The missing link between genetic association and regulatory function

  1. Noah James Connally  Is a corresponding author
  2. Sumaiya Nazeen
  3. Daniel Lee
  4. Huwenbo Shi
  5. John Stamatoyannopoulos
  6. Sung Chun
  7. Chris Cotsapas  Is a corresponding author
  8. Christopher A Cassa  Is a corresponding author
  9. Shamil R Sunyaev  Is a corresponding author
  1. Harvard Medical School, United States
  2. Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, United States
  3. Altius Institute for Biomedical Sciences, United States
  4. Boston Children's Hospital, United States
  5. Broad Institute, United States
  6. Brigham and Women's Hospital, United States

Abstract

The genetic basis of most traits is highly polygenic and dominated by non-coding alleles. It is widely assumed that such alleles exert small regulatory effects on the expression of cis-linked genes. However, despite the availability of gene expression and epigenomic data sets, few variant-to-gene links have emerged. It is unclear whether these sparse results are due to limitations in available data and methods, or to deficiencies in the underlying assumed model. To better distinguish between these possibilities, we identified 220 gene-trait pairs in which protein-coding variants influence a complex trait or its Mendelian cognate. Despite the presence of expression quantitative trait loci near most GWAS associations, by applying a gene-based approach we found limited evidence that the baseline expression of trait-related genes explains GWAS associations, whether using colocalization methods (8% of genes implicated), transcription-wide association (2% of genes implicated), or a combination of regulatory annotations and distance (4% of genes implicated). These results contradict the hypothesis that most complex trait-associated variants coincide with homeostatic eQTLs, suggesting that better models are needed. The field must confront this deficit, and pursue this 'missing regulation'.

Data availability

Numerical data for results is included in Source Data 1.The dataset generated (GWAS summary statistics conditioned on coding variants) can be found at doi:10.5061/dryad.612jm644q

The following data sets were generated
    1. Connally NJ
    (2022) GWAS results conditioned on coding variants
    Dryad Digital Repository, doi:10.5061/dryad.612jm644q.
The following previously published data sets were used
    1. UK Biobank
    (2012) UK Biobank
    http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/.
    1. TOPMed Consortium
    (2021) NHLBI TOPMed
    https://www.nhlbiwgs.org/topmed-whole-genome-sequencing-project-freeze-5b-phases-1-and-2.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Noah James Connally

    Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    noahconnally@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3818-6739
  2. Sumaiya Nazeen

    Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Daniel Lee

    Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Huwenbo Shi

    Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. John Stamatoyannopoulos

    Altius Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sung Chun

    Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Chris Cotsapas

    Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    cotsapas@broadinstitute.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Christopher A Cassa

    Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    cassa@mit.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Shamil R Sunyaev

    Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    ssunyaev@rics.bwh.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5715-5677

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R35GM127131)

  • Shamil R Sunyaev

National Institutes of Health (R01HG010372)

  • Shamil R Sunyaev

National Institutes of Health (R01MH101244)

  • Shamil R Sunyaev

National Institutes of Health (U01HG012009)

  • Chris Cotsapas

National Institutes of Health (T32GM74897)

  • Shamil R Sunyaev

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Connally et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,564
    views
  • 1,002
    downloads
  • 78
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Noah James Connally
  2. Sumaiya Nazeen
  3. Daniel Lee
  4. Huwenbo Shi
  5. John Stamatoyannopoulos
  6. Sung Chun
  7. Chris Cotsapas
  8. Christopher A Cassa
  9. Shamil R Sunyaev
(2022)
The missing link between genetic association and regulatory function
eLife 11:e74970.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74970

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74970

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Dániel Molnár, Éva Viola Surányi ... Judit Toth
    Research Article

    The sustained success of Mycobacterium tuberculosis as a pathogen arises from its ability to persist within macrophages for extended periods and its limited responsiveness to antibiotics. Furthermore, the high incidence of resistance to the few available antituberculosis drugs is a significant concern, especially since the driving forces of the emergence of drug resistance are not clear. Drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis can emerge through de novo mutations, however, mycobacterial mutation rates are low. To unravel the effects of antibiotic pressure on genome stability, we determined the genetic variability, phenotypic tolerance, DNA repair system activation, and dNTP pool upon treatment with current antibiotics using Mycobacterium smegmatis. Whole-genome sequencing revealed no significant increase in mutation rates after prolonged exposure to first-line antibiotics. However, the phenotypic fluctuation assay indicated rapid adaptation to antibiotics mediated by non-genetic factors. The upregulation of DNA repair genes, measured using qPCR, suggests that genomic integrity may be maintained through the activation of specific DNA repair pathways. Our results, indicating that antibiotic exposure does not result in de novo adaptive mutagenesis under laboratory conditions, do not lend support to the model suggesting antibiotic resistance development through drug pressure-induced microevolution.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Sanjarbek Hudaiberdiev, Ivan Ovcharenko
    Research Article

    Enhancers and promoters are classically considered to be bound by a small set of transcription factors (TFs) in a sequence-specific manner. This assumption has come under increasing skepticism as the datasets of ChIP-seq assays of TFs have expanded. In particular, high-occupancy target (HOT) loci attract hundreds of TFs with often no detectable correlation between ChIP-seq peaks and DNA-binding motif presence. Here, we used a set of 1003 TF ChIP-seq datasets (HepG2, K562, H1) to analyze the patterns of ChIP-seq peak co-occurrence in combination with functional genomics datasets. We identified 43,891 HOT loci forming at the promoter (53%) and enhancer (47%) regions. HOT promoters regulate housekeeping genes, whereas HOT enhancers are involved in tissue-specific process regulation. HOT loci form the foundation of human super-enhancers and evolve under strong negative selection, with some of these loci being located in ultraconserved regions. Sequence-based classification analysis of HOT loci suggested that their formation is driven by the sequence features, and the density of mapped ChIP-seq peaks across TF-bound loci correlates with sequence features and the expression level of flanking genes. Based on the affinities to bind to promoters and enhancers we detected five distinct clusters of TFs that form the core of the HOT loci. We report an abundance of HOT loci in the human genome and a commitment of 51% of all TF ChIP-seq binding events to HOT locus formation thus challenging the classical model of enhancer activity and propose a model of HOT locus formation based on the existence of large transcriptional condensates.