The missing link between genetic association and regulatory function

  1. Noah James Connally  Is a corresponding author
  2. Sumaiya Nazeen
  3. Daniel Lee
  4. Huwenbo Shi
  5. John Stamatoyannopoulos
  6. Sung Chun
  7. Chris Cotsapas  Is a corresponding author
  8. Christopher A Cassa  Is a corresponding author
  9. Shamil R Sunyaev  Is a corresponding author
  1. Harvard Medical School, United States
  2. Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, United States
  3. Altius Institute for Biomedical Sciences, United States
  4. Boston Children's Hospital, United States
  5. Broad Institute, United States
  6. Brigham and Women's Hospital, United States

Abstract

The genetic basis of most traits is highly polygenic and dominated by non-coding alleles. It is widely assumed that such alleles exert small regulatory effects on the expression of cis-linked genes. However, despite the availability of gene expression and epigenomic data sets, few variant-to-gene links have emerged. It is unclear whether these sparse results are due to limitations in available data and methods, or to deficiencies in the underlying assumed model. To better distinguish between these possibilities, we identified 220 gene-trait pairs in which protein-coding variants influence a complex trait or its Mendelian cognate. Despite the presence of expression quantitative trait loci near most GWAS associations, by applying a gene-based approach we found limited evidence that the baseline expression of trait-related genes explains GWAS associations, whether using colocalization methods (8% of genes implicated), transcription-wide association (2% of genes implicated), or a combination of regulatory annotations and distance (4% of genes implicated). These results contradict the hypothesis that most complex trait-associated variants coincide with homeostatic eQTLs, suggesting that better models are needed. The field must confront this deficit, and pursue this 'missing regulation'.

Data availability

Numerical data for results is included in Source Data 1.The dataset generated (GWAS summary statistics conditioned on coding variants) can be found at doi:10.5061/dryad.612jm644q

The following data sets were generated
    1. Connally NJ
    (2022) GWAS results conditioned on coding variants
    Dryad Digital Repository, doi:10.5061/dryad.612jm644q.
The following previously published data sets were used
    1. UK Biobank
    (2012) UK Biobank
    http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/.
    1. TOPMed Consortium
    (2021) NHLBI TOPMed
    https://www.nhlbiwgs.org/topmed-whole-genome-sequencing-project-freeze-5b-phases-1-and-2.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Noah James Connally

    Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    noahconnally@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3818-6739
  2. Sumaiya Nazeen

    Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Daniel Lee

    Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Huwenbo Shi

    Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. John Stamatoyannopoulos

    Altius Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sung Chun

    Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Chris Cotsapas

    Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    cotsapas@broadinstitute.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Christopher A Cassa

    Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    cassa@mit.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Shamil R Sunyaev

    Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    ssunyaev@rics.bwh.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5715-5677

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R35GM127131)

  • Shamil R Sunyaev

National Institutes of Health (R01HG010372)

  • Shamil R Sunyaev

National Institutes of Health (R01MH101244)

  • Shamil R Sunyaev

National Institutes of Health (U01HG012009)

  • Chris Cotsapas

National Institutes of Health (T32GM74897)

  • Shamil R Sunyaev

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jonathan Flint, University of California, Los Angeles, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: June 11, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: October 25, 2021
  3. Accepted: December 2, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: December 14, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: January 16, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Connally et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,139
    views
  • 970
    downloads
  • 62
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Noah James Connally
  2. Sumaiya Nazeen
  3. Daniel Lee
  4. Huwenbo Shi
  5. John Stamatoyannopoulos
  6. Sung Chun
  7. Chris Cotsapas
  8. Christopher A Cassa
  9. Shamil R Sunyaev
(2022)
The missing link between genetic association and regulatory function
eLife 11:e74970.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74970

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74970

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Ardalan Naseri, Degui Zhi, Shaojie Zhang
    Research Article Updated

    Runs-of-homozygosity (ROH) segments, contiguous homozygous regions in a genome were traditionally linked to families and inbred populations. However, a growing literature suggests that ROHs are ubiquitous in outbred populations. Still, most existing genetic studies of ROH in populations are limited to aggregated ROH content across the genome, which does not offer the resolution for mapping causal loci. This limitation is mainly due to a lack of methods for the efficient identification of shared ROH diplotypes. Here, we present a new method, ROH-DICE (runs-of-homozygous diplotype cluster enumerator), to find large ROH diplotype clusters, sufficiently long ROHs shared by a sufficient number of individuals, in large cohorts. ROH-DICE identified over 1 million ROH diplotypes that span over 100 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and are shared by more than 100 UK Biobank participants. Moreover, we found significant associations of clustered ROH diplotypes across the genome with various self-reported diseases, with the strongest associations found between the extended human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region and autoimmune disorders. We found an association between a diplotype covering the homeostatic iron regulator (HFE) gene and hemochromatosis, even though the well-known causal SNP was not directly genotyped or imputed. Using a genome-wide scan, we identified a putative association between carriers of an ROH diplotype in chromosome 4 and an increase in mortality among COVID-19 patients (p-value = 1.82 × 10−11). In summary, our ROH-DICE method, by calling out large ROH diplotypes in a large outbred population, enables further population genetics into the demographic history of large populations. More importantly, our method enables a new genome-wide mapping approach for finding disease-causing loci with multi-marker recessive effects at a population scale.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Lisa Baumgartner, Jonathan J Ipsaro ... Julius Brennecke
    Research Advance

    Members of the diverse heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family play crucial roles in heterochromatin formation and maintenance. Despite the similar affinities of their chromodomains for di- and tri-methylated histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9me2/3), different HP1 proteins exhibit distinct chromatin-binding patterns, likely due to interactions with various specificity factors. Previously, we showed that the chromatin-binding pattern of the HP1 protein Rhino, a crucial factor of the Drosophila PIWI-interacting RNA (piRNA) pathway, is largely defined by a DNA sequence-specific C2H2 zinc finger protein named Kipferl (Baumgartner et al., 2022). Here, we elucidate the molecular basis of the interaction between Rhino and its guidance factor Kipferl. Through phylogenetic analyses, structure prediction, and in vivo genetics, we identify a single amino acid change within Rhino’s chromodomain, G31D, that does not affect H3K9me2/3 binding but disrupts the interaction between Rhino and Kipferl. Flies carrying the rhinoG31D mutation phenocopy kipferl mutant flies, with Rhino redistributing from piRNA clusters to satellite repeats, causing pronounced changes in the ovarian piRNA profile of rhinoG31D flies. Thus, Rhino’s chromodomain functions as a dual-specificity module, facilitating interactions with both a histone mark and a DNA-binding protein.