Cohesin-dependence of neuronal gene expression relates to chromatin loop length

  1. Lesly Calderon
  2. Felix D Weiss
  3. Jonathan A Beagan
  4. Marta S Oliveira
  5. Radina Georgieva
  6. Yi-Fang Wang
  7. Thomas S Carroll
  8. Gopuraja Dharmalingam
  9. Wanfeng Gong
  10. Kyoko Tossell
  11. Vincenzo de Paola
  12. Chad Whilding
  13. Mark A Ungless
  14. Amanda G Fisher
  15. Jennifer E Phillips-Cremins  Is a corresponding author
  16. Matthias Merkenschlager  Is a corresponding author
  1. Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  2. University of Bonn, Germany
  3. University of Pennsylvania, United States
  4. Rockefeller University, United States

Abstract

Cohesin and CTCF are major drivers of 3D genome organization, but their role in neurons is still emerging. Here we show a prominent role for cohesin in the expression of genes that facilitate neuronal maturation and homeostasis. Unexpectedly, we observed two major classes of activity-regulated genes with distinct reliance on cohesin in mouse primary cortical neurons. Immediate early genes remained fully inducible by KCl and BDNF, and short-range enhancer-promoter contacts at the Immediate early gene Fos formed robustly in the absence of cohesin. In contrast, cohesin was required for full expression of a subset of secondary response genes characterised by long-range chromatin contacts. Cohesin-dependence of constitutive neuronal genes with key functions in synaptic transmission and neurotransmitter signaling also scaled with chromatin loop length. Our data demonstrate that key genes required for the maturation and activation of primary cortical neurons depend on cohesin for their full expression, and that the degree to which these genes rely on cohesin scales with the genomic distance traversed by their chromatin contacts.

Data availability

RNAseq and 5C data generated in this study have been deposited at Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE172429

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lesly Calderon

    MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5253-7369
  2. Felix D Weiss

    Institute of Innate Immunity, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jonathan A Beagan

    Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Marta S Oliveira

    MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Radina Georgieva

    MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Yi-Fang Wang

    MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Thomas S Carroll

    Bioinformatics Resouce Center, Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Gopuraja Dharmalingam

    MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Wanfeng Gong

    Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Kyoko Tossell

    Institute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Vincenzo de Paola

    Institute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Chad Whilding

    MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Mark A Ungless

    MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Amanda G Fisher

    MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Jennifer E Phillips-Cremins

    Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    For correspondence
    jcremins@seas.upenn.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Matthias Merkenschlager

    Institute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    matthias.merkenschlager@lms.mrc.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2889-3288

Funding

Medical Research Council

  • Matthias Merkenschlager

Wellcome Trust (099276/Z/12/Z)

  • Matthias Merkenschlager

European Molecular Biology Organization (ALTF 1047-2012)

  • Lesly Calderon

Human Frontiers in Science Program (LT00427/2013)

  • Lesly Calderon

National Institutes of Health (1R01-MH120269)

  • Jennifer E Phillips-Cremins

National Institutes of Health (1DP1OD031253)

  • Jennifer E Phillips-Cremins

National Institutes of Health (1R01-NS114226)

  • Jennifer E Phillips-Cremins

4D Nucleome Common Fund (1U01DK127405)

  • Jennifer E Phillips-Cremins

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Laboratory bred mice of the appropriate genotype were maintained under SPF conditions and 12h light/dark cycle. Embryos were used to derive cells and tissues. Ethical approval was granted by the Home Office, UK, and the Imperial College London Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body (AWERB).

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jeremy J Day, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States

Publication history

  1. Preprint posted: February 24, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: December 20, 2021
  3. Accepted: April 26, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: April 26, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: May 13, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Calderon et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,251
    Page views
  • 270
    Downloads
  • 1
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lesly Calderon
  2. Felix D Weiss
  3. Jonathan A Beagan
  4. Marta S Oliveira
  5. Radina Georgieva
  6. Yi-Fang Wang
  7. Thomas S Carroll
  8. Gopuraja Dharmalingam
  9. Wanfeng Gong
  10. Kyoko Tossell
  11. Vincenzo de Paola
  12. Chad Whilding
  13. Mark A Ungless
  14. Amanda G Fisher
  15. Jennifer E Phillips-Cremins
  16. Matthias Merkenschlager
(2022)
Cohesin-dependence of neuronal gene expression relates to chromatin loop length
eLife 11:e76539.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76539

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Jakub Gemperle et al.
    Tools and Resources

    CRISPR technology has made generation of gene knock-outs widely achievable in cells. However, once inactivated, their re-activation remains difficult, especially in diploid cells. Here, we present DExCon (Doxycycline-mediated endogenous gene Expression Control), DExogron (DExCon combined with auxin-mediated targeted protein degradation), and LUXon (light responsive DExCon) approaches which combine one-step CRISPR-Cas9-mediated targeted knockin of fluorescent proteins with an advanced Tet-inducible TRE3GS promoter. These approaches combine blockade of active gene expression with the ability to re-activate expression on demand, including activation of silenced genes. Systematic control can be exerted using doxycycline or spatiotemporally by light, and we demonstrate functional knock-out/rescue in the closely related Rab11 family of vesicle trafficking regulators. Fluorescent protein knock-in results in bright signals compatible with low-light live microscopy from monoallelic modification, the potential to simultaneously image different alleles of the same gene, and bypasses the need to work with clones. Protein levels are easily tunable to correspond with endogenous expression through cell sorting (DExCon), timing of light illumination (LUXon), or by exposing cells to different levels of auxin (DExogron). Furthermore, our approach allowed us to quantify previously unforeseen differences in vesicle dynamics, transferrin receptor recycling, expression kinetics, and protein stability among highly similar endogenous Rab11 family members and their colocalization in triple knock-in ovarian cancer cell lines.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Sarah Lensch et al.
    Research Article

    In mammalian cells genes that are in close proximity can be transcriptionally coupled: silencing or activating one gene can affect its neighbors. Understanding these dynamics is important for natural processes, such as heterochromatin spreading during development and aging, and when designing synthetic gene regulation circuits. Here, we systematically dissect this process in single cells by recruiting and releasing repressive chromatin regulators at dual-gene synthetic reporters, and measuring how fast gene silencing and reactivation spread as a function of intergenic distance and configuration of insulator elements. We find that silencing by KRAB, associated with histone methylation, spreads between two genes within hours, with a time delay that increases with distance. This fast KRAB-mediated spreading is not blocked by the classical cHS4 insulators. Silencing by histone deacetylase HDAC4 of the upstream gene can also facilitate background silencing of the downstream gene by PRC2, but with a days-long delay that does not change with distance. This slower silencing can sometimes be stopped by insulators. Gene reactivation of neighboring genes is also coupled, with strong promoters and insulators determining the order of reactivation. Our data can be described by a model of multi-gene regulation that builds upon previous knowledge of heterochromatin spreading, where both gene silencing and gene reactivation can act at a distance, allowing for coordinated dynamics via chromatin regulator recruitment.