Abstract

Organ fibroblasts are essential components of homeostatic and diseased tissues. They participate in sculpting the extracellular matrix, sensing the microenvironment and communicating with other resident cells. Recent studies have revealed transcriptomic heterogeneity among fibroblasts within and between organs. To dissect the basis of inter-organ heterogeneity, we compare the gene expression of murine fibroblasts from different tissues (tail, skin, lung, liver, heart, kidney, gonads) and show that they display distinct positional and organ-specific transcriptome signatures that reflect their embryonic origins. We demonstrate that expression of genes typically attributed to the surrounding parenchyma by fibroblasts is established in embryonic development and largely maintained in culture, bioengineered tissues and ectopic transplants. Targeted knockdown of key organ-specific transcription factors affects fibroblast functions, in particular genes involved in the modulation of fibrosis and inflammation. In conclusion, our data reveal that adult fibroblasts maintain an embryonic gene expression signature inherited from their organ of origin, thereby increasing our understanding of adult fibroblast heterogeneity. The knowledge of this tissue-specific gene signature may assist in targeting fibrotic diseases in a more precise, organ-specific manner.

Data availability

All data has been made available through public databases, as per statement in main manuscript

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Elvira Forte

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    For correspondence
    elviraforte83@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5555-9122
  2. Mirana Ramialison

    Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6315-4777
  3. Hieu T Nim

    Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Madison Mara

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jacky Y Li

    Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Rachel Cohn

    Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sandra L Daigle

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sarah Boyd

    Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Edouard G Stanley

    Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Andrew G Elefanty

    Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. John Travis Hinson

    Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Mauro W Costa

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Nadia A Rosenthal

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Milena B Furtado

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1387-325X

Funding

Australian Research Council

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

National Health and Medical Research Council

  • Mirana Ramialison
  • Mauro W Costa
  • Nadia A Rosenthal

Heart Foundation

  • Mirana Ramialison

Jackson Laboratory

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

National Institutes of Health

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

Leducq Foundation for Cardiovascular Research

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

Australian Government

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

State Government of Victoria

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocol (#16010) of the Jackson Laboratory. All surgery was performed under tribromoethanol anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize pain and suffering.

Human subjects: Human samples were obtained through the Sydney Heart Bank (SHB) in Australia. Investigators have not collected patient samples or been privy to patient records.

Copyright

© 2022, Forte et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,789
    views
  • 526
    downloads
  • 24
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Elvira Forte
  2. Mirana Ramialison
  3. Hieu T Nim
  4. Madison Mara
  5. Jacky Y Li
  6. Rachel Cohn
  7. Sandra L Daigle
  8. Sarah Boyd
  9. Edouard G Stanley
  10. Andrew G Elefanty
  11. John Travis Hinson
  12. Mauro W Costa
  13. Nadia A Rosenthal
  14. Milena B Furtado
(2022)
Adult mouse fibroblasts retain organ-specific transcriptomic identity
eLife 11:e71008.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71008

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71008

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bhumil Patel, Maryke Grobler ... Needhi Bhalla
    Research Article

    Meiotic crossover recombination is essential for both accurate chromosome segregation and the generation of new haplotypes for natural selection to act upon. This requirement is known as crossover assurance and is one example of crossover control. While the conserved role of the ATPase, PCH-2, during meiotic prophase has been enigmatic, a universal phenotype when pch-2 or its orthologs are mutated is a change in the number and distribution of meiotic crossovers. Here, we show that PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation. This antagonism produces different effects at different stages of meiotic prophase: early in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 prevents double-strand breaks from becoming crossover-eligible intermediates, limiting crossover formation at sites of initial double-strand break formation and homolog interactions. Later in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 winnows the number of crossover-eligible intermediates, contributing to the designation of crossovers and ultimately, crossover assurance. We also demonstrate that PCH-2 accomplishes this regulation through the meiotic HORMAD, HIM-3. Our data strongly support a model in which PCH-2’s conserved role is to remodel meiotic HORMADs throughout meiotic prophase to destabilize crossover-eligible precursors and coordinate meiotic recombination with synapsis, ensuring the progressive implementation of meiotic recombination and explaining its function in the pachytene checkpoint and crossover control.

    1. Cell Biology
    Jingjing Li, Xinyue Wang ... Vincent Archambault
    Research Article

    In animals, mitosis involves the breakdown of the nucleus. The reassembly of a nucleus after mitosis requires the reformation of the nuclear envelope around a single mass of chromosomes. This process requires Ankle2 (also known as LEM4 in humans) which interacts with PP2A and promotes the function of the Barrier-to-Autointegration Factor (BAF). Upon dephosphorylation, BAF dimers cross-bridge chromosomes and bind lamins and transmembrane proteins of the reassembling nuclear envelope. How Ankle2 functions in mitosis is incompletely understood. Using a combination of approaches in Drosophila, along with structural modeling, we provide several lines of evidence that suggest that Ankle2 is a regulatory subunit of PP2A, explaining how it promotes BAF dephosphorylation. In addition, we discovered that Ankle2 interacts with the endoplasmic reticulum protein Vap33, which is required for Ankle2 localization at the reassembling nuclear envelope during telophase. We identified the interaction sites of PP2A and Vap33 on Ankle2. Through genetic rescue experiments, we show that the Ankle2/PP2A interaction is essential for the function of Ankle2 in nuclear reassembly and that the Ankle2/Vap33 interaction also promotes this process. Our study sheds light on the molecular mechanisms of post-mitotic nuclear reassembly and suggests that the endoplasmic reticulum is not merely a source of membranes in the process, but also provides localized enzymatic activity.