Host ecology regulates interspecies recombination in bacteria of the genus Campylobacter

  1. Evangelos Mourkas
  2. Koji Yahara
  3. Sion C Bayliss
  4. Jessica K Calland
  5. Håkan Johansson
  6. Leonardos Mageiros
  7. Zilia Y Muñoz-Ramirez
  8. Grant Futcher
  9. Guillaume Méric
  10. Matthew D Hitchings
  11. Santiago Sandoval-Motta
  12. Javier Torres
  13. Keith A Jolley
  14. Martin CJ Maiden
  15. Patrik Ellström
  16. Jonas Waldenström
  17. Ben Pascoe
  18. Samuel K Sheppard  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Bath, United Kingdom
  2. National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan
  3. Linnaeus University, Sweden
  4. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico
  5. Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Australia
  6. Swansea University, United Kingdom
  7. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  8. Uppsala University, Sweden

Abstract

Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) can allow traits that have evolved in one bacterial species to transfer to another. This has potential to rapidly promote new adaptive trajectories such as zoonotic transfer or antimicrobial resistance. However, for this to occur requires gaps to align in barriers to recombination within a given time frame. Chief among these barriers is the physical separation of species with distinct ecologies in separate niches. Within the genus Campylobacter there are species with divergent ecologies, from rarely isolated single host specialists to multi-host generalist species that are among the most common global causes of human bacterial gastroenteritis. Here, by characterising these contrasting ecologies, we can quantify HGT among sympatric and allopatric species in natural populations. Analysing recipient and donor population ancestry among genomes from 30 Campylobacter species we show that cohabitation in the same host can lead to a 6-fold increase in HGT between species. This accounts for up to 30% of all SNPs within a given species and identifies highly recombinogenic genes with functions including host adaptation and antimicrobial resistance. As described in some animal and plant species, ecological factors are a major evolutionary force for speciation in bacteria and changes to the host landscape can promote partial convergence of distinct species through HGT.

Data availability

Genomes sequenced as part of other studies are archived on the Short Read Archive associated with BioProject accessions: PRJNA176480, PRJNA177352, PRJNA342755, PRJNA345429, PRJNA312235, PRJNA415188, PRJNA524300, PRJNA528879, PRJNA529798, PRJNA575343, PRJNA524315 and PRJNA689604. Additional genomes were also downloaded from NCBI [101] and pubMLST (http://pubmlst.org/campylobacter). Contiguous assemblies of all genome sequences compared are available at the public data repository Figshare (doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.15061017) and individual project and accession numbers can be found in Supplementary Table 1.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Evangelos Mourkas

    Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7411-4743
  2. Koji Yahara

    Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4289-1115
  3. Sion C Bayliss

    Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5997-2002
  4. Jessica K Calland

    Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Håkan Johansson

    Centre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Leonardos Mageiros

    Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0846-522X
  7. Zilia Y Muñoz-Ramirez

    Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Grant Futcher

    Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Guillaume Méric

    Cambridge Baker Systems Genomics Initiative, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Matthew D Hitchings

    Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Santiago Sandoval-Motta

    Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Javier Torres

    Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Keith A Jolley

    Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Martin CJ Maiden

    Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6321-5138
  15. Patrik Ellström

    Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Jonas Waldenström

    Centre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Ben Pascoe

    Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Samuel K Sheppard

    Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    s.k.sheppard@bath.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6901-3203

Funding

Medical Research Council (MR/M501608/1)

  • Samuel K Sheppard

Medical Research Council (MR/L015080/1)

  • Samuel K Sheppard

Wellcome Trust (088786/C/09/Z)

  • Samuel K Sheppard

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Mourkas et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Evangelos Mourkas
  2. Koji Yahara
  3. Sion C Bayliss
  4. Jessica K Calland
  5. Håkan Johansson
  6. Leonardos Mageiros
  7. Zilia Y Muñoz-Ramirez
  8. Grant Futcher
  9. Guillaume Méric
  10. Matthew D Hitchings
  11. Santiago Sandoval-Motta
  12. Javier Torres
  13. Keith A Jolley
  14. Martin CJ Maiden
  15. Patrik Ellström
  16. Jonas Waldenström
  17. Ben Pascoe
  18. Samuel K Sheppard
(2022)
Host ecology regulates interspecies recombination in bacteria of the genus Campylobacter
eLife 11:e73552.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73552

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73552

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Rosalyn W Sayaman, Masaru Miyano ... Mark A LaBarge
    Research Article Updated

    Effects from aging in single cells are heterogenous, whereas at the organ- and tissue-levels aging phenotypes tend to appear as stereotypical changes. The mammary epithelium is a bilayer of two major phenotypically and functionally distinct cell lineages: luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells. Mammary luminal epithelia exhibit substantial stereotypical changes with age that merit attention because these cells are the putative cells-of-origin for breast cancers. We hypothesize that effects from aging that impinge upon maintenance of lineage fidelity increase susceptibility to cancer initiation. We generated and analyzed transcriptomes from primary luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells from younger <30 (y)ears old and older >55 y women. In addition to age-dependent directional changes in gene expression, we observed increased transcriptional variance with age that contributed to genome-wide loss of lineage fidelity. Age-dependent variant responses were common to both lineages, whereas directional changes were almost exclusively detected in luminal epithelia and involved altered regulation of chromatin and genome organizers such as SATB1. Epithelial expression variance of gap junction protein GJB6 increased with age, and modulation of GJB6 expression in heterochronous co-cultures revealed that it provided a communication conduit from myoepithelial cells that drove directional change in luminal cells. Age-dependent luminal transcriptomes comprised a prominent signal that could be detected in bulk tissue during aging and transition into cancers. A machine learning classifier based on luminal-specific aging distinguished normal from cancer tissue and was highly predictive of breast cancer subtype. We speculate that luminal epithelia are the ultimate site of integration of the variant responses to aging in their surrounding tissue, and that their emergent phenotype both endows cells with the ability to become cancer-cells-of-origin and represents a biosensor that presages cancer susceptibility.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    David B Blumenthal, Marta Lucchetta ... Martin H Schaefer
    Research Article Updated

    Degree distributions in protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are believed to follow a power law (PL). However, technical and study biases affect the experimental procedures for detecting PPIs. For instance, cancer-associated proteins have received disproportional attention. Moreover, bait proteins in large-scale experiments tend to have many false-positive interaction partners. Studying the degree distributions of thousands of PPI networks of controlled provenance, we address the question if PL distributions in observed PPI networks could be explained by these biases alone. Our findings are supported by mathematical models and extensive simulations, and indicate that study bias and technical bias suffice to produce the observed PL distribution. It is, hence, problematic to derive hypotheses about the topology of the true biological interactome from the PL distributions in observed PPI networks. Our study casts doubt on the use of the PL property of biological networks as a modeling assumption or quality criterion in network biology.