Endogenous Syngap1 alpha splice forms promote cognitive function and seizure protection

  1. Murat Kilinc
  2. Vineet Arora
  3. Thomas K Creson
  4. Camilo Rojas
  5. Aliza A Le
  6. Julie Lauterborn
  7. Brent Wilkinson
  8. Nicolas Hartel
  9. Nicholas Graham
  10. Adrian Reich
  11. Gemma Gou
  12. Yoichi Araki
  13. Àlex Bayés
  14. Marcelo Coba
  15. Gary Lynch
  16. Courtney A Miller
  17. Gavin Rumbaugh  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Scripps Research Institute, United States
  2. University of California, Irvine, United States
  3. University of Southern California, United States
  4. Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau, Spain
  5. Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Loss-of-function variants in SYNGAP1 cause a developmental encephalopathy defined by cognitive impairment, autistic features, and epilepsy. SYNGAP1 splicing leads to expression of distinct functional protein isoforms. Splicing imparts multiple cellular functions of SynGAP proteins through coding of distinct C-terminal motifs. However, it remains unknown how these different splice sequences function in vivo to regulate neuronal function and behavior. Reduced expression of SynGAP-a1/2 C-terminal splice variants in mice caused severe phenotypes, including reduced survival, impaired learning, and reduced seizure latency. In contrast, upregulation of a1/2 expression improved learning and increased seizure latency. Mice expressing a1-specific mutations, which disrupted SynGAP cellular functions without altering protein expression, promoted seizure, disrupted synapse plasticity, and impaired learning. These findings demonstrate that endogenous SynGAP isoforms with a1/2 spliced sequences promote cognitive function and impart seizure protection. Regulation of SynGAP-a expression or function may be a viable therapeutic strategy to broadly improve cognitive function and mitigate seizure.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided for western blots and mass spec experiments.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Murat Kilinc

    Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Vineet Arora

    Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7856-0401
  3. Thomas K Creson

    Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Camilo Rojas

    Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Aliza A Le

    Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Julie Lauterborn

    Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Brent Wilkinson

    Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Nicolas Hartel

    Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Nicholas Graham

    Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Adrian Reich

    Bioinformatics and Statistics Core, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Gemma Gou

    Molecular Physiology of the Synapse Laboratory, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yoichi Araki

    Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3455-9377
  13. Àlex Bayés

    Molecular Physiology of the Synapse Laboratory, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5265-6306
  14. Marcelo Coba

    Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Gary Lynch

    Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Courtney A Miller

    Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Gavin Rumbaugh

    Departments of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    For correspondence
    gavin@scripps.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6360-3894

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (MH096847 ; MH108408)

  • Gavin Rumbaugh

Autism Speaks (#10646)

  • Murat Kilinc

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#15-037 and #15-038) of Scripps Florida.

Copyright

© 2022, Kilinc et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,167
    views
  • 511
    downloads
  • 20
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Murat Kilinc
  2. Vineet Arora
  3. Thomas K Creson
  4. Camilo Rojas
  5. Aliza A Le
  6. Julie Lauterborn
  7. Brent Wilkinson
  8. Nicolas Hartel
  9. Nicholas Graham
  10. Adrian Reich
  11. Gemma Gou
  12. Yoichi Araki
  13. Àlex Bayés
  14. Marcelo Coba
  15. Gary Lynch
  16. Courtney A Miller
  17. Gavin Rumbaugh
(2022)
Endogenous Syngap1 alpha splice forms promote cognitive function and seizure protection
eLife 11:e75707.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75707

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75707

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Pál Barzó, Ildikó Szöts ... Gábor Tamás
    Research Article

    The basic excitatory neurons of the cerebral cortex, the pyramidal cells, are the most important signal integrators for the local circuit. They have quite characteristic morphological and electrophysiological properties that are known to be largely constant with age in the young and adult cortex. However, the brain undergoes several dynamic changes throughout life, such as in the phases of early development and cognitive decline in the aging brain. We set out to search for intrinsic cellular changes in supragranular pyramidal cells across a broad age range: from birth to 85 y of age and we found differences in several biophysical properties between defined age groups. During the first year of life, subthreshold and suprathreshold electrophysiological properties changed in a way that shows that pyramidal cells become less excitable with maturation, but also become temporarily more precise. According to our findings, the morphological features of the three-dimensional reconstructions from different life stages showed consistent morphological properties and systematic dendritic spine analysis of an infantile and an old pyramidal cell showed clear significant differences in the distribution of spine shapes. Overall, the changes that occur during development and aging may have lasting effects on the properties of pyramidal cells in the cerebral cortex. Understanding these changes is important to unravel the complex mechanisms underlying brain development, cognition, and age-related neurodegenerative diseases.

    1. Neuroscience
    Elissa Sutlief, Charlie Walters ... Marshall G Hussain Shuler
    Research Article

    Reward-rate maximization is a prominent normative principle in behavioral ecology, neuroscience, economics, and AI. Here, we identify, compare, and analyze equations to maximize reward rate when assessing whether to initiate a pursuit. In deriving expressions for the value of a pursuit, we show that time’s cost consists of both apportionment and opportunity cost. Reformulating value as a discounting function, we show precisely how a reward-rate-optimal agent’s discounting function (1) combines hyperbolic and linear components reflecting apportionment and opportunity costs, and (2) is dependent not only on the considered pursuit’s properties but also on time spent and rewards obtained outside the pursuit. This analysis reveals how purported signs of suboptimal behavior (hyperbolic discounting, and the Delay, Magnitude, and Sign effects) are in fact consistent with reward-rate maximization. To better account for observed decision-making errors in humans and animals, we then analyze the impact of misestimating reward-rate-maximizing parameters and find that suboptimal decisions likely stem from errors in assessing time’s apportionment—specifically, underweighting time spent outside versus inside a pursuit—which we term the ‘Malapportionment Hypothesis’. This understanding of the true pattern of temporal decision-making errors is essential to deducing the learning algorithms and representational architectures actually used by humans and animals.