
  4. Samuel Q Mellentine
  5. Yiling Lan
  6. Alexei V Tivanski
  7. Tina L Tootle  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, United States
  2. University of Iowa, United States

Abstract

A key regulator of collective cell migrations, which drive development and cancer metastasis, is substrate stiffness. Increased substrate stiffness promotes migration and is controlled by Myosin. Using Drosophila border cell migration as a model of collective cell migration, we identify, for the first time, that the actin bundling protein Fascin limits Myosin activity in vivo. Loss of Fascin results in: increased activated Myosin on the border cells and their substrate, the nurse cells; decreased border cell Myosin dynamics; and increased nurse cell stiffness as measured by atomic force microscopy. Reducing Myosin restores on-time border cell migration in fascin mutant follicles. Further, Fascin’s actin bundling activity is required to limit Myosin activation. Surprisingly, we find that Fascin regulates Myosin activity in the border cells to control nurse cell stiffness to promote migration. Thus, these data shift the paradigm from a substrate stiffness-centric model of regulating migration, to uncover that collectively migrating cells play a critical role in controlling the mechanical properties of their substrate in order to promote their own migration. This understudied means of mechanical regulation of migration is likely conserved across contexts and organisms, as Fascin and Myosin are common regulators of cell migration.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file 1.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Maureen C Lamb

    University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Chathuri P Kaluarachchi

    University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2538-3952
  3. Thiranjeewa I Lansakara

    University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Samuel Q Mellentine

    University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Yiling Lan

    University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Alexei V Tivanski

    University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Tina L Tootle

    University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, United States
    For correspondence
    tina-tootle@uiowa.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1515-9538

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM116885)

  • Maureen C Lamb
  • Samuel Q Mellentine
  • Tina L Tootle

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Lamb et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,498
    views
  • 276
    downloads
  • 28
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Maureen C Lamb
  2. Chathuri P Kaluarachchi
  3. Thiranjeewa I Lansakara
  4. Samuel Q Mellentine
  5. Yiling Lan
  6. Alexei V Tivanski
  7. Tina L Tootle
(2021)
Fascin limits Myosin activity within Drosophila border cells to control substrate stiffness and promote migration
eLife 10:e69836.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69836

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69836

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Vibhavari Aysha Bansal, Jia Min Tan ... Toh Hean Ch'ng
    Research Article

    The emergence of Aβ pathology is one of the hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but the mechanisms and impact of Aβ in progression of the disease is unclear. The nuclear pore complex (NPC) is a multi-protein assembly in mammalian cells that regulates movement of macromolecules across the nuclear envelope; its function is shown to undergo age-dependent decline during normal aging and is also impaired in multiple neurodegenerative disorders. Yet not much is known about the impact of Aβ on NPC function in neurons. Here, we examined NPC and nucleoporin (NUP) distribution and nucleocytoplasmic transport using a mouse model of AD (AppNL-G-F/NL-G-F) that expresses Aβ in young animals. Our studies revealed that a time-dependent accumulation of intracellular Aβ corresponded with a reduction of NPCs and NUPs in the nuclear envelope which resulted in the degradation of the permeability barrier and inefficient segregation of nucleocytoplasmic proteins, and active transport. As a result of the NPC dysfunction App KI neurons become more vulnerable to inflammation-induced necroptosis – a programmed cell death pathway where the core components are activated via phosphorylation through nucleocytoplasmic shutting. Collectively, our data implicates Aβ in progressive impairment of nuclear pore function and further confirms that the protein complex is vulnerable to disruption in various neurodegenerative diseases and is a potential therapeutic target.

    1. Cell Biology
    Qi Zeng, Chen Yao ... Shuai Chen
    Research Article

    Mounting evidence has demonstrated the genetic association of ORMDL sphingolipid biosynthesis regulator 3 (ORMDL3) gene polymorphisms with bronchial asthma and a diverse set of inflammatory disorders. However, its role in type I interferon (type I IFN) signaling remains poorly defined. Herein, we report that ORMDL3 is a negative modulator of the type I IFN signaling by interacting with mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS) and subsequently promoting the proteasome-mediated degradation of retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I). Immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry (IP-MS) assays uncovered that ORMDL3 binds to ubiquitin-specific protease 10 (USP10), which forms a complex with and stabilizes RIG-I through decreasing its K48-linked ubiquitination. ORMDL3 thus disrupts the interaction between USP10 and RIG-I, thereby promoting RIG-I degradation. Additionally, subcutaneous syngeneic tumor models in C57BL/6 mice revealed that inhibition of ORMDL3 enhances anti-tumor efficacy by augmenting the proportion of cytotoxic CD8 positive T cells and IFN production in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Collectively, our findings reveal the pivotal roles of ORMDL3 in maintaining antiviral innate immune responses and anti-tumor immunity.