Motor memories of object dynamics are categorically organized

  1. Evan Cesanek  Is a corresponding author
  2. Zhaoran Zhang
  3. James N Ingram
  4. Daniel M Wolpert
  5. J Randall Flanagan
  1. Columbia University, United States
  2. Queen's University, Canada

Abstract

The ability to predict the dynamics of objects, linking applied force to motion, underlies our capacity to perform many of the tasks we carry out on a daily basis. Thus, a fundamental question is how the dynamics of the myriad objects we interact with are organized in memory. Using a custom-built three-dimensional robotic interface that allowed us to simulate objects of varying appearance and weight, we examined how participants learned the weights of sets of objects that they repeatedly lifted. We find strong support for the novel hypothesis that motor memories of object dynamics are organized categorically, in terms of families, based on covariation in their visual and mechanical properties. A striking prediction of this hypothesis, supported by our findings and not predicted by standard associative map models, is that outlier objects with weights that deviate from the family-predicted weight will never be learned despite causing repeated lifting errors.

Data availability

All source data, analysis code, and figure generation code is available in the supplementary files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Evan Cesanek

    Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    evan.cesanek@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5335-6604
  2. Zhaoran Zhang

    Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. James N Ingram

    Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Daniel M Wolpert

    Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2011-2790
  5. J Randall Flanagan

    Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

No external funding was received for this work.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Matthew Crossley, Macquarie University, Australia

Ethics

Human subjects: All experiments were conducted in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki, following protocol approved by the Columbia University Institutional Review Board (IRB-AAAR9148). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their participation.

Version history

  1. Received: June 24, 2021
  2. Preprint posted: July 14, 2021 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: November 18, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: November 19, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: December 1, 2021 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record updated: July 26, 2022 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2021, Cesanek et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,076
    views
  • 156
    downloads
  • 10
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Evan Cesanek
  2. Zhaoran Zhang
  3. James N Ingram
  4. Daniel M Wolpert
  5. J Randall Flanagan
(2021)
Motor memories of object dynamics are categorically organized
eLife 10:e71627.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71627

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71627

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Kenneth Chiou, Noah Snyder-Mackler
    Insight

    Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the extent to which marmosets carry genetically distinct cells from their siblings.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Mariana I Tsap, Andriy S Yatsenko ... Halyna R Shcherbata
    Research Article

    Mutations in Drosophila Swiss Cheese (SWS) gene or its vertebrate orthologue Neuropathy Target Esterase (NTE) lead to progressive neuronal degeneration in flies and humans. Despite its enzymatic function as a phospholipase is well-established, the molecular mechanism responsible for maintaining nervous system integrity remains unclear. In this study, we found that NTE/SWS is present in surface glia that forms the blood-brain-barrier (BBB) and that NTE/SWS is important to maintain its structure and permeability. Importantly, BBB glia-specific expression of Drosophila NTE/SWS or human NTE in the sws mutant background fully rescues surface glial organization and partially restores BBB integrity, suggesting a conserved function of NTE/SWS. Interestingly, sws mutant glia showed abnormal organization of plasma membrane domains and tight junction rafts accompanied by the accumulation of lipid droplets, lysosomes, and multilamellar bodies. Since the observed cellular phenotypes closely resemble the characteristics described in a group of metabolic disorders known as lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs), our data established a novel connection between NTE/SWS and these conditions. We found that mutants with defective BBB exhibit elevated levels of fatty acids, which are precursors of eicosanoids and are involved in the inflammatory response. Also, as a consequence of a permeable BBB, several innate immunity factors are upregulated in an age-dependent manner, while BBB glia-specific expression of NTE/SWS normalizes inflammatory response. Treatment with anti-inflammatory agents prevents the abnormal architecture of the BBB, suggesting that inflammation contributes to the maintenance of a healthy brain barrier. Considering the link between a malfunctioning BBB and various neurodegenerative diseases, gaining a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms causing inflammation due to a defective BBB could help to promote the use of anti-inflammatory therapies for age-related neurodegeneration.