Structural basis for membrane recruitment of ATG16L1 by WIPI2 in Autophagy

  1. Lisa M Strong
  2. Chunmei Chang
  3. Julia F Riley
  4. C Alexander Boecker
  5. Thomas G Flower
  6. Cosmo Z Buffalo
  7. Xuefeng Ren
  8. Andrea KH Stavoe
  9. Erika LF Holzbaur
  10. James H Hurley  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Berkeley, United States
  2. University of Pennsylvania, United States
  3. The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School, United States

Abstract

Autophagy is a cellular process that degrades cytoplasmic cargo by engulfing it in a double membrane vesicle, known as the autophagosome, and delivering it to the lysosome. The ATG12-5-16L1 complex is responsible for conjugating members of the ubiquitin-like ATG8 protein family to phosphatidylethanolamine in the growing autophagosomal membrane, known as the phagophore. ATG12-5-16L1 is recruited to the phagophore by a subset of the phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate-binding seven bladed â-propeller WIPI proteins. We determined the crystal structure of WIPI2d in complex with the WIPI2 interacting region (W2IR) of ATG16L1 comprising residues 207-230 at 1.85 Å resolution. The structure shows that the ATG16L1 W2IR adopts an alpha helical conformation and binds in an electropositive and hydrophobic groove between WIPI2 â-propeller blades 2 and 3. Mutation of residues at the interface reduces or blocks the recruitment of ATG12-5-16L1 and the conjugation of the ATG8 protein LC3B to synthetic membranes. Interface mutants show a decrease in starvation-induced autophagy. Comparisons across the four human WIPIs suggest that WIPI1 and 2 belong to a W2IR-binding subclass responsible for localizing ATG12-5-16L1 and driving ATG8 lipidation, whilst WIPI3 and 4 belong to a second W34IR-binding subclass responsible for localizing ATG2, and so directing lipid supply to the nascent phagophore. The structure provides a framework for understanding the regulatory node connecting two central events in autophagy initiation, the action of the autophagic PI 3-kinase complex on the one hand, and ATG8 lipidation on the other.

Data availability

Coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession code PDB 7MU2. Protocols have been deposited in protocols.io. Plasmids developed for this study will be deposited at Addgene.org. GUV source data are being deposited in Zenodo.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lisa M Strong

    Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    Lisa M Strong, LMS is enrolled as a graduate student at UC Berkeley. The author has no competing interests to declare..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4293-8131
  2. Chunmei Chang

    Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    Chunmei Chang, CC is employed at UC Berkeley. The author has no competing interests to declare..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5607-7985
  3. Julia F Riley

    University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia,, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. C Alexander Boecker

    University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia,, United States
    Competing interests
    C Alexander Boecker, is employed at the University of Pennsylvania. The author has no competing interests to declare..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9701-5273
  5. Thomas G Flower

    Molecular Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    Thomas G Flower, Thomas G. Flower was employed by UC Berkeley at the time he contributed to this study, and is currently employed at Galapagos, Romainville, France. The author has no competing interests to declare..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7890-6473
  6. Cosmo Z Buffalo

    Molecular Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    Cosmo Z Buffalo, CZB is employed by UC Berkeley. The author has no competing interests to declare..
  7. Xuefeng Ren

    Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    Xuefeng Ren, XR is employed by UC Berkeley. The author has no competing interests to declare..
  8. Andrea KH Stavoe

    The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    Andrea KH Stavoe, is employed by The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School. The author has no competing interests to declare..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4073-4565
  9. Erika LF Holzbaur

    Physiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    Erika LF Holzbaur, ELFH is employed by the University of Pennsylvania. The author has no competing interests to declare..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5389-4114
  10. James H Hurley

    Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    For correspondence
    jimhurley@berkeley.edu
    Competing interests
    James H Hurley, JHH is employed by UC Berkeley. JHH has a competing interest as a co-founder of Casma Therapeutics..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5054-5445

Funding

Aligning Science Across Parkinson's (ASAP-000350)

  • Erika LF Holzbaur
  • James H Hurley

NIGMS (R01 GM111730)

  • James H Hurley

NINDS (R00 NS109286)

  • Andrea KH Stavoe

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Strong et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 559
    downloads
  • 41
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70372

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Yan Song, Linda J Fothergill ... Gene W Yeo
    Research Article

    Dynamic interactions between gut mucosal cells and the external environment are essential to maintain gut homeostasis. Enterochromaffin (EC) cells transduce both chemical and mechanical signals and produce 5-hydroxytryptamine to mediate disparate physiological responses. However, the molecular and cellular basis for functional diversity of ECs remains to be adequately defined. Here, we integrated single-cell transcriptomics with spatial image analysis to identify 14 EC clusters that are topographically organized along the gut. Subtypes predicted to be sensitive to the chemical environment and mechanical forces were identified that express distinct transcription factors and hormones. A Piezo2+ population in the distal colon was endowed with a distinctive neuronal signature. Using a combination of genetic, chemogenetic, and pharmacological approaches, we demonstrated Piezo2+ ECs are required for normal colon motility. Our study constructs a molecular map for ECs and offers a framework for deconvoluting EC cells with pleiotropic functions.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sarah Y Coomson, Salil A Lachke
    Insight

    A study in mice reveals key interactions between proteins involved in fibroblast growth factor signaling and how they contribute to distinct stages of eye lens development.