Intestinal GCN2 controls Drosophila systemic growth in response to Lactiplantibacillus plantarum symbiotic cues encoded by r/tRNA operons

Abstract

Symbiotic bacteria interact with their host through symbiotic cues. Here, we took advantage of the mutualism between Drosophila and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (Lp) to investigate a novel mechanism of host-symbiont interaction. Using chemically-defined diets, we found that association with Lp improves the growth of larvae fed amino acid-imbalanced diets, even though Lp cannot produce the limiting amino acid. We show that in this context Lp supports its host's growth through a molecular dialog that requires functional operons encoding ribosomal and transfer RNAs (r/tRNAs) in Lp and the GCN2 kinase in Drosophila's enterocytes. Our data indicate Lp's r/tRNAs are packaged in extracellular vesicles and activate GCN2 in a subset of larval enterocytes, a mechanism necessary to remodel the intestinal transcriptome and ultimately to support anabolic growth. Based on our findings, we propose a novel beneficial molecular dialog between host and microbes, which relies on a non-canonical role of GCN2 as a mediator of non-nutritional symbiotic cues encoded by r/tRNA operons.

Data availability

-RNAseq raw data are deposited at NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the numbers SUB10970982 and PRJNA799161.-Source data files containing all the numerical data used to generate the figures are provided for each figure.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Théodore Grenier

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5242, Lyon, France
    For correspondence
    t.grenier@hubrecht.eu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6022-1954
  2. Jessika Consuegra

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5242, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3185-803X
  3. Mariana G Ferrarini

    INSA-Lyon, INRAE, BF2I, University of Lyon, Villeurbanne, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Houssam Akherraz

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5242, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Longwei Bai

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5242, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Yves Dusabyinema

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5242, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Isabelle Rahioui

    INSA-Lyon, INRAE, BF2I, University of Lyon, Villeurbanne, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Pedro Da Silva

    INSA-Lyon, INRAE, BF2I, University of Lyon, Villeurbanne, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Benjamin Gillet

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5242, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Sandrine Hughes

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5242, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Cathy I Ramos

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5242, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Renata C Matos

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5242, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7480-6099
  13. François Leulier

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5242, Lyon, France
    For correspondence
    francois.leulier@ens-lyon.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4542-3053

Funding

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (DEQ20180339196)

  • Théodore Grenier
  • Jessika Consuegra
  • Mariana G Ferrarini
  • Houssam Akherraz
  • Longwei Bai
  • Yves Dusabyinema
  • Isabelle Rahioui
  • Pedro Da Silva
  • Benjamin Gillet
  • Sandrine Hughes
  • Cathy I Ramos
  • Renata C Matos
  • François Leulier

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (SPF20170938612)

  • Jessika Consuegra

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Grenier et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,022
    views
  • 196
    downloads
  • 5
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Théodore Grenier
  2. Jessika Consuegra
  3. Mariana G Ferrarini
  4. Houssam Akherraz
  5. Longwei Bai
  6. Yves Dusabyinema
  7. Isabelle Rahioui
  8. Pedro Da Silva
  9. Benjamin Gillet
  10. Sandrine Hughes
  11. Cathy I Ramos
  12. Renata C Matos
  13. François Leulier
(2023)
Intestinal GCN2 controls Drosophila systemic growth in response to Lactiplantibacillus plantarum symbiotic cues encoded by r/tRNA operons
eLife 12:e76584.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76584

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76584

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Bin Zhu, Rui Wei ... Pei Liang
    Research Article

    Wing dimorphism is a common phenomenon that plays key roles in the environmental adaptation of aphid; however, the signal transduction in response to environmental cues and the regulation mechanism related to this event remain unknown. Adenosine (A) to inosine (I) RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification that extends transcriptome variety without altering the genome, playing essential roles in numerous biological and physiological processes. Here, we present a chromosome-level genome assembly of the rose-grain aphid Metopolophium dirhodum by using PacBio long HiFi reads and Hi-C technology. The final genome assembly for M. dirhodum is 447.8 Mb, with 98.50% of the assembled sequences anchored to nine chromosomes. The contig and scaffold N50 values are 7.82 and 37.54 Mb, respectively. A total of 18,003 protein-coding genes were predicted, of which 92.05% were functionally annotated. In addition, 11,678 A-to-I RNA-editing sites were systematically identified based on this assembled M. dirhodum genome, and two synonymous A-to-I RNA-editing sites on CYP18A1 were closely associated with transgenerational wing dimorphism induced by crowding. One of these A-to-I RNA-editing sites may prevent the binding of miR-3036-5p to CYP18A1, thus elevating CYP18A1 expression, decreasing 20E titer, and finally regulating the wing dimorphism of offspring. Meanwhile, crowding can also inhibit miR-3036-5p expression and further increase CYP18A1 abundance, resulting in winged offspring. These findings support that A-to-I RNA editing is a dynamic mechanism in the regulation of transgenerational wing dimorphism in aphids and would advance our understanding of the roles of RNA editing in environmental adaptability and phenotypic plasticity.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Alexandra V Bruter, Ekaterina A Varlamova ... Victor V Tatarskiy
    Research Article

    CDK8 and CDK19 paralogs are regulatory kinases associated with the transcriptional Mediator complex. We have generated mice with the systemic inducible Cdk8 knockout on the background of Cdk19 constitutive knockout. Cdk8/19 double knockout (iDKO) males, but not single Cdk8 or Cdk19 KO, had an atrophic reproductive system and were infertile. The iDKO males lacked postmeiotic spermatids and spermatocytes after meiosis I pachytene. Testosterone levels were decreased whereas the amounts of the luteinizing hormone were unchanged. Single-cell RNA sequencing showed marked differences in the expression of steroidogenic genes (such as Cyp17a1, Star, and Fads) in Leydig cells concomitant with alterations in Sertoli cells and spermatocytes, and were likely associated with an impaired synthesis of steroids. Star and Fads were also downregulated in cultured Leydig cells after iDKO. The treatment of primary Leydig cell culture with a CDK8/19 inhibitor did not induce the same changes in gene expression as iDKO, and a prolonged treatment of mice with a CDK8/19 inhibitor did not affect the size of testes. iDKO, in contrast to the single knockouts or treatment with a CDK8/19 kinase inhibitor, led to depletion of cyclin C (CCNC), the binding partner of CDK8/19 that has been implicated in CDK8/19-independent functions. This suggests that the observed phenotype was likely mediated through kinase-independent activities of CDK8/19, such as CCNC stabilization.