Distinct signatures of calcium activity in brain mural cells

  1. Chaim Glück  Is a corresponding author
  2. Kim David Ferrari
  3. Noemi Binini
  4. Annika Keller
  5. Aiman S Saab
  6. Jillian L Stobart
  7. Bruno Weber  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Zurich, Switzerland
  2. Max-Planck-Institute for Experimental Medicine, Germany
  3. College of Pharmacy, Canada

Abstract

Pericytes have been implicated in various neuropathologies, yet, little is known about their function and signaling pathways in health. Here, we characterized calcium dynamics of cortical mural cells in anesthetized or awake Pdgfrb-CreERT2;Rosa26<LSL-GCaMP6s> mice and in acute brain slices. Smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and ensheathing pericytes (EPs), also named as terminal vascular SMCs, revealed similar calcium dynamics in vivo. In contrast, calcium signals in capillary pericytes (CPs) were irregular, higher in frequency and occurred in cellular microdomains. In the absence of the vessel constricting agent U46619 in acute slices, SMCs and EPs revealed only sparse calcium signals whereas CPs retained their spontaneous calcium activity. Interestingly, chemogenetic activation of neurons in vivo and acute elevations of extracellular potassium in brain slices strongly decreased calcium activity in CPs. We propose that neuronal activation and an extracellular increase in potassium suppress calcium activity in CPs, likely mediated by Kir2.2 and KATP channels.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Chaim Glück

    Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    chaim.glueck@uzh.ch
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8754-9965
  2. Kim David Ferrari

    Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7565-1276
  3. Noemi Binini

    Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Annika Keller

    Dept. of Neurosurgery, University of Zurich, 8952/Schlieren, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1466-3633
  5. Aiman S Saab

    Department of Neurogenetics, Max-Planck-Institute for Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jillian L Stobart

    Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Winnipeg, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Bruno Weber

    Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    bweber@pharma.uzh.ch
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9089-0689

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were approved by the local Cantonal Veterinary Office inZürich (license ZH 169/17) and conformed to the guidelines of the Swiss Animal Protection Law, Swiss Veterinary Office, Canton of Zürich(Animal Welfare Act of 16 December 2005 and Animal Protection Ordinance of 23 April 2008). Every effort was made to minimize suffering andconform to the 3Rs principles.

Copyright

© 2021, Glück et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,872
    views
  • 376
    downloads
  • 35
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Chaim Glück
  2. Kim David Ferrari
  3. Noemi Binini
  4. Annika Keller
  5. Aiman S Saab
  6. Jillian L Stobart
  7. Bruno Weber
(2021)
Distinct signatures of calcium activity in brain mural cells
eLife 10:e70591.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70591

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70591

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Mohsen Alavash
    Insight

    Combining electrophysiological, anatomical and functional brain maps reveals networks of beta neural activity that align with dopamine uptake.

    1. Neuroscience
    Kiichi Watanabe, Hui Chiu, David J Anderson
    Tools and Resources

    Monitoring neuronal activity at single-cell resolution in freely moving Drosophila engaged in social behaviors is challenging because of their small size and lack of transparency. Extant methods, such as Flyception, are highly invasive. Whole-brain calcium imaging in head-fixed, walking flies is feasible but the animals cannot perform the consummatory phases of social behaviors like aggression or mating under these conditions. This has left open the fundamental question of whether neurons identified as functionally important for such behaviors using loss- or gain-of-function screens are actually active during the natural performance of such behaviors, and if so during which phase(s). Here, we perform brain-wide mapping of active cells expressing the Immediate Early Gene hr38 using a high-sensitivity/low background fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) amplification method called HCR-3.0. Using double-labeling for hr38 mRNA and for GFP, we describe the activity of several classes of aggression-promoting neurons during courtship and aggression, including P1a cells, an intensively studied population of male-specific interneurons. Using HI-FISH in combination with optogenetic activation of aggression-promoting neurons (opto-HI-FISH), we identify candidate downstream functional targets of these cells in a brain-wide, unbiased manner. Finally, we compare the activity of P1a neurons during sequential performance of courtship and aggression, using intronic vs. exonic hr38 probes to differentiate newly synthesized nuclear transcripts from cytoplasmic transcripts synthesized at an earlier time. These data provide evidence suggesting that different subsets of P1a neurons may be active during courtship vs. aggression. HI-FISH and associated methods may help to fill an important lacuna in the armamentarium of tools for neural circuit analysis in Drosophila.