The missing link between genetic association and regulatory function

  1. Noah James Connally  Is a corresponding author
  2. Sumaiya Nazeen
  3. Daniel Lee
  4. Huwenbo Shi
  5. John Stamatoyannopoulos
  6. Sung Chun
  7. Chris Cotsapas  Is a corresponding author
  8. Christopher A Cassa  Is a corresponding author
  9. Shamil R Sunyaev  Is a corresponding author
  1. Harvard Medical School, United States
  2. Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, United States
  3. Altius Institute for Biomedical Sciences, United States
  4. Boston Children's Hospital, United States
  5. Broad Institute, United States
  6. Brigham and Women's Hospital, United States

Abstract

The genetic basis of most traits is highly polygenic and dominated by non-coding alleles. It is widely assumed that such alleles exert small regulatory effects on the expression of cis-linked genes. However, despite the availability of gene expression and epigenomic data sets, few variant-to-gene links have emerged. It is unclear whether these sparse results are due to limitations in available data and methods, or to deficiencies in the underlying assumed model. To better distinguish between these possibilities, we identified 220 gene-trait pairs in which protein-coding variants influence a complex trait or its Mendelian cognate. Despite the presence of expression quantitative trait loci near most GWAS associations, by applying a gene-based approach we found limited evidence that the baseline expression of trait-related genes explains GWAS associations, whether using colocalization methods (8% of genes implicated), transcription-wide association (2% of genes implicated), or a combination of regulatory annotations and distance (4% of genes implicated). These results contradict the hypothesis that most complex trait-associated variants coincide with homeostatic eQTLs, suggesting that better models are needed. The field must confront this deficit, and pursue this 'missing regulation'.

Data availability

Numerical data for results is included in Source Data 1.The dataset generated (GWAS summary statistics conditioned on coding variants) can be found at doi:10.5061/dryad.612jm644q

The following data sets were generated
    1. Connally NJ
    (2022) GWAS results conditioned on coding variants
    Dryad Digital Repository, doi:10.5061/dryad.612jm644q.
The following previously published data sets were used
    1. UK Biobank
    (2012) UK Biobank
    http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/.
    1. TOPMed Consortium
    (2021) NHLBI TOPMed
    https://www.nhlbiwgs.org/topmed-whole-genome-sequencing-project-freeze-5b-phases-1-and-2.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Noah James Connally

    Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    noahconnally@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3818-6739
  2. Sumaiya Nazeen

    Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Daniel Lee

    Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Huwenbo Shi

    Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. John Stamatoyannopoulos

    Altius Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sung Chun

    Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Chris Cotsapas

    Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    cotsapas@broadinstitute.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Christopher A Cassa

    Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    cassa@mit.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Shamil R Sunyaev

    Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    ssunyaev@rics.bwh.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5715-5677

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R35GM127131)

  • Shamil R Sunyaev

National Institutes of Health (R01HG010372)

  • Shamil R Sunyaev

National Institutes of Health (R01MH101244)

  • Shamil R Sunyaev

National Institutes of Health (U01HG012009)

  • Chris Cotsapas

National Institutes of Health (T32GM74897)

  • Shamil R Sunyaev

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Connally et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,000
    views
  • 1,052
    downloads
  • 98
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Noah James Connally
  2. Sumaiya Nazeen
  3. Daniel Lee
  4. Huwenbo Shi
  5. John Stamatoyannopoulos
  6. Sung Chun
  7. Chris Cotsapas
  8. Christopher A Cassa
  9. Shamil R Sunyaev
(2022)
The missing link between genetic association and regulatory function
eLife 11:e74970.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74970

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74970

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Tackhoon Kim, Byung-Sun Park ... Timothy Lu
    Research Article

    Tyrosine kinases play a crucial role in cell proliferation and survival and are extensively investigated as targets for cancer treatment. However, the efficacy of most tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in cancer therapy is limited due to resistance. In this study, we identify a synergistic combination therapy involving TKIs for the treatment of triple negative breast cancer. By employing pairwise tyrosine kinase knockout CRISPR screens, we identify FYN and KDM4 as critical targets whose inhibition enhances the effectiveness of TKIs, such as NVP-ADW742 (IGF-1R inhibitor), gefitinib (EGFR inhibitor), and imatinib (ABL inhibitor) both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, treatment with TKIs upregulates the transcription of KDM4, which in turn demethylates H3K9me3 at FYN enhancer for FYN transcription. This compensatory activation of FYN and KDM4 contributes to the resistance against TKIs. FYN expression is associated with therapy resistance and persistence by demonstrating its upregulation in various experimental models of drug-tolerant persisters and residual disease following targeted therapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Collectively, our study provides novel targets and mechanistic insights that can guide the development of effective combinatorial targeted therapies, thus maximizing the therapeutic benefits of TKIs.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Hirokazu Kimura, Kamel Lahouel ... Nicholas Jason Roberts
    Research Article

    Interpretation of variants identified during genetic testing is a significant clinical challenge. In this study, we developed a high-throughput CDKN2A functional assay and characterized all possible human CDKN2A missense variants. We found that 17.7% of all missense variants were functionally deleterious. We also used our functional classifications to assess the performance of in silico models that predict the effect of variants, including recently reported models based on machine learning. Notably, we found that all in silico models performed similarly when compared to our functional classifications with accuracies of 39.5–85.4%. Furthermore, while we found that functionally deleterious variants were enriched within ankyrin repeats, we did not identify any residues where all missense variants were functionally deleterious. Our functional classifications are a resource to aid the interpretation of CDKN2A variants and have important implications for the application of variant interpretation guidelines, particularly the use of in silico models for clinical variant interpretation.