Coupling of pupil- and neuronal population dynamics reveals diverse influences of arousal on cortical processing
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain
- University of Stirling, United Kingdom
- University of Münster, Germany
- University of Dundee, United Kingdom
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
- University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
- University of Muenster, Germany
Abstract
Fluctuations in arousal, controlled by subcortical neuromodulatory systems, continuously shape cortical state, with profound consequences for information processing. Yet, how arousal signals influence cortical population activity in detail has so far only been characterized for a few selected brain regions. Traditional accounts conceptualize arousal as a homogeneous modulator of neural population activity across the cerebral cortex. Recent insights, however, point to a higher specificity of arousal effects on different components of neural activity and across cortical regions. Here, we provide a comprehensive account of the relationships between fluctuations in arousal and neuronal population activity across the human brain. Exploiting the established link between pupil size and central arousal systems, we performed concurrent magnetoencephalographic (MEG) and pupillographic recordings in a large number of participants, pooled across three laboratories. We found a cascade of effects relative to the peak timing of spontaneous pupil dilations: Decreases in low-frequency (2-8 Hz) activity in temporal and lateral frontal cortex, followed by increased high-frequency (>64 Hz) activity in mid-frontal regions, followed by monotonic and inverted-U relationships with intermediate frequency-range activity (8-32 Hz) in occipito-parietal regions. Pupil-linked arousal also coincided with widespread changes in the structure of the aperiodic component of cortical population activity, indicative of changes in the excitation-inhibition balance in underlying microcircuits. Our results provide a novel basis for studying the arousal modulation of cognitive computations in cortical circuits.
Data availability
The ethics protocol(s) disallow sharing raw and preprocessed MEG and MRI data via a public repository. Data may be shared however within the context of a collaboration.No proposal is needed. However, the results presented in the manuscript are based on three separate datasets, collected independently in three different laboratories. As such, in order to obtain the data, an (informal) email to the authors responsible for the respective data sets is required (Hamburg: Thomas Pfeffer, thms.pfffr@gmail.com; Glasgow: Anne Keitel, a.keitel@dundee.ac.uk; Münster: Daniel Kluger, daniel.kluger@wwu.de).The code and data immediately underlying all main and supplementary figures has been made publicly available. Source data has been uploaded to a public repository (https://osf.io/fw4bt), along with MATLAB code that was used to generate the main and supplementary figures.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung (Feodor-Lynen Fellowship)
- Thomas Pfeffer
Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research of the Medical Faculty of Münster (Gro3/001/19)
- Joachim Gross
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GR 2024/5-1)
- Joachim Gross
Wellcome Trust (Senior Investigator Grant #098433)
- Joachim Gross
Wellcome Trust (Senior Investigator Grant #98434)
- Gregor Thut
University of Glasgow (BBSRC Flexible Talent Mobility funding (BB/R506576/1))
- Christian Keitel
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DO 1240/3-1)
- Tobias H Donner
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DO 1240/4-1)
- Tobias H Donner
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 936 A7/Z3)
- Tobias H Donner
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01GQ1907)
- Tobias H Donner
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01EW2007B)
- Tobias H Donner
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Human subjects: Human subjects were recruited and participated in the experiments in accordance with the ethics committee responsible for the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (Hamburg MEG data) approval number PV4648, the ethics committee of the University of Glasgow, College of Science and Engineering (Glasgow MEG data) approval number 300140078, and the ethics committee of the University of Muenster (Muenster MEG data) approval number 2018-068-f-S. All participants gave written informed consent prior to all experimental procedures and received monetary compensation for their participation.
Copyright
© 2022, Pfeffer et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 3,175
- views
-
- 492
- downloads
-
- 51
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Coupling of pupil- and neuronal population dynamics reveals diverse influences of arousal on cortical processing
eLife 11:e71890.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71890
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Recognizing goal-directed actions is a computationally challenging task, requiring not only the visual analysis of body movements, but also analysis of how these movements causally impact, and thereby induce a change in, those objects targeted by an action. We tested the hypothesis that the analysis of body movements and the effects they induce relies on distinct neural representations in superior and anterior inferior parietal lobe (SPL and aIPL). In four fMRI sessions, participants observed videos of actions (e.g. breaking stick, squashing plastic bottle) along with corresponding point-light-display (PLD) stick figures, pantomimes, and abstract animations of agent–object interactions (e.g. dividing or compressing a circle). Cross-decoding between actions and animations revealed that aIPL encodes abstract representations of action effect structures independent of motion and object identity. By contrast, cross-decoding between actions and PLDs revealed that SPL is disproportionally tuned to body movements independent of visible interactions with objects. Lateral occipitotemporal cortex (LOTC) was sensitive to both action effects and body movements. These results demonstrate that parietal cortex and LOTC are tuned to physical action features, such as how body parts move in space relative to each other and how body parts interact with objects to induce a change (e.g. in position or shape/configuration). The high level of abstraction revealed by cross-decoding suggests a general neural code supporting mechanical reasoning about how entities interact with, and have effects on, each other.
-
- Neuroscience
Recent studies suggest that calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) neurons in the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) represent aversive information and signal a general alarm to the forebrain. If CGRP neurons serve as a true general alarm, their activation would modulate both passive nad active defensive behaviors depending on the magnitude and context of the threat. However, most prior research has focused on the role of CGRP neurons in passive freezing responses, with limited exploration of their involvement in active defensive behaviors. To address this, we examined the role of CGRP neurons in active defensive behavior using a predator-like robot programmed to chase mice. Our electrophysiological results revealed that CGRP neurons encode the intensity of aversive stimuli through variations in firing durations and amplitudes. Optogenetic activation of CGRP neurons during robot chasing elevated flight responses in both conditioning and retention tests, presumably by amplifying the perception of the threat as more imminent and dangerous. In contrast, animals with inactivated CGRP neurons exhibited reduced flight responses, even when the robot was programmed to appear highly threatening during conditioning. These findings expand the understanding of CGRP neurons in the PBN as a critical alarm system, capable of dynamically regulating active defensive behaviors by amplifying threat perception, and ensuring adaptive responses to varying levels of danger.
