Standardizing workflows in imaging transcriptomics with the abagen toolbox

  1. Ross D Markello  Is a corresponding author
  2. Aurina Arnatkevičiūtė
  3. Jean-Baptiste Poline
  4. Ben D Fulcher
  5. Alex Fornito
  6. Bratislav Misic  Is a corresponding author
  1. McGill University, Canada
  2. Monash University, Australia
  3. University of Sydney, Australia

Abstract

Gene expression fundamentally shapes the structural and functional architecture of the human brain. Open-access transcriptomic datasets like the Allen Human Brain Atlas provide an unprecedented ability to examine these mechanisms in vivo; however, a lack of standardization across research groups has given rise to myriad processing pipelines for using these data. Here, we develop the abagen toolbox, an open-access software package for working with transcriptomic data, and use it to examine how methodological variability influences the outcomes of research using the Allen Human Brain Atlas. Applying three prototypical analyses to the outputs of 750,000 unique processing pipelines, we find that choice of pipeline has a large impact on research findings, with parameters commonly varied in the literature influencing correlations between derived gene expression and other imaging phenotypes by as much as p ≥ 1:0. Our results further reveal an ordering of parameter importance, with processing steps that influence gene normalization yielding the greatest impact on downstream statistical inferences and conclusions. The presented work and the development of the abagen toolbox lay the foundation for more standardized and systematic research in imaging transcriptomics, and will help to advance future understanding of the influence of gene expression in the human brain.

Data availability

All datasets used in this study are publicly available. Detailed information about the datasets and how to access them are described in the manuscript.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ross D Markello

    McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    For correspondence
    ross.markello@mail.mcgill.ca
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1057-1336
  2. Aurina Arnatkevičiūtė

    Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Jean-Baptiste Poline

    Montreal Neurological Institute & Hospital,, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9794-749X
  4. Ben D Fulcher

    School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3003-4055
  5. Alex Fornito

    Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    Alex Fornito, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  6. Bratislav Misic

    McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    For correspondence
    bratislav.misic@mcgill.ca
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0307-2862

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (017-04265)

  • Bratislav Misic

National Health and Medical Research Council (3274306)

  • Alex Fornito

National Institutes of Health (NIH-NIBIB P41 EB019936)

  • Jean-Baptiste Poline

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Saad Jbabdi, University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: July 9, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: July 12, 2021
  3. Accepted: November 15, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: November 16, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: December 9, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Markello et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,712
    views
  • 543
    downloads
  • 171
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ross D Markello
  2. Aurina Arnatkevičiūtė
  3. Jean-Baptiste Poline
  4. Ben D Fulcher
  5. Alex Fornito
  6. Bratislav Misic
(2021)
Standardizing workflows in imaging transcriptomics with the abagen toolbox
eLife 10:e72129.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72129

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72129

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Anja T Zai, Anna E Stepien ... Richard HR Hahnloser
    Research Article

    Songbirds’ vocal mastery is impressive, but to what extent is it a result of practice? Can they, based on experienced mismatch with a known target, plan the necessary changes to recover the target in a practice-free manner without intermittently singing? In adult zebra finches, we drive the pitch of a song syllable away from its stable (baseline) variant acquired from a tutor, then we withdraw reinforcement and subsequently deprive them of singing experience by muting or deafening. In this deprived state, birds do not recover their baseline song. However, they revert their songs toward the target by about 1 standard deviation of their recent practice, provided the sensory feedback during the latter signaled a pitch mismatch with the target. Thus, targeted vocal plasticity does not require immediate sensory experience, showing that zebra finches are capable of goal-directed vocal planning.

    1. Neuroscience
    Amanda Chu, Nicholas T Gordon ... Michael A McDannald
    Research Article Updated

    Pavlovian fear conditioning has been extensively used to study the behavioral and neural basis of defensive systems. In a typical procedure, a cue is paired with foot shock, and subsequent cue presentation elicits freezing, a behavior theoretically linked to predator detection. Studies have since shown a fear conditioned cue can elicit locomotion, a behavior that – in addition to jumping, and rearing – is theoretically linked to imminent or occurring predation. A criticism of studies observing fear conditioned cue-elicited locomotion is that responding is non-associative. We gave rats Pavlovian fear discrimination over a baseline of reward seeking. TTL-triggered cameras captured 5 behavior frames/s around cue presentation. Experiment 1 examined the emergence of danger-specific behaviors over fear acquisition. Experiment 2 examined the expression of danger-specific behaviors in fear extinction. In total, we scored 112,000 frames for nine discrete behavior categories. Temporal ethograms show that during acquisition, a fear conditioned cue suppresses reward seeking and elicits freezing, but also elicits locomotion, jumping, and rearing – all of which are maximal when foot shock is imminent. During extinction, a fear conditioned cue most prominently suppresses reward seeking, and elicits locomotion that is timed to shock delivery. The independent expression of these behaviors in both experiments reveals a fear conditioned cue to orchestrate a temporally organized suite of behaviors.