Convalescent plasma use in the USA was inversely correlated with COVID-19 mortality

  1. Arturo Casadevall  Is a corresponding author
  2. Quigly Dragotakes
  3. Patrick W Johnson
  4. Jonathon W Senefeld
  5. Stephen A Klassen
  6. R Scott Wright
  7. Michael J Joyner
  8. Nigel Paneth
  9. Rickey E Carter
  1. Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, United States
  2. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, United States
  3. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, United States
  4. Department of Cardiology, Mayo Clinic, United States
  5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Pediatrics and Human Development, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, United States
4 figures, 1 table and 6 additional files

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
Doses of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) distributed in the USA by the American Red Cross and American Blood Centers (dashed) and total COVID-19 cases in the USA reported in Our World in Data (OWID) database (solid).

The vertical black line marks August 23, 2020, when the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that Emergency Use Authorization for CCP in the USA. The vertical gray line marks April 4, 2020, as the start of the Emergency Access Program.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Correlation of convalescent plasma distribution and usage within the Expanded Access Program (EAP).

Shown is the progressive increase in the number of convalescent plasma units distributed in the USA and convalescent plasma units used in the EAP. Data between April 6 and August 23, 2020, are pooled in weekly intervals and represented as filled circles. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation (r = 0.946, p<0.001) and a LOESS smoother with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and a reference line were overlayed. Points below the reference line represent weeks where more convalescent plasma was distributed than used within the EAP. Conversely, points above the reference line are indicative of more convalescent plasma being used in the EAP than distributed.

Doses of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) per hospital admission (red) and mortality calculated as deaths per hospital admission (green) using Our World in Data (OWID) database.

To account for time between admission to death, deaths from 2 weeks after admission are used to calculate mortality. The vertical line marks August 23, 2020, when the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that Emergency Use Authorization for CCP in the USA.

Figure 3 with 3 supplements
Correlation of mortality (death per admission) and COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) doses per admitted patients using the Our World in Data (OWID) database.

Correlation analysis yields a Pearson’s correlation coefficient of −0.518 (p=0.0024). The black line represents a linear model regression with an R squared of 0.268.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1
A series of linear regressions and Pearson’s correlation tests comparing weekly reported deaths to new weekly hospital admissions, offset by various numbers of weeks to identify the length of lag between admission and death of patients using Our World in Data (OWID) database.

y-Axis values reflect the parameter of each gray box throughout the shifted weeks. Correlations peak at 2–3 weeks shifted, suggesting the lag time between admission and reported death is roughly 2 weeks.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2
Mortality from COVID-19 by quintile of percent of admissions receiving COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP).

Regression analysis for the quintiles revealed R = 0.5 and p=0.03.

Figure 3—figure supplement 3
Investigation of high age group mortality.

The shifted mortality is compared to the percent of hospitalized patients 65+ each week as reported by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). There is no significant correlation between the two variables, suggesting changes in mortality are not explainable by an increase in hospitalized high-risk patients.

Figure 4 with 1 supplement
Estimated (Est.) deaths under modeled scenarios of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) using Centers for Disease Control (CDC) database.

Panel A presents the longitudinal observed (dashed line) and modeled number of deaths under three scenarios for CCP over the study period (August 3, 2020 to February 22, 2021) that included 356,534 deaths in 1,793,502 hospitalized patients. Over the entire study period, the CCP utilization ratio was 29.1%. In the scenario labeled maintenance (Maint.) of plasma, the CCP utilization ratio was set to 39.5%. With the no plasma and 50% plasma usage scenarios, the CCP utilization ratio was set at 0% and 50%, respectively. Panel B provides the pairwise comparisons of these scenarios to estimate the difference in expected number of deaths among the scenarios for the entire hospitalized patients (upper right triangle) and re-indexed to events per 1000 patients (lower left triangle). The rows represent the comparator or reference scenario, columns indicate the altered CCP use scenario. For example, the cell that intersects the observed deaths and the maintenance of plasma column shows that 29,018 fewer deaths would result had plasma use remained at the 39.5% level.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Replicated cumulative excess deaths analysis per Our World in Data (OWID) database for scenario 1 (orange).

Maintained plasma transfusion rate from October to November throughout period, scenario 2 (blue): 50% transfusion rate throughout period, and scenario 3 (red): 0% transfusion rate throughout period. Black dashed line represents observed cumulative deaths per OWID reporting.

Tables

Table 1
Estimated number of excess deaths due to transfusion hesitancy.
Time periodTransfusion rateNumber of admissionsDeathsMortality rateExpected deaths if mortality had remained at 18.16%Excess deaths in the low transfusion periodExcess deaths per 1000 admissions
High utilization ( September 21, 2021 to November 8, 2021)42.59%257,42446,74718.16%46,747
Low Utilization (November 9, 2021 to March 22, 2021)27.43%1,344,463270,01920.08%244,14825,87119.2

Additional files

Source data 1

Centers for Disease Control (CDC) analysis data.

Summarized data of hospitalizations and deaths, from CDC data.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69866/elife-69866-data1-v2.xlsx
Source data 2

Blood banker distribution data for plasma units.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69866/elife-69866-data2-v2.xlsx
Supplementary file 1

Mortality of COVID-19 in US COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) efficacy studies.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69866/elife-69866-supp1-v2.docx
Supplementary file 2

Data from and calculations for excess mortality from COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) hesitancy based on the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) database.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69866/elife-69866-supp2-v2.docx
Supplementary file 3

Excess death calculations based on Our World in Data (OWID) database.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69866/elife-69866-supp3-v2.docx
Transparent reporting form
https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/69866/elife-69866-transrepform-v2.docx

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Arturo Casadevall
  2. Quigly Dragotakes
  3. Patrick W Johnson
  4. Jonathon W Senefeld
  5. Stephen A Klassen
  6. R Scott Wright
  7. Michael J Joyner
  8. Nigel Paneth
  9. Rickey E Carter
(2021)
Convalescent plasma use in the USA was inversely correlated with COVID-19 mortality
eLife 10:e69866.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69866