Effector membrane translocation biosensors reveal G protein and βarrestin coupling profiles of 100 therapeutically relevant GPCRs

  1. Charlotte Avet
  2. Arturo Mancini
  3. Billy Breton
  4. Christian Le Gouill
  5. Alexander Sebastian Hauser
  6. Claire Normand
  7. Hiroyuki Kobayashi
  8. Florence Gross
  9. Mireille Hogue
  10. Viktoriya Lukasheva
  11. Stéphane St-Onge
  12. Marilyn Carrier
  13. Madeleine Héroux
  14. Sandra Morissette
  15. Eric B Fauman
  16. Jean-Philippe Fortin
  17. Stephan Schann
  18. Xavier Leroy  Is a corresponding author
  19. David E Gloriam  Is a corresponding author
  20. Michel Bouvier  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Montreal, Canada
  2. Domain Therapeutics North America, Canada
  3. University of Copenhagen, Denmark
  4. Pfizer Worldwide Research, United States
  5. Pfizer Global R&D, United States
  6. Domain Therapeutics, France

Abstract

The recognition that individual GPCRs can activate multiple signaling pathways has raised the possibility of developing drugs selectively targeting therapeutically relevant ones. This requires tools to determine which G proteins and barrestins are activated by a given receptor. Here, we present a set of BRET sensors monitoring the activation of the 12 G protein subtypes based on the translocation of their effectors to the plasma membrane (EMTA). Unlike most of the existing detection systems, EMTA does not require modification of receptors or G proteins (except for Gs). EMTA was found to be suitable for the detection of constitutive activity, inverse agonism, biased signaling and polypharmacology. Profiling of 100 therapeutically relevant human GPCRs resulted in 1,500 pathway-specific concentration-response curves and revealed a great diversity of coupling profiles ranging from exquisite selectivity to broad promiscuity. Overall, this work describes unique resources for studying the complexities underlying GPCR signaling and pharmacology.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided for Figures 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 and associated figure supplements. Supplementary Table 1 contains the numerical data used to generate Figure 2-figure supplement 1 and Figure 2-figure supplement 3. Supplementary Table 2 contains the numerical data used to generate figure 3.

The following data sets were generated
    1. Hauser AS
    2. Avet C
    3. Normand C
    4. Mancini A
    5. Inoue A
    6. Bouvier M
    7. Gloriam DE
    (2021) G protein selectivity - a unified meta-analysis
    Accompanying dataset paper in BioRXiv (https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.07.459250) and www.gpcrdb.org (https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab852).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Charlotte Avet

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Montreal, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Arturo Mancini

    Domain Therapeutics North America, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    Arturo Mancini, was employee of Domain Therapeutics North America during this research.
  3. Billy Breton

    Domain Therapeutics North America, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    Billy Breton, was employee of Domain Therapeutics North America during this research. Has filed patent application (US20200256869A1) related to the biosensors used in this work and the technology has been licensed to Domain Therapeutics..
  4. Christian Le Gouill

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Montreal, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    Christian Le Gouill, has filed patent application (US20200256869A1) related to the biosensors used in this work and the technology has been licensed to Domain Therapeutics..
  5. Alexander Sebastian Hauser

    Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1098-6419
  6. Claire Normand

    Domain Therapeutics North America, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    Claire Normand, was employee of Domain Therapeutics North America during this research.
  7. Hiroyuki Kobayashi

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Montreal, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    Hiroyuki Kobayashi, has filed patent application (US20200256869A1) related to the biosensors used in this work and the technology has been licensed to Domain Therapeutics..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4965-0883
  8. Florence Gross

    Domain Therapeutics North America, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    Florence Gross, was employee of Domain Therapeutics North America during this research.
  9. Mireille Hogue

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Montreal, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    Mireille Hogue, has filed patent application (US20200256869A1) related to the biosensors used in this work and the technology has been licensed to Domain Therapeutics..
  10. Viktoriya Lukasheva

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Montreal, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    Viktoriya Lukasheva, has filed patent application (US20200256869A1) related to the biosensors used in this work and the technology has been licensed to Domain Therapeutics..
  11. Stéphane St-Onge

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Montreal, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Marilyn Carrier

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Montreal, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Madeleine Héroux

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Montreal, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Sandra Morissette

    Domain Therapeutics North America, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    Sandra Morissette, SM was employee of Domain Therapeutics North America during this research.
  15. Eric B Fauman

    Internal Medicine Research Unit, Pfizer Worldwide Research, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Eric B Fauman, is employee and shares holders of Pfizer.
  16. Jean-Philippe Fortin

    Pfizer Global R&D, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Jean-Philippe Fortin, is employee and shares holders of Pfizer.
  17. Stephan Schann

    Domain Therapeutics, Illkirch-Strasbourg, France
    Competing interests
    Stephan Schann, is employee and is part of the management of Domain Therapeutics.
  18. Xavier Leroy

    Domain Therapeutics, llkirch-Strasbourg, France
    For correspondence
    xleroy@domaintherapeutics.com
    Competing interests
    Xavier Leroy, is employee and is part of the management of Domain Therapeutics.
  19. David E Gloriam

    Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    For correspondence
    david.gloriam@sund.ku.dk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4299-7561
  20. Michel Bouvier

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Montreal, Montréal, Canada
    For correspondence
    michel.bouvier@umontreal.ca
    Competing interests
    Michel Bouvier, is the president of Domain Therapeutics scientific Has filed patent application (US20200256869A1) related to the biosensors used in this work and the technology has been licensed to Domain Therapeutics..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1128-0100

Funding

Canada Research Chairs

  • Michel Bouvier

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN-148431)

  • Michel Bouvier

Lundbeckfonden (R218-2016-1266)

  • David E Gloriam

Lundbeckfonden (R313-2019-526)

  • David E Gloriam

Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF18OC0031226)

  • David E Gloriam

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. William I Weis, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: April 24, 2020 (view preprint)
  2. Received: September 21, 2021
  3. Accepted: March 17, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: March 18, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: April 12, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Avet et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,687
    Page views
  • 1,197
    Downloads
  • 74
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Charlotte Avet
  2. Arturo Mancini
  3. Billy Breton
  4. Christian Le Gouill
  5. Alexander Sebastian Hauser
  6. Claire Normand
  7. Hiroyuki Kobayashi
  8. Florence Gross
  9. Mireille Hogue
  10. Viktoriya Lukasheva
  11. Stéphane St-Onge
  12. Marilyn Carrier
  13. Madeleine Héroux
  14. Sandra Morissette
  15. Eric B Fauman
  16. Jean-Philippe Fortin
  17. Stephan Schann
  18. Xavier Leroy
  19. David E Gloriam
  20. Michel Bouvier
(2022)
Effector membrane translocation biosensors reveal G protein and βarrestin coupling profiles of 100 therapeutically relevant GPCRs
eLife 11:e74101.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74101

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74101

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Karolina Honzejkova, Dalibor Kosek ... Tomas Obsil
    Research Article

    Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) is a crucial stress sensor, directing cells toward apoptosis, differentiation, and senescence via the p38 and JNK signaling pathways. ASK1 dysregulation has been associated with cancer and inflammatory, cardiovascular, and neurodegenerative diseases, among others. However, our limited knowledge of the underlying structural mechanism of ASK1 regulation hampers our ability to target this member of the MAP3K protein family towards developing therapeutic interventions for these disorders. Nevertheless, as a multidomain Ser/Thr protein kinase, ASK1 is regulated by a complex mechanism involving dimerization and interactions with several other proteins, including thioredoxin 1 (TRX1). Thus, the present study aims at structurally characterizing ASK1 and its complex with TRX1 using several biophysical techniques. As shown by cryo-EM analysis, in a state close to its active form, ASK1 is a compact and asymmetric dimer, which enables extensive interdomain and interchain interactions. These interactions stabilize the active conformation of the ASK1 kinase domain. In turn, TRX1 functions as a negative allosteric effector of ASK1, modifying the structure of the TRX1-binding domain and changing its interaction with the tetratricopeptide repeats domain. Consequently, TRX1 reduces access to the activation segment of the kinase domain. Overall, our findings not only clarify the role of ASK1 dimerization and inter-domain contacts but also provide key mechanistic insights into its regulation, thereby highlighting the potential of ASK1 protein-protein interactions as targets for anti-inflammatory therapy.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Jake W Anderson, David Vaisar ... Natalie G Ahn
    Research Article

    Activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase-2 (ERK2) by phosphorylation has been shown to involve changes in protein dynamics, as determined by hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) and NMR relaxation dispersion measurements. These can be described by a global exchange between two conformational states of the active kinase, named ‘L’ and ‘R,’ where R is associated with a catalytically productive ATP-binding mode. An ATP-competitive ERK1/2 inhibitor, Vertex-11e, has properties of conformation selection for the R-state, revealing movements of the activation loop that are allosterically coupled to the kinase active site. However, the features of inhibitors important for R-state selection are unknown. Here, we survey a panel of ATP-competitive ERK inhibitors using HDX-MS and NMR and identify 14 new molecules with properties of R-state selection. They reveal effects propagated to distal regions in the P+1 and helix αF segments surrounding the activation loop, as well as helix αL16. Crystal structures of inhibitor complexes with ERK2 reveal systematic shifts in the Gly loop and helix αC, mediated by a Tyr-Tyr ring stacking interaction and the conserved Lys-Glu salt bridge. The findings suggest a model for the R-state involving small movements in the N-lobe that promote compactness within the kinase active site and alter mobility surrounding the activation loop. Such properties of conformation selection might be exploited to modulate the protein docking interface used by ERK substrates and effectors.