1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease

Impact of a human gut microbe on Vibrio cholerae host colonization through biofilm enhancement

  1. Kelsey Barrasso
  2. Denise Chac
  3. Meti D Debela
  4. Catherine Geigel
  5. Anjali Steenhaut
  6. Abigail Rivera Seda
  7. Chelsea N Dunmire
  8. Jason B Harris
  9. Regina C Larocque
  10. Firas S Midani
  11. Firdausi Qadri
  12. Jing Yan
  13. Ana A Weil  Is a corresponding author
  14. Wai-Leung Ng  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, United States
  2. Program of Molecular Microbiology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University School of Medicine, United States
  3. Department of Medicine, University of Washington, United States
  4. Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, United States
  5. Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, United States
  6. Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, United States
  7. Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  8. International Center for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Bangladesh
  9. Quantitative Biology Institute, Yale University, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73010
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Kelsey Barrasso
  2. Denise Chac
  3. Meti D Debela
  4. Catherine Geigel
  5. Anjali Steenhaut
  6. Abigail Rivera Seda
  7. Chelsea N Dunmire
  8. Jason B Harris
  9. Regina C Larocque
  10. Firas S Midani
  11. Firdausi Qadri
  12. Jing Yan
  13. Ana A Weil
  14. Wai-Leung Ng
(2022)
Impact of a human gut microbe on Vibrio cholerae host colonization through biofilm enhancement
eLife 11:e73010.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73010
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Recent studies indicate that the human intestinal microbiota could impact the outcome of infection by Vibrio cholerae, the etiological agent of the diarrheal disease cholera. A commensal bacterium, Paracoccus aminovorans, was previously identified in high abundance in stool collected from individuals infected with V. cholerae when compared to stool from uninfected persons. However, if and how P. aminovorans interacts with V. cholerae has not been experimentally determined; moreover, whether any association between this bacterium alters the behaviors of V. cholerae to affect the disease outcome is unclear. Here, we show that P. aminovorans and V. cholerae together form dual-species biofilm structure at the air–liquid interface, with previously uncharacterized novel features. Importantly, the presence of P. aminovorans within the murine small intestine enhances V. cholerae colonization in the same niche that is dependent on the Vibrio exopolysaccharide and other major components of mature V. cholerae biofilm. These studies illustrate that multispecies biofilm formation is a plausible mechanism used by a gut microbe to increase the virulence of the pathogen, and this interaction may alter outcomes in enteric infections.

Editor's evaluation

In this work, the authors study the previously reported positive association between the presence of the gut bacterium Paracoccus aminovorans and Vibrio cholerae during infection. They describe and image dual-species biofilm formed in vitro as well as enhanced V. cholerae gut colonization in the presence of P. aminovorans in a neonatal mouse model. Collectively, the authors conclude that P. aminovorans enhances biofilm formation by V. cholerae, which could explain the increased abundance ofP. aminovorans in persons infected with V. cholerae in endemic areas, and may have impacted the course of infections in humans.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73010.sa0

Introduction

Vibrio cholerae (Vc) causes an estimated 3 million infections and 120,000 deaths each year, and larger and more deadly outbreaks have increased during the last decade (Camacho et al., 2018; Luquero et al., 2016). A wide range of clinical outcomes occur in persons exposed to Vc, ranging from asymptomatic infection to severe secretory diarrhea. It is nearly certain that many behaviors of Vc in the aquatic environment and inside the host are significantly affected by the presence of other microbes (Weil and Ryan, 2018), and recent studies provide evidence that the gut microbiota may impact the severity of cholera (Alavi et al., 2020; Hsiao et al., 2014; Levade et al., 2020; Midani et al., 2018).

Several functions of the gut microbiota influence the growth or colonization of enteric pathogens, including production of antimicrobial compounds, maintenance of the intestinal barrier, regulation of the host immune response, and modulation of available nutrients (McKenney and Pamer, 2015). Gut microbes have been shown to have an important role in Vc infection in various animal models. For instance, disruption of the commensal microbiota with antibiotics is required to allow successful Vc colonization in adult rodent models. Starvation and streptomycin treatment are needed to reduce the intestinal normal flora to allow Vc infection to occur in the cecum and the entire bowel in guinea pigs (Freter, 1955). In another case, streptomycin treatment is needed to allow Vc colonization, mainly in the cecum and large intestine, of adult mice (Nygren et al., 2009). Conversely, Vc actively employs a type VI secretion system to attack host commensal microbiota to enhance colonization of the gut in infant mice (Zhao et al., 2018). Moreover, specific microbial species have a profound impact on Vc colonization. Pre-colonization with Blautia obeum, an anaerobic Gram-positive bacterium, in adult gnotobiotic mice decreases the Vc counts in the feces after infection. B. obeum is thought to produce a signaling molecule that induces Vc into a high cell-density quorum sensing state (Hsiao et al., 2014) in which virulence gene expression is repressed (Jung et al., 2015; Watve et al., 2020). Certain microbiota species reduce Vc colonization in germfree adult and suckling mice by producing the enzyme bile salt hydrolase that degrades the host-produced virulence-activating compound taurocholate (Alavi et al., 2020; Hsiao et al., 2014). Through metabolizing host glycans into short-chain fatty acids that suppress Vc growth, a prominent commensal species, Bacteroides vulgatus, reduces Vc proliferation within the intestine of germfree adult mice and typical laboratory infant mice (You et al., 2019).

While the above studies exemplify how a single microbe or a group of microbes can protect the host from Vc infection, the mechanisms used by certain gut microbes to promote Vc virulence, thereby increasing the likelihood of individuals developing cholera and worsening disease outcomes, are less well understood. We have previously studied household contacts of cholera patients to understand how gut microbes impact on susceptibility to cholera, and we identified bacteria associated with increased or decreased susceptibility to Vc infection (Levade et al., 2020; Midani et al., 2018). We also observed that the gut microbial species Paracoccus aminovorans (Pa) was more abundant in the gut microbiota during Vc infection (Midani et al., 2018). This association between Pa and Vc is unusual because most of the native gut microbiota is typically displaced by secretory diarrhea during cholera (Hsiao et al., 2014; David et al., 2015). To determine the underlying mechanisms driving these correlative clinical findings, we evaluated the relationship between Pa and Vc in co-culture and determined the effects of Pa on Vc infection outcomes with in vivo models. Here, we show that Pa interacts directly with Vc to form dual-species biofilm structures with previously uncharacterized features. Moreover, Vc colonization inside the animal host is enhanced by the presence of Pa in the small intestine, and this effect is dependent upon Vc biofilm production. Our findings demonstrate a plausible mechanism by which a gut microbe specifically associates with Vc, and this reinforces our microbiome analysis in humans that identified Pa as highly associated with infected individuals. Our findings also demonstrate that interactions between these two species have the potential to directly impact Vc pathogenesis and alter outcomes in human Vc infection.

Results

P. aminovorans is differentially abundant in individuals with active V. cholerae infection

Paracoccus is a genus of soil microbes found in low abundance in the gut microbiome of humans (Yatsunenko et al., 2012; Urakami et al., 1990). Our previously published analysis of stool gut microbes from household contacts of cholera patients identified Pa as an unexpectedly abundant gut microbe during active Vc infection, and this organism was rarely found in uninfected participants (Midani et al., 2018). In this prior study, we used a support vector machine (SVM) model with recursive feature elimination to learn patterns of relative abundance of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) that distinguished infected (defined as Vc DNA detected in stool or a stool culture with Vc growth) from uninfected persons (Vc DNA undetected in stool and Vc stool culture negative). The model was trained on a subset of study participants and tested on another subset in a hold-out validation. Here, we have extracted data from this prior study to examine separately the Pa OTUs in infected compared to uninfected persons. Pa abundance was significantly higher as a proportion of the total sequencing reads in the stool of infected household contacts (6/22, 27%) compared to only 5.6% (2/36) of uninfected individuals (Figure 1A, p=0.009 by Mann–Whitney U-test). The ratio of Pa to Vc abundance present during infection was variable and averaged 1:1 (Figure 1B). These findings were particularly interesting because typically there is a drastic reduction of nearly all gut microbes during active Vc infection (Hsiao et al., 2014; David et al., 2015) due to secretory diarrhea, oral rehydration solution ingestion, and Vc infection itself, and yet here Pa was found in an increased abundance in some actively infected participants. The Vc count in Pa-colonized infected household contacts compared to non-Pa colonized household contacts was modestly higher (approximately threefold) in this study; however, statistically the difference was not significant (Mann–Whitney U-test, p=0.1474), which is likely due to small sample size (Supplementary file 1). Based on these findings, we hypothesized that Pa may be resistant to displacement from the gut during infection. While our previous study demonstrates a positive correlation between Pa in human stool and Vc infection, a causal relationship between this gut microbiota species and Vc infection had not been previously established.

Figure 1
Download asset Open asset
Paracoccus aminovorans (Pa) is more abundant in persons with Vibrio cholerae (Vc) infection compared to uninfected persons.

In a prior study of household contacts of cholera patients in Bangladesh (Midani et al., 2018), Pa was identified as differentially abundant using a support vector machine model with recursive feature elimination in order to discriminate patterns of microbial taxa relative abundance that distinguished infected from uninfected persons. The microbiota was assessed using 16S rRNA in rectal swabs collected from individuals with Vc infection (n = 22) compared to uninfected individuals (n = 36). In this study, total sum normalization was applied to operational taxonomic unit (OTU) counts from each sample, and a median of 37,958 mapped reads per sample was generated (Midani et al., 2018). Based on this sequencing data, the estimated limit of detection for a Pa OTU is 2.0 × 10–5. Raw and normalized counts of Pa and Vc are shown in Supplementary file 1. (A) Normalized relative abundance of Pa in infected and uninfected individuals, comparison between infected and uninfected p=0.009 (Mann–Whitney nonparametric U-test). All data points are shown, and bars mark the maximum and minimum values. (B) Ratio of Vc to Pa in six Vc-infected persons.

Figure 1—source data 1

Paracoccus aminovorans (Pa) abundance in persons with and without Vibrio cholerae (Vc) infection.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/73010/elife-73010-fig1-data1-v3.xlsx
Figure 1—source data 2

Ratio of Paracoccus aminovorans (Pa) to Vibrio cholerae (Vc) in infected persons.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/73010/elife-73010-fig1-data2-v3.xlsx

Pa increases Vc host colonization

We modified a well-established infant mouse colonization model (Klose, 2000) to assess whether the presence of Pa in the small intestine would promote Vc host colonization. First, we isolated a spontaneous streptomycin-resistant (StrepR) mutant derived from the ATCC-type strain of Pa for selection and enumeration of Pa following host colonization. Infant mice (3-day-old) were intragastrically inoculated with Pa (107 colony-forming units [CFUs]) every 12 hr for four doses (0, 12, 24, and 36 hr). At 24 hr (i.e., 12 hr after the second Pa inoculation and right before the third Pa inoculation) and 48 hr (i.e., 12 hr after the last Pa inoculation), small intestines from these animals were dissected and homogenized. Gut homogenates were serially diluted and plated on medium containing streptomycin to assess Pa colonization. StrepR Pa colonies (>106 CFUs/small intestine) were recovered at these two time points (Figure 2A), and no StrepR colonies were detected in the mock-treated group, indicating that Pa successfully and stably colonized the small intestines of these animals using these methods at least for 12 hr. Unlike previous studies (Freter, 1955; Nygren et al., 2009), pretreatment with antibiotics was not required for Pa colonization (Figure 2A). Sequencing analysis of the mouse small intestines demonstrated no significant change in the microbial composition and diversity with and without Pa colonization (Figure 2—figure supplement 1).

Figure 2 with 2 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
The presence of Paracoccus aminovorans (Pa) enhances Vibrio cholerae (Vc) colonization in the infant mouse intestine.

(A) 3-day-old infant mice were intragastrically inoculated with 107 colony-forming unit (CFU) of Pa every 12 hr twice or four times. 12 hr after the second or fourth dose of Pa inoculation (i.e., at 24 hr and 48 hr, respectively), mice were sacrificed and CFUs were enumerated by plating serial dilutions of small intestine samples on selective media. (B) 3-day-old infant mice were intragastrically inoculated four times with LB or 107 CFU of Pa for every 12 hr, and 12 hr after the last Pa inoculation, the animals were infected with 106 CFU of WT Vc. Mice were sacrificed 20–24 hr post infection, and the small intestine samples were taken to enumerate Vc. Bars on graphs depict median value with 95% confidence interval (CI) and individual data points plotted. Unpaired nonparametric U-test (Mann–Whitney); ***p≤0.001. (C) Vc was inoculated intragastrically into the animals alone or together with Pa in a 1:1 ratio. After 24 hr, enumeration of Vc was performed as described above. Unpaired nonparametric U-test (Mann–Whitney); **p≤0.01.

Figure 2—source data 1

Viable cell count of Paracoccus aminovorans (Pa) in infant mouse intestine.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/73010/elife-73010-fig2-data1-v3.xlsx
Figure 2—source data 2

Viable cell count of Vibrio cholerae (Vc) in the infant mouse intestine with and without Pa pre-colonization.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/73010/elife-73010-fig2-data2-v3.xlsx
Figure 2—source data 3

Viable cell count of Vibrio cholerae (Vc) in the infant mouse intestine with and without Pa co-infection.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/73010/elife-73010-fig2-data3-v3.xlsx

We then evaluated if pre-colonization by Pa would influence Vc colonization in the small intestine. Four doses of Pa were inoculated into infant mice as described above. Negative control animals were inoculated with sterile media in place of Pa over the same dosing schedule. 12 hr after the last Pa inoculation (i.e., 48 hr after the first Pa inoculation), these animals were infected with Vc (106 CFU) to evaluate whether pre-colonization with Pa had an impact on Vc colonization. Although we do not fully understand the exact composition and growth dynamics of Vc and Pa inside the human gut, the pre-colonization/infection scheme was aimed to closely simulate the ratio of Pa to Vc observed in the gut microbiota of Vc-infected humans (Figures 1 and 2A). Comparing Pa pre-colonized mice to the control group, there was a significant increase (~10-fold, p≤0.0001) of Vc colonization in the mice pre-colonized with Pa (Figure 2B) 24 hr after infection. This enhanced intestinal colonization by Vc in the Pa-colonized mice was observed as early as 6 hr after infection and maintained throughout the colonization period (Figure 2—figure supplement 2). We did not monitor Vc counts in the small intestine beyond 24 hr after infection due to institutional restrictions. Using this infection model, similar to human infection, the Vc:Pa ratio inside the mouse intestine at the early stage of infection (6 hr after Vc infection, 18 hr after the last Pa inoculation) was variable, but was approximately 10:1 (Figure 2—figure supplement 2). We noticed that once Pa inoculation ended Pa abundance in the small intestine decreased over time but was still detectable 22 hr after the last inoculation (i.e., 10 hr after Vc infection; Figure 2—figure supplement 2). Thus, even though this animal model does not fully mimic Vc infection of human host, it allows a sufficient time to study the interaction between Vc and Pa in the intestinal environment.

We reasoned that it was also possible for Vc and Pa to encounter one another in the environment before entering the host. To model this scenario, Vc was mixed with Pa in a 1:1 ratio, and the mixture was used immediately for animal infection. In agreement with the results obtained with the Pa pre-colonization model, Vc intestinal colonization was significantly higher when coinfected with Pa than without Pa (Figure 2C). Given that Pa colonization did not overtly change the overall composition of the gut microbiota (Figure 2—figure supplement 1), collectively, our results demonstrate that the presence of a single gut microbiota species is sufficient to increase Vc host colonization. Our findings also illustrate that our approach to microbiome studies in humans (Levade et al., 2020; Midani et al., 2018) can be used as a predictive tool to identify gut microbes that alter Vc colonization.

Pa promotes Vc biofilm formation

To investigate if the increased Vc intestinal colonization is due to direct interactions between Vc and Pa, these two species were co-cultured and allowed to propagate for 3 days where both planktonic growth and pellicle formation (i.e., biofilm formation at the air–liquid interface) of both species were monitored. There was a small difference (less than twofold) in growth in the planktonic phase of either Vc or Pa in the co-cultures when compared to the cultures containing a single species (Figure 3A). However, more importantly, the Vc/Pa co-culture formed a pellicle that was visibly thicker and more robust than that formed by Vc monoculture (Figure 3B). The Pa monoculture did not form a visible pellicle. The co-culture pellicle samples were carefully lifted and removed from the culture medium, washed, and agitated to release single cells for enumeration of each species. Compared to Vc monoculture, the co-culture samples contained over 50-fold more Vc cells while the ratio of Vc to Pa approached approximately 1:1 (Figure 3C). Moreover, only a small fraction (0.01%) of Vc and Pa could be washed off from the isolated pellicles (Figure 3D), suggesting that these species are tightly integrated into the pellicle.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Paracoccus aminovorans (Pa) promotes biofilm formation of Vibrio cholerae (Vc).

(A) Planktonic cell counts from cultures used for pellicle analysis of Vc and Pa grown together or in monoculture. (B) Representative images of pellicles formed by Vc grown in monoculture and co-culture with Pa. Colony-forming unit (CFU) counts of each strain in (C) pellicle samples and (D) spent medium used to wash the pellicle. Bars on graphs depict median value with 95% confidence interval (CI) and individual data points plotted. Unpaired nonparametric U-test (Mann–Whitney): **p≤0.01.

Figure 3—source data 1

Viable cell count in for Paracoccus aminovorans (Pa) and Vibrio cholerae (Vc) in the planktonic phase in mono- and co-cultures.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/73010/elife-73010-fig3-data1-v3.xlsx
Figure 3—source data 2

Pellicle formation in Vc mono- and Vc/Pa coculture.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/73010/elife-73010-fig3-data2-v3.pdf
Figure 3—source data 3

Viable cell count in for Paracoccus aminovorans (Pa) and Vibrio cholerae (Vc) in the pellicle formed by mono- and co-cultures.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/73010/elife-73010-fig3-data3-v3.xlsx
Figure 3—source data 4

Viable cell count in for Paracoccus aminovorans (Pa) and Vibrio cholerae (Vc) released by washing of the pellicle formed by mono- and co-cultures.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/73010/elife-73010-fig3-data4-v3.xlsx

Based on the above data, we hypothesize that Vc and Pa form dual-species biofilms at the air–liquid interface. This is unexpected because Vc is known to form a clonal community in both in vitro and in vivo biofilms and these are known to exclude other species, including even planktonic Vc cells (Millet, 2014; Nadell et al., 2015). To test this hypothesis, we transferred the co-culture pellicles onto coverslips for imaging with confocal microscopy (Figure 4). All cells in the pellicle were stained with FM 4-64 membrane dye, and Vc cells were differentiated from Pa using a constitutively produced mNeonGreen reporter (Shaner et al., 2013) expressed from a neutral Vc locus (Dalia et al., 2014). Pa cells have a cocci morphology that is distinct from the characteristic Vc curved-rod shape. In the Vc/Pa co-culture pellicles, we observed a continuous film structure spanning the entire pellicle (Figure 4A). Notably, cocci-shaped Pa cells were clearly visible in the co-culture pellicle (Figure 4B and C), consistent with the CFU quantification in Figure 3A. Interestingly, Pa cells were found throughout the pellicle, with a higher abundance in the bottom layer (Figure 4D–F) and in close association with Vc cells. In summary, we found that Vc and Pa coexist stably in the pellicle structure and this relationship may explain the mechanism by which Pa resists displacement in humans during active Vc infection.

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Representative microscopy images of Vibrio cholerae (Vc) and Paracoccus aminovorans (Pa) dual-species pellicles.

(A) Large-scale cross-sectional image of the internal structure in a co-culture pellicle. All cells are stained with FM 4-64 and Vc cells constitutively express mNeonGreen. Therefore, the red signal in the overlay image corresponds primarily to Pa cells. The Pa cells can also be distinguished from Vc cells by their characteristic cocci shape. (B) Zoom-in view of the region highlighted in (A). (C) Zoom-in view of the region highlighted in (B). (D) Cross-sectional views of the region shown in (C), at the bottom of the pellicle. Pa cells exist mainly at the pellicle–liquid interface, with clusters of Pa cells penetrating into the interior of the pellicle. (E, F) Top (E) and bottom (F) views of the co-culture structure shown in (B), rendered in 3D.

Next, we used a standard crystal violet (CV) microtiter plate assay (O’Toole, 2011) to quantitatively evaluate how Vc and Pa interact under pellicle-forming conditions. Vc and Pa were simultaneously inoculated into the wells of microplates in two different Vc:Pa ratios (1:1 and 1:10). We also tested if the viability of Pa was crucial for this interaction by using heat-killed Pa as a control. Consistent with our pellicle compositional analysis, Vc formed a more robust biofilm than Pa under these conditions as demonstrated by increased CV staining in wells containing Vc only compared to wells containing Pa only (Figure 5A). Importantly, CV staining was increased in wells containing Vc and live Pa compared to wells with Vc only in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 5A). In contrast, CV staining was not different in wells containing Vc and heat-killed Pa compared to wells with Vc only (Figure 5A).

Figure 5
Download asset Open asset
Paracoccus aminovorans (Pa) increases biofilm production in Vibrio cholerae (Vc).

Crystal violet assays were performed in 96-well microtiter plates to quantify biofilm formation. Overnight-grown (A) wild-type Vc or (B) ∆vpsL mutant and Pa cultures were diluted to a final concentration of 106 colony-forming unit (CFU) in a total volume of 200 µL/well. In samples containing a 1:10 ratio of Vc/Pa, Pa was diluted to a final concentration of 107 CFU. Samples with heat-killed (HK) Pa are specified on the x-axis. Microtiter plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hr. Crystal violet staining and ethanol solubilization were performed as previously described (O’Toole, 2011). Absorbance of the crystal violet stain was measured at 550 nm using a BioTek Synergy HTX plate reader. Data are represented with horizontal lines indicating the mean with standard deviation. Unpaired U-test (Mann–Whitney); **p≤0.01. (C) Vc and Pa were co-cultured at a 1:10 ratio statically for 72 hr at 30°C. At the specified time points, culture from the air–liquid interface was sampled and the RNA extracted. Relative vpsL transcript levels were determined by qRT-PCR using housekeeping gene groEL and the ΔΔCT analytic method. Bars on graphs depict mean with standard error of mean (SEM). Mann–Whitney U-test was performed, **p<0.01, *p<0.05, NS p>0.05.

Figure 5—source data 1

Crystal violet assays of biofilm formed by Vc mono- and Vc/Pa co-cultures using WT with live or heat-killed Pa.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/73010/elife-73010-fig5-data1-v3.xlsx
Figure 5—source data 2

Crystal violet staining of biofilm formed by Vc mono- and Vc/Pa co-cultures using vpsL mutants with live and heat-killed Pa.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/73010/elife-73010-fig5-data2-v3.xlsx
Figure 5—source data 3

qRT-PCR analysis of vpsL gene in cells in biofilm formed by Vc mono- and Vc/Pa co-cultures.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/73010/elife-73010-fig5-data3-v3.xlsx

To replicate our mouse experiments (Figure 2), we also tested if the order in which the two species encounter one another is critical for the Vc biofilm enhancement phenotype. Pa was grown in wells 24 hr before the addition of Vc. As in our previous results in the co-inoculation experiment, an increase in CV staining was observed in wells in which the two species were added sequentially, but not in the wells with Vc only (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). Moreover, wells pre-incubated with heat-killed Pa and subsequently inoculated with Vc had no increase in CV staining compared to wells inoculated with Vc alone (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). Together, our biofilm quantification data suggest that the presence of Pa, regardless of the order of encounter, results in an enhanced biofilm formation of Vc.

Vibrio exopolysaccharide is essential for a stable biofilm structure formed by Vc and Pa

To understand what biofilm component is required for the enhancement of biofilm production in Vc/Pa co-culture, we repeated the above experiments with a ∆vpsL Vc mutant that cannot produce the Vibrio exopolysaccharide (VPS) necessary for mature biofilm formation (Yildiz and Schoolnik, 1999). In contrast to our observations in culture of a vpsL+ strain, there was no significant increase in CV staining in wells with ∆vpsL mutant and Pa co-culture when compared to wells with the ∆vpsL mutants only (Figure 5B). The biofilm formation defects of the Vc ∆vpsL mutants and the increased biofilm formation response in the presence of Pa could be restored by the introduction of a plasmid constitutively expressing vpsL (Figure 3—figure supplement 1).

We then tested if the presence of Pa changes vps gene expression in Vc as one of the mechanisms responsible for enhanced biofilm formation. Vc monoculture and Vc/Pa co-culture were grown statically to induce pellicle formation, and cells near the air–liquid interface where pellicle was formed were collected. Using qRT-PCR, we determined that the relative transcript levels of vpsL (the first and a representative gene in the vpsII operon in Vc) were significantly higher in the Vc/Pa co-culture than that in the Vc monoculture after 24–48 hr of growth (Figure 5C). There was no significant difference in vpsL transcript levels after 72 hr of co-culture. Our results suggest that Pa induces Vc biofilm gene expression when the two species are cultured together, especially at the early stage of interaction, creating the conditions for increased pellicle formation in co-cultures.

To further investigate the role of VPS in promoting co-culture biofilms, we stained the co-culture pellicle in situ with wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), a common stain for the N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) moieties that is a component of VPS (Yildiz et al., 2014). Note that for Gram-negative bacteria, including Vc and Pa, the WGA lectin molecules do not pass through the outer membrane of healthy cells. Indeed, control experiments show that healthy Pa cells and Vc ∆vpsL mutant cells do not show positive VPS staining (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). To avoid spatial overlap with the membrane stain (excited at 561 nm), the Vc cells used in this experiment express a cyan-fluorescent protein SCFP3A cytosolically (excited at 445 nm), and the WGA is conjugated to Oregon Green (excited at 488 nm). Figure 6A shows a Vc/Pa co-culture pellicle, in which extensive WGA signal is observed. Zoom-in view of the pellicle shows the characteristic envelope structures around clusters of Vc cells (Figure 6B), consistent with the known VPS staining pattern in submerged Vc biofilms (Berk et al., 2012). We also noticed that regions with strong VPS signal are not necessarily spatially correlated with clusters of Pa cells.

Figure 6
Download asset Open asset
Vibrio cholerae/Paracoccus aminovorans (Vc/Pa) co-culture biofilms depend on Vibrio exopolysaccharide (VPS).

(A) Representative cross-sectional view of the bottom layer of a co-culture pellicle with wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) staining. Vc cells constitutively express SCFP3A cytosolically; all cells were stained with FM 4-64 membrane stain; WGA is conjugated to Oregon Green and shown in yellow. Note that WGA also stained dead cells with an exposed peptidoglycan layer, corresponding to the bright spots in the image. Scale bar: 20 µm. (B) Zoom-in view of the region highlighted by the white box in (A). Shown are separate channels from Vc cell fluorescence (SCFP3A, blue), membrane staining (FM 4-64, red), WGA staining (Oregon Green, yellow), and the overlay of the three channels. Pa cells can be distinguished from Vc cells by both the absence of SCFP3A fluorescence and the distinct cell shape. Scale bar: 5 µm. (C) Representative cross-sectional view of a co-culture pellicle in which the Vc cells harbor a PvpsL-mNeonGreen reporter. Scale bar: 20 µm. (D) Zoom-in view of the region highlighted by the white box in (C). Shown are separate channels from Vc cell fluorescence (SCFP3A, blue), membrane staining (FM 4-64, red), vpsL reporter (mNeonGreen, yellow), and the overlay of the three channels. Scale bar: 5 µm.

Next, to demonstrate that co-culturing with Pa increases vps gene expression, we used a Vc strain harboring a PvpsL-mNeonGreen reporter and repeated the imaging of the co-cultured pellicle. Figure 6C shows that in the co-cultured pellicle vspL expression is elevated in subpopulations of Vc cells in the co-culture. Zoom-in views show that even adjacent to Pa cell clusters some Vc cells have high vspL expression and others have basal-level expression (Figure 6D, Figure 4—figure supplement 1). These results are consistent with the qRT-PCR results in Figure 5C, suggesting that Pa induces Vc biofilm gene expression in co-culture. Together, these results suggest that the physical presence of Pa in the co-culture pellicle augments the production of VPS in Vc cells, leading to increased Vc biofilm formation; the Pa cells, in turn, require VPS to be integrated into the 3D structure of the pellicle.

Enhancement of Vc host colonization by Pa depends on biofilm exopolysaccharide

Biofilm-grown Vc cells are known to be more infectious in humans due to increased resistance to gastric pH and higher expression of virulence factors (e.g., such as the toxin co-regulated pilus, which mediates host colonization) compared to planktonically grown cells (Tamayo et al., 2010; Gallego-Hernandez et al., 2020; Zhu and Mekalanos, 2003). We hypothesize that because Vc biofilm formation is enhanced in the presence of Pa this results in increased virulence inside the host in a VPS-dependent manner. Previous studies report that Vc El Tor biotype strains require certain growth conditions (e.g., AKI) to induce virulence gene expression in vitro (DiRita et al., 1996; Iwanaga et al., 1986). However, these specific growth conditions include culture agitation, which would prevent proper interaction of Vc and Pa. Therefore, using qRT-PCR, we measured virulence gene expression in Vc/Pa co-culture and compared this to Vc monoculture grown statically in identical conditions to those that favor biofilm formation. As expected, ctxA and tcpA relative transcript levels were low in all samples; however, there was a modest increase in the expression of these two virulence genes in the Vc/Pa co-culture compared to the Vc monoculture (Figure 7—figure supplement 1).

To further test our hypothesis and measure if the effect of the Vc/Pa biofilm interaction impacts host colonization, we compared the colonization efficiency between wild-type (WT) or the ∆vpsL mutants in infant mice with and without Pa pre-colonization. As shown previously (Fong et al., 2010), the ∆vpsL mutant was able to colonize the mouse small intestine as well as the WT vpsL+ strain, confirming that VPS is not absolutely required for host colonization when Vc was administered to the animals alone. In contrast, while Pa increased WT vpsL+ Vc colonization, the ∆vpsL mutant did not exhibit the enhanced colonization phenotype in the Pa pre-colonized mice (Figure 7A). Host colonization enhancement caused by Pa pre-colonization could be restored in the ∆vpsL mutants with a plasmid constitutively expressing vpsL, but not with the empty vector (Figure 7—figure supplement 2). Similar results were observed using the co-infection model; when Vc ∆vpsL mutants were coinfected with Pa, there was no increase in host colonization (Figure 7B). Together, we concluded that the enhancement of Vc intestinal colonization in the presence Pa is dependent on the VPS, consistent with our in vitro data.

Figure 7 with 2 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Enhanced Vibrio cholerae (Vc) intestinal colonization in the presence of Paracoccus aminovorans (Pa) is dependent on Vibrio exopolysaccharide (VPS) and accessory matrix proteins.

(A) 3-day-old infant mice were intragastrically inoculated with LB or 107 colony-forming unit (CFU) of Pa every 12 hr for a period of 48 hr, and subsequently infected with 106 CFU of a Vc strain defective for extracellular matrix production (∆vpsL). Mice were sacrificed 20–24 hr post infection, and small intestine samples were taken to enumerate Vc CFU. Data from infection with the wild-type Vc strain (Figure 2B) are shown again here for comparison purposes. (B) Vc WT or different biofilm mutants were mixed with Pa in 1:1 ratio, and the mixture was used immediately for animal infection. Mice were sacrificed 20–24 hr post infection, and small intestine samples were taken to enumerate Vc CFU. Each symbol represents an individual mouse. Data from infection with the WT Vc strain (Figure 2C) are shown again here for comparison purposes. (C) Crystal violet assays performed in 96-well plates to quantify pellicle formation. Overnight cultures of Vc ΔrbmA, ΔrbmC Δbap1, and Pa were diluted in fresh LB and plated as 200 µL/well. Samples were co-cultured in 1:10 ratios of Vc/Pa and incubated at 37°C for 24 hr. Crystal violet staining was then performed as previously described. For all panels, horizontal lines indicating medianwith standard deviation are shown. Unpaired Mann–Whitney U-test; ****p≤0.0001, ***p≤0.001, **p≤0.01, *p≤0.05, NS p>0.05.

Figure 7—source data 1

Viable cell count of Vc in the mouse intestine with and without Pa pre-colonization using Vc WT and vpsL mutants.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/73010/elife-73010-fig7-data1-v3.xlsx
Figure 7—source data 2

Viable cell count of Vc in the mouse intestine with and without Pa pre-colonization using Vc WT and different biofilm matrix protein mutants.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/73010/elife-73010-fig7-data2-v3.xlsx
Figure 7—source data 3

Crystal violet staining of biofilm formed by different biofilm matrix protein mutants with and without Pa.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/73010/elife-73010-fig7-data3-v3.xlsx

Accessary biofilm matrix proteins are involved in Pa and Vc interaction

Mature Vc biofilm is stabilized with a variety of accessory matrix proteins in addition to the VPS (Berk et al., 2012; Fong et al., 2006; Fong and Yildiz, 2007). To interrogate the roles of these components in the interactions between Vc and Pa, we tested mutants lacking the cell-cell adhesion proteins RbmA (Berk et al., 2012; Fong et al., 2006; Absalon et al., 2011) and mutants lacking surface adhesion redundantly conferred by RbmC and Bap1 (Berk et al., 2012; Fong and Yildiz, 2007; Absalon et al., 2011) for their ability to increase biofilm formation in the presence of Pa using CV assays (Figure 7C). When compared to the wells containing the ∆rbmA mutant alone, the CV staining was higher in the wells with the ∆rbmA mutant co-cultured with Pa. However, the increase was not as high in the ∆rbmA mutant/Pa co-culture compared to that in WT Vc/Pa co-culture (Figure 7C). Furthermore, the presence of Pa did not increase CV staining in the wells containing the ∆rbmC ∆bap1 mutants (Figure 7C) because the ∆rbmC ∆bap1 mutant is not able to adhere to the interface.

We then performed the infant mouse colonization experiments with Vc biofilm matrix protein mutants using the Pa co-infection model to test the roles of these proteins in vivo. For this series of experiments, each Vc biofilm mutant was coinfected into the animals with Pa in 1:1 ratio. In agreement with our in vitro results, while host colonization was significantly higher for WT Vc coinfected with Pa than without Pa (Figure 2C), ∆rbmA mutants did not show any increase in host colonization when coinfected with Pa, and ∆rbmC ∆bap1 mutants demonstrated increased colonization with Pa but less colonization compared with WT Vc co-infection with Pa (Figure 7B). These results indicate that the ability of Vc to form a structurally intact biofilm is important for the enhancement of colonization facilitated by the presence of Pa.

Discussion

Evidence that the composition of the gut microbiota influences the clinical outcomes of enteric infections in humans is accumulating (Ubeda et al., 2017; Weil et al., 2019). Several studies have identified commensal species and underlying colonization resistance mechanisms that could be protective against Vc infection. While these studies suggest that microbiota species reduce Vc virulence through various mechanisms during the early stages of infection (Alavi et al., 2020; Hsiao et al., 2014; You et al., 2019), the precise role of these colonization resistance mechanisms in impacting susceptibility to cholera in humans has only begun to be appreciated. For instance, a gut bacterium in the genus Blautia was recently found to encode functions that confer colonization resistance (e.g., bile salt hydrolase) to Vc infection (Alavi et al., 2020). Consistent with this finding, our previous stool microbiome study also independently identified that a species in the genus Blautia is correlated with decreased susceptibility to Vc infection (Levade et al., 2020; Midani et al., 2018).

While previous studies have identified microbiota-associated mechanisms that are protective against Vc infection, examples of interactions between Vc and a human-associated microbiota species that increases Vc pathogenicity are scarce. Although Escherichia coli and Vc are believed to reside in different intestinal niches, one previous study showed that an atypical E. coli isolated from a mouse that does not ferment lactose can increase the virulence of a quorum-sensing (QS)-defective Vc strain N16961 (Yoon et al., 2016). How QS-proficient Vc strains, which are prevalent among toxigenic clinical isolates (Wang et al., 2011), respond to E. coli in the human gut remains to be studied. In contrast, a recent study showed that E. coli motility facilitates aggregation of these two organisms in a dual-species biofilm, but there was no impact of such aggregation on Vc intestinal colonization (Wang et al., 2021). Indeed, coaggregation between Vc and other microbiota species has been observed (Toh et al., 2019), but these associations are not known to have a direct influence on Vc pathogenicity. This is consistent with our prior human studies in which E. coli species were present in the gut microbiota of persons during active Vc infection, but these were not correlated with active Vc infection (Midani et al., 2018). Our findings highlight the importance of coupling mechanistic studies (in vitro and animal models) with human microbiome data analysis to pinpoint the relevant species and interactions involved in enteric infections.

Here, we show that the presence of a human gut microbe Pa promotes Vc host colonization, which is consistent with our prior human study in which Pa was more likely to be present in persons infected with Vc. This raises the possibility that uncharacterized interactions between Vc and members of the gut microbiota may exacerbate Vc virulence and contribute to increased morbidity. While our previous study showed that Vc has a better growth yield in the conditioned medium (CM) harvested from stationary culture of Pa than in the CM harvested from stationary culture Vc, the growth yield of Vc in the CM harvested from stationary culture of Pa does not reach as high as Vc in fresh medium (Midani et al., 2018). These results suggest that Pa does not actively secrete any molecules that enhance Vc growth. Most likely, the limited growth yield increase of Vc in the CM harvested from Pa is due to the presence of a trace amount of nutrients that have been exhausted in the CM harvested from Vc. In contrast, this study establishes a plausible mechanism used by Pa, and perhaps other gut microbes, to increase the virulence of Vc through induction of biofilm formation, a physiological state in which Vc is known to increase expression of other virulence factors critical for human infection and disease (Tamayo et al., 2010; Gallego-Hernandez et al., 2020). Vc biofilms have also been demonstrated to deform and even damage tissue-engineered soft epithelia mimicking the host tissue (Cont et al., 2020), suggesting that in vivo-formed biofilm structures could negatively impact host gut physiology.

While VPS and other biofilm components are not usually considered critical host colonization factors, we found that these macromolecular structures were essential for the enhancement of Vc host colonization induced by Pa. Whether these components mediate other Vc-gut microbe interaction has not been studied. Interestingly, many gut microbes appear to exist in the form of mixed-species biofilms on mucosal surfaces (Sadiq et al., 2021), suggesting that microbiota-induced biofilm enhancement could play a major role in modulating virulence of other pathogens. Many structural components, regulatory factors, and signaling transduction pathways that control biofilm formation in Vc have been well characterized (Teschler et al., 2015), and these factors could be targeted for manipulation by other gut microbes that modulate Vc virulence. For example, 3,5-dimethylpyrazin-2-ol (DPO) was recently discovered as a new class of Vc QS autoinducer that binds to the transcription factor VqmA to activate expression of vqmR, which encodes a small regulatory RNA that downregulates Vc biofilm formation. The VqmA-VqmR system can be activated both in vitro by E. coli and in vivo by B. obeum (Hsiao et al., 2014; Papenfort et al., 2017), and results in suppression of biofilm formation. Interestingly, Pa demonstrates the opposite tendency by promoting Vc biofilm formation, with implications for the enhancement of Vc colonization, in contrast to other commensal bacteria.

Many aspects of the Vc/Pa interaction are still unclear. What is the selective advantage that fosters the formation of dual-species biofilm? Investigation of the structure–function relationship in other multispecies biofilms, such as dental biofilms, demonstrates a coordinated organization of each species that allows for optimal nutrient and oxygen usage, as well as mechanical stability (Christensen et al., 2002; Mark Welch et al., 2016). While we did not observe any growth yield enhancement in the planktonic phase of the co-culture, there was a significant increase of Vc and Pa abundance in the co-culture pellicle at the air–liquid interface. Thus, a possible driving force of this interaction could be the optimization of nutrient sharing and distribution, or removal of toxic metabolites accumulated during growth. Biofilm formation also changes the biophysical properties of the microbial community that could facilitate host adhesion (Jiang et al., 2021). The exact mechanism used by these two species to detect and coordinate with each other remains unclear. Secreted small molecules produced by Pa do not appear to impact Vc as evidenced by our prior studies in which Vc cultured in Pa spent-cell supernatant did not result in increased biofilm formation (Midani et al., 2018). Therefore, we surmised that the close physical association between Vc and Pa cells in space in the co-culture pellicles is required for the enhanced biofilm formation. This hypothesis is supported by our microscopy analysis. The Vc–Pa interaction has two reciprocal aspects: first, Pa activates the production of VPS in Vc cells, leading to enhanced pellicle formation. Future characterizations of Pa could potentially elucidate the underlying molecular mechanism of this effect Pa has on Vc. Second, in order to be integrated into the pellicle structure, Pa cells seem to physically adhere to Vc cells or alternatively to the extracellular matrix that Vc cells secrete. Future biochemical and biophysical studies to investigate this relationship may provide new insights about the interactions between Pa and Vc biofilm, and about pathogen–gut microbe interactions in general. Other members of the Paracoccus genus are known to form biofilms and encode adhesins to facilitate surface attachment (Yoshida et al., 2017; Srinandan et al., 2010), and the potential role of these adhesins in facilitating interaction with Vc remains to be studied.

In addition to VPS, the main structural component of Vc biofilms, we have shown that matrix proteins, including RbmA, Bap1, and RbmC, are also critical for the enhancement of Vc biofilm by Pa in the neonatal mouse colonization model. Specifically, we showed that cell–cell adhesion, conferred by RbmA, is more important than cell–surface adhesion conferred by RbmC/Bap1. Previous work established that RbmA is responsible for maintaining dense, structurally robust biofilms (Berk et al., 2012; Absalon et al., 2011; Fong et al., 2017; Yan et al., 2016). Therefore, we contemplate that the ΔrbmA mutant biofilm may be mechanically impaired and become destroyed in the gut environment by physical forces such as peristaltic flow, food particle collision, and others. Likewise, such physical forces could impede biofilm colonization when biofilm adhesins are absent, which explains the slight defect in colonization of the ΔrbmCΔbap1 mutant. Indeed, recently Vc cells have been visualized in the mouse gut and the biofilm population has been shown to be located primarily at the tip of the villi, where fluid shear is strongest (Gallego-Hernandez et al., 2020). These relationships may be further revealed by additional imaging of the distribution of the Vc and Pa cells and potentially other commensal bacteria in the new mouse model presented here.

In conclusion, we describe a novel interaction between Vc and a gut microbe found in high abundance in Vc-infected persons that leads to a significant change in Vc biofilm behaviors, as well as an increase in the virulence of the pathogen. Our findings are also consistent with other observations that rare gut microbial species can have significant impacts on microbial ecosystems (Jousset et al., 2017). This study adds to the growing number of pathogen–gut microbial species interactions that may impact outcomes in human diseases.

Materials and methods

Prior published study sample collection and analysis

Request a detailed protocol

In a prior study, we enrolled household contacts of persons hospitalized with cholera at the International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b; Midani et al., 2018). Briefly, in this previously published study, household contacts were followed prospectively with rectal swab sampling, 30 days of clinical symptom report, and vibriocidal titer measurements, and 16S rRNA sequencing was performed on rectal swab sampling from the day of enrollment in the study (Midani et al., 2018). Persons with evidence of Vc infection at the time of enrollment in the study were compared to those who did not have evidence of infection in a model to detect gut microbes that were differentially abundant during Vc infection (Midani et al., 2018). Vc infection was defined as Vc DNA identified on 16S rRNA sequencing or a positive Vc stool culture. In this previously published study, we used a machine learning method called a support vector machine (SVM), which utilizes patterns of OTU relative abundance to detect OTUs associated with infected compared to uninfected persons. This SVM was used with a recursive feature elimination algorithm that simplifies models and increases accuracy of the identification of differentially associated OTUs by removing uninformative bacterial taxa (Midani et al., 2018). For this study, we reexamined the microbiome data from household contacts at the time of enrollment to quantify the abundance of 16S rRNA reads that mapped to Pa OTUs between uninfected study participants and infected participants.

Strains and culture conditions

Request a detailed protocol

All Vc strains used in this study are streptomycin-resistant derivatives of C6706, a 1991 El Tor O1 clinical isolate from Peru (Thelin and Taylor, 1996). As luxO mutations are readily isolated in this strain (Jung et al., 2015; Stutzmann and Blokesch, 2016), DNA sequencing or cell-density-dependent Pqrr4-lux reporter assay (Jung et al., 2015) was performed to confirm our strains carry a functional WT allele of luxO. The in-frame ∆vpsL deletion mutants used in various assays were previously described (Waters et al., 2008). The ∆rbmA and ∆rbmC∆bap1 mutants were constructed by allelic exchange (Skorupski and Taylor, 1996) using specific suicide vectors described before (Nadell et al., 2015; Yan et al., 2016). Vc strains used for microscopy experiments, Δvc1807::Ptac–mNeonGreen, Δvc1807::Ptac–SCFP3A-specR, and Δvc1807::Ptac–SCFP3A-specR ΔLacIZ::PvpsL-mNeonGreen, were constructed using natural transformation as previous described (Dalia et al., 2014). For vpsL complementation, the reading frame of vpsL was first amplified by PCR using Phusion DNA polymerase, C6706 genomic DNA, and primers gataacaatttcacaatgaaggaaaaaagcagaatacgcattac and gaattctgtttcctgttaatacgcgttttttccaacaaatcctttg. Vector pMMB67eh was linearized by PCR using primers tgtgaaattgttatccgctc and caggaaacagaattcgag. Gibson assembly was used to fuse the two fragments together. The resulting plasmid was transformed into DH5α and confirmed by sequencing. This plasmid was introduced into Vc by triparental mating with a helper plasmid pRK2013. The Pa used in our experiments is a StrepR isolate derived from the ATCC-type strain (ATCC #49632). Vc and Pa overnight cultures were grown with aeration in LB at 30°C. Heat-killed strains were incubated at 60°C for 2 hr prior to experimentation. Unless specified, media were supplemented with streptomycin (Sm, 100 μg/mL) and chloramphenicol (Cm, 10 μg/mL) when appropriate.

Animal studies

Request a detailed protocol

For establishing colonization of the microbiota species, 3-day-old suckling CD-1 mice (Charles River Laboratories) were fasted for 1 hr, then orally dosed with Pa at a concentration of 107 CFU using 30-gauge plastic tubing, after which the animals were placed with a lactating dam for 10–12 hr and monitored in accordance with the regulations of Tufts Comparative Medicine Services. This inoculation scheme was followed an additional three times at 12, 24, and 36 hr. 12 hr after the last inoculation (i.e., 48 hr after the first inoculation), mice were infected with 106 CFU of Vc, WT C6706 or mutant strain, or LB as a vehicle control in a gavage volume of 50 μL to evaluate the effect of Pa pre-colonization on Vc host colonization. At 18–24 hr post infection, animals were sacrificed, and small intestine tissue samples were collected and homogenized for CFU enumeration. WT Vc is lac+ and appears blue on medium containing X-gal while Pa appears white on the same medium. For co-infection experiments, cultures of Vc and Pa strains were mixed in a 1:1 ratio and mice were orally dosed with a final bacterial count of 106 CFU. Mice were sacrificed 20–24 hr post infection, and small intestine samples were processed as outlined above to evaluate the colonization efficiency of both species.

Ethics statement

Request a detailed protocol

All animal experiments were performed at and in accordance with the rules of the Tufts Comparative Medicine Services (CMS), following the guidelines of the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA), as well as the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All procedures were performed with approval of the Tufts University CMS (protocol# B 2018-99 and #B2021-81). Euthanasia was performed in accordance with the guidelines provided by the AVMA and was approved by the Tufts CMS. The previously published study from which Figure 1 is derived (Midani et al., 2018) received approval from the Ethical Review Committee at the icddr,b and the institutional review boards of Massachusetts General Hospital and the University of Washington, and in that study participants or their guardians provided written informed consent.

Pellicle composition analysis

Request a detailed protocol

To assess pellicle composition, overnight cultures of Vc and Pa were inoculated into glass culture tubes (18 × 150 mm) containing 2 mL LB media in a ratio of 1:10 Vc (106) to Pa (107) CFU, and co-cultures were allowed to grow statically at room temperature for 3 days. Following static growth, floating pellicles were carefully transferred into sterile 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes containing 1 mL LB, and samples were gently spun down to wash away any planktonic bacteria. Planktonic cells were removed, and cell pellets of pellicle samples were resuspended in 1 mL of fresh LB media. All samples, including supernatant from the pellicle wash step, were serially diluted and plated on Sm/X-Gal media to differentiate Vc (blue) and Pa (white) colonies.

Crystal violet biomass assays

View detailed protocol

CV biofilm assays were performed as described previously in 96-well flat-bottom clear, tissue-culture-treated polystyrene microplates (Thermo Fisher; O’Toole, 2011). In each well, Vc (106 CFUs) and/or Pa (106 or 107 CFUs) were inoculated into 200 μL of medium. Plates were then sealed using a gas-permeable sealing film (BrandTech) and incubated at 37°C. Planktonic culture was removed after 24 hr of incubation, and plates were washed with distilled water once. Attached biofilms were stained with 0.1% CV at room temperature for 15–20 min. The amount of biomass adhered to the sides of each well was quantified by dissolving the CV in 95% ethanol, and the absorbance of the resulting solution was measured at 550 nm using a plate reader.

Microscopy

Request a detailed protocol

Liquid LB culture of Vc, Pa, and co-cultures (Vc:Pa = 1:10) were prepared according to the procedures described above. To image pellicles, we used a modified literature procedure (Fiebig, 2019). Monocultures and co-culture pellicles were first prepared following the procedure described above, except that 3 mL of the culture was incubated in a 5 mL culture tube. After 3 days of incubation at room temperature, the pellicles were carefully picked up by the large end of a 200 µL pipette tip, transferred to a coverslip (22 × 60 mm, no. 1.5), and immediately covered with another square coverslip to prevent drying. The LB medium contained 4 µg/mL FM 4-64 stain (Thermo Fisher) to stain all cells. To stain VPS, the LB medium additionally contained 4 µg/mL of WGA conjugated to Oregon Green (Thermo Fisher). The stained biofilms were imaged with a Nikon-W1 confocal microscope using ×60 water objective (numerical aperture = 1.20). The imaging window was 222 × 222 µm2. For large-scale view, a 5 × 5 tiling was performed. For zoom-in view, the z-step size was 0.5 µm and the pixel size was 108 nm. For large-scale view, the z-step size was 1 µm and the pixel size was 216 nm. The mNeonGreen (or SCFP3A) expressed by Vc was imaged at 488 nm (or 445 nm) excitation, FM 4-64 at 561 nm, and WGA-Oregon Green at 488 nm with the corresponding filters. All presented images are raw images processed from Nikon Element software.

Quantitative-real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) for Vc virulence factors

Request a detailed protocol

Liquid LB culture of Vc, Pa, and co-cultures (Vc:Pa = 1:10) were prepared according to the procedures described above. Samples were inoculated and then incubated statically for 72 hr at room temperature. To measure the relative transcript levels of vpsL, ctxA, and tcpA at the air–liquid interface, 500 µL of liquid culture at the surface of the culture and any present pellicle were extracted at 24, 48, and 72 hr. Samples were treated with TRIzol LS (Invitrogen) and RNA was extracted using chloroform (Fisher Chemical), isopropanol (Fisher Chemical), and ethanol (Fisher Chemical). Extracted RNA was treated with TURBO DNase (Invitrogen) to remove DNA. Integrity and purity were assessed using NanoDrop (ND-1000, Thermo Fisher). cDNA synthesis was performed on 1 µg of RNA using High Capacity cDNA reverse transcriptase (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Resulting cDNA was diluted 1:2, and RT-PCR was performed to measure CtxA, TcpA, and VpsL expression. The primers used were (CtxA-F) 5′-TTGGAGCATTCCCACAACCC-3′, (CtxA-R) 5′-GCTCCAGCAGCAGATGGTTA-3’′ – amplicon 109 bp (Zhao et al., 2018), (TcpA-F) 5′-CGCTGAGACCACACCCATA-3′, (TcpA-R) 5′-GAAGAAGTTTGTAAAAGAAGAACACG-3′ – amplicon 103 bp (Fykse et al., 2007), (VpsL-R) 5′-CATTCGTCGAACATCGCTGG-3′, (VpsL-F) 5′-GTAGCGATTCACTATGGTGCGA-3′ – amplicon 130 bp, (groEL-F) 5′-ATGATGTTGCCCACGCTAGA-3′, and (groEL-R) 5′-GGTTATCGCTGCGGTAGAAG-3′ – amplicon 117 bp (Fykse et al., 2007). GroEL was used for housekeeping gene. Real-time PCR was performed using SYBR green (Invitrogen) with 0.3 µM of specific primer sets and 2 µL of cDNA sample. PCR amplification was conducted on the StepOne RT-PCR System (Applied Biosystems) with the following conditions: 95°C for 5 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s, 58°C for 10 s, and 72°C for 15 s, and a final melting temperature analysis of PCR products. Each qRT-PCR run included a no-template and water negative control. Each sample was performed in duplicate. The ΔΔCT method was used to calculate fold change in expression levels (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001).

Statistics

All statistical analyses were performed on GraphPad Prism v9.2 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Error bars in the figures depict the median with a 95% confidence interval as indicated. Based on the experimental design, either standard t-test or Mann–Whitney test was used to compare treatment groups as indicated in each figure legend.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided for Figures 1-3, 5, 7.

The following previously published data sets were used

References

Decision letter

  1. Melanie Blokesch
    Reviewing Editor; Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
  2. Wendy S Garrett
    Senior Editor; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, United States

Our editorial process produces two outputs: i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Impact of a human gut microbe on Vibrio cholerae host colonization through biofilm enhancement" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Wendy Garrett as the Senior Editor. The reviewers have opted to remain anonymous.

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Based on this consultation, it was concluded that additional data are required to support the claim of the study, namely that Paracoccus aminovorans enhances biofilm production by Vibrio cholerae. In this context, the experts are keen to see transcriptional and/or protein-level data shat show changes in expression of the vps genes or those genes that encode for the accessory proteins (RbmA, RbmC, Bap1 etc). Furthermore, transcriptional or protein-level data of canonical virulence factors-encoding genes (ctx, tcp)/ proteins (CTX by ELISA or TcpA by WB for instance) should be provided, as those data would support the notion on increased virulence of Vc in the presence of Pa.

Essential revisions:

1) Provide data to show that Pa increases biofilm production through transcriptional or protein-level data. Indeed, as Midani et al. (2018) showed that conditioned medium from P. aminovorans significantly increased growth of V. cholerae, it seems essential for your study to distinguish between increased growth (and hence more biofilm in the pellicles) versus biofilm enhancement, as claimed in your manuscript.

2) Please evaluate the impact of Pa on the production of V. cholerae's main virulence factors.

3) Please provide a reanalysis of the data shown in Figure 1 to show the abundance/normalized abundance of P.a. and V.c.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

– In Figure 1A, the authors could determine the relative abundance of V. cholerae in the 22 infected individuals to demonstrate that there a positive correlation between the abundance of P. aminovorans and the abundance of V. cholerae in the 6 individuals with a significantly higher proportion of P. aminovorans. The authors could also determine the "Normalized Abundance" of P. aminovorans and V. cholerae in these samples.

– The authors could also determine CFU of P. aminovorans in their suckling mouse model of infection to determine whether there is a correlation between the abundance of P. aminovorans and the abundance of V. cholerae during infection of these mice. This would also allow them to determine whether the ratio of abundance in mice is also 1:1 as observed in human samples.

– In Supplemental Figure 1, the authors could analyze their microbiota sequencing data to determine whether members of the Proteobacteria Phylum are being displaced by P. aminovorans at the Family level.

– The authors could measure the expression of a V. cholerae virulence factor (such as tcpA) by qPCR to determine whether there is an increase in virulence factor expression in V. cholerae in the presence of P. aminovorans (Figure 2B and Figure 2C).

– In Lines 166-168, the authors state, "Our findings also illustrate that our approach to microbiome studies in humans (6, 7) can be used as a predictive tool to identify gut microbes that alter Vc virulence." The authors should replace the word "virulence" with "colonization" which seems more appropriate for the data shown.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

1. Based on the results shown in Figure xx the authors are proposing that P. aminovorans increases the ability of V. cholerae to produce VPL (Vibrio polysaccharides). I think this is an interesting point towards the mechanistic understanding by which P. aminovorans can enhances biofilm formation of this pathogens. I think it would be nice to further obtain support for this hypothesis using a transcription reporter fusion to a vpl-associated promoter to obtain further support for this proposal.

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

1) The introduction would be greatly improved by being specific about the model in which previous studies were done, where V. cholerae is found within the intestine in each model, and how the association between V. cholerae and the microbe of interest was established in the study (i.e. stool cultures vs intestinal tissue). When discussing concordant vs discordant observations, these details are very important (eg line 141).

2) Figure 2: Figure 2A: Here the authors show the results of a colonization assay in which Pa is inoculated into mice every 12 hours for 48 hours. Were the measurements taken at 24 and 48 hrs performed before or after the 24- and 48-hour inoculations, respectively. This should be clarified. If taken immediately after inoculation, this may not demonstrate colonization. Figure 2B: Here is Vc inoculated directly after the 48h inoculation of Pa? If so, have the authors tested whether the earlier inoculations are relevant or necessary?

3) Line 227-245 and Figure 6: Because WGA is not specific for VPS and Pa are not specifically labeled, conclusions from these studies must be tempered.

4) Line 356-259: The conclusion that Pa activates production of VPS would be greatly strengthened if transcriptional activation of the vps genes could be shown. If transcriptional activation is not observed, there is a concern that increased WGA staining in biofilms is not sufficient to support this claim.

5) Figure 2B: This strain of V. cholerae is well-known to undergo spontaneous mutations that result in QS-incompetence and increased biofilm production. Is it possible that Pa is promoting a change at the chromosomal level? If not, V. cholerae isolated from the Vc + Pa pellicle should behave like WT Vc in monoculture.

6) Figure 7: Based on the authors' model, intestinal titers of Pa should be higher during WT infection as compared with that during ΔvpsL infection. Intestinal titers of Pa increase in response to VPS production by Vc would help to support the in vitro results, which suggest that Vc VPS recruits Pa to biofilm aggregates.

Reviewing Editor comments:

1) The authors should provide complementation data for the vps / rbmA / rbmC+bap1 mutant. If this isn't possible, they should at least Sanger sequence the luxO gene of all their strains (WT and the mutants) to ensure all strains are QS-proficient and not derived from a QS-impaired circulating mutant of the "WT" C6706 isolate (which is known to produced enhanced biofilms).

2) Do the authors have colonization data beyond the 24h time point? If these data are not available, the topic should be at least discussed (e.g., whether colonization is expected to be enhanced beyond the 24h time point).

3) The authors wrote "Unlike previous studies (9, 10), pre-treatment with antibiotics did not change the outcome of Pa colonization (not shown)." => this is an important and somewhat surprising finding for which the data should be provided.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73010.sa1

Author response

Essential revisions:

1) Provide data to show that Pa increases biofilm production through transcriptional or protein-level data. Indeed, as Midani et al. (2018) showed that conditioned medium from P. aminovorans significantly increased growth of V. cholerae, it seems essential for your study to distinguish between increased growth (and hence more biofilm in the pellicles) versus biofilm enhancement, as claimed in your manuscript.

We have added Figure 5C which shows vpsL expression results from Vc grown in coculture with Pa and Vc alone. qRT-PCR analyses demonstrated that the relative transcript levels of vpsL (the first and a representative gene in the vpsII operon) are higher in Vc cocultured with Pa than in Vc monoculture. In addition, in the new Figures 6C and D, we have used a PvpsL-mNeonGreen reporter to show the activation of the vpsII operon in the co-culture pellicle, compared to the Vc monoculture pellicle.

We also want to clarify the results in the previous study (Midani 2018). In that study, Vc yield was higher in the conditioned medium (CM) harvested from Pa than Vc yield in CM harvested from Vc. However, the growth yield of Vc in the CM harvested from Pa was never as high as Vc in fresh medium. Indeed, Vc growth is higher in CM from Pa harvested at low cell-density than in CM from Pa harvested at high cell-density (our unpublished results), suggesting that the growth enhancement observed in the previous study is due to growth-limiting nutrients present in the CM harvested from Pa which were exhausted in CM harvested from Vc. This is the underlying reason that our prior results seem to contrast with our current findings. This was confirmed in our measurement of the planktonic growth yield of Vc monoculture which is comparable to Vc growth yield in the Vc-Pa coculture (Figure 3A). Importantly, biofilm formation is not enhanced when Vc is grown in CM harvested from Pa. We have added this discussion to the revised manuscript to clarify.

2) Please evaluate the impact of Pa on the production of V. cholerae's main virulence factors.

We have added new Figure 7—figure supplement 1 showing the relative transcript levels of ctxA and tcpA in Vc monoculture and Vc-Pa co-culture.

We measured virulence gene expression in regular LB medium (identical to the conditions used in the biofilm coculture experiments). Here, we noted that under these growth conditions the relative transcript levels of these virulence genes were low (e.g., compared to the relative levels of vpsL shown in Figure 5C). These results suggest that these are not ideal conditions for virulence gene expression measurement, based on prior knowledge, it is known that virulence-inducing conditions typically requires specific growth conditions (AKI) and with a shaking phase. However, shaking in AKI medium prevents proper interaction between the two species. Nonetheless, we found that ctxA and tcpA transcript levels are slightly higher in coculture (although only the ctxA comparison is statistically significant). We have edited the manuscript to include this information.

3) Please provide a reanalysis of the data shown in Figure 1 to show the abundance/normalized abundance of P.a. and V.c.

We have clarified in the manuscript that Figure 1 shows normalized abundance data, and we have added new Supplementary file 1 (containing two excel tables of raw data), which include the raw and normalized abundance for Pa, and for Vc in Vc-infected persons.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

– In Figure 1A, the authors could determine the relative abundance of V. cholerae in the 22 infected individuals to demonstrate that there a positive correlation between the abundance of P. aminovorans and the abundance of V. cholerae in the 6 individuals with a significantly higher proportion of P. aminovorans. The authors could also determine the "Normalized Abundance" of P. aminovorans and V. cholerae in these samples.

We have clarified that the data shown in Figure 1 is normalized relative abundance, and we have shown the full raw and normalized data in the new Supplementary file 1. Please see above for detailed explanation of the results.

– The authors could also determine CFU of P. aminovorans in their suckling mouse model of infection to determine whether there is a correlation between the abundance of P. aminovorans and the abundance of V. cholerae during infection of these mice. This would also allow them to determine whether the ratio of abundance in mice is also 1:1 as observed in human samples.

We have determined the temporal dynamics of Pa in the small intestine of infant mouse (Figure 2—figure supplement 2). Pa can be detected 12 hours after the last Pa inoculation (right before Vc infection at 0 hr). The Pa counts decreased over the next 24 hours and the rate of decrease is independent of the presence of Vc. At the early onset of the infection when Pa was still detectable (6 hrs after Vc infection), the ratio between Vc and Pa is variable but close to 10:1. We have included these new data in the revised Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Although we did not observe the 1:1 ratio, which is likely due to the difference in intestinal physiology between human and mouse, we believe our model is still sufficient to show the effect of the presence of Pa inside the small intestine on Vc host colonization.

– In Supplemental Figure 1, the authors could analyze their microbiota sequencing data to determine whether members of the Proteobacteria Phylum are being displaced by P. aminovorans at the Family level.

We have added Panel C in Figure 2—figure supplement 1 ((original Supplemental Figure 1) which shows the order-level taxonomic impact of Pa colonization) within the Proteobacteria phylum. Differences in the two groups were not found to be significant with FDR-adjusted significance testing at multiple taxonomic levels.

– The authors could measure the expression of a V. cholerae virulence factor (such as tcpA) by qPCR to determine whether there is an increase in virulence factor expression in V. cholerae in the presence of P. aminovorans (Figure 2B and Figure 2C).

We have added this assay to our results as described above. These results are now shown in Figure 7—figure supplement 1. Please see above for detailed explanation.

– In Lines 166-168, the authors state, "Our findings also illustrate that our approach to microbiome studies in humans (6, 7) can be used as a predictive tool to identify gut microbes that alter Vc virulence." The authors should replace the word "virulence" with "colonization" which seems more appropriate for the data shown.

This correction has been made in the revised manuscript.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

1. Based on the results shown in Figure xx the authors are proposing that P. aminovorans increases the ability of V. cholerae to produce VPL (Vibrio polysaccharides). I think this is an interesting point towards the mechanistic understanding by which P. aminovorans can enhances biofilm formation of this pathogens. I think it would be nice to further obtain support for this hypothesis using a transcription reporter fusion to a vpl-associated promoter to obtain further support for this proposal.

In response to the reviewer’s request, we have obtained a strain harboring Pvpsl-mNeonGreen and we have repeated the pellicle imaging in the updated Figure 6C-D. Interestingly, subpopulations of Vc cells have elevated vpsL level when co-cultured with Pa. These data are consistent with our new qRT-PCR results showing higher vpsL expression (Figure 5C).

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

1) The introduction would be greatly improved by being specific about the model in which previous studies were done, where V. cholerae is found within the intestine in each model, and how the association between V. cholerae and the microbe of interest was established in the study (i.e. stool cultures vs intestinal tissue). When discussing concordant vs discordant observations, these details are very important (eg line 141).

We have revised the manuscript to include the recommended additional information on the models discussed in the introduction.

2) Figure 2: Figure 2A: Here the authors show the results of a colonization assay in which Pa is inoculated into mice every 12 hours for 48 hours. Were the measurements taken at 24 and 48 hrs performed before or after the 24- and 48-hour inoculations, respectively. This should be clarified. If taken immediately after inoculation, this may not demonstrate colonization. Figure 2B: Here is Vc inoculated directly after the 48h inoculation of Pa? If so, have the authors tested whether the earlier inoculations are relevant or necessary?

We apologize for the ambiguity. To clarify, the animals were inoculated with four doses of Pa at 0, 12, 24, and 36-hour time points. In some animals, after two doses of Pa inoculation, the Pa count in the small intestine was determined at the 24-hr (i.e., 12 hrs after the second Pa inoculation). The Pa count was also determined after four doses of Pa inoculation at 48-hr (i.e., 12 hrs after the last Pa inoculation). Vc infection was performed 12 hrs after the last Pa inoculation, and we have shown that Pa was detectable in the small intestine at that time point prior to Vc infection. We have revised the text and figure legends to clarify.

3) Line 227-245 and Figure 6: Because WGA is not specific for VPS and Pa are not specifically labeled, conclusions from these studies must be tempered.

In response to the reviewer’s question, we have added negative controls (new Figure 4—figure supplement 1) showing that Pa cells alone or Vc ΔvpsL mutant does not show WGA staining under the current conditions. While it is true that WGA stains GlcNAC residues, for Gram-negative bacterial cells including Vc and Pa, the WGA lectin molecules do not pass through the outer membrane. Only when the outer membrane is significantly impaired will one see strong WGA signal. Indeed, we always observe dead cells with strong WGA signal but those are easily distinguished from the VPS signal.

Regarding the labeling of Pa cells, currently we do not have good genetic tools to express fluorescent proteins in Pa; therefore, we relied on the universal membrane labeling of FM 4-64 to detect their presence in the co-culture biofilm. Importantly, Pa cells also have a characteristic cocci shape that is distinct from Vc’s curved-rod shape. In the updated Figure 6A-B, we have provided clearer zoom-in image, in which Pa cells can be clearly distinguished from Vc cells by both the absence of SCFP3A signal and the characteristic cocci shape.

4) Line 356-259: The conclusion that Pa activates production of VPS would be greatly strengthened if transcriptional activation of the vps genes could be shown. If transcriptional activation is not observed, there is a concern that increased WGA staining in biofilms is not sufficient to support this claim.

We have added new Figure 5C showing qRT-PCR results and Figure 6C-D showing microscopy analysis on vpsL expression from Vc grown in monoculture or in coculture with Pa. Please see above for detailed explanation.

5) Figure 2B: This strain of V. cholerae is well-known to undergo spontaneous mutations that result in QS-incompetence and increased biofilm production. Is it possible that Pa is promoting a change at the chromosomal level? If not, V. cholerae isolated from the Vc + Pa pellicle should behave like WT Vc in monoculture.

Thank you for pointing out this important issue. We have isolated 15 individual Vc colonies from pellicles harvested in Vc monocultures (5 isolates) and Vc-Pa cocultures (10 isolates). The luxO locus of these isolates was sequenced; all carry the WT luxO allele, suggesting Pa does not promote additional mutational change in Vc in this allele.

6) Figure 7: Based on the authors' model, intestinal titers of Pa should be higher during WT infection as compared with that during ΔvpsL infection. Intestinal titers of Pa increase in response to VPS production by Vc would help to support the in vitro results, which suggest that Vc VPS recruits Pa to biofilm aggregates.

We thank the reviewer for the great suggestion.

As discussed in the response to reviewer #1, we have determined the temporal dynamics of Pa in the small intestine of infant mouse. Pa can be detected 12 hours after the last Pa inoculation (right before Vc infection at 0 hr). The Pa counts decreased over the next 24 hours and the rate of decrease is independent of the presence of Vc. At the early onset of the infection when Pa was still detectable (6 hrs after Vc infection), the ratio between Vc and Pa is variable but close to 10:1. We have included these new data in the revised Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Although we did not observe the 1:1 ratio, which is likely due to the difference in intestinal physiology between human and mouse, we believe our model is still sufficient to show the effect of the presence of Pa inside the small intestine on Vc host colonization. Further studies are needed to fully understand the dynamic of the interaction in vivo.

Reviewing Editor comments:

1) The authors should provide complementation data for the vps / rbmA / rbmC+bap1 mutant. If this isn't possible, they should at least Sanger sequence the luxO gene of all their strains (WT and the mutants) to ensure all strains are QS-proficient and not derived from a QS-impaired circulating mutant of the "WT" C6706 isolate (which is known to produced enhanced biofilms).

We have now provided new complementation data for the vpsL mutant in CV assay and pellicle assay (revised Figure 3—figure supplement 1), and in vivo (new Figure 7—figure supplement 2). All the other strains have been sequenced and they carry the WT allele of luxO. We also tested all our strains with a Pqrr4-lux assay and they all show a Qrr4 expression pattern identical to the WT, confirming they carry a WT luxO allele.

2) Do the authors have colonization data beyond the 24h time point? If these data are not available, the topic should be at least discussed (e.g., whether colonization is expected to be enhanced beyond the 24h time point).

Our current IACUC protocol only allows us to keep the infant animals away from their dams for no more than 24 hours. Therefore, we could not obtain data points beyond 24 hours after infection. As predicted from our time course study (revised Figure 2—figure supplement 2), the difference between the Vc counts in mice with and without Pa steadily increases, therefore, we predict the difference could be bigger if we allow the Vc infection to continue beyond 24 hours.

3) The authors wrote "Unlike previous studies (9, 10), pre-treatment with antibiotics did not change the outcome of Pa colonization (not shown)." => this is an important and somewhat surprising finding for which the data should be provided.

Thank you for pointing out this ambiguity. We intended to point out that unlike previous studies in which antibiotic treatment was required to achieve bacterial colonization, in our study antibiotic treatment was not required for Pa colonization. We have shown Pa can colonize in the small intestines of untreated mice (Figure 2A). We have rewritten this statement to clarify.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73010.sa2

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kelsey Barrasso

    1. Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, United States
    2. Program of Molecular Microbiology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  2. Denise Chac

    Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  3. Meti D Debela

    Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  4. Catherine Geigel

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  5. Anjali Steenhaut

    Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  6. Abigail Rivera Seda

    Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  7. Chelsea N Dunmire

    Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  8. Jason B Harris

    1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
    2. Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Contribution
    Project administration, Resources
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  9. Regina C Larocque

    Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
    Contribution
    Resources
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  10. Firas S Midani

    Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis, Software
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2473-7758

  11. Firdausi Qadri

    International Center for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh
    Contribution
    Project administration, Resources
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  12. Jing Yan

    1. Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    2. Quantitative Biology Institute, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  13. Ana A Weil

    Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    anaweil@uw.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6170-4306

  14. Wai-Leung Ng

    1. Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, United States
    2. Program of Molecular Microbiology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    wai-leung.ng@tufts.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8966-6604

Funding

National Institutes of Health (AI121337)

  • Wai-Leung Ng

National Institutes of Health (AI123494)

  • Ana A Weil

National Institutes of Health (DP2GM146253)

  • Jing Yan

National Institutes of Health (R25 GM066567)

  • Abigail Rivera Seda

Burroughs Wellcome Fund (1015763.02)

  • Jing Yan

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Ng and Weil Labs for helpful discussions. We acknowledge Dr. Andrew Bridges for sharing the vpsL reporter strain, Dr. Aretha Fiebig for suggestions on imaging pellicles, and Dr. Ed Ryan for his assistance in reviewing the manuscript. AAW and W-LN received support from a Rozan Award from Tufts University School of Medicine for this project. AAW was supported by AI123494 and W-LN was supported by AI121337 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). JY was supported by DP2GM146253 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS). JY holds a Career Award at the Scientific Interface from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund (1015763.02). ARS was supported by the Tufts Post-Baccalaureate Research Education (PREP) Program (R25 GM066567).

Ethics

The previously published study from which Figure 1 is derived from ref (7) received approval from the Ethical Review Committee at the icddr,b and the institutional review boards of Massachusetts General Hospital and the University of Washington. Participants or their guardians provided written informed consent.

All animal experiments were performed at and in accordance with the rules of the Tufts Comparative Medicine Services (CMS), following the guidelines of the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) as well as the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All procedures were performed with approval of the Tufts University CMS (Protocol# B 2018-99). Euthanasia was performed in accordance with guidelines provided by the AVMA and was approved by the Tufts CMS.

Senior Editor

  1. Wendy S Garrett, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, United States

Reviewing Editor

  1. Melanie Blokesch, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: February 2, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: August 12, 2021
  3. Accepted: March 25, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: March 28, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: March 31, 2022 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record published: April 8, 2022 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2022, Barrasso et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,885
    Page views
  • 260
    Downloads
  • 7
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kelsey Barrasso
  2. Denise Chac
  3. Meti D Debela
  4. Catherine Geigel
  5. Anjali Steenhaut
  6. Abigail Rivera Seda
  7. Chelsea N Dunmire
  8. Jason B Harris
  9. Regina C Larocque
  10. Firas S Midani
  11. Firdausi Qadri
  12. Jing Yan
  13. Ana A Weil
  14. Wai-Leung Ng
(2022)
Impact of a human gut microbe on Vibrio cholerae host colonization through biofilm enhancement
eLife 11:e73010.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73010

Categories and tags

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease

    The chemorepellent, SLIT2, bolsters innate immunity against Staphylococcus aureus

    Vikrant K Bhosle, Chunxiang Sun ... Lisa A Robinson
    Research Article

    Neutrophils are essential for host defense against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). The neuro-repellent, SLIT2, potently inhibits neutrophil chemotaxis, and might, therefore, be expected to impair antibacterial responses. We report here that, unexpectedly, neutrophils exposed to the N-terminal SLIT2 (N-SLIT2) fragment kill extracellular S. aureus more efficiently. N-SLIT2 amplifies reactive oxygen species production in response to the bacteria by activating p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase that in turn phosphorylates NCF1, an essential subunit of the NADPH oxidase complex. N-SLIT2 also enhances the exocytosis of neutrophil secondary granules. In a murine model of S. aureus skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI), local SLIT2 levels fall initially but increase subsequently, peaking at 3 days after infection. Of note, the neutralization of endogenous SLIT2 worsens SSTI. Temporal fluctuations in local SLIT2 levels may promote neutrophil recruitment and retention at the infection site and hasten bacterial clearance by augmenting neutrophil oxidative burst and degranulation. Collectively, these actions of SLIT2 coordinate innate immune responses to limit susceptibility to S. aureus.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease

    A tRNA modification in Mycobacterium tuberculosis facilitates optimal intracellular growth

    Francesca G Tomasi, Satoshi Kimura ... Matthew K Waldor
    Research Article

    Diverse chemical modifications fine-tune the function and metabolism of tRNA. Although tRNA modification is universal in all kingdoms of life, profiles of modifications, their functions, and physiological roles have not been elucidated in most organisms including the human pathogen, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), the causative agent of tuberculosis. To identify physiologically important modifications, we surveyed the tRNA of Mtb, using tRNA sequencing (tRNA-seq) and genome-mining. Homology searches identified 23 candidate tRNA modifying enzymes that are predicted to create 16 tRNA modifications across all tRNA species. Reverse transcription-derived error signatures in tRNA-seq predicted the sites and presence of nine modifications. Several chemical treatments prior to tRNA-seq expanded the number of predictable modifications. Deletion of Mtb genes encoding two modifying enzymes, TruB and MnmA, eliminated their respective tRNA modifications, validating the presence of modified sites in tRNA species. Furthermore, the absence of mnmA attenuated Mtb growth in macrophages, suggesting that MnmA-dependent tRNA uridine sulfation contributes to Mtb intracellular growth. Our results lay the foundation for unveiling the roles of tRNA modifications in Mtb pathogenesis and developing new therapeutics against tuberculosis.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease

    Synchronization of oscillatory growth prepares fungal hyphae for fusion

    Valentin Wernet, Marius Kriegler ... Reinhard Fischer
    Research Article Updated

    Communication is crucial for organismic interactions, from bacteria, to fungi, to humans. Humans may use the visual sense to monitor the environment before starting acoustic interactions. In comparison, fungi, lacking a visual system, rely on a cell-to-cell dialogue based on secreted signaling molecules to coordinate cell fusion and establish hyphal networks. Within this dialogue, hyphae alternate between sending and receiving signals. This pattern can be visualized via the putative signaling protein Soft (SofT), and the mitogen-activated protein kinase MAK-2 (MakB) which are recruited in an alternating oscillatory manner to the respective cytoplasmic membrane or nuclei of interacting hyphae. Here, we show that signal oscillations already occur in single hyphae of Arthrobotrys flagrans in the absence of potential fusion partners (cell monologue). They were in the same phase as growth oscillations. In contrast to the anti-phasic oscillations observed during the cell dialogue, SofT and MakB displayed synchronized oscillations in phase during the monologue. Once two fusion partners came into each other’s vicinity, their oscillation frequencies slowed down (entrainment phase) and transit into anti-phasic synchronization of the two cells’ oscillations with frequencies of 104±28 s and 117±19 s, respectively. Single-cell oscillations, transient entrainment, and anti-phasic oscillations were reproduced by a mathematical model where nearby hyphae can absorb and secrete a limited molecular signaling component into a shared extracellular space. We show that intracellular Ca2+ concentrations oscillate in two approaching hyphae, and depletion of Ca2+ from the medium affected vesicle-driven extension of the hyphal tip, abolished the cell monologue and the anti-phasic synchronization of two hyphae. Our results suggest that single hyphae engage in a ‘monologue’ that may be used for exploration of the environment and can dynamically shift their extracellular signaling systems into a ‘dialogue’ to initiate hyphal fusion.