Adult mouse fibroblasts retain organ-specific transcriptomic identity

  1. Elvira Forte  Is a corresponding author
  2. Mirana Ramialison
  3. Hieu T Nim
  4. Madison Mara
  5. Jacky Y Li
  6. Rachel Cohn
  7. Sandra L Daigle
  8. Sarah Boyd
  9. Edouard G Stanley
  10. Andrew G Elefanty
  11. John Travis Hinson
  12. Mauro W Costa
  13. Nadia A Rosenthal
  14. Milena B Furtado
  1. Jackson Laboratory, United States
  2. Monash University, Australia
  3. Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Australia

Abstract

Organ fibroblasts are essential components of homeostatic and diseased tissues. They participate in sculpting the extracellular matrix, sensing the microenvironment and communicating with other resident cells. Recent studies have revealed transcriptomic heterogeneity among fibroblasts within and between organs. To dissect the basis of inter-organ heterogeneity, we compare the gene expression of murine fibroblasts from different tissues (tail, skin, lung, liver, heart, kidney, gonads) and show that they display distinct positional and organ-specific transcriptome signatures that reflect their embryonic origins. We demonstrate that expression of genes typically attributed to the surrounding parenchyma by fibroblasts is established in embryonic development and largely maintained in culture, bioengineered tissues and ectopic transplants. Targeted knockdown of key organ-specific transcription factors affects fibroblast functions, in particular genes involved in the modulation of fibrosis and inflammation. In conclusion, our data reveal that adult fibroblasts maintain an embryonic gene expression signature inherited from their organ of origin, thereby increasing our understanding of adult fibroblast heterogeneity. The knowledge of this tissue-specific gene signature may assist in targeting fibrotic diseases in a more precise, organ-specific manner.

Data availability

All data has been made available through public databases, as per statement in main manuscript

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Elvira Forte

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    For correspondence
    elviraforte83@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5555-9122
  2. Mirana Ramialison

    Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6315-4777
  3. Hieu T Nim

    Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Madison Mara

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jacky Y Li

    Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Rachel Cohn

    Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sandra L Daigle

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sarah Boyd

    Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Edouard G Stanley

    Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Andrew G Elefanty

    Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. John Travis Hinson

    Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Mauro W Costa

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Nadia A Rosenthal

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Milena B Furtado

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1387-325X

Funding

Australian Research Council

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

National Health and Medical Research Council

  • Mirana Ramialison
  • Mauro W Costa
  • Nadia A Rosenthal

Heart Foundation

  • Mirana Ramialison

Jackson Laboratory

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

National Institutes of Health

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

Leducq Foundation for Cardiovascular Research

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

Australian Government

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

State Government of Victoria

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocol (#16010) of the Jackson Laboratory. All surgery was performed under tribromoethanol anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize pain and suffering.

Human subjects: Human samples were obtained through the Sydney Heart Bank (SHB) in Australia. Investigators have not collected patient samples or been privy to patient records.

Copyright

© 2022, Forte et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,892
    views
  • 529
    downloads
  • 24
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71008

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Artem K Velichko, Nadezhda V Petrova ... Omar L Kantidze
    Research Article

    We investigated the role of the nucleolar protein Treacle in organizing and regulating the nucleolus in human cells. Our results support Treacle’s ability to form liquid-like phase condensates through electrostatic interactions among molecules. The formation of these biomolecular condensates is crucial for segregating nucleolar fibrillar centers from the dense fibrillar component and ensuring high levels of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene transcription and accurate rRNA processing. Both the central and C-terminal domains of Treacle are required to form liquid-like condensates. The initiation of phase separation is attributed to the C-terminal domain. The central domain is characterized by repeated stretches of alternatively charged amino acid residues and is vital for condensate stability. Overexpression of mutant forms of Treacle that cannot form liquid-like phase condensates compromises the assembly of fibrillar centers, suppressing rRNA gene transcription and disrupting rRNA processing. These mutant forms also fail to recruit DNA topoisomerase II binding protein 1 (TOPBP1), suppressing the DNA damage response in the nucleolus.

    1. Cell Biology
    Tomoharu Kanie, Roy Ng ... Peter K Jackson
    Research Article Updated

    The primary cilium is a microtubule-based organelle that cycles through assembly and disassembly. In many cell types, formation of the cilium is initiated by recruitment of preciliary vesicles to the distal appendage of the mother centriole. However, the distal appendage mechanism that directly captures preciliary vesicles is yet to be identified. In an accompanying paper, we show that the distal appendage protein, CEP89, is important for the preciliary vesicle recruitment, but not for other steps of cilium formation (Kanie et al., 2025). The lack of a membrane-binding motif in CEP89 suggests that it may indirectly recruit preciliary vesicles via another binding partner. Here, we identify Neuronal Calcium Sensor-1 (NCS1) as a stoichiometric interactor of CEP89. NCS1 localizes to the position between CEP89 and the centriole-associated vesicle marker, RAB34, at the distal appendage. This localization was completely abolished in CEP89 knockouts, suggesting that CEP89 recruits NCS1 to the distal appendage. Similar to CEP89 knockouts, preciliary vesicle recruitment as well as subsequent cilium formation was perturbed in NCS1 knockout cells. The ability of NCS1 to recruit the preciliary vesicle is dependent on its myristoylation motif and NCS1 knockout cells expressing a myristoylation defective mutant failed to rescue the vesicle recruitment defect despite localizing properly to the centriole. In sum, our analysis reveals the first known mechanism for how the distal appendage recruits the preciliary vesicles.