Memory recall involves a transient break in excitatory-inhibitory balance

  1. Renée S Koolschijn  Is a corresponding author
  2. Anna Shpektor
  3. William T Clarke
  4. I Betina Ip
  5. David Dupret
  6. Uzay E Emir
  7. Helen C Barron  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  2. Purdue University, United States

Abstract

The brain has a remarkable capacity to acquire and store memories that can later be selectively recalled. These processes are supported by the hippocampus which is thought to index memory recall by reinstating information stored across distributed neocortical circuits. However, the mechanism that supports this interaction remains unclear. Here, in humans, we show that recall of a visual cue from a paired associate is accompanied by a transient increase in the ratio between glutamate and GABA in visual cortex. Moreover, these excitatory-inhibitory fluctuations are predicted by activity in the hippocampus. These data suggest the hippocampus gates memory recall by indexing information stored across neocortical circuits using a disinhibitory mechanism.

Data availability

The data and code used in this study are available via the MRC BNDU Data Sharing PlatformThe data is available here:https://data.mrc.ox.ac.uk/data-set/fmri-fmrs-inferenceDOI: https://doi.org/10.5287/bodleian:vmJOOm7KDThe code is available here:https://data.mrc.ox.ac.uk/data-set/frms-codeDOI: https://doi.org/10.5287/bodleian:8JwYayQmD

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Renée S Koolschijn

    University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    renee.koolschijn@keble.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9553-4213
  2. Anna Shpektor

    University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. William T Clarke

    University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. I Betina Ip

    University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3544-0711
  5. David Dupret

    University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Uzay E Emir

    school of health science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5376-0431
  7. Helen C Barron

    University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    helen.barron@merton.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/L016052/1)

  • Renée S Koolschijn

Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Research Fellowship

  • I Betina Ip

Wellcome Trust (203836/Z/16/Z)

  • Anna Shpektor

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/N0059TX/1)

  • David Dupret

Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12024/3)

  • David Dupret

John Fell Fund, University of Oxford (153/046)

  • Helen C Barron

Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (Seed grant)

  • Helen C Barron

Merton College, University of Oxford (JRF)

  • Helen C Barron

Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12024/3)

  • Helen C Barron

Wellcome Trust (203139/Z/16/Z)

  • Renée S Koolschijn
  • Anna Shpektor
  • William T Clarke
  • I Betina Ip
  • Helen C Barron

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Muireann Irish, University of Sydney, Australia

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants gave informed written consent.All experiments were approved by the University of Oxford ethics committee (reference number R43594/RE001).

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: November 27, 2020 (view preprint)
  2. Received: May 5, 2021
  3. Accepted: September 7, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: October 8, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: October 14, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Koolschijn et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,487
    views
  • 456
    downloads
  • 17
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Renée S Koolschijn
  2. Anna Shpektor
  3. William T Clarke
  4. I Betina Ip
  5. David Dupret
  6. Uzay E Emir
  7. Helen C Barron
(2021)
Memory recall involves a transient break in excitatory-inhibitory balance
eLife 10:e70071.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70071

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70071

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Alexandra L Jellinger, Rebecca L Suthard ... Steve Ramirez
    Research Article

    Negative memories engage a brain and body-wide stress response in humans that can alter cognition and behavior. Prolonged stress responses induce maladaptive cellular, circuit, and systems-level changes that can lead to pathological brain states and corresponding disorders in which mood and memory are affected. However, it is unclear if repeated activation of cells processing negative memories induces similar phenotypes in mice. In this study, we used an activity-dependent tagging method to access neuronal ensembles and assess their molecular characteristics. Sequencing memory engrams in mice revealed that positive (male-to-female exposure) and negative (foot shock) cells upregulated genes linked to anti- and pro-inflammatory responses, respectively. To investigate the impact of persistent activation of negative engrams, we chemogenetically activated them in the ventral hippocampus over 3 months and conducted anxiety and memory-related tests. Negative engram activation increased anxiety behaviors in both 6- and 14-month-old mice, reduced spatial working memory in older mice, impaired fear extinction in younger mice, and heightened fear generalization in both age groups. Immunohistochemistry revealed changes in microglial and astrocytic structure and number in the hippocampus. In summary, repeated activation of negative memories induces lasting cellular and behavioral abnormalities in mice, offering insights into the negative effects of chronic negative thinking-like behaviors on human health.

    1. Neuroscience
    Alexandra H Leighton, Juliette E Cheyne, Christian Lohmann
    Research Article

    Synaptic inputs to cortical neurons are highly structured in adult sensory systems, such that neighboring synapses along dendrites are activated by similar stimuli. This organization of synaptic inputs, called synaptic clustering, is required for high-fidelity signal processing, and clustered synapses can already be observed before eye opening. However, how clustered inputs emerge during development is unknown. Here, we employed concurrent in vivo whole-cell patch-clamp and dendritic calcium imaging to map spontaneous synaptic inputs to dendrites of layer 2/3 neurons in the mouse primary visual cortex during the second postnatal week until eye opening. We found that the number of functional synapses and the frequency of transmission events increase several fold during this developmental period. At the beginning of the second postnatal week, synapses assemble specifically in confined dendritic segments, whereas other segments are devoid of synapses. By the end of the second postnatal week, just before eye opening, dendrites are almost entirely covered by domains of co-active synapses. Finally, co-activity with their neighbor synapses correlates with synaptic stabilization and potentiation. Thus, clustered synapses form in distinct functional domains presumably to equip dendrites with computational modules for high-capacity sensory processing when the eyes open.