The control and training of single motor units in isometric tasks are constrained by a common input signal

  1. Mario Bräcklein
  2. Deren Yusuf Barsakcioglu
  3. Jaime Ibáñez
  4. Jonathan Eden
  5. Etienne Burdet
  6. Carsten Mehring
  7. Dario Farina  Is a corresponding author
  1. Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  2. University of Freiburg, Germany

Abstract

Recent developments in neural interfaces enable the real-time and non-invasive tracking of motor neuron spiking activity. Such novel interfaces could provide a promising basis for human motor augmentation by extracting potentially high-dimensional control signals directly from the human nervous system. However, it is unclear how flexibly humans can control the activity of individual motor neurons to effectively increase the number of degrees-of-freedom available to coordinate multiple effectors simultaneously. Here, we provided human subjects (N=7) with real-time feedback on the discharge patterns of pairs of motor units (MUs) innervating a single muscle (tibialis anterior) and encouraged them to independently control the MUs by tracking targets in a 2D space. Subjects learned control strategies to achieve the target-tracking task for various combinations of MUs. These strategies rarely corresponded to a volitional control of independent input signals to individual MUs during the onset of neural activity. Conversely, MU activation was consistent with a common input to the MU pair, while individual activation of the MUs in the pair was predominantly achieved by alterations in de-recruitment order that could be explained with history-dependent changes in motor neuron excitability. These results suggest that flexible MU recruitment based on independent synaptic inputs to single MUs is unlikely, although de-recruitment might reflect varying inputs or modulations in the neuron's intrinsic excitability.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mario Bräcklein

    Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Mario Bräcklein, is one inventor in a patent application (Neural interface. UK Patent application no. GB2014671.8. September 17, 2020) related to the methods and applications of this work..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1537-7495
  2. Deren Yusuf Barsakcioglu

    Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Deren Yusuf Barsakcioglu, is an inventor in a patent (Neural 690 Interface. UK Patent application no. GB1813762.0. August 23, 2018) and in a patent application (Neural interface. UK Patent application no. GB2014671.8. September 17, 2020) related to the methods and applications of this work..
  3. Jaime Ibáñez

    Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Jonathan Eden

    Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Etienne Burdet

    Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Carsten Mehring

    Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8125-5205
  7. Dario Farina

    Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    d.farina@imperial.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    Dario Farina, is an inventor in a patent (Neural 690 Interface. UK Patent application no. GB1813762.0. August 23, 2018) and in a patent application (Neural interface. UK Patent application no. GB2014671.8. September 17, 2020) related to the methods and applications of this work..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7883-2697

Funding

EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Neurotechnology and Health

  • Mario Bräcklein

H2020 NIMA (FETOPEN 899626)

  • Deren Yusuf Barsakcioglu
  • Jaime Ibáñez
  • Jonathan Eden
  • Etienne Burdet
  • Carsten Mehring
  • Dario Farina

H2020 TRIMANUAL (MSCA 843408)

  • Jonathan Eden
  • Etienne Burdet

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. J Andrew Pruszynski, Western University, Canada

Ethics

Human subjects: Informed consent and consent to publish was obtained from all subjects. The study was approved by the ethics committee at Imperial College London (reference number: 18IC4685).

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: August 4, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: August 10, 2021
  3. Accepted: June 6, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: June 7, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: June 20, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Bräcklein et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,514
    Page views
  • 393
    Downloads
  • 11
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mario Bräcklein
  2. Deren Yusuf Barsakcioglu
  3. Jaime Ibáñez
  4. Jonathan Eden
  5. Etienne Burdet
  6. Carsten Mehring
  7. Dario Farina
(2022)
The control and training of single motor units in isometric tasks are constrained by a common input signal
eLife 11:e72871.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72871

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72871

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Songyao Zhang, Tuo Zhang ... Tianming Liu
    Research Article

    Cortical folding is an important feature of primate brains that plays a crucial role in various cognitive and behavioral processes. Extensive research has revealed both similarities and differences in folding morphology and brain function among primates including macaque and human. The folding morphology is the basis of brain function, making cross-species studies on folding morphology important for understanding brain function and species evolution. However, prior studies on cross-species folding morphology mainly focused on partial regions of the cortex instead of the entire brain. Previously, our research defined a whole-brain landmark based on folding morphology: the gyral peak. It was found to exist stably across individuals and ages in both human and macaque brains. Shared and unique gyral peaks in human and macaque are identified in this study, and their similarities and differences in spatial distribution, anatomical morphology, and functional connectivity were also dicussed.

    1. Neuroscience
    Avani Koparkar, Timothy L Warren ... Lena Veit
    Research Article

    Complex skills like speech and dance are composed of ordered sequences of simpler elements, but the neuronal basis for the syntactic ordering of actions is poorly understood. Birdsong is a learned vocal behavior composed of syntactically ordered syllables, controlled in part by the songbird premotor nucleus HVC (proper name). Here, we test whether one of HVC’s recurrent inputs, mMAN (medial magnocellular nucleus of the anterior nidopallium), contributes to sequencing in adult male Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata domestica). Bengalese finch song includes several patterns: (1) chunks, comprising stereotyped syllable sequences; (2) branch points, where a given syllable can be followed probabilistically by multiple syllables; and (3) repeat phrases, where individual syllables are repeated variable numbers of times. We found that following bilateral lesions of mMAN, acoustic structure of syllables remained largely intact, but sequencing became more variable, as evidenced by ‘breaks’ in previously stereotyped chunks, increased uncertainty at branch points, and increased variability in repeat numbers. Our results show that mMAN contributes to the variable sequencing of vocal elements in Bengalese finch song and demonstrate the influence of recurrent projections to HVC. Furthermore, they highlight the utility of species with complex syntax in investigating neuronal control of ordered sequences.