Auditory mismatch responses are differentially sensitive to changes in muscarinic acetylcholine versus dopamine receptor function

  1. Lilian Aline Weber  Is a corresponding author
  2. Sara Tomiello
  3. Dario Schöbi
  4. Katharina V. Wellstein
  5. Daniel Mueller
  6. Sandra Iglesias
  7. Klaas Enno Stephan
  1. University of Zurich, Switzerland
  2. University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

The auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) has been proposed as a biomarker of NMDA receptor (NMDAR) dysfunction in schizophrenia. Such dysfunction may be caused by aberrant interactions of different neuromodulators with NMDARs, which could explain clinical heterogeneity among patients. In two studies (N=81 each), we used a double-blind placebo-controlled between-subject design to systematically test whether auditory mismatch responses under varying levels of environmental stability are sensitive to diminishing and enhancing cholinergic vs. dopaminergic function. We found a significant drug x mismatch interaction: while the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist biperiden delayed and topographically shifted mismatch responses, particularly during high stability, this effect could not be detected for amisulpride, a dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonist. Neither galantamine nor levodopa, which elevate acetylcholine and dopamine levels, respectively, exerted significant effects on MMN. This differential MMN sensitivity to muscarinic versus dopaminergic receptor function may prove useful for developing tests that predict individual treatment responses in schizophrenia.

Data availability

All raw data (EEG data, behavior) used for this manuscript are available at https://research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/477685, adhering to the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Re-usable) data principles. The analysis code that reproduces the results presented here is publicly available on the GIT repository of ETH Zurich at https://gitlab.ethz.ch/tnu/code/weber-muscarinic-mmn-erp-2021.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lilian Aline Weber

    Translational Neuroimaging Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical EngineeringInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    weber@biomed.ee.ethz.ch
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9727-9623
  2. Sara Tomiello

    Translational Neuroimaging Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Dario Schöbi

    Translational Neuroimaging Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Katharina V. Wellstein

    Translational Neuroimaging Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Daniel Mueller

    Institute for Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sandra Iglesias

    Translational Neuroimaging Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1778-7239
  7. Klaas Enno Stephan

    Translational Neuroimaging Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8594-9092

Funding

University of Zurich (N/A)

  • Klaas Enno Stephan

René und Susanne Braginsky Stiftung (N/A)

  • Klaas Enno Stephan

Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research (open access funding)

  • Klaas Enno Stephan

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants gave written informed consent prior to data acquisition and were financially reimbursed for their participation. The study was approved by the cantonal Ethics Committee of Zurich (KEK-ZH-Nr. 2011-0101/3).

Copyright

© 2022, Weber et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,400
    views
  • 215
    downloads
  • 13
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lilian Aline Weber
  2. Sara Tomiello
  3. Dario Schöbi
  4. Katharina V. Wellstein
  5. Daniel Mueller
  6. Sandra Iglesias
  7. Klaas Enno Stephan
(2022)
Auditory mismatch responses are differentially sensitive to changes in muscarinic acetylcholine versus dopamine receptor function
eLife 11:e74835.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74835

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74835

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Shuo Zhang, Yan Tian ... Haiyan Wu
    Research Article

    Active inference integrates perception, decision-making, and learning into a united theoretical framework, providing an efficient way to trade off exploration and exploitation by minimizing (expected) free energy. In this study, we asked how the brain represents values and uncertainties (novelty and variability), and resolves these uncertainties under the active inference framework in the exploration-exploitation trade-off. Twenty-five participants performed a contextual two-armed bandit task, with electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. By comparing the model evidence for active inference and reinforcement learning models of choice behavior, we show that active inference better explains human decision-making under novelty and variability, which entails exploration or information seeking. The EEG sensor-level results show that the activity in the frontal, central, and parietal regions is associated with novelty, while the activity in the frontal and central brain regions is associated with variability. The EEG source-level results indicate that the expected free energy is encoded in the frontal pole and middle frontal gyrus and uncertainties are encoded in different brain regions but with overlap. Our study dissociates the expected free energy and uncertainties in active inference theory and their neural correlates, speaking to the construct validity of active inference in characterizing cognitive processes of human decisions. It provides behavioral and neural evidence of active inference in decision processes and insights into the neural mechanism of human decisions under uncertainties.

    1. Neuroscience
    Myrthe Faber, Koen V Haak
    Insight

    Untangling the functional organisation of a brain region crucial for memory and learning helps reveal how individual differences are linked to variations in recall ability, aging and dopamine receptor distribution.