Abstract

Organ fibroblasts are essential components of homeostatic and diseased tissues. They participate in sculpting the extracellular matrix, sensing the microenvironment and communicating with other resident cells. Recent studies have revealed transcriptomic heterogeneity among fibroblasts within and between organs. To dissect the basis of inter-organ heterogeneity, we compare the gene expression of murine fibroblasts from different tissues (tail, skin, lung, liver, heart, kidney, gonads) and show that they display distinct positional and organ-specific transcriptome signatures that reflect their embryonic origins. We demonstrate that expression of genes typically attributed to the surrounding parenchyma by fibroblasts is established in embryonic development and largely maintained in culture, bioengineered tissues and ectopic transplants. Targeted knockdown of key organ-specific transcription factors affects fibroblast functions, in particular genes involved in the modulation of fibrosis and inflammation. In conclusion, our data reveal that adult fibroblasts maintain an embryonic gene expression signature inherited from their organ of origin, thereby increasing our understanding of adult fibroblast heterogeneity. The knowledge of this tissue-specific gene signature may assist in targeting fibrotic diseases in a more precise, organ-specific manner.

Data availability

All data has been made available through public databases, as per statement in main manuscript

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Elvira Forte

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    For correspondence
    elviraforte83@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5555-9122
  2. Mirana Ramialison

    Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6315-4777
  3. Hieu T Nim

    Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Madison Mara

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jacky Y Li

    Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Rachel Cohn

    Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sandra L Daigle

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sarah Boyd

    Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Edouard G Stanley

    Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Andrew G Elefanty

    Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. John Travis Hinson

    Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Mauro W Costa

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Nadia A Rosenthal

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Milena B Furtado

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1387-325X

Funding

Australian Research Council

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

National Health and Medical Research Council

  • Mirana Ramialison
  • Mauro W Costa
  • Nadia A Rosenthal

Heart Foundation

  • Mirana Ramialison

Jackson Laboratory

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

National Institutes of Health

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

Leducq Foundation for Cardiovascular Research

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

Australian Government

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

State Government of Victoria

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocol (#16010) of the Jackson Laboratory. All surgery was performed under tribromoethanol anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize pain and suffering.

Human subjects: Human samples were obtained through the Sydney Heart Bank (SHB) in Australia. Investigators have not collected patient samples or been privy to patient records.

Copyright

© 2022, Forte et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,622
    views
  • 509
    downloads
  • 21
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Elvira Forte
  2. Mirana Ramialison
  3. Hieu T Nim
  4. Madison Mara
  5. Jacky Y Li
  6. Rachel Cohn
  7. Sandra L Daigle
  8. Sarah Boyd
  9. Edouard G Stanley
  10. Andrew G Elefanty
  11. John Travis Hinson
  12. Mauro W Costa
  13. Nadia A Rosenthal
  14. Milena B Furtado
(2022)
Adult mouse fibroblasts retain organ-specific transcriptomic identity
eLife 11:e71008.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71008

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71008

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Mitsuhiro Abe, Masataka Yanagawa ... Yasushi Sako
    Research Article

    Anionic lipid molecules, including phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2), are implicated in the regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). However, the role of the spatiotemporal dynamics of PI(4,5)P2 in the regulation of EGFR activity in living cells is not fully understood, as it is difficult to visualize the local lipid domains around EGFR. Here, we visualized both EGFR and PI(4,5)P2 nanodomains in the plasma membrane of HeLa cells using super-resolution single-molecule microscopy. The EGFR and PI(4,5)P2 nanodomains aggregated before stimulation with epidermal growth factor (EGF) through transient visits of EGFR to the PI(4,5)P2 nanodomains. The degree of coaggregation decreased after EGF stimulation and depended on phospholipase Cγ, the EGFR effector hydrolyzing PI(4,5)P2. Artificial reduction in the PI(4,5)P2 content of the plasma membrane reduced both the dimerization and autophosphorylation of EGFR after stimulation with EGF. Inhibition of PI(4,5)P2 hydrolysis after EGF stimulation decreased phosphorylation of EGFR-Thr654. Thus, EGFR kinase activity and the density of PI(4,5)P2 around EGFR molecules were found to be mutually regulated.

    1. Cell Biology
    Jeongsik Kim, Dahyun Kim ... Dae-Sik Lim
    Research Article

    Cell survival in metazoans depends on cell attachment to the extracellular matrix (ECM) or to neighboring cells. Loss of such attachment triggers a type of programmed cell death known as anoikis, the acquisition of resistance to which is a key step in cancer development. The mechanisms underlying anoikis resistance remain unclear, however. The intracellular F-actin cytoskeleton plays a key role in sensing the loss of cell–ECM attachment, but how its disruption affects cell fate during such stress is not well understood. Here, we reveal a cell survival strategy characterized by the formation of a giant unilocular vacuole (GUVac) in the cytoplasm of the cells whose actin cytoskeleton is disrupted during loss of matrix attachment. Time-lapse imaging and electron microscopy showed that large vacuoles with a diameter of >500 nm accumulated early after inhibition of actin polymerization in cells in suspension culture, and that these vacuoles subsequently coalesced to form a GUVac. GUVac formation was found to result from a variation of a macropinocytosis-like process, characterized by the presence of inwardly curved membrane invaginations. This phenomenon relies on both F-actin depolymerization and the recruitment of septin proteins for micron-sized plasma membrane invagination. The vacuole fusion step during GUVac formation requires PI(3)P produced by VPS34 and PI3K-C2α on the surface of vacuoles. Furthermore, its induction after loss of matrix attachment conferred anoikis resistance. Our results thus show that the formation of a previously unrecognized organelle promotes cell survival in the face of altered actin and matrix environments.