Intracranial human recordings reveal association between neural activity and perceived intensity for the pain of others in the insula

  1. Efe Soyman
  2. Rune Bruls
  3. Kalliopi Ioumpa
  4. Laura Müller-Pinzler
  5. Selene Gallo
  6. Chaoyi Qin
  7. Elisabeth CW van Straaten
  8. Matthew W Self
  9. Judith C Peters
  10. Jessy K Possel
  11. Yoshiyuki Onuki
  12. Johannes C Baayen
  13. Sander Idema
  14. Christian Keysers  Is a corresponding author
  15. Valeria Gazzola  Is a corresponding author
  1. Koç University, Turkey
  2. Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Netherlands
  3. University of Lübeck, Germany
  4. Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Netherlands
  5. Jichi Medical University, Japan

Abstract

Based on neuroimaging data, the insula is considered important for people to empathize with the pain of others. Here we present intracranial electroencephalographic (iEEG) recordings and single-cell recordings from the human insulae while 7 epilepsy patients rated the intensity of a woman's painful experiences seen in short movie clips. Pain had to be deduced from seeing facial expressions or a hand being slapped by a belt. We found activity in the broadband 20-190 Hz range correlated with the trial-by-trial perceived intensity in the insula for both types of stimuli. Within the insula, some locations had activity correlating with perceived intensity for our facial expressions but not for our hand stimuli, others only for our hand but not our face stimuli, and others for both. The timing of responses to the sight of the hand being hit is best explained by kinematic information; that for our facial expressions, by shape information. Comparing the broadband activity in the iEEG signal with spiking activity from a small number of neurons and an fMRI experiment with similar stimuli, revealed a consistent spatial organization, with stronger associations with intensity more anteriorly, while viewing the hand being slapped.

Data availability

The data presented in this work is publicly available at the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/mcahz/

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Efe Soyman

    Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Lab, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Rune Bruls

    Social Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kalliopi Ioumpa

    Social Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Laura Müller-Pinzler

    Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5567-5430
  5. Selene Gallo

    Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Chaoyi Qin

    Social Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Elisabeth CW van Straaten

    Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Matthew W Self

    Department of Vision and Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5731-579X
  9. Judith C Peters

    Department of Vision and Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jessy K Possel

    Department of Vision and Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Yoshiyuki Onuki

    Department of Neurosurgery, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Johannes C Baayen

    Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Sander Idema

    Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Christian Keysers

    Social Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    c.keysers@nin.knaw.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2845-5467
  15. Valeria Gazzola

    Social Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    v.gazzola@nin.knaw.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0324-0619

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (452-14-015)

  • Valeria Gazzola

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (453-15-009)

  • Christian Keysers

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Written informed consent was obtained from each participant before participating in the study. All procedures on patients were approved by the medical ethical committee of the Vrije University Medical Center (protocol 2016/037). All procedures on healthy participants were approved by the local ethics committee of the University of Amsterdam (protocols 2017-EXT-8542 and 2021-EXT-13608). In addition, written informed consent to publish was obtained from the individual whose photographs are shown in Figures 1 and 3 of the article.

Copyright

© 2022, Soyman et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,413
    views
  • 392
    downloads
  • 13
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Efe Soyman
  2. Rune Bruls
  3. Kalliopi Ioumpa
  4. Laura Müller-Pinzler
  5. Selene Gallo
  6. Chaoyi Qin
  7. Elisabeth CW van Straaten
  8. Matthew W Self
  9. Judith C Peters
  10. Jessy K Possel
  11. Yoshiyuki Onuki
  12. Johannes C Baayen
  13. Sander Idema
  14. Christian Keysers
  15. Valeria Gazzola
(2022)
Intracranial human recordings reveal association between neural activity and perceived intensity for the pain of others in the insula
eLife 11:e75197.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75197

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75197

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Kayson Fakhar, Fatemeh Hadaeghi ... Claus C Hilgetag
    Research Article

    Efficient communication in brain networks is foundational for cognitive function and behavior. However, how communication efficiency is defined depends on the assumed model of signaling dynamics, e.g., shortest path signaling, random walker navigation, broadcasting, and diffusive processes. Thus, a general and model-agnostic framework for characterizing optimal neural communication is needed. We address this challenge by assigning communication efficiency through a virtual multi-site lesioning regime combined with game theory, applied to large-scale models of human brain dynamics. Our framework quantifies the exact influence each node exerts over every other, generating optimal influence maps given the underlying model of neural dynamics. These descriptions reveal how communication patterns unfold if regions are set to maximize their influence over one another. Comparing these maps with a variety of brain communication models showed that optimal communication closely resembles a broadcasting regime in which regions leverage multiple parallel channels for information dissemination. Moreover, we found that the brain’s most influential regions are its rich-club, exploiting their topological vantage point by broadcasting across numerous pathways that enhance their reach even if the underlying connections are weak. Altogether, our work provides a rigorous and versatile framework for characterizing optimal brain communication, and uncovers the most influential brain regions, and the topological features underlying their influence.

    1. Neuroscience
    François Osiurak, Giovanni Federico ... Mathieu Lesourd
    Research Article

    Our propensity to materiality, which consists in using, making, creating, and passing on technologies, has enabled us to shape the physical world according to our ends. To explain this proclivity, scientists have calibrated their lens to either low-level skills such as motor cognition or high-level skills such as language or social cognition. Yet, little has been said about the intermediate-level cognitive processes that are directly involved in mastering this materiality, that is, technical cognition. We aim to focus on this intermediate level for providing new insights into the neurocognitive bases of human materiality. Here, we show that a technical-reasoning process might be specifically at work in physical problem-solving situations. We found via two distinct neuroimaging studies that the area PF (parietal F) within the left parietal lobe is central for this reasoning process in both tool-use and non-tool-use physical problem-solving and can work along with social-cognitive skills to resolve day-to-day interactions that combine social and physical constraints. Our results demonstrate the existence of a specific cognitive module in the human brain dedicated to materiality, which might be the supporting pillar allowing the accumulation of technical knowledge over generations. Intensifying research on technical cognition could nurture a comprehensive framework that has been missing in fields interested in how early and modern humans have been interacting with the physical world through technology, and how this interaction has shaped our history and culture.