Mapping dopaminergic projections in the human brain with resting-state fMRI

  1. Marianne Oldehinkel  Is a corresponding author
  2. Alberto Llera
  3. Myrthe Faber
  4. Ismael Huertas
  5. Jan K Buitelaar
  6. Bastiaan R Bloem
  7. Andre F Marquand
  8. Rick Helmich
  9. Koen V Haak
  10. Christian F Beckmann
  1. Radboud University Medical Centre, Netherlands
  2. Institute of Biomedicine of Seville (IBiS), Spain
  3. Radboud University Medical Center, Netherlands

Abstract

The striatum receives dense dopaminergic projections making it a key region of the dopaminergic system. Its dysfunction has been implicated in various conditions including Parkinson's disease (PD) and substance use disorder. However, the investigation of dopamine-specific functioning in humans is problematic as current MRI approaches are unable to differentiate between dopaminergic and other projections. Here, we demonstrate that 'connectopic mapping' -a novel approach for characterizing fine-grained, overlapping modes of functional connectivity- can be used to map dopaminergic projections in striatum. We applied connectopic mapping to resting-state functional MRI data of the Human Connectome Project (population cohort; N=839) and selected the second-order striatal connectivity mode for further analyses. We first validated its specificity to dopaminergic projections by demonstrating a high spatial correlation (r=0.884) with dopamine transporter availability -a marker of dopaminergic projections- derived from DaT SPECT scans of 209 healthy controls. Next, we obtained the subject-specific second-order modes from 20 controls, and 39 PD patients scanned under placebo and under dopamine replacement therapy (L-DOPA), and show that our proposed dopaminergic marker tracks PD diagnosis, symptom severity and sensitivity to L-DOPA. Finally, across 30 daily alcohol users and 38 daily smokers, we establish strong associations with self-reported alcohol and nicotine use. Our findings provide evidence that the second-order mode of functional connectivity in striatum maps onto dopaminergic projections, tracks inter-individual differences in PD symptom severity and L-DOPA sensitivity, and exhibits strong associations with levels of nicotine and alcohol use, thereby offering a new biomarker for dopamine-related (dys)function in the human brain.

Data availability

We made use of publicly available data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) dataset, from publicly available data from the Parkinson Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI) dataset, and from a local PD dataset that was part of a clinical trial.See https://www.humanconnectome.org/study/hcp-young-adult/document/1200-subjects-data-release for access to the HCP data. The subject identifiers from the HCP dataset used in our first analysis can be found in Appendix 2 - Table 4. Please note that the subject identifiers from the subset of HCP subjects included in the nicotine-use and alcohol-use analyses cannot be provided, since the access to information about substance use is restricted. For more information about applying to get access to the HCP restricted data and for the HCP restricted data use terms see: https://www.humanconnectome.org/study/hcp-young-adult/document/wu-minn-hcp-consortium-restricted-data-use-terms.For access to the PPMI dataset, see https://www.ppmi-info.org/access-data-specimens/download-data. The subject identifiers from the PPMI dataset used in our analyses can be found in Appendix 2 - Tables 5 and 6.All derived and anonymized individual data from our local PD dataset are available at the Donders Repository: https://data.donders.ru.nl/.The code used for the connectopic mapping procedure in all three datasets is available at the following Github repository: https://github.com/koenhaak/congrads.In addition, for supplementary analyses, we further used PET scans available in the JuSpace Toolbox: https://github.com/ juryxy/JuSpace.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Marianne Oldehinkel

    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    marianne.oldehinkel@donders.ru.nl
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7573-0548
  2. Alberto Llera

    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8358-8625
  3. Myrthe Faber

    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Ismael Huertas

    Institute of Biomedicine of Seville (IBiS), Seville, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Jan K Buitelaar

    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Bastiaan R Bloem

    Department of Neurology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Andre F Marquand

    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5903-203X
  8. Rick Helmich

    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Koen V Haak

    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Christian F Beckmann

    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    Christian F Beckmann, C.F.B. is director and shareholder in SBGneuro Ltd..

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Vidi Grant No. 864-12-004)

  • Christian F Beckmann

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Vici Grant No. 17854)

  • Christian F Beckmann

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Vidi Grant No. 016.156.415)

  • Andre F Marquand

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Veni Grant No. 016.171.068)

  • Koen V Haak

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Veni Grant No. 91617077)

  • Rick Helmich

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO-CAS Grant No. 012-200-013)

  • Christian F Beckmann

ZonMw (Rubicon Grant No. 452172019)

  • Marianne Oldehinkel

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Shella Keilholz, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants from whom data was used in this manuscript, provided written informed consent (and consent to publish) according to the declaration of Helsinki. For the HCP dataset ethical approval was given by the Washington University Institutional Review Board (IRB), for the PPMI dataset ethical approval was obtained locally at each of the participating sites, and for our local PD dataset ethical approval was obtained from the local ethical committee (Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek MO Arnhem Nijmegen, CMO 2014/014).

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: March 26, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: July 1, 2021
  3. Accepted: January 26, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: February 3, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: February 14, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Oldehinkel et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,240
    views
  • 579
    downloads
  • 18
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Marianne Oldehinkel
  2. Alberto Llera
  3. Myrthe Faber
  4. Ismael Huertas
  5. Jan K Buitelaar
  6. Bastiaan R Bloem
  7. Andre F Marquand
  8. Rick Helmich
  9. Koen V Haak
  10. Christian F Beckmann
(2022)
Mapping dopaminergic projections in the human brain with resting-state fMRI
eLife 11:e71846.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71846

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71846

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    John J Stout, Allison E George ... Amy L Griffin
    Research Article

    Functional interactions between the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, as revealed by strong oscillatory synchronization in the theta (6–11 Hz) frequency range, correlate with memory-guided decision-making. However, the degree to which this form of long-range synchronization influences memory-guided choice remains unclear. We developed a brain-machine interface that initiated task trials based on the magnitude of prefrontal-hippocampal theta synchronization, then measured choice outcomes. Trials initiated based on strong prefrontal-hippocampal theta synchrony were more likely to be correct compared to control trials on both working memory-dependent and -independent tasks. Prefrontal-thalamic neural interactions increased with prefrontal-hippocampal synchrony and optogenetic activation of the ventral midline thalamus primarily entrained prefrontal theta rhythms, but dynamically modulated synchrony. Together, our results show that prefrontal-hippocampal theta synchronization leads to a higher probability of a correct choice and strengthens prefrontal-thalamic dialogue. Our findings reveal new insights into the neural circuit dynamics underlying memory-guided choices and highlight a promising technique to potentiate cognitive processes or behavior via brain-machine interfacing.

    1. Neuroscience
    Tianhao Chu, Zilong Ji ... Si Wu
    Research Article

    Hippocampal place cells in freely moving rodents display both theta phase precession and procession, which is thought to play important roles in cognition, but the neural mechanism for producing theta phase shift remains largely unknown. Here, we show that firing rate adaptation within a continuous attractor neural network causes the neural activity bump to oscillate around the external input, resembling theta sweeps of decoded position during locomotion. These forward and backward sweeps naturally account for theta phase precession and procession of individual neurons, respectively. By tuning the adaptation strength, our model explains the difference between ‘bimodal cells’ showing interleaved phase precession and procession, and ‘unimodal cells’ in which phase precession predominates. Our model also explains the constant cycling of theta sweeps along different arms in a T-maze environment, the speed modulation of place cells’ firing frequency, and the continued phase shift after transient silencing of the hippocampus. We hope that this study will aid an understanding of the neural mechanism supporting theta phase coding in the brain.