Expression of a CO2-permeable aquaporin enhances mesophyll conductance in the C4 species Setaria viridis

  1. Maria Ermakova  Is a corresponding author
  2. Hannah Osborn
  3. Michael Groszmann
  4. Soumi Bala
  5. Andrew Bowerman
  6. Samantha McGaughey
  7. Caitlin Byrt
  8. Hugo Alonso-cantabrana
  9. Steve Tyerman
  10. Robert T Furbank
  11. Robert E Sharwood  Is a corresponding author
  12. Suzanne von Caemmerer
  1. Australian National University, Australia
  2. University of Adelaide, Australia
  3. Western Sydney University, Australia

Abstract

A fundamental limitation of photosynthetic carbon fixation is the availability of CO2. In C4 plants, primary carboxylation occurs in mesophyll cytosol, and little is known about the role of CO2 diffusion in facilitating C4 photosynthesis. We have examined the expression, localization, and functional role of selected plasma membrane intrinsic aquaporins (PIPs) from Setaria italica (foxtail millet) and discovered that SiPIP2;7 is CO2-permeable. When ectopically expressed in mesophyll cells of S. viridis (green foxtail), SiPIP2;7 was localized to the plasma membrane and caused no marked changes in leaf biochemistry. Gas-exchange and C18O16O discrimination measurements revealed that targeted expression of SiPIP2;7 enhanced the conductance to CO2 diffusion from the intercellular airspace to the mesophyll cytosol. Our results demonstrate that mesophyll conductance limits C4 photosynthesis at low pCO2 and that SiPIP2;7 is a functional CO2 permeable aquaporin that can improve CO2 diffusion at the airspace/mesophyll interface and enhance C4 photosynthesis.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Maria Ermakova

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    For correspondence
    maria.ermakova@anu.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8466-4186
  2. Hannah Osborn

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Michael Groszmann

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Soumi Bala

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Andrew Bowerman

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Samantha McGaughey

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Caitlin Byrt

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Hugo Alonso-cantabrana

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5462-5861
  9. Steve Tyerman

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Agriculture Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Robert T Furbank

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Agriculture Food and Wine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Robert E Sharwood

    Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, Australia
    For correspondence
    robert.sharwood@anu.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4993-3816
  12. Suzanne von Caemmerer

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Australian Research Council (Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis,CE140100015)

  • Maria Ermakova
  • Hannah Osborn
  • Michael Groszmann
  • Soumi Bala
  • Hugo Alonso-cantabrana
  • Robert T Furbank
  • Robert E Sharwood
  • Suzanne von Caemmerer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. David M Kramer, Michigan State University, United States

Publication history

  1. Preprint posted: April 29, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: May 6, 2021
  3. Accepted: November 23, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: November 29, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: December 6, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Ermakova et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 811
    Page views
  • 169
    Downloads
  • 4
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Maria Ermakova
  2. Hannah Osborn
  3. Michael Groszmann
  4. Soumi Bala
  5. Andrew Bowerman
  6. Samantha McGaughey
  7. Caitlin Byrt
  8. Hugo Alonso-cantabrana
  9. Steve Tyerman
  10. Robert T Furbank
  11. Robert E Sharwood
  12. Suzanne von Caemmerer
(2021)
Expression of a CO2-permeable aquaporin enhances mesophyll conductance in the C4 species Setaria viridis
eLife 10:e70095.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70095

Further reading

    1. Plant Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Koji Kato et al.
    Research Article

    Photosystem I (PSI) is a multi-subunit pigment-protein complex that functions in light-harvesting and photochemical charge-separation reactions, followed by reduction of NADP to NADPH required for CO2 fixation in photosynthetic organisms. PSI from different photosynthetic organisms has a variety of chlorophylls (Chls), some of which are at lower-energy levels than its reaction center P700, a special pair of Chls, and are called low-energy Chls. However, the sites of low-energy Chls are still under debate. Here, we solved a 2.04-Å resolution structure of a PSI trimer by cryo-electron microscopy from a primordial cyanobacterium Gloeobacter violaceus PCC 7421, which has no low-energy Chls. The structure shows the absence of some subunits commonly found in other cyanobacteria, confirming the primordial nature of this cyanobacterium. Comparison with the known structures of PSI from other cyanobacteria and eukaryotic organisms reveals that one dimeric and one trimeric Chls are lacking in the Gloeobacter PSI. The dimeric and trimeric Chls are named Low1 and Low2, respectively. Low2 is missing in some cyanobacterial and eukaryotic PSIs, whereas Low1 is absent only in Gloeobacter. These findings provide insights into not only the identity of low-energy Chls in PSI, but also the evolutionary changes of low-energy Chls in oxyphototrophs.

    1. Plant Biology
    Sylvia P Kinosian, Paul G Wolf
    Feature Article Updated

    The fern Ceratopteris richardii has been studied as a model organism for over 50 years because it is easy to grow and has a short life cycle. In particular, as the first homosporous vascular plant for which genomic resources were developed, C. richardii has been an important system for studying plant evolution. However, we know relatively little about the natural history of C. richardii. In this article, we summarize what is known about this aspect of C. richardii, and discuss how learning more about its natural history could greatly increase our understanding of the evolution of land plants.