The BigBrainWarp toolbox for integration of BigBrain 3D histology with multimodal neuroimaging

  1. Casey Paquola  Is a corresponding author
  2. Jessica Royer
  3. Lindsay B Lewis
  4. Claude Lepage
  5. Tristan Glatard
  6. Konrad Wagstyl
  7. Jordan DeKraker
  8. Paule-Joanne Toussaint
  9. Sofie Louise Valk
  10. D Louis Collins
  11. Ali Khan
  12. Katrin Amunts
  13. Alan C Evans
  14. Timo Dickscheid
  15. Boris C Bernhardt  Is a corresponding author
  1. McGill University, Canada
  2. Concordia University, Canada
  3. UCL, United Kingdom
  4. University of Western Ontario, Canada
  5. Max Planck Institute Leipzig, Germany
  6. Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Canada
  7. Heinrich Heine University, Germany
  8. Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany

Abstract

Neuroimaging stands to benefit from emerging ultrahigh-resolution 3D histological atlases of the human brain; the first of which is 'BigBrain'. Here, we review recent methodological advances for the integration of BigBrain with multi-modal neuroimaging and introduce a toolbox, 'BigBrainWarp', that combines these developments. The aim of BigBrainWarp is to simplify workflows and support the adoption of best practices. This is accomplished with a simple wrapper function that allows users to easily map data between BigBrain and standard MRI spaces. The function automatically pulls specialised transformation procedures, based on ongoing research from a wide collaborative network of researchers. Additionally, the toolbox improves accessibility of histological information through dissemination of ready-to-use cytoarchitectural features. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of BigBrainWarp with three tutorials and discuss the potential of the toolbox to support multi-scale investigations of brain organisation.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the BigBrainWarp repository (https://github.com/caseypaquola/BigBrainWarp).

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Casey Paquola

    Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
    For correspondence
    casey.paquola@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0190-4103
  2. Jessica Royer

    Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Lindsay B Lewis

    Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Claude Lepage

    Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Tristan Glatard

    Concordia University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Konrad Wagstyl

    Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jordan DeKraker

    Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Paule-Joanne Toussaint

    Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7446-150X
  9. Sofie Louise Valk

    Cognitive Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2998-6849
  10. D Louis Collins

    McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8432-7021
  11. Ali Khan

    Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Katrin Amunts

    Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5828-0867
  13. Alan C Evans

    Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Timo Dickscheid

    Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Boris C Bernhardt

    Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    For correspondence
    boris.bernhardt@mcgill.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9256-6041

Funding

Helmholtz Association

  • Casey Paquola
  • Lindsay B Lewis
  • Claude Lepage
  • Jordan DeKraker
  • Paule-Joanne Toussaint
  • Sofie Louise Valk
  • D Louis Collins
  • Katrin Amunts
  • Alan C Evans
  • Timo Dickscheid
  • Boris C Bernhardt

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé

  • Casey Paquola
  • Boris C Bernhardt

National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada

  • Ali Khan
  • Boris C Bernhardt

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

  • Jessica Royer
  • Ali Khan
  • Boris C Bernhardt

SickKids Foundation

  • Boris C Bernhardt

Azrieli Center for Autism Research

  • Boris C Bernhardt

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Paquola et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,793
    views
  • 382
    downloads
  • 53
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Casey Paquola
  2. Jessica Royer
  3. Lindsay B Lewis
  4. Claude Lepage
  5. Tristan Glatard
  6. Konrad Wagstyl
  7. Jordan DeKraker
  8. Paule-Joanne Toussaint
  9. Sofie Louise Valk
  10. D Louis Collins
  11. Ali Khan
  12. Katrin Amunts
  13. Alan C Evans
  14. Timo Dickscheid
  15. Boris C Bernhardt
(2021)
The BigBrainWarp toolbox for integration of BigBrain 3D histology with multimodal neuroimaging
eLife 10:e70119.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70119

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70119

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Mohsen Alavash
    Insight

    Combining electrophysiological, anatomical and functional brain maps reveals networks of beta neural activity that align with dopamine uptake.

    1. Neuroscience
    Masahiro Takigawa, Marta Huelin Gorriz ... Daniel Bendor
    Research Article

    During rest and sleep, memory traces replay in the brain. The dialogue between brain regions during replay is thought to stabilize labile memory traces for long-term storage. However, because replay is an internally-driven, spontaneous phenomenon, it does not have a ground truth - an external reference that can validate whether a memory has truly been replayed. Instead, replay detection is based on the similarity between the sequential neural activity comprising the replay event and the corresponding template of neural activity generated during active locomotion. If the statistical likelihood of observing such a match by chance is sufficiently low, the candidate replay event is inferred to be replaying that specific memory. However, without the ability to evaluate whether replay detection methods are successfully detecting true events and correctly rejecting non-events, the evaluation and comparison of different replay methods is challenging. To circumvent this problem, we present a new framework for evaluating replay, tested using hippocampal neural recordings from rats exploring two novel linear tracks. Using this two-track paradigm, our framework selects replay events based on their temporal fidelity (sequence-based detection), and evaluates the detection performance using each event's track discriminability, where sequenceless decoding across both tracks is used to quantify whether the track replaying is also the most likely track being reactivated.