Opioid antagonism modulates wanting-related frontostriatal connectivity

  1. Alexander Soutschek  Is a corresponding author
  2. Susanna C Weber
  3. Thorsten Kahnt
  4. Boris B Quednow
  5. Philippe N Tobler
  1. Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Germany
  2. University of Zurich, Switzerland
  3. Northwestern University, United States

Abstract

Theoretical accounts distinguish between motivational ('wanting') and hedonic ('liking') dimensions of rewards. Previous animal and human research linked wanting and liking to anatomically and neurochemically distinct brain mechanisms, but it remains unknown how the different brain regions and neurotransmitter systems interact in processing distinct reward dimensions. Here, we assessed how pharmacological manipulations of opioid and dopamine receptor activation modulate the neural processing of wanting and liking in humans in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Reducing opioid receptor activation with naltrexone selectively reduced wanting of rewards, which on a neural level was reflected by stronger coupling between dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the striatum under naltrexone compared with placebo. In contrast, reducing dopaminergic neurotransmission with amisulpride revealed no robust effects on behavior or neural activity. Our findings thus provide insights into how opioid receptors mediate neural connectivity related to specifically motivational, not hedonic, aspects of rewards.

Data availability

The behavioral data that support the findings of this study are available on Open Science Framework https://osf.io/6cevt/

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alexander Soutschek

    Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
    For correspondence
    alexander.soutschek@psy.lmu.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8438-7721
  2. Susanna C Weber

    University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Thorsten Kahnt

    Department of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    Thorsten Kahnt, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3575-2670
  4. Boris B Quednow

    University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Philippe N Tobler

    University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Grants 10001C_188878,100019_176016,and 100014_165884)

  • Philippe N Tobler

Velux Stiftung (981)

  • Philippe N Tobler

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SO 1636/2-1)

  • Alexander Soutschek

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants provided written informed consent. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the canton of Zurich (KEK-ZH-NR2012-0347).

Copyright

© 2021, Soutschek et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 662
    views
  • 105
    downloads
  • 10
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alexander Soutschek
  2. Susanna C Weber
  3. Thorsten Kahnt
  4. Boris B Quednow
  5. Philippe N Tobler
(2021)
Opioid antagonism modulates wanting-related frontostriatal connectivity
eLife 10:e71077.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71077

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71077

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Eun Joo Kim, Mi-Seon Kong ... Jeansok John Kim
    Research Article

    Pavlovian fear conditioning research suggests that the interaction between the dorsal periaqueductal gray (dPAG) and basolateral amygdala (BLA) acts as a prediction error mechanism in the formation of associative fear memories. However, their roles in responding to naturalistic predatory threats, characterized by less explicit cues and the absence of reiterative trial-and-error learning events, remain unexplored. In this study, we conducted single-unit recordings in rats during an ‘approach food-avoid predator’ task, focusing on the responsiveness of dPAG and BLA neurons to a rapidly approaching robot predator. Optogenetic stimulation of the dPAG triggered fleeing behaviors and increased BLA activity in naive rats. Notably, BLA neurons activated by dPAG stimulation displayed immediate responses to the robot, demonstrating heightened synchronous activity compared to BLA neurons that did not respond to dPAG stimulation. Additionally, the use of anterograde and retrograde tracer injections into the dPAG and BLA, respectively, coupled with c-Fos activation in response to predatory threats, indicates that the midline thalamus may play an intermediary role in innate antipredatory-defensive functioning.

    1. Neuroscience
    Yangang Li, Xinyun Zhu ... Yueming Wang
    Research Article

    In motor cortex, behaviorally relevant neural responses are entangled with irrelevant signals, which complicates the study of encoding and decoding mechanisms. It remains unclear whether behaviorally irrelevant signals could conceal some critical truth. One solution is to accurately separate behaviorally relevant and irrelevant signals at both single-neuron and single-trial levels, but this approach remains elusive due to the unknown ground truth of behaviorally relevant signals. Therefore, we propose a framework to define, extract, and validate behaviorally relevant signals. Analyzing separated signals in three monkeys performing different reaching tasks, we found neural responses previously considered to contain little information actually encode rich behavioral information in complex nonlinear ways. These responses are critical for neuronal redundancy and reveal movement behaviors occupy a higher-dimensional neural space than previously expected. Surprisingly, when incorporating often-ignored neural dimensions, behaviorally relevant signals can be decoded linearly with comparable performance to nonlinear decoding, suggesting linear readout may be performed in motor cortex. Our findings prompt that separating behaviorally relevant signals may help uncover more hidden cortical mechanisms.