(A) Example cell-attached recording of a heterotypic MC pair during photostimulation. Morphology (upper) and representative trial (lower; blue rectangles: 10 ms light pulses of the 5 Hz …
(A) Raster plots of spike times recorded during photostimulation across all trials in the MCs in Figure 1A (‘expt.’), as well as across 500 trials of spike times simulated from rate-matched …
(A) Trial-averaged experimental spike-time cross-power spectral density (CPSD) spectrogram from the MC pair in Figure 1A following photostimulation onset at 0.0 s (upper), and equivalent …
(A) Distribution of ridge cross-power spectral density (CPSD) vs. frequency for the 5/16 MC pairs and 24/26 TC pairs exhibiting spike-time CPSD ridges. Ellipses denote mean ± standard deviation of …
(A) Mean spike-time cross-power spectral density (CPSD) ridge frequency across all pairs following photostimulation onset at 0.0 s. (B) Mean derivative of spike-time CPSD ridge frequency across all …
(A) Experimental spike times recorded across MC pairs (‘expt.’) within consecutive 50 ms windows of the 5 Hz photostimulation cycle exhibited consistently higher cross-correlogram peaks (within |Δtsp…
(A) Trial-averaged excitatory currents recorded in TCs and MCs during photostimulation. Blue rectangles: 10 ms light pulses of the 5 Hz photostimulation protocol. (B) TCs and MCs exhibited …
(A) MCs and TCs included comparable proportions of homotypic and heterotypic pairs (chi-squared test: p=0.26, χ2 = 1.3). (B) Spike-time cross-power spectral density (CPSD) spectrograms averaged …
(A, B) Mitral cells (MCs) and tufted cells (TCs) exhibited comparable within-pair total intersomatic distance (A) (Wilcoxon rank-sum test: p=0.51), while TCs exhibited shorter within-pair lateral …
(A) Normalized depth of TC somata within the EPL; lines connect recorded pairs. (B, C) Within-pair intersomatic differences in EPL depth did not correlate with spike-time cross-correlogram peaks …
(A) Spike-time cross-power spectral density (CPSD) spectrograms averaged across all TC pairs (upper) and MC pairs (lower) expanded in time across consecutive photostimulation cycles (dashed lines). …
(A) Expanded-timescale cross-correlogram of spike times recorded in the MC pair in Figure 1A, with 50-ms-long sliding window average applied to highlight temporal patterning at frequencies < 20 Hz. …
(A, B) Trial-averaged cross-power spectral density (CPSD) spectrograms of spike times evoked in a heterotypic tufted cell (TC) pair (A) and homotypic TC pair (B) following 2 Hz, 5 Hz, and 8 Hz …
(A) Example voltage-clamp recording of a heterotypic MC pair during photostimulation. Morphology (upper) and representative trial (lower; blue rectangles: 10 ms light pulses of the 5 Hz …
(A) Raster plots of IPSC times recorded during photostimulation across all trials in the MCs in Figure 6A (‘expt.’), as well as across 500 trials of spike times simulated from rate-matched …
(A, B) Trial-averaged IPSC rates (A) and amplitudes (B; averaged within 20 ms time bins) across all TCs and MCs during photostimulation. Blue rectangles: 10 ms light pulses of the 5 Hz …
(A) Trial-averaged rates of IPSCs occurring synchronously (|ΔtIPSC| ≤ 1 ms) and asynchronously (|ΔtIPSC| > 1 ms) between MCs of the pair in Figure 6A following photostimulation onset at 0.0 s. …
(A) Trial-averaged experimental IPSC-time cross-power spectral density (CPSD) spectrogram from the MC pair in Figure 6A following photostimulation onset at 0.0 s (upper), and equivalent …
(A) Time-independent IPSC-time cross-power spectral density (CPSD) of mitral cell (MC) pairs and TC pairs recorded throughout the photostimulation protocol. (B) MC pairs exhibited greater IPSC-time …
(A, B) Mitral cells (MCs) and tufted cells (TCs) exhibited comparable within-pair total intersomatic distance (A) (two-sample t-test: p=0.93, t7 = 0.089) and lateral intersomatic distance (B) …
(A) Normalized depth of TC somata within the EPL; lines connect recorded pairs. (B, C) Within-pair intersomatic differences in EPL depth did not correlate with IPSC-time cross-correlogram peaks …
(A) Trial-averaged cross-correlogram of inhibitory currents recorded throughout the photostimulation protocol in the MC pair in Figure 6A. (B) Trial-averaged cross-power spectral density (CPSD) …
(A) Trial-averaged spike-time auto-power spectral density (APSD) spectrogram from the MCs in Figure 1A. Continuous epochs (ΔHz/ms < 150) of high APSD reflecting robust periodic firing are defined as …
(A) Trial-averaged experimental spike-time auto-power spectral density (APSD) spectrogram from the anterior MC in Figure 1A following photostimulation onset at 0.0 s (upper), and equivalent …
(A) Cellwise distribution of ridge auto-power spectral density (APSD) vs. frequency. Ellipses denote mean ± standard deviation of APSD and frequencies across all ridges detected in each cell. (B) …
The probability of robust spike-time periodicity reflected in spike-time auto-power spectral density (APSD) ridges was consistently higher among TCs than MCs throughout the average photostimulation …
(A) Instantaneous firing rate of the MCs in Figure 1A plotted against the simultaneous frequency of periodic spike-time synchrony during each spike-time cross-power spectral density (CPSD) ridge. …
(A) Tufted cell (TC) pairs exhibited smaller mean firing rate differences, averaged throughout the photostimulation protocol and relative to the mean firing rate of the pair, than mitral cell (MC) …
(A, B) Example recording of a resonant MC. Reconstructed morphology (A) and representative response to depolarizing step current injection (B) (light trace: original membrane potential; dark trace: …
Spreadsheet of source data for all figures.