Cryo-EM structure of the human somatostatin receptor 2 complex with its agonist somatostatin delineates the ligand binding specificity

  1. Yunseok Heo
  2. Eojin Yoon
  3. Ye-Eun Jeon
  4. Ji-Hye Yun
  5. Naito Ishimoto
  6. Hyeonuk Woo
  7. Sam-Yong Park
  8. Ji-Joon Song  Is a corresponding author
  9. Weontae Lee  Is a corresponding author
  1. Yonsei University, Republic of Korea
  2. Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Republic of Korea
  3. Yokohama City University, Japan
  4. Seoul National University, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Somatostatin is a peptide hormone that regulates endocrine systems by binding to G-protein-coupled somatostatin receptors. Somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) is a human somatostatin receptor and is highly implicated in hormone disorders, cancers and neurological diseases. Here, we report the high resolution cryo-EM structure of full-length human SSTR2 bound to the agonist somatostatin (SST-14) in complex with inhibitory G (Gi) proteins. Our structural and mutagenesis analyses show that seven transmembrane helices form a deep pocket for ligand binding and that SSTR2 recognizes the highly conserved Trp-Lys motif of SST-14 at the bottom of the pocket. Furthermore, our sequence analysis combined with AlphaFold modeled structures of other SSTR isoforms provide a structural basis for the mechanism by which SSTR family proteins specifically interact with their cognate ligands. This work provides the first glimpse into the molecular recognition mechanism of somatostatin receptors and a crucial resource to develop therapeutics targeting somatostatin receptors.

Data availability

The cryo-EM map and the model are to be deposited at EMDB (www.ebi.ac.uk) and RCSB (www.rcsb.org) data base with the accession codes of EMD-32543 and 7WJ5, respectively.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yunseok Heo

    Department of Biochemistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Eojin Yoon

    Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Ye-Eun Jeon

    Department of Biochemistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Ji-Hye Yun

    Department of Biochemistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    Ji-Hye Yun, is an employee at PCG-Biotech and holds a research director position..
  5. Naito Ishimoto

    Drug Design Laboratory, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Hyeonuk Woo

    Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Sam-Yong Park

    Drug Design Laboratory, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6164-8896
  8. Ji-Joon Song

    Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
    For correspondence
    songj@kaist.ac.kr
    Competing interests
    Ji-Joon Song, is a co-founder of PCG-Biotech.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7120-6311
  9. Weontae Lee

    Department of Biochemistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    For correspondence
    wlee@spin.yonsei.ac.kr
    Competing interests
    Weontae Lee, is a co-founder of PCG-Biotech.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020M3A9G7103934)

  • Ji-Joon Song

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020M3A9G7103934)

  • Weontae Lee

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Heo et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,223
    views
  • 526
    downloads
  • 13
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yunseok Heo
  2. Eojin Yoon
  3. Ye-Eun Jeon
  4. Ji-Hye Yun
  5. Naito Ishimoto
  6. Hyeonuk Woo
  7. Sam-Yong Park
  8. Ji-Joon Song
  9. Weontae Lee
(2022)
Cryo-EM structure of the human somatostatin receptor 2 complex with its agonist somatostatin delineates the ligand binding specificity
eLife 11:e76823.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76823

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76823

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Gabriel E Jara, Francesco Pontiggia ... Dorothee Kern
    Research Article

    Transition-state (TS) theory has provided the theoretical framework to explain the enormous rate accelerations of chemical reactions by enzymes. Given that proteins display large ensembles of conformations, unique TSs would pose a huge entropic bottleneck for enzyme catalysis. To shed light on this question, we studied the nature of the enzymatic TS for the phosphoryl-transfer step in adenylate kinase by quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics calculations. We find a structurally wide set of energetically equivalent configurations that lie along the reaction coordinate and hence a broad transition-state ensemble (TSE). A conformationally delocalized ensemble, including asymmetric TSs, is rooted in the macroscopic nature of the enzyme. The computational results are buttressed by enzyme kinetics experiments that confirm the decrease of the entropy of activation predicted from such wide TSE. TSEs as a key for efficient enzyme catalysis further boosts a unifying concept for protein folding and conformational transitions underlying protein function.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Joseph Clayton, Aarion Romany ... Jana Shen
    Research Article

    Aberrant signaling of BRAFV600E is a major cancer driver. Current FDA-approved RAF inhibitors selectively inhibit the monomeric BRAFV600E and suffer from tumor resistance. Recently, dimer-selective and equipotent RAF inhibitors have been developed; however, the mechanism of dimer selectivity is poorly understood. Here, we report extensive molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the monomeric and dimeric BRAFV600E in the apo form or in complex with one or two dimer-selective (PHI1) or equipotent (LY3009120) inhibitor(s). The simulations uncovered the unprecedented details of the remarkable allostery in BRAFV600E dimerization and inhibitor binding. Specifically, dimerization retrains and shifts the αC helix inward and increases the flexibility of the DFG motif; dimer compatibility is due to the promotion of the αC-in conformation, which is stabilized by a hydrogen bond formation between the inhibitor and the αC Glu501. A more stable hydrogen bond further restrains and shifts the αC helix inward, which incurs a larger entropic penalty that disfavors monomer binding. This mechanism led us to propose an empirical way based on the co-crystal structure to assess the dimer selectivity of a BRAFV600E inhibitor. Simulations also revealed that the positive cooperativity of PHI1 is due to its ability to preorganize the αC and DFG conformation in the opposite protomer, priming it for binding the second inhibitor. The atomically detailed view of the interplay between BRAF dimerization and inhibitor allostery as well as cooperativity has implications for understanding kinase signaling and contributes to the design of protomer selective RAF inhibitors.