Sequence features of retrotransposons allow for epigenetic variability

  1. Kevin R Costello
  2. Amy Leung
  3. Candi Trac
  4. Michael Lee
  5. Mudaser Basam
  6. J Andrew Popsilik
  7. Dustin E Schones  Is a corresponding author
  1. Beckman Research Institute, United States
  2. Van Andel Research Institute, United States

Abstract

Transposable elements (TEs) are mobile genetic elements that make up a large fraction of mammalian genomes. While select TEs have been co-opted in host genomes to have function, the majority of these elements are epigenetically silenced by DNA methylation in somatic cells. However, some TEs in mice, including the Intracisternal A-particle (IAP) subfamily of retrotransposons, have been shown to display interindividual variation in DNA methylation. Recent work has revealed that IAP sequence differences and strain-specific KRAB zinc finger proteins (KZFPs) may influence the methylation state of these IAPs. However, the mechanisms underlying the establishment and maintenance of interindividual variability in DNA methylation still remain unclear. Here we report that sequence content and genomic context influence the likelihood that IAPs become variably methylated. IAPs that differ from consensus IAP sequences have altered KZFP recruitment that can lead to decreased KAP1 recruitment when in proximity of constitutively expressed genes. These variably methylated loci have a high CpG density, similar to CpG islands, and can be bound by ZF-CxxC proteins, providing a potential mechanism to maintain this permissive chromatin environment and protect from DNA methylation. These observations indicate that variably methylated IAPs escape silencing through both attenuation of KZFP binding and recognition by ZF-CxxC proteins to maintain a hypomethylated state.

Data availability

All datasets generated in this study have been submitted to GEO under accession code GSE176176.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kevin R Costello

    Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Amy Leung

    Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Candi Trac

    Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Michael Lee

    Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Mudaser Basam

    Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. J Andrew Popsilik

    Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Dustin E Schones

    Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, United States
    For correspondence
    dschones@coh.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7692-8583

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01DK112041)

  • Dustin E Schones

National Institutes of Health (R01CA220693)

  • Dustin E Schones

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal protocols were in accordance with German and United Kingdom legislation; Project license numbers 80/2098, 80/2497, and 35-9185.81/G-10/94.

Copyright

© 2021, Costello et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,289
    views
  • 293
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kevin R Costello
  2. Amy Leung
  3. Candi Trac
  4. Michael Lee
  5. Mudaser Basam
  6. J Andrew Popsilik
  7. Dustin E Schones
(2021)
Sequence features of retrotransposons allow for epigenetic variability
eLife 10:e71104.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71104

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71104

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    Junhong Choi, Wei Chen ... Jay Shendure
    Research Article

    One of the goals of synthetic biology is to enable the design of arbitrary molecular circuits with programmable inputs and outputs. Such circuits bridge the properties of electronic and natural circuits, processing information in a predictable manner within living cells. Genome editing is a potentially powerful component of synthetic molecular circuits, whether for modulating the expression of a target gene or for stably recording information to genomic DNA. However, programming molecular events such as protein-protein interactions or induced proximity as triggers for genome editing remains challenging. Here, we demonstrate a strategy termed ‘P3 editing’, which links protein-protein proximity to the formation of a functional CRISPR-Cas9 dual-component guide RNA. By engineering the crRNA:tracrRNA interaction, we demonstrate that various known protein-protein interactions, as well as the chemically induced dimerization of protein domains, can be used to activate prime editing or base editing in human cells. Additionally, we explore how P3 editing can incorporate outputs from ADAR-based RNA sensors, potentially allowing specific RNAs to induce specific genome edits within a larger circuit. Our strategy enhances the controllability of CRISPR-based genome editing, facilitating its use in synthetic molecular circuits deployed in living cells.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Kira Breunig, Xuifen Lei ... Luiz O Penalva
    Research Article

    RNA binding proteins (RBPs) containing intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are present in diverse molecular complexes where they function as dynamic regulators. Their characteristics promote liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) and the formation of membraneless organelles such as stress granules and nucleoli. IDR-RBPs are particularly relevant in the nervous system and their dysfunction is associated with neurodegenerative diseases and brain tumor development. Serpine1 mRNA-binding protein 1 (SERBP1) is a unique member of this group, being mostly disordered and lacking canonical RNA-binding domains. We defined SERBP1’s interactome, uncovered novel roles in splicing, cell division and ribosomal biogenesis, and showed its participation in pathological stress granules and Tau aggregates in Alzheimer’s brains. SERBP1 preferentially interacts with other G-quadruplex (G4) binders, implicated in different stages of gene expression, suggesting that G4 binding is a critical component of SERBP1 function in different settings. Similarly, we identified important associations between SERBP1 and PARP1/polyADP-ribosylation (PARylation). SERBP1 interacts with PARP1 and its associated factors and influences PARylation. Moreover, protein complexes in which SERBP1 participates contain mostly PARylated proteins and PAR binders. Based on these results, we propose a feedback regulatory model in which SERBP1 influences PARP1 function and PARylation, while PARylation modulates SERBP1 functions and participation in regulatory complexes.