Mapping dopaminergic projections in the human brain with resting-state fMRI
Abstract
The striatum receives dense dopaminergic projections making it a key region of the dopaminergic system. Its dysfunction has been implicated in various conditions including Parkinson's disease (PD) and substance use disorder. However, the investigation of dopamine-specific functioning in humans is problematic as current MRI approaches are unable to differentiate between dopaminergic and other projections. Here, we demonstrate that 'connectopic mapping' -a novel approach for characterizing fine-grained, overlapping modes of functional connectivity- can be used to map dopaminergic projections in striatum. We applied connectopic mapping to resting-state functional MRI data of the Human Connectome Project (population cohort; N=839) and selected the second-order striatal connectivity mode for further analyses. We first validated its specificity to dopaminergic projections by demonstrating a high spatial correlation (r=0.884) with dopamine transporter availability -a marker of dopaminergic projections- derived from DaT SPECT scans of 209 healthy controls. Next, we obtained the subject-specific second-order modes from 20 controls, and 39 PD patients scanned under placebo and under dopamine replacement therapy (L-DOPA), and show that our proposed dopaminergic marker tracks PD diagnosis, symptom severity and sensitivity to L-DOPA. Finally, across 30 daily alcohol users and 38 daily smokers, we establish strong associations with self-reported alcohol and nicotine use. Our findings provide evidence that the second-order mode of functional connectivity in striatum maps onto dopaminergic projections, tracks inter-individual differences in PD symptom severity and L-DOPA sensitivity, and exhibits strong associations with levels of nicotine and alcohol use, thereby offering a new biomarker for dopamine-related (dys)function in the human brain.
Data availability
We made use of publicly available data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) dataset, from publicly available data from the Parkinson Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI) dataset, and from a local PD dataset that was part of a clinical trial.See https://www.humanconnectome.org/study/hcp-young-adult/document/1200-subjects-data-release for access to the HCP data. The subject identifiers from the HCP dataset used in our first analysis can be found in Appendix 2 - Table 4. Please note that the subject identifiers from the subset of HCP subjects included in the nicotine-use and alcohol-use analyses cannot be provided, since the access to information about substance use is restricted. For more information about applying to get access to the HCP restricted data and for the HCP restricted data use terms see: https://www.humanconnectome.org/study/hcp-young-adult/document/wu-minn-hcp-consortium-restricted-data-use-terms.For access to the PPMI dataset, see https://www.ppmi-info.org/access-data-specimens/download-data. The subject identifiers from the PPMI dataset used in our analyses can be found in Appendix 2 - Tables 5 and 6.All derived and anonymized individual data from our local PD dataset are available at the Donders Repository: https://data.donders.ru.nl/.The code used for the connectopic mapping procedure in all three datasets is available at the following Github repository: https://github.com/koenhaak/congrads.In addition, for supplementary analyses, we further used PET scans available in the JuSpace Toolbox: https://github.com/ juryxy/JuSpace.
-
The WU-Minn human connectome project: an overview.Human Connectome Project, see Appendix 2 - Table 4.
-
The parkinson progression marker initiative (PPMI)Parkinson Progression Marker Initiative, see Appendix 2 - Tables 5 and 6.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Vidi Grant No. 864-12-004)
- Christian F Beckmann
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Vici Grant No. 17854)
- Christian F Beckmann
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Vidi Grant No. 016.156.415)
- Andre F Marquand
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Veni Grant No. 016.171.068)
- Koen V Haak
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Veni Grant No. 91617077)
- Rick Helmich
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO-CAS Grant No. 012-200-013)
- Christian F Beckmann
ZonMw (Rubicon Grant No. 452172019)
- Marianne Oldehinkel
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Shella Keilholz, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, United States
Ethics
Human subjects: All participants from whom data was used in this manuscript, provided written informed consent (and consent to publish) according to the declaration of Helsinki. For the HCP dataset ethical approval was given by the Washington University Institutional Review Board (IRB), for the PPMI dataset ethical approval was obtained locally at each of the participating sites, and for our local PD dataset ethical approval was obtained from the local ethical committee (Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek MO Arnhem Nijmegen, CMO 2014/014).
Version history
- Preprint posted: March 26, 2021 (view preprint)
- Received: July 1, 2021
- Accepted: January 26, 2022
- Accepted Manuscript published: February 3, 2022 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: February 14, 2022 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2022, Oldehinkel et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 5,240
- views
-
- 579
- downloads
-
- 18
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Functional interactions between the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, as revealed by strong oscillatory synchronization in the theta (6–11 Hz) frequency range, correlate with memory-guided decision-making. However, the degree to which this form of long-range synchronization influences memory-guided choice remains unclear. We developed a brain-machine interface that initiated task trials based on the magnitude of prefrontal-hippocampal theta synchronization, then measured choice outcomes. Trials initiated based on strong prefrontal-hippocampal theta synchrony were more likely to be correct compared to control trials on both working memory-dependent and -independent tasks. Prefrontal-thalamic neural interactions increased with prefrontal-hippocampal synchrony and optogenetic activation of the ventral midline thalamus primarily entrained prefrontal theta rhythms, but dynamically modulated synchrony. Together, our results show that prefrontal-hippocampal theta synchronization leads to a higher probability of a correct choice and strengthens prefrontal-thalamic dialogue. Our findings reveal new insights into the neural circuit dynamics underlying memory-guided choices and highlight a promising technique to potentiate cognitive processes or behavior via brain-machine interfacing.
-
- Neuroscience
Hippocampal place cells in freely moving rodents display both theta phase precession and procession, which is thought to play important roles in cognition, but the neural mechanism for producing theta phase shift remains largely unknown. Here, we show that firing rate adaptation within a continuous attractor neural network causes the neural activity bump to oscillate around the external input, resembling theta sweeps of decoded position during locomotion. These forward and backward sweeps naturally account for theta phase precession and procession of individual neurons, respectively. By tuning the adaptation strength, our model explains the difference between ‘bimodal cells’ showing interleaved phase precession and procession, and ‘unimodal cells’ in which phase precession predominates. Our model also explains the constant cycling of theta sweeps along different arms in a T-maze environment, the speed modulation of place cells’ firing frequency, and the continued phase shift after transient silencing of the hippocampus. We hope that this study will aid an understanding of the neural mechanism supporting theta phase coding in the brain.