Expression of a CO2-permeable aquaporin enhances mesophyll conductance in the C4 species Setaria viridis

Abstract

A fundamental limitation of photosynthetic carbon fixation is the availability of CO2. In C4 plants, primary carboxylation occurs in mesophyll cytosol, and little is known about the role of CO2 diffusion in facilitating C4 photosynthesis. We have examined the expression, localization, and functional role of selected plasma membrane intrinsic aquaporins (PIPs) from Setaria italica (foxtail millet) and discovered that SiPIP2;7 is CO2-permeable. When ectopically expressed in mesophyll cells of S. viridis (green foxtail), SiPIP2;7 was localized to the plasma membrane and caused no marked changes in leaf biochemistry. Gas-exchange and C18O16O discrimination measurements revealed that targeted expression of SiPIP2;7 enhanced the conductance to CO2 diffusion from the intercellular airspace to the mesophyll cytosol. Our results demonstrate that mesophyll conductance limits C4 photosynthesis at low pCO2 and that SiPIP2;7 is a functional CO2 permeable aquaporin that can improve CO2 diffusion at the airspace/mesophyll interface and enhance C4 photosynthesis.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Maria Ermakova

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    For correspondence
    maria.ermakova@anu.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8466-4186
  2. Hannah Osborn

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Michael Groszmann

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Soumi Bala

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Andrew Bowerman

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Samantha McGaughey

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Caitlin Byrt

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Hugo Alonso-cantabrana

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5462-5861
  9. Steve Tyerman

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Agriculture Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Robert T Furbank

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Agriculture Food and Wine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Robert E Sharwood

    Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, Australia
    For correspondence
    robert.sharwood@anu.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4993-3816
  12. Suzanne von Caemmerer

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Australian Research Council (Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis,CE140100015)

  • Maria Ermakova
  • Hannah Osborn
  • Michael Groszmann
  • Soumi Bala
  • Hugo Alonso-cantabrana
  • Robert T Furbank
  • Robert E Sharwood
  • Suzanne von Caemmerer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Ermakova et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,504
    views
  • 309
    downloads
  • 34
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Maria Ermakova
  2. Hannah Osborn
  3. Michael Groszmann
  4. Soumi Bala
  5. Andrew Bowerman
  6. Samantha McGaughey
  7. Caitlin Byrt
  8. Hugo Alonso-cantabrana
  9. Steve Tyerman
  10. Robert T Furbank
  11. Robert E Sharwood
  12. Suzanne von Caemmerer
(2021)
Expression of a CO2-permeable aquaporin enhances mesophyll conductance in the C4 species Setaria viridis
eLife 10:e70095.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70095

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70095

Further reading

    1. Plant Biology
    Yuanyuan Bu, Xingye Dong ... Shenkui Liu
    Research Article

    Urea is intensively utilized as a nitrogen fertilizer in agriculture, originating either from root uptake or from catabolism of arginine by arginase. Despite its extensive use, the underlying physiological mechanisms of urea, particularly its adverse effects on seed germination and seedling growth under salt stress remains unclear. In this study, we demonstrate that salt stress induces excessive hydrolysis of arginine-derived urea, leading to an increase in cytoplasmic pH within seed radical cells, which, in turn, triggers salt-induced inhibition of seed germination (SISG) and hampers seedling growth. Our findings challenge the long-held belief that ammonium accumulation and toxicity are the primary causes of SISG, offering a novel perspective on the mechanism underlying these processes. This study provides significant insights into the physiological impact of urea hydrolysis under salt stress, contributing to a better understanding of SISG.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Henning Mühlenbeck, Yuko Tsutsui ... Cyril Zipfel
    Research Article

    Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic signaling mechanisms of protein kinase domains have been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (elongation factor Tu receptor) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated kinase 1/somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.