1. Computational and Systems Biology
  2. Medicine

Meta-Research: Individual-level researcher data confirm the widening gender gap in publishing rates during COVID-19

  1. Emil Bargmann Madsen
  2. Mathias Wullum Nielsen
  3. Josefine Bjørnholm
  4. Reshma Jagsi
  5. Jens Peter Andersen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Aarhus University, Denmark
  2. University of Copenhagen, Denmark
  3. University of Michigan, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76559
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Emil Bargmann Madsen
  2. Mathias Wullum Nielsen
  3. Josefine Bjørnholm
  4. Reshma Jagsi
  5. Jens Peter Andersen
(2022)
Meta-Research: Individual-level researcher data confirm the widening gender gap in publishing rates during COVID-19
eLife 11:e76559.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76559
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Publishing is part and parcel of a successful academic career, and Covid-19 has amplified gender disparities in manuscript submissions and authorships. We used longitudinal publication data on 431,207 scientists in biology, chemistry, and clinical and basic medicine to quantify the differential impact of Covid-19 on women's and men's annual publishing rates. In a difference-in-differences analysis, we estimated that the average gender difference in publication productivity increased from -0.26 in 2019 (corresponding to a 17% lower output for women than men) to -0.35 in 2020 (corresponding to a 24% lower output for women than men). An age-group comparison showed a widening gender gap for both early career and mid-career scientists. The increasing gender gap was most pronounced among highly productive authors and scientists in clinical medicine and biology. Our study demonstrates the importance of reinforcing institutional commitments to diversity through policies that support the inclusion and retention of women researchers.

Data availability

The current manuscript is a computational study, so no data have been generated for this manuscript. Source data and code will be provided on git-hub for all tables and figures.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Emil Bargmann Madsen

    Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4394-5373

  2. Mathias Wullum Nielsen

    Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8759-7150

  3. Josefine Bjørnholm

    Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  4. Reshma Jagsi

    Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    Reshma Jagsi, stock options as compensation for advisory board role at Equity Quotient, a company that evaluates culture in health care companies; has received personal fees from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) as a special government employee (in her role as a member of the Advisory Committee for Research on Women's Health), the Greenwall Foundation, and the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation; has received grants for unrelated work from the NIH, the Doris Duke Foundation, the Greenwall Foundation, the Komen Foundation, and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan for the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium; has held a contract to conduct an unrelated investigator-initiated study with Genentech; has served as an expert witness for Sherinian and Hasso, Dressman Benzinger LaVelle, and Kleinbard LLC..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6562-1228

  5. Jens Peter Andersen

    Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
    For correspondence
    jpa@ps.au.dk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2444-6210

Funding

Samfund og Erhverv, Det Frie Forskningsråd (DFF-0133-00165B)

  • Emil Bargmann Madsen
  • Mathias Wullum Nielsen
  • Josefine Bjørnholm
  • Jens Peter Andersen

Aarhus Universitets Forskningsfond (AUFF-F-2018-7-5)

  • Jens Peter Andersen

Independent Research Fund Denmark (9130-00029B)

  • Mathias Wullum Nielsen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Madsen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,042
    views
  • 271
    downloads
  • 38
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Emil Bargmann Madsen
  2. Mathias Wullum Nielsen
  3. Josefine Bjørnholm
  4. Reshma Jagsi
  5. Jens Peter Andersen
(2022)
Meta-Research: Individual-level researcher data confirm the widening gender gap in publishing rates during COVID-19
eLife 11:e76559.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76559

Categories and tags

    1. Part of Collection
    Meta-research

    Meta-Research: A Collection of Articles

    Edited by Peter A Rodgers
  2. Further reading

Further reading

  1. Meta-Research: A Collection of Articles

    Edited by Peter A Rodgers
    Collection

    The study of science itself is a growing field of research.

  2. Executable Research Articles

    Edited by Fred Atherden
    Collection

    eLife’s Executable Research Article lets authors include live code, data and interactive figures in their published paper.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology

    AI-enabled alkaline-resistant evolution of protein to apply in mass production

    Liqi Kang, Banghao Wu ... Liang Hong
    Research Article

    Artificial intelligence (AI) models have been used to study the compositional regularities of proteins in nature, enabling it to assist in protein design to improve the efficiency of protein engineering and reduce manufacturing cost. However, in industrial settings, proteins are often required to work in extreme environments where they are relatively scarce or even non-existent in nature. Since such proteins are almost absent in the training datasets, it is uncertain whether AI model possesses the capability of evolving the protein to adapt extreme conditions. Antibodies are crucial components of affinity chromatography, and they are hoped to remain active at the extreme environments where most proteins cannot tolerate. In this study, we applied an advanced large language model (LLM), the Pro-PRIME model, to improve the alkali resistance of a representative antibody, a VHH antibody capable of binding to growth hormone. Through two rounds of design, we ensured that the selected mutant has enhanced functionality, including higher thermal stability, extreme pH resistance, and stronger affinity, thereby validating the generalized capability of the LLM in meeting specific demands. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first LLM-designed protein product, which is successfully applied in mass production.