Abstract

The sharing of research data is essential to ensure reproducibility and maximize the impact of public investments in scientific research. Here we describe OpenNeuro, a BRAIN Initiative data archive that provides the ability to openly share data from a broad range of brain imaging data types following the FAIR principles for data sharing. We highlight the importance of the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) standard for enabling effective curation, sharing, and reuse of data. The archive presently shares more than 600 datasets including data from more than 20,000 participants, comprising multiple species and measurement modalities and a broad range of phenotypes. The impact of the shared data is evident in a growing number of published reuses, currently totalling more than 150 publications. We conclude by describing plans for future development and integration with other ongoing open science efforts.

Data availability

The OpenNeuro data repository is accessible at http://openneuro.org. The derived data used to generate the analyses and figures reported here are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5559041

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Christopher J Markiewicz

    Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6533-164X
  2. Krzysztof J Gorgolewski

    Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3321-7583
  3. Franklin Feingold

    Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Ross Blair

    Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Yaroslav O Halchenko

    Dartmouth University, Hanover, NH, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Eric Miller

    Squishymedia, Portland, OR, United States
    Competing interests
    Eric Miller, EM is owner of Squishymedia which is funded to perform software development work on OpenNeuro..
  7. Nell Hardcastle

    Squishymedia, Portland, OR, United States
    Competing interests
    Nell Hardcastle, NH is an employee of Squishymedia which is funded to perform software development work on OpenNeuro..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3837-0707
  8. Joe Wexler

    Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Oscar Esteban

    Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8435-6191
  10. Mathias Goncavles

    Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Anita Jwa

    Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Russell Poldrack

    Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    russpold@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6755-0259

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (R24MH117179)

  • Russell Poldrack

National Institute of Mental Health (R24MH114705)

  • Russell Poldrack

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Thorsten Kahnt, Northwestern University, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: June 29, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: June 29, 2021
  3. Accepted: October 15, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: October 18, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: October 27, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Markiewicz et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,022
    views
  • 500
    downloads
  • 150
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Christopher J Markiewicz
  2. Krzysztof J Gorgolewski
  3. Franklin Feingold
  4. Ross Blair
  5. Yaroslav O Halchenko
  6. Eric Miller
  7. Nell Hardcastle
  8. Joe Wexler
  9. Oscar Esteban
  10. Mathias Goncavles
  11. Anita Jwa
  12. Russell Poldrack
(2021)
The OpenNeuro resource for sharing of neuroscience data
eLife 10:e71774.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71774

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71774

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Shanka Subhra Mondal, Steven Frankland ... Jonathan D Cohen
    Research Article

    Deep neural networks have made tremendous gains in emulating human-like intelligence, and have been used increasingly as ways of understanding how the brain may solve the complex computational problems on which this relies. However, these still fall short of, and therefore fail to provide insight into how the brain supports strong forms of generalization of which humans are capable. One such case is out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization – successful performance on test examples that lie outside the distribution of the training set. Here, we identify properties of processing in the brain that may contribute to this ability. We describe a two-part algorithm that draws on specific features of neural computation to achieve OOD generalization, and provide a proof of concept by evaluating performance on two challenging cognitive tasks. First we draw on the fact that the mammalian brain represents metric spaces using grid cell code (e.g., in the entorhinal cortex): abstract representations of relational structure, organized in recurring motifs that cover the representational space. Second, we propose an attentional mechanism that operates over the grid cell code using determinantal point process (DPP), that we call DPP attention (DPP-A) – a transformation that ensures maximum sparseness in the coverage of that space. We show that a loss function that combines standard task-optimized error with DPP-A can exploit the recurring motifs in the grid cell code, and can be integrated with common architectures to achieve strong OOD generalization performance on analogy and arithmetic tasks. This provides both an interpretation of how the grid cell code in the mammalian brain may contribute to generalization performance, and at the same time a potential means for improving such capabilities in artificial neural networks.

    1. Neuroscience
    Sanggeon Park, Yeowool Huh ... Jeiwon Cho
    Research Article

    The brain’s ability to appraise threats and execute appropriate defensive responses is essential for survival in a dynamic environment. Humans studies have implicated the anterior insular cortex (aIC) in subjective fear regulation and its abnormal activity in fear/anxiety disorders. However, the complex aIC connectivity patterns involved in regulating fear remain under investigated. To address this, we recorded single units in the aIC of freely moving male mice that had previously undergone auditory fear conditioning, assessed the effect of optogenetically activating specific aIC output structures in fear, and examined the organization of aIC neurons projecting to the specific structures with retrograde tracing. Single-unit recordings revealed that a balanced number of aIC pyramidal neurons’ activity either positively or negatively correlated with a conditioned tone-induced freezing (fear) response. Optogenetic manipulations of aIC pyramidal neuronal activity during conditioned tone presentation altered the expression of conditioned freezing. Neural tracing showed that non-overlapping populations of aIC neurons project to the amygdala or the medial thalamus, and the pathway bidirectionally modulated conditioned fear. Specifically, optogenetic stimulation of the aIC-amygdala pathway increased conditioned freezing, while optogenetic stimulation of the aIC-medial thalamus pathway decreased it. Our findings suggest that the balance of freezing-excited and freezing-inhibited neuronal activity in the aIC and the distinct efferent circuits interact collectively to modulate fear behavior.