Ecdysone coordinates plastic growth with robust pattern in the developing wing

  1. André Nogueira Alves
  2. Marisa Matheus Oliveira
  3. Takashi Koyama
  4. Alexander Shingleton  Is a corresponding author
  5. Christen K Mirth  Is a corresponding author
  1. Monash University, Australia
  2. Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Portugal
  3. University of Illinois at Chicago, United States

Abstract

Animals develop in unpredictable, variable environments. In response to environmental change some aspects of development adjust to generate plastic phenotypes. Other aspects of development, however, are buffered against environmental change to produce robust phenotypes. How organ development is coordinated to accommodate both plastic and robust developmental responses is poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that the steroid hormone ecdysone coordinates both plasticity of organ size and robustness of organ pattern in the developing wings of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Using fed and starved larvae that lack prothoracic glands, which synthesise ecdysone, we show that nutrition regulates growth both via ecdysone and via an ecdysone-independent mechanism, while nutrition regulates patterning only via ecdysone. We then demonstrate that growth shows a graded response to ecdysone concentration, while patterning shows a threshold response. Collectively, these data support a model where nutritionally-regulated ecdysone fluctuations confer plasticity by regulating disc growth in response to basal ecdysone levels, and confers robustness by initiating patterning only once ecdysone peaks exceeds a threshold concentration. This could represent a generalizable mechanism through which hormones coordinate plastic growth with robust patterning in the face of environmental change.

Data availability

All data and R scripts for analysis have been deposited on Figshare (DOI: 10.26180/13393676).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. André Nogueira Alves

    School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Marisa Matheus Oliveira

    Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Takashi Koyama

    Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4203-114X
  4. Alexander Shingleton

    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, United States
    For correspondence
    ashingle@uic.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Christen K Mirth

    School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
    For correspondence
    christen.mirth@monash.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9765-4021

Funding

Australian Research Council (FT170100259)

  • Christen K Mirth

National Science Foundation (IOS-0919855)

  • Alexander Shingleton

National Science Foundation (IOS-1557638)

  • Alexander Shingleton

National Science Foundation (IOS-1952385)

  • Alexander Shingleton

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Nogueira Alves et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,859
    views
  • 246
    downloads
  • 10
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. André Nogueira Alves
  2. Marisa Matheus Oliveira
  3. Takashi Koyama
  4. Alexander Shingleton
  5. Christen K Mirth
(2022)
Ecdysone coordinates plastic growth with robust pattern in the developing wing
eLife 11:e72666.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72666

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72666

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Nathan D Harry, Christina Zakas
    Research Article

    New developmental programs can evolve through adaptive changes to gene expression. The annelid Streblospio benedicti has a developmental dimorphism, which provides a unique intraspecific framework for understanding the earliest genetic changes that take place during developmental divergence. Using comparative RNAseq through ontogeny, we find that only a small proportion of genes are differentially expressed at any time, despite major differences in larval development and life history. These genes shift expression profiles across morphs by either turning off any expression in one morph or changing the timing or amount of gene expression. We directly connect the contributions of these mechanisms to differences in developmental processes. We examine F1 offspring – using reciprocal crosses – to determine maternal mRNA inheritance and the regulatory architecture of gene expression. These results highlight the importance of both novel gene expression and heterochronic shifts in developmental evolution, as well as the trans-acting regulatory factors in initiating divergence.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Deepak Adhikari, John Carroll
    Insight

    The formation of large endolysosomal structures in unfertilized eggs ensures that lysosomes remain dormant before fertilization, and then shift into clean-up mode after the egg-to-embryo transition.