Protein Phosphatase 1 in association with Bud14 inhibits mitotic exit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Abstract

Mitotic exit in budding yeast is dependent on correct orientation of the mitotic spindle along the cell polarity axis. When accurate positioning of the spindle fails, a surveillance mechanism named the Spindle Position Checkpoint (SPOC) prevents cells from exiting mitosis. Mutants with a defective SPOC become multinucleated and lose their genomic integrity. Yet, a comprehensive understanding of the SPOC mechanism is missing. In this study, we identified the type 1 protein phosphatase, Glc7, in association with its regulatory protein Bud14 as a novel checkpoint component. We further showed that Glc7-Bud14 promotes dephosphorylation of the SPOC effector protein Bfa1. Our results suggest a model in which two mechanisms act in parallel for a robust checkpoint response: first, the SPOC kinase Kin4 isolates Bfa1 away from the inhibitory kinase Cdc5 and second, Glc7-Bud14 dephosphorylates Bfa1 to fully activate the checkpoint effector.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided for Figures 2A-2C, 3A and 3C, 4B and 4D, 6A-6D, 7G and Figure 2-Figure Supplement 1B-C, Figure 5-Figure Supplement 2A, Figure 6-Figure Supplement 1A-1D, Figure 6-Figure Supplement 2C-2D, Figure 7- Figure supplement 2B

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Dilara Kocakaplan

    Molecular Biology and Genetics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Hüseyin Karaburk

    Molecular Biology and Genetics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Cansu Dilege

    Molecular Biology and Genetics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Idil Kirdök

    Molecular Biology and Genetics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Şeyma Nur Bektaş

    Molecular Biology and Genetics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ayse Koca Caydasi

    Molecular Biology and Genetics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
    For correspondence
    aykoca@ku.edu.tr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2570-1367

Funding

EMBO (IG - 3918)

  • Dilara Kocakaplan
  • Ayse Koca Caydasi

TUBITAK (117Z232)

  • Ayse Koca Caydasi

TUBITAK (118Z979)

  • Hüseyin Karaburk
  • Idil Kirdök

European Commission (H2020-MSCA-IF (796599))

  • Ayse Koca Caydasi

ICGEB (IG-No. CRP/TUR17-04_EC)

  • Ayse Koca Caydasi

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Kocakaplan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,712
    views
  • 238
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Dilara Kocakaplan
  2. Hüseyin Karaburk
  3. Cansu Dilege
  4. Idil Kirdök
  5. Şeyma Nur Bektaş
  6. Ayse Koca Caydasi
(2021)
Protein Phosphatase 1 in association with Bud14 inhibits mitotic exit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
eLife 10:e72833.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72833

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72833

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Yajun Zhai, Peiyi Liu ... Gongzheng Hu
    Research Article

    Discovering new strategies to combat the multidrug-resistant bacteria constitutes a major medical challenge of our time. Previously, artesunate (AS) has been reported to exert antibacterial enhancement activity in combination with β-lactam antibiotics via inhibition of the efflux pump AcrB. However, combination of AS and colistin (COL) revealed a weak synergistic effect against a limited number of strains, and few studies have further explored its possible mechanism of synergistic action. In this article, we found that AS and EDTA could strikingly enhance the antibacterial effects of COL against mcr-1- and mcr-1+ Salmonella strains either in vitro or in vivo, when used in triple combination. The excellent bacteriostatic effect was primarily related to the increased cell membrane damage, accumulation of toxic compounds and inhibition of MCR-1. The potential binding sites of AS to MCR-1 (THR283, SER284, and TYR287) were critical for its inhibition of MCR-1 activity. Additionally, we also demonstrated that the CheA of chemosensory system and virulence-related protein SpvD were critical for the bacteriostatic synergistic effects of the triple combination. Selectively targeting CheA, SpvD, or MCR using the natural compound AS could be further investigated as an attractive strategy for the treatment of Salmonella infection. Collectively, our work opens new avenues toward the potentiation of COL and reveals an alternative drug combination strategy to overcome COL-resistant bacterial infections.

    1. Cell Biology
    Tamás Visnovitz, Dorina Lenzinger ... Edit I Buzas
    Short Report

    Recent studies showed an unexpected complexity of extracellular vesicle (EV) biogenesis pathways. We previously found evidence that human colorectal cancer cells in vivo release large multivesicular body-like structures en bloc. Here, we tested whether this large EV type is unique to colorectal cancer cells. We found that all cell types we studied (including different cell lines and cells in their original tissue environment) released multivesicular large EVs (MV-lEVs). We also demonstrated that upon spontaneous rupture of the limiting membrane of the MV-lEVs, their intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) escaped to the extracellular environment by a ‘torn bag mechanism’. We proved that the MV-lEVs were released by ectocytosis of amphisomes (hence, we termed them amphiectosomes). Both ILVs of amphiectosomes and small EVs separated from conditioned media were either exclusively CD63 or LC3B positive. According to our model, upon fusion of multivesicular bodies with autophagosomes, fragments of the autophagosomal inner membrane curl up to form LC3B positive ILVs of amphisomes, while CD63 positive small EVs are of multivesicular body origin. Our data suggest a novel common release mechanism for small EVs, distinct from the exocytosis of multivesicular bodies or amphisomes, as well as the small ectosome release pathway.