Impact of a human gut microbe on Vibrio cholerae host colonization through biofilm enhancement

  1. Kelsey Barrassso
  2. Denise Chac
  3. Meti D Debela
  4. Catherine Geigel
  5. Anjali Steenhaut
  6. Abigail Rivera Seda
  7. Chelsea N Dunmire
  8. Jason B Harris
  9. Regina C Larocque
  10. Firas S Midani
  11. Firdausi Qadri
  12. Jing Yan
  13. Ana A Weil  Is a corresponding author
  14. Wai-Leung Ng  Is a corresponding author
  1. Tufts University School of Medicine, United States
  2. University of Washington, United States
  3. Massachusetts General Hospital, United States
  4. Yale University, United States
  5. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  6. icddr,b, Bangladesh

Abstract

Recent studies indicate that the human intestinal microbiota could impact the outcome of infection by Vibrio cholerae, the etiological agent of the diarrheal disease cholera. A commensal bacterium, Paracoccus aminovorans, was previously identified in high abundance in stool collected from individuals infected with V. cholerae when compared to stool from uninfected persons. However, if and how P. aminovorans interacts with V. cholerae has not been experimentally determined; moreover, whether any association between this bacterium alters the behaviors of V. cholerae to affect the disease outcome is unclear. Here we show that P. aminovorans and V. cholerae together form dual-species biofilm structure at the air-liquid interface, with previously uncharacterized novel features. Importantly, the presence of P. aminovorans within the murine small intestine enhances V. cholerae colonization in the same niche that is dependent on the Vibrio exopolysaccharide (VPS) and other major components of mature V. cholerae biofilm. These studies illustrate that multi-species biofilm formation is a plausible mechanism used by a gut microbe to increase the virulence of the pathogen, and this interaction may alter outcomes in enteric infections.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided for Figures 1-3, 5, 7.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kelsey Barrassso

    Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Denise Chac

    Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Meti D Debela

    Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Catherine Geigel

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Anjali Steenhaut

    Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Abigail Rivera Seda

    Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Chelsea N Dunmire

    Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jason B Harris

    Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Regina C Larocque

    Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Firas S Midani

    Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2473-7758
  11. Firdausi Qadri

    icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Jing Yan

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Ana A Weil

    Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    anaweil@uw.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Wai-Leung Ng

    Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    wai-leung.ng@tufts.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8966-6604

Funding

National Institutes of Health (AI121337)

  • Wai-Leung Ng

National Institutes of Health (AI123494)

  • Ana A Weil

National Institutes of Health (DP2GM146253)

  • Jing Yan

National Institutes of Health (R25 GM066567)

  • Abigail Rivera Seda

Burroughs Wellcome Fund (1015763.02)

  • Jing Yan

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Melanie Blokesch, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were performed at and in accordance with the rules of the Tufts Comparative Medicine Services (CMS), following the guidelines of the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) as well as the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All procedures were performed with approval of the Tufts University CMS (Protocol# B 2018-99). Euthanasia was performed in accordance with guidelines provided by the AVMA and was approved by the Tufts CMS.

Human subjects: The previously published study from which Figure 1 is derived from ref (7) received approval from the Ethical Review Committee at the icddr,b and the institutional review boards of Massachusetts General Hospital and the University of Washington. Participants or their guardians provided written informed consent.

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: February 2, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: August 12, 2021
  3. Accepted: March 25, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: March 28, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: March 31, 2022 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record published: April 8, 2022 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2022, Barrassso et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,136
    views
  • 289
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kelsey Barrassso
  2. Denise Chac
  3. Meti D Debela
  4. Catherine Geigel
  5. Anjali Steenhaut
  6. Abigail Rivera Seda
  7. Chelsea N Dunmire
  8. Jason B Harris
  9. Regina C Larocque
  10. Firas S Midani
  11. Firdausi Qadri
  12. Jing Yan
  13. Ana A Weil
  14. Wai-Leung Ng
(2022)
Impact of a human gut microbe on Vibrio cholerae host colonization through biofilm enhancement
eLife 11:e73010.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73010

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73010

Further reading

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Alexander D Cook, Mark Carrington, Matthew K Higgins
    Research Article

    African trypanosomes replicate within infected mammals where they are exposed to the complement system. This system centres around complement C3, which is present in a soluble form in serum but becomes covalently deposited onto the surfaces of pathogens after proteolytic cleavage to C3b. Membrane-associated C3b triggers different complement-mediated effectors which promote pathogen clearance. To counter complement-mediated clearance, African trypanosomes have a cell surface receptor, ISG65, which binds to C3b and which decreases the rate of trypanosome clearance in an infection model. However, the mechanism by which ISG65 reduces C3b function has not been determined. We reveal through cryogenic electron microscopy that ISG65 has two distinct binding sites for C3b, only one of which is available in C3 and C3d. We show that ISG65 does not block the formation of C3b or the function of the C3 convertase which catalyses the surface deposition of C3b. However, we show that ISG65 forms a specific conjugate with C3b, perhaps acting as a decoy. ISG65 also occludes the binding sites for complement receptors 2 and 3, which may disrupt recruitment of immune cells, including B cells, phagocytes, and granulocytes. This suggests that ISG65 protects trypanosomes by combining multiple approaches to dampen the complement cascade.

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Michael D Sacco, Lauren R Hammond ... Yu Chen
    Research Article

    In the Firmicutes phylum, GpsB is a membrane associated protein that coordinates peptidoglycan synthesis with cell growth and division. Although GpsB has been studied in several bacteria, the structure, function, and interactome of Staphylococcus aureus GpsB is largely uncharacterized. To address this knowledge gap, we solved the crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of S. aureus GpsB, which adopts an atypical, asymmetric dimer, and demonstrates major conformational flexibility that can be mapped to a hinge region formed by a three-residue insertion exclusive to Staphylococci. When this three-residue insertion is excised, its thermal stability increases, and the mutant no longer produces a previously reported lethal phenotype when overexpressed in Bacillus subtilis. In S. aureus, we show that these hinge mutants are less functional and speculate that the conformational flexibility imparted by the hinge region may serve as a dynamic switch to finetune the function of the GpsB complex and/or to promote interaction with its various partners. Furthermore, we provide the first biochemical, biophysical, and crystallographic evidence that the N-terminal domain of GpsB binds not only PBP4, but also FtsZ, through a conserved recognition motif located on their C-termini, thus coupling peptidoglycan synthesis to cell division. Taken together, the unique structure of S. aureus GpsB and its direct interaction with FtsZ/PBP4 provide deeper insight into the central role of GpsB in S. aureus cell division.