Common coupling map advances GPCR-G protein selectivity

  1. Alexander Sebastian Hauser
  2. Charlotte Avet
  3. Claire Normand
  4. Arturo Mancini
  5. Asuka Inoue
  6. Michel Bouvier  Is a corresponding author
  7. David E Gloriam  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Copenhagen, Denmark
  2. University of Montreal, Canada
  3. Domain Therapeutics North America, Canada
  4. Tohoku University, Japan

Abstract

Two-thirds of human hormones and one-third of clinical drugs act on membrane receptors that couple to G proteins to achieve appropriate functional responses. While G protein transducers from literature are annotated in the Guide to Pharmacology database, two recent large-scale datasets now expand the receptor-G protein 'couplome'. However, these three datasets differ in scope and reported G protein couplings giving different coverage and conclusions on GPCR-G protein signaling. Here, we report a common coupling map uncovering novel couplings supported by both large-scale studies, the selectivity/promiscuity of GPCRs and G proteins, and how the co-coupling and co-expression of G proteins compare to the families from phylogenetic relationships. The coupling map and insights on GPCR-G protein selectivity will catalyze advances in receptor research and cellular signaling towards the exploitation of G protein signaling bias in design of safer drugs.

Data availability

All underlying data are available in Spreadsheets S1-5. The obtained common coupling map is available in the online database GproteinDb at https://gproteindb.org/signprot/couplings.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alexander Sebastian Hauser

    Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1098-6419
  2. Charlotte Avet

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Montreal, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Claire Normand

    Domain Therapeutics North America, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    Claire Normand, was an employees of Domain Therapeutics North America during part or all of this research..
  4. Arturo Mancini

    Domain Therapeutics North America, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    Arturo Mancini, was an employees of Domain Therapeutics North America during part or all of this research..
  5. Asuka Inoue

    Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Michel Bouvier

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Montreal, Montréal, Canada
    For correspondence
    michel.bouvier@umontreal.ca
    Competing interests
    Michel Bouvier, is the president of Domain Therapeutics scientific advisory board..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1128-0100
  7. David E Gloriam

    Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    For correspondence
    david.gloriam@sund.ku.dk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4299-7561

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN-148431)

  • Michel Bouvier

Lundbeckfonden (R218-2016-1266)

  • David E Gloriam

Lundbeckfonden (R313-2019-526)

  • David E Gloriam

Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF18OC0031226)

  • David E Gloriam

Basis for Supporting Innovative Drug Discovery and Life Science Research (JP20am0101095)

  • Asuka Inoue

Leading Asia's Private Infrastructure Fund (JP20gm0010004)

  • Asuka Inoue

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development

  • Asuka Inoue

Takeda Science Foundation

  • Asuka Inoue

Uehara Memorial Foundation

  • Asuka Inoue

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Hauser et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,392
    views
  • 952
    downloads
  • 90
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alexander Sebastian Hauser
  2. Charlotte Avet
  3. Claire Normand
  4. Arturo Mancini
  5. Asuka Inoue
  6. Michel Bouvier
  7. David E Gloriam
(2022)
Common coupling map advances GPCR-G protein selectivity
eLife 11:e74107.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74107

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74107

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    Jun Ren, Ying Zhou ... Qiyuan Li
    Research Article

    Manifold-learning is particularly useful to resolve the complex cellular state space from single-cell RNA sequences. While current manifold-learning methods provide insights into cell fate by inferring graph-based trajectory at cell level, challenges remain to retrieve interpretable biology underlying the diverse cellular states. Here, we described MGPfactXMBD, a model-based manifold-learning framework and capable to factorize complex development trajectories into independent bifurcation processes of gene sets, and thus enables trajectory inference based on relevant features. MGPfactXMBD offers a more nuanced understanding of the biological processes underlying cellular trajectories with potential determinants. When bench-tested across 239 datasets, MGPfactXMBD showed advantages in major quantity-control metrics, such as branch division accuracy and trajectory topology, outperforming most established methods. In real datasets, MGPfactXMBD recovered the critical pathways and cell types in microglia development with experimentally valid regulons and markers. Furthermore, MGPfactXMBD discovered evolutionary trajectories of tumor-associated CD8+ T cells and yielded new subtypes of CD8+ T cells with gene expression signatures significantly predictive of the responses to immune checkpoint inhibitor in independent cohorts. In summary, MGPfactXMBD offers a manifold-learning framework in scRNA-seq data which enables feature selection for specific biological processes and contributing to advance our understanding of biological determination of cell fate.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Daniel Hui, Scott Dudek ... Marylyn D Ritchie
    Research Article

    Apart from ancestry, personal or environmental covariates may contribute to differences in polygenic score (PGS) performance. We analyzed the effects of covariate stratification and interaction on body mass index (BMI) PGS (PGSBMI) across four cohorts of European (N = 491,111) and African (N = 21,612) ancestry. Stratifying on binary covariates and quintiles for continuous covariates, 18/62 covariates had significant and replicable R2 differences among strata. Covariates with the largest differences included age, sex, blood lipids, physical activity, and alcohol consumption, with R2 being nearly double between best- and worst-performing quintiles for certain covariates. Twenty-eight covariates had significant PGSBMI–covariate interaction effects, modifying PGSBMI effects by nearly 20% per standard deviation change. We observed overlap between covariates that had significant R2 differences among strata and interaction effects – across all covariates, their main effects on BMI were correlated with their maximum R2 differences and interaction effects (0.56 and 0.58, respectively), suggesting high-PGSBMI individuals have highest R2 and increase in PGS effect. Using quantile regression, we show the effect of PGSBMI increases as BMI itself increases, and that these differences in effects are directly related to differences in R2 when stratifying by different covariates. Given significant and replicable evidence for context-specific PGSBMI performance and effects, we investigated ways to increase model performance taking into account nonlinear effects. Machine learning models (neural networks) increased relative model R2 (mean 23%) across datasets. Finally, creating PGSBMI directly from GxAge genome-wide association studies effects increased relative R2 by 7.8%. These results demonstrate that certain covariates, especially those most associated with BMI, significantly affect both PGSBMI performance and effects across diverse cohorts and ancestries, and we provide avenues to improve model performance that consider these effects.