Contextual effects in sensorimotor adaptation adhere to associative learning rules

  1. Guy Avraham  Is a corresponding author
  2. Jordan A Taylor
  3. Assaf Breska
  4. Richard B Ivry
  5. Samuel David McDougle  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Berkeley, United States
  2. Princeton University, United States
  3. Yale University, United States

Abstract

Traditional associative learning tasks focus on the formation of associations between salient events and arbitrary stimuli that predict those events. This is exemplified in cerebellar-dependent delay eyeblink conditioning, where arbitrary cues such as a light or tone act as conditioning stimuli (CSs) that predict aversive sensations at the cornea (unconditioned stimulus, US). Here we ask if a similar framework could be applied to another type of cerebellar-dependent sensorimotor learning – sensorimotor adaptation. Models of sensorimotor adaptation posit that the introduction of an environmental perturbation results in an error signal that is used to update an internal model of a sensorimotor map for motor planning. Here we take a step towards an integrative account of these two forms of cerebellar-dependent learning, examining the relevance of core concepts from associative learning for sensorimotor adaptation. Using a visuomotor adaptation reaching task, we paired movement-related feedback (US) with neutral auditory or visual contextual cues that served as conditioning stimuli (CSs). Trial-by-trial changes in feedforward movement kinematics exhibited three key signatures of associative learning: Differential conditioning, sensitivity to the CS-US interval, and compound conditioning. Moreover, after compound conditioning, a robust negative correlation was observed between responses to the two elemental CSs of the compound (i.e., overshadowing), consistent with the additivity principle posited by theories of associative learning. The existence of associative learning effects in sensorimotor adaptation provides a proof-of-concept for linking cerebellar-dependent learning paradigms within a common theoretical framework.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript; Source Data files have been provided for Figures 2B, 2C, 2D, 5B, 6B, 6C, 6D, 7B, 7C, 7D, 8B, 8C, 8E and 8F.All raw data files and codes for data analysis and simulations are available from the GitHub repository: https://github.com/guyavr/AssociativeMotorAdaptation.git

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Guy Avraham

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    For correspondence
    guyavraham@berkeley.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6170-1041
  2. Jordan A Taylor

    Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Assaf Breska

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley,, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6233-073X
  4. Richard B Ivry

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    Richard B Ivry, Senior editor, eLife, and a co-founder with equity in Magnetic Tides, Inc..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4728-5130
  5. Samuel David McDougle

    Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    samuel.mcdougle@yale.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8100-4238

Funding

National Institutes of Health (NS084948)

  • Jordan A Taylor

National Science Foundation (1838462)

  • Jordan A Taylor

National Science Foundation (1827550)

  • Jordan A Taylor

Office of Naval Research (N00014-18-1-2873)

  • Jordan A Taylor

National Institutes of Health (NS116883)

  • Richard B Ivry

National Institutes of Health (DC077091)

  • Richard B Ivry

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Taraz Lee, University of Michigan, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of California, Berkeley (Protocol 2016-02-8439) and adhered to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent to participate in the study.

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: September 15, 2020 (view preprint)
  2. Received: November 24, 2021
  3. Accepted: October 4, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: October 5, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: November 4, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Avraham et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,278
    views
  • 317
    downloads
  • 10
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Guy Avraham
  2. Jordan A Taylor
  3. Assaf Breska
  4. Richard B Ivry
  5. Samuel David McDougle
(2022)
Contextual effects in sensorimotor adaptation adhere to associative learning rules
eLife 11:e75801.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75801

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75801

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Kenneth Chiou, Noah Snyder-Mackler
    Insight

    Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the extent to which marmosets carry genetically distinct cells from their siblings.

    1. Neuroscience
    Flavio J Schmidig, Simon Ruch, Katharina Henke
    Research Article

    We are unresponsive during slow-wave sleep but continue monitoring external events for survival. Our brain wakens us when danger is imminent. If events are non-threatening, our brain might store them for later consideration to improve decision-making. To test this hypothesis, we examined whether novel vocabulary consisting of simultaneously played pseudowords and translation words are encoded/stored during sleep, and which neural-electrical events facilitate encoding/storage. An algorithm for brain-state-dependent stimulation selectively targeted word pairs to slow-wave peaks or troughs. Retrieval tests were given 12 and 36 hr later. These tests required decisions regarding the semantic category of previously sleep-played pseudowords. The sleep-played vocabulary influenced awake decision-making 36 hr later, if targeted to troughs. The words’ linguistic processing raised neural complexity. The words’ semantic-associative encoding was supported by increased theta power during the ensuing peak. Fast-spindle power ramped up during a second peak likely aiding consolidation. Hence, new vocabulary played during slow-wave sleep was stored and influenced decision-making days later.