Fitness consequences of outgroup conflict

  1. Ines Braga Goncalves
  2. Amy Morris-Drake
  3. Patrick Kennedy
  4. Andrew N Radford  Is a corresponding author
  1. School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
4 figures and 2 tables

Figures

Outgroup conflict occurs in social species throughout the animal kingdom, including (a) mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei), (b) vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus), (c) dwarf mongooses (Helogale parvula), (d) pied babblers (Turdoides bicolor), (e) daffodil cichlids (Neolamprologus pulcher) and (f) fire ants (Solenopsis invicta).

(d) Courtesy of Andrew Radford, with permission to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution License. (e) Courtesy of Ines Braga Goncalves, with permission to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

© 2019, Mittleman et al. Panel (a) courtesy of Simbi Yvan (https://unsplash.com/photos/NJuAzM8OhNE), reproduced under the terms of the Unsplash license (https://unsplash.com/license). Further reproduction of these panels should adhere to the Unsplash license.

© 2021, Andrew Liu. Panel (b) courtesy of Andrew Liu (https://unsplash.com/photos/tHEr4iqoWBQ), reproduced under the terms of the Unsplash license (https://unsplash.com/license). Further reproduction of these panels should adhere to the Unsplash license.

© 2018, Shannon Wild. Panel (c) courtesy of Shannon Wild (with permission from Shannon Wild, copyright 2018). This panel is not available under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution license and further reproduction of this image requires permission from the copyright holder.

© 2017, Mittleman et al. Permissions: Panel (f) courtesy of Mikhail Vasilyev (https://unsplash.com/photos/Vf1JrKMUS0Q), reproduced under the terms of the Unsplash license (https://unsplash.com/license). Further reproduction of these panels should adhere to the Unsplash license.

The enforced takeover of a breeding position by one or more outsiders can have a series of immediate and delayed fitness consequences, for both contest participants and for same- and next-generation third-party individuals, as illustrated by African lions (Panthera leo).

Lion artwork is by Martin Aveling and is not available under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution licence; further reproduction of these images requires permission from the copyright holder.

© 2022, Martin Aveling. Lion artwork is by Martin Aveling and is not available under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution licence; further reproduction of these images requires permission from the copyright holder.

Interactions with secondary cues of rival groups (as well as with the outsiders themselves) can cause behavioural changes and increase the risk of disease and parasite transmission, with downstream fitness consequences, as illustrated by dwarf mongooses (Helogale parvula).

Mongooses artwork is by Martin Aveling and is not available under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution licence; further reproduction of these images requires permission from the copyright holder.

© 2022, Martin Aveling. Mongooses artwork is by Martin Aveling and is not available under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution licence; further reproduction of these images requires permission from the copyright holder.

The cumulative pressure from outsiders, whether from multiple contests or the general threat of conflict, can affect adult reproduction and offspring number and characteristics, as illustrated by the daffodil cichlid (Neolamprologus pulcher).

Fish artwork is by Martin Aveling and is not available under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution licence; further reproduction of these images requires permission from the copyright holder.

© 2022, Martin Aveling. Fish artwork is by Martin Aveling and is not available under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution licence; further reproduction of these images requires permission from the copyright holder.

Tables

Table 1
Potential ways in which outgroup conflict may have immediate, delayed, and cumulative consequences for the survival and reproductive success (RS) of individuals directly affected.

Examples are those of outgroup effects; where demonstrated, they also include the ensuing fitness consequences but in some cases, those have yet to be quantified.

Outgroup effectsPotential fitness consequencesExamples
(a) Immediate consequences
Death of adultDecreased survivalDuring intercolony interactions in dampwood termites (Zootermopsis nevadensis), founding reproductives are targeted and killed (Thorne et al., 2003).
Death of offspringDecreased survivalIn fights between rival groups of banded mongooses (Mungos mungo), pups are the most common victims (Nichols et al., 2015).
Extra-group matingIncreased RS of external male; decreased RS of cuckolded male; increased RS (better genes, unrelated partner) for femaleSubordinate female common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) sneak matings with outgroup males whilst other group members are engaged in intergroup contests (Lazaro-Perea, 2001).
Female transferDecreased RS for male(s) in original group; increased RS for male(s) in new groupFemale hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas) may be kidnapped by rival males during intergroup contests; males from the original group may attempt to recover the females, putting themselves at risk of serious injury (Pines and Swedell, 2011).
Breeder replacementIncreased RS for incoming breeder; decreased RS for usurped breederIn Arabian babblers (Turdoides squamiceps), outsiders frequently take over the breeding position in a group; coalitions of same-sexed individuals are more successful at takeovers than lone individuals (Ridley, 2011).
(b) Delayed consequences
InjuryDecreased survival and RSIn mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei), attacks on intruding adult males can result in severe injury (Rosenbaum et al., 2016).
Disease / parasite transmissionDecreased survival and RSHoneybees (Apis mellifera) from healthy colonies that rob honey from neighbouring colonies collapsing from Varroa mite infestations inadvertently carry the mites back to their own colonies (Peck and Seeley, 2019).
Avoidance of areaDecreased survival and RSBaboon (Papio cynocephalus) groups that lose intergroup contests avoid the area around the encounter location in the following three months (Markham et al., 2012).
Change in behaviour (e.g. movement)Decreased survival and RSWhite-faced capuchin (Cebus capucinus) groups that lose intergroup contests move further, faster, and for longer compared to groups that won (Crofoot, 2013).
(c) Cumulative consequences
Change in territory sizeIncreased survival and RS for winners; decreased survival and RS for losersArtificially reducing the colony size of a territorial ant, Azteca trigona, resulted in loss of territory (by up to 35%) to neighbours (Adams, 1990).
StressDecreased survival and RSCortisol levels are higher in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) on days when the group experiences an intergroup encounter (Samuni et al., 2019); female reproductive success is reduced (increase in inter-birth intervals) when pressure from neighbouring groups, and likely stress, is high (Lemoine et al., 2020).
Table 2
Potential ways in which outgroup conflict may have consequences for the survival and reproductive success (RS) of third-party individuals following an initial effect on others.

Examples are those of third-party effects from outgroup conflicts; where demonstrated, they also include the ensuing fitness consequences but in some cases, those have yet to be quantified.

Outgroup effectThird-party effectPotential fitness consequencesExamples
(a) Same generation
Change in breederAccess to unrelated potential mateIncreased breeding opportunities for opposite-sex group membersSubordinate female meerkats (Suricata suricatta) are more likely to reproduce when there are unrelated males in the group (Clutton-Brock et al., 2001).
Changes to female reproductive outputReduced fertilityFollowing male takeovers, female African lions (Panthera leo) that lose dependent young to infanticide take about 3.5 months longer to conceive again relative to females that lose young under other circumstances (Packer and Pusey, 1983).
InfanticideDecreased RS for parents; increased RS for incoming maleMale takeovers in geladas (Theropithecus gelada) are associated with a 32-fold increase in rates of infant death and a halving of inter-birth intervals in females that lost their infants following the takeover (Beehner and Bergman, 2008).
Eviction of adultsDecreased survival and RS for evicted individualsFollowing takeovers in Arabian babblers (Turdoides squamiceps), same-sex subordinates are often evicted from the group (Ridley, 2011).
Change in group sizeMore groupmatesDecreased risk of group extinctionIn several ant species, including the honey ant Myrmecocystus mimicus and the fire ant Solenopsis invicta, workers in starting colonies raid nearby conspecific nests for brood (intraspecific slave-making), with colonies that have the most workers being most likely to prevail (Pollock and Rissing, 1989).
Fewer groupmatesDecreased survival and RSDeath of a groupmate during an outgroup contest reduced the resource-holding potential of a spotted hyaena (Crocuta crocuta) group, resulting in substantial loss of territory to competing groups and individuals being more vulnerable to heterospecific competitors and predators (Henschel and Skinner, 1991).
(b) Next generation
Time and energy in contestsReduced quality of parental careDecreased offspring survivalPied babbler (Turdoides bicolor) groups, especially those with fewer members, leave nests exposed to predators and nestlings to go hungry during territory defence against neighbouring groups, resulting in lower reproductive success (Ridley, 2016).
Change in breederInfanticideDecreased offspring survivalIn crested macaques (Macaca nigra), group takeovers by immigrant males are associated with a near tripling in the probability of infant mortality (Kerhoas et al., 2014).
Eviction of independent youngDecreased survival for evicted individualsFollowing a pride takeover, incoming male African lions often evict independent sub-adults; young males rarely disperse successfully, invariably resulting in premature deaths (Elliot et al., 2014).
Parental stressDecreased offspring qualityDecreased infant survivalIn chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), the level of neighbour pressure experienced during pregnancy is negatively associated with subsequent infant survival (Lemoine et al., 2020).
Reduced offspring sizeReduced future RSDaffodil cichlid (Neolamprologus pulcher) groups experiencing chronic outgroup conflict produce young with lower survivorship and smaller body size (Braga Goncalves and Radford, 2022); surviving young likely incur fitness costs because adult body size is a key determinant of dominance and fecundity in this species (Wong and Balshine, 2011).

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ines Braga Goncalves
  2. Amy Morris-Drake
  3. Patrick Kennedy
  4. Andrew N Radford
(2022)
Fitness consequences of outgroup conflict
eLife 11:e74550.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74550