Analysis of meiosis in Pristionchus pacificus reveals plasticity in homolog pairing and synapsis in the nematode lineage

  1. Regina Rillo-Bohn
  2. Renzo Adilardi
  3. Therese Mitros
  4. Barış Avşaroğlu
  5. Lewis Stevens
  6. Simone Koehler
  7. Joshua Bayes III
  8. Clara Wang
  9. Sabrina Lin
  10. Kayla Alienor Baskevitch
  11. Daniel S Rokhsar
  12. Abby F Dernburg  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Davis, United States
  2. UC Berkeley and HHMI, United States
  3. University of California, Berkeley, United States
  4. Northwestern University, United States
  5. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Germany
  6. University of California, Berkeley and HHMI, United States

Abstract

Meiosis is conserved across eukaryotes yet varies in the details of its execution. Here we describe a new comparative model system for molecular analysis of meiosis, the nematode Pristionchus pacificus, a distant relative of the widely studied model organism Caenorhabditis elegans. P. pacificus shares many anatomical and other features that facilitate analysis of meiosis in C. elegans. However, while C. elegans has lost the meiosis-specific recombinase Dmc1 and evolved a recombination-independent mechanism to synapse its chromosomes, P. pacificus expresses both DMC-1 and RAD-51. We find that SPO-11 and DMC-1 are required for stable homolog pairing, synapsis, and crossover formation, while RAD-51 is dispensable for these key meiotic processes. RAD-51 and DMC-1 localize sequentially to chromosomes during meiotic prophase and show nonoverlapping functions. We also present a new genetic map for P. pacificus that reveals a crossover landscape very similar to that of C. elegans, despite marked divergence in the regulation of synapsis and crossing-over between these lineages.

Data availability

Sequence data used to generate the recombination map for P. pacificus have been deposited at the NIH Sequence Read Archive under accession number PRJNA734516 and are available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA734516. These include sequence reads for three parental genomes and 93 hybrid progeny. Genotype calls are provided as Excel files in the Supplemental Data.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Regina Rillo-Bohn

    University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Renzo Adilardi

    Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley and HHMI, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Therese Mitros

    University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Barış Avşaroğlu

    Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley and HHMI, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Lewis Stevens

    Department of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6075-8273
  6. Simone Koehler

    European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Joshua Bayes III

    Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley and HHMI, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Clara Wang

    Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley and HHMI, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Sabrina Lin

    Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley and HHMI, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Kayla Alienor Baskevitch

    Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley and HHMI, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Daniel S Rokhsar

    University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Abby F Dernburg

    University of California, Berkeley and HHMI, Berkeley, United States
    For correspondence
    afdernburg@berkeley.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8037-1079

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Abby F Dernburg

Miller Institute for Basic Research

  • Abby F Dernburg

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Rillo-Bohn et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,675
    views
  • 237
    downloads
  • 26
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Regina Rillo-Bohn
  2. Renzo Adilardi
  3. Therese Mitros
  4. Barış Avşaroğlu
  5. Lewis Stevens
  6. Simone Koehler
  7. Joshua Bayes III
  8. Clara Wang
  9. Sabrina Lin
  10. Kayla Alienor Baskevitch
  11. Daniel S Rokhsar
  12. Abby F Dernburg
(2021)
Analysis of meiosis in Pristionchus pacificus reveals plasticity in homolog pairing and synapsis in the nematode lineage
eLife 10:e70990.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70990

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70990

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Yajun Zhai, Peiyi Liu ... Gongzheng Hu
    Research Article

    Discovering new strategies to combat the multidrug-resistant bacteria constitutes a major medical challenge of our time. Previously, artesunate (AS) has been reported to exert antibacterial enhancement activity in combination with β-lactam antibiotics via inhibition of the efflux pump AcrB. However, combination of AS and colistin (COL) revealed a weak synergistic effect against a limited number of strains, and few studies have further explored its possible mechanism of synergistic action. In this article, we found that AS and EDTA could strikingly enhance the antibacterial effects of COL against mcr-1- and mcr-1+ Salmonella strains either in vitro or in vivo, when used in triple combination. The excellent bacteriostatic effect was primarily related to the increased cell membrane damage, accumulation of toxic compounds and inhibition of MCR-1. The potential binding sites of AS to MCR-1 (THR283, SER284, and TYR287) were critical for its inhibition of MCR-1 activity. Additionally, we also demonstrated that the CheA of chemosensory system and virulence-related protein SpvD were critical for the bacteriostatic synergistic effects of the triple combination. Selectively targeting CheA, SpvD, or MCR using the natural compound AS could be further investigated as an attractive strategy for the treatment of Salmonella infection. Collectively, our work opens new avenues toward the potentiation of COL and reveals an alternative drug combination strategy to overcome COL-resistant bacterial infections.

    1. Cell Biology
    Tamás Visnovitz, Dorina Lenzinger ... Edit I Buzas
    Short Report

    Recent studies showed an unexpected complexity of extracellular vesicle (EV) biogenesis pathways. We previously found evidence that human colorectal cancer cells in vivo release large multivesicular body-like structures en bloc. Here, we tested whether this large EV type is unique to colorectal cancer cells. We found that all cell types we studied (including different cell lines and cells in their original tissue environment) released multivesicular large EVs (MV-lEVs). We also demonstrated that upon spontaneous rupture of the limiting membrane of the MV-lEVs, their intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) escaped to the extracellular environment by a ‘torn bag mechanism’. We proved that the MV-lEVs were released by ectocytosis of amphisomes (hence, we termed them amphiectosomes). Both ILVs of amphiectosomes and small EVs separated from conditioned media were either exclusively CD63 or LC3B positive. According to our model, upon fusion of multivesicular bodies with autophagosomes, fragments of the autophagosomal inner membrane curl up to form LC3B positive ILVs of amphisomes, while CD63 positive small EVs are of multivesicular body origin. Our data suggest a novel common release mechanism for small EVs, distinct from the exocytosis of multivesicular bodies or amphisomes, as well as the small ectosome release pathway.