Eye movements reveal spatiotemporal dynamics of visually-informed planning in navigation

  1. Seren Zhu  Is a corresponding author
  2. Kaushik Janakiraman Lakshminarasimhan
  3. Nastaran Arfaei
  4. Dora E Angelaki
  1. New York University, United States
  2. Columbia University, United States

Abstract

Goal-oriented navigation is widely understood to depend upon internal maps. Although this may be the case in many settings, humans tend to rely on vision in complex, unfamiliar environments. To study the nature of gaze during visually-guided navigation, we tasked humans to navigate to transiently visible goals in virtual mazes of varying levels of difficulty, observing that they took near-optimal trajectories in all arenas. By analyzing participants’ eye movements, we gained insights into how they performed visually-informed planning. The spatial distribution of gaze revealed that environmental complexity mediated a striking tradeoff in the extent to which attention was directed towards two complimentary aspects of the world model: the reward location and task-relevant transitions. The temporal evolution of gaze revealed rapid, sequential prospection of the future path, evocative of neural replay. These findings suggest that the spatiotemporal characteristics of gaze during navigation are significantly shaped by the unique cognitive computations underlying real-world, sequential decision making.

Data availability

Links to data and code are included in the manuscript.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Seren Zhu

    Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    lt1686@nyu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0555-9690
  2. Kaushik Janakiraman Lakshminarasimhan

    Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Nastaran Arfaei

    Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Dora E Angelaki

    Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9650-8962

Funding

National Institutes of Health (U19-NS118246)

  • Seren Zhu
  • Nastaran Arfaei
  • Dora E Angelaki

National Institutes of Health (R01-EY022538)

  • Seren Zhu
  • Nastaran Arfaei
  • Dora E Angelaki

National Science Foundation (DBI-1707398)

  • Kaushik Janakiraman Lakshminarasimhan

Gatsby Charitable Foundation

  • Kaushik Janakiraman Lakshminarasimhan

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, nor the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board at New York University and all participants signed an informed consent form (IRB-FY2019-2599).

Copyright

© 2022, Zhu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,357
    views
  • 580
    downloads
  • 20
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Citations by DOI

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Seren Zhu
  2. Kaushik Janakiraman Lakshminarasimhan
  3. Nastaran Arfaei
  4. Dora E Angelaki
(2022)
Eye movements reveal spatiotemporal dynamics of visually-informed planning in navigation
eLife 11:e73097.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73097

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73097