Expression of a CO2-permeable aquaporin enhances mesophyll conductance in the C4 species Setaria viridis

Abstract

A fundamental limitation of photosynthetic carbon fixation is the availability of CO2. In C4 plants, primary carboxylation occurs in mesophyll cytosol, and little is known about the role of CO2 diffusion in facilitating C4 photosynthesis. We have examined the expression, localization, and functional role of selected plasma membrane intrinsic aquaporins (PIPs) from Setaria italica (foxtail millet) and discovered that SiPIP2;7 is CO2-permeable. When ectopically expressed in mesophyll cells of S. viridis (green foxtail), SiPIP2;7 was localized to the plasma membrane and caused no marked changes in leaf biochemistry. Gas-exchange and C18O16O discrimination measurements revealed that targeted expression of SiPIP2;7 enhanced the conductance to CO2 diffusion from the intercellular airspace to the mesophyll cytosol. Our results demonstrate that mesophyll conductance limits C4 photosynthesis at low pCO2 and that SiPIP2;7 is a functional CO2 permeable aquaporin that can improve CO2 diffusion at the airspace/mesophyll interface and enhance C4 photosynthesis.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Maria Ermakova

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    For correspondence
    maria.ermakova@anu.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8466-4186
  2. Hannah Osborn

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Michael Groszmann

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Soumi Bala

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Andrew Bowerman

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Samantha McGaughey

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Caitlin Byrt

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Hugo Alonso-cantabrana

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5462-5861
  9. Steve Tyerman

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Agriculture Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Robert T Furbank

    ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Agriculture Food and Wine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Robert E Sharwood

    Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, Australia
    For correspondence
    robert.sharwood@anu.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4993-3816
  12. Suzanne von Caemmerer

    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Division of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Australian Research Council (Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis,CE140100015)

  • Maria Ermakova
  • Hannah Osborn
  • Michael Groszmann
  • Soumi Bala
  • Hugo Alonso-cantabrana
  • Robert T Furbank
  • Robert E Sharwood
  • Suzanne von Caemmerer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Ermakova et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,561
    views
  • 312
    downloads
  • 37
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Maria Ermakova
  2. Hannah Osborn
  3. Michael Groszmann
  4. Soumi Bala
  5. Andrew Bowerman
  6. Samantha McGaughey
  7. Caitlin Byrt
  8. Hugo Alonso-cantabrana
  9. Steve Tyerman
  10. Robert T Furbank
  11. Robert E Sharwood
  12. Suzanne von Caemmerer
(2021)
Expression of a CO2-permeable aquaporin enhances mesophyll conductance in the C4 species Setaria viridis
eLife 10:e70095.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70095

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70095

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Masanori Izumi, Sakuya Nakamura ... Shinya Hagihara
    Research Article

    Plants distribute many nutrients to chloroplasts during leaf development and maturation. When leaves senesce or experience sugar starvation, the autophagy machinery degrades chloroplast proteins to facilitate efficient nutrient reuse. Here, we report on the intracellular dynamics of an autophagy pathway responsible for piecemeal degradation of chloroplast components. Through live-cell monitoring of chloroplast morphology, we observed the formation of chloroplast budding structures in sugar-starved leaves. These buds were then released and incorporated into the vacuolar lumen as an autophagic cargo termed a Rubisco-containing body. The budding structures did not accumulate in mutants of core autophagy machinery, suggesting that autophagosome creation is required for forming chloroplast buds. Simultaneous tracking of chloroplast morphology and autophagosome development revealed that the isolation membranes of autophagosomes interact closely with part of the chloroplast surface before forming chloroplast buds. Chloroplasts then protrude at the site associated with the isolation membranes, which divide synchronously with autophagosome maturation. This autophagy-related division does not require DYNAMIN-RELATED PROTEIN 5B, which constitutes the division ring for chloroplast proliferation in growing leaves. An unidentified division machinery may thus fragment chloroplasts for degradation in coordination with the development of the chloroplast-associated isolation membrane.

    1. Plant Biology
    Koji Kato, Yoshiki Nakajima ... Ryo Nagao
    Research Article

    Photosynthetic organisms exhibit remarkable diversity in their light-harvesting complexes (LHCs). LHCs are associated with photosystem I (PSI), forming a PSI-LHCI supercomplex. The number of LHCI subunits, along with their protein sequences and pigment compositions, has been found to differ greatly among the PSI-LHCI structures. However, the mechanisms by which LHCIs recognize their specific binding sites within the PSI core remain unclear. In this study, we determined the cryo-electron microscopy structure of a PSI supercomplex incorporating fucoxanthin chlorophyll a/c-binding proteins (FCPs), designated as PSI-FCPI, isolated from the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana CCMP1335. Structural analysis of PSI-FCPI revealed five FCPI subunits associated with a PSI monomer; these subunits were identified as RedCAP, Lhcr3, Lhcq10, Lhcf10, and Lhcq8. Through structural and sequence analyses, we identified specific protein–protein interactions at the interfaces between FCPI and PSI subunits, as well as among FCPI subunits themselves. Comparative structural analyses of PSI-FCPI supercomplexes, combined with phylogenetic analysis of FCPs from T. pseudonana and the diatom Chaetoceros gracilis, underscore the evolutionary conservation of protein motifs crucial for the selective binding of individual FCPI subunits. These findings provide significant insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the assembly and selective binding of FCPIs in diatoms.