The BigBrainWarp toolbox for integration of BigBrain 3D histology with multimodal neuroimaging

  1. Casey Paquola  Is a corresponding author
  2. Jessica Royer
  3. Lindsay B Lewis
  4. Claude Lepage
  5. Tristan Glatard
  6. Konrad Wagstyl
  7. Jordan DeKraker
  8. Paule-Joanne Toussaint
  9. Sofie Louise Valk
  10. D Louis Collins
  11. Ali Khan
  12. Katrin Amunts
  13. Alan C Evans
  14. Timo Dickscheid
  15. Boris C Bernhardt  Is a corresponding author
  1. McGill University, Canada
  2. Concordia University, Canada
  3. UCL, United Kingdom
  4. University of Western Ontario, Canada
  5. Max Planck Institute Leipzig, Germany
  6. Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Canada
  7. Heinrich Heine University, Germany
  8. Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany

Abstract

Neuroimaging stands to benefit from emerging ultrahigh-resolution 3D histological atlases of the human brain; the first of which is 'BigBrain'. Here, we review recent methodological advances for the integration of BigBrain with multi-modal neuroimaging and introduce a toolbox, 'BigBrainWarp', that combines these developments. The aim of BigBrainWarp is to simplify workflows and support the adoption of best practices. This is accomplished with a simple wrapper function that allows users to easily map data between BigBrain and standard MRI spaces. The function automatically pulls specialised transformation procedures, based on ongoing research from a wide collaborative network of researchers. Additionally, the toolbox improves accessibility of histological information through dissemination of ready-to-use cytoarchitectural features. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of BigBrainWarp with three tutorials and discuss the potential of the toolbox to support multi-scale investigations of brain organisation.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the BigBrainWarp repository (https://github.com/caseypaquola/BigBrainWarp).

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Casey Paquola

    Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
    For correspondence
    casey.paquola@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0190-4103
  2. Jessica Royer

    Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Lindsay B Lewis

    Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Claude Lepage

    Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Tristan Glatard

    Concordia University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Konrad Wagstyl

    Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jordan DeKraker

    Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Paule-Joanne Toussaint

    Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7446-150X
  9. Sofie Louise Valk

    Cognitive Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2998-6849
  10. D Louis Collins

    McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8432-7021
  11. Ali Khan

    Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Katrin Amunts

    Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5828-0867
  13. Alan C Evans

    Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Timo Dickscheid

    Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Boris C Bernhardt

    Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    For correspondence
    boris.bernhardt@mcgill.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9256-6041

Funding

Helmholtz Association

  • Casey Paquola
  • Lindsay B Lewis
  • Claude Lepage
  • Jordan DeKraker
  • Paule-Joanne Toussaint
  • Sofie Louise Valk
  • D Louis Collins
  • Katrin Amunts
  • Alan C Evans
  • Timo Dickscheid
  • Boris C Bernhardt

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé

  • Casey Paquola
  • Boris C Bernhardt

National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada

  • Ali Khan
  • Boris C Bernhardt

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

  • Jessica Royer
  • Ali Khan
  • Boris C Bernhardt

SickKids Foundation

  • Boris C Bernhardt

Azrieli Center for Autism Research

  • Boris C Bernhardt

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Paquola et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,967
    views
  • 402
    downloads
  • 62
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Casey Paquola
  2. Jessica Royer
  3. Lindsay B Lewis
  4. Claude Lepage
  5. Tristan Glatard
  6. Konrad Wagstyl
  7. Jordan DeKraker
  8. Paule-Joanne Toussaint
  9. Sofie Louise Valk
  10. D Louis Collins
  11. Ali Khan
  12. Katrin Amunts
  13. Alan C Evans
  14. Timo Dickscheid
  15. Boris C Bernhardt
(2021)
The BigBrainWarp toolbox for integration of BigBrain 3D histology with multimodal neuroimaging
eLife 10:e70119.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70119

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70119

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Yi-Yun Ho, Qiuwei Yang ... Melissa R Warden
    Research Article

    The infralimbic cortex (IL) is essential for flexible behavioral responses to threatening environmental events. Reactive behaviors such as freezing or flight are adaptive in some contexts, but in others a strategic avoidance behavior may be more advantageous. IL has been implicated in avoidance, but the contribution of distinct IL neural subtypes with differing molecular identities and wiring patterns is poorly understood. Here, we study IL parvalbumin (PV) interneurons in mice as they engage in active avoidance behavior, a behavior in which mice must suppress freezing in order to move to safety. We find that activity in inhibitory PV neurons increases during movement to avoid the shock in this behavioral paradigm, and that PV activity during movement emerges after mice have experienced a single shock, prior to learning avoidance. PV neural activity does not change during movement toward cued rewards or during general locomotion in the open field, behavioral paradigms where freezing does not need to be suppressed to enable movement. Optogenetic suppression of PV neurons increases the duration of freezing and delays the onset of avoidance behavior, but does not affect movement toward rewards or general locomotion. These data provide evidence that IL PV neurons support strategic avoidance behavior by suppressing freezing.

    1. Neuroscience
    David C Williams, Amanda Chu ... Michael A McDannald
    Research Advance Updated

    Recognizing and responding to threat cues is essential to survival. Freezing is a predominant threat behavior in rats. We have recently shown that a threat cue can organize diverse behaviors beyond freezing, including locomotion (Chu et al., 2024). However, that experimental design was complex, required many sessions, and had rats receive many foot shock presentations. Moreover, the findings were descriptive. Here, we gave female and male Long Evans rats cue light illumination paired or unpaired with foot shock (eight total) in a conditioned suppression setting using a range of shock intensities (0.15, 0.25, 0.35, or 0.50 mA). We found that conditioned suppression was only observed at higher foot shock intensities (0.35 mA and 0.50 mA). We constructed comprehensive temporal ethograms by scoring 22,272 frames across 12 behavior categories in 200-ms intervals around cue light illumination. The 0.50 mA and 0.35 mA shock-paired visual cues suppressed reward seeking, rearing, and scaling, as well as light-directed rearing and light-directed scaling. These shock-paired visual cues further elicited locomotion and freezing. Linear discriminant analyses showed that ethogram data could accurately classify rats into paired and unpaired groups. Using complete ethogram data produced superior classification compared to behavior subsets, including an immobility subset featuring freezing. The results demonstrate diverse threat behaviors – in a short and simple procedure – containing sufficient information to distinguish the visual fear conditioning status of individual rats.