XAB2 dynamics during DNA damage-dependent transcription inhibition

  1. Lise-Marie Donnio  Is a corresponding author
  2. Elena Cerutti
  3. Charlene Magnani
  4. Damien Neuillet
  5. Pierre-Olivier Mari
  6. Giuseppina Giglia-Mari  Is a corresponding author
  1. CNRS UMR 5310, INSERM U1217, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, France

Abstract

Xeroderma Pigmentosum group A-binding protein 2 (XAB2) is a multi-functional protein playing a critical role in distinct cellular processes including transcription, splicing, DNA repair and mRNA export. In this study, we demonstrate that XAB2 is involved specifically and exclusively in Transcription-Coupled Nucleotide Excision Repair (TC-NER) reactions and solely for RNA Polymerase 2 transcribed genes. Surprisingly, contrary to all the other NER proteins studied so far, XAB2 does not accumulate on the local UV-C damage; on the contrary, it becomes more mobile after damage induction. XAB2 mobility is restored when DNA repair reactions are completed. By scrutinizing from which cellular complex/partner/structure XAB2 is released, we have identified that XAB2 is detached after DNA damage induction from DNA:RNA hybrids, commonly known as R-loops, and from the CSA and XPG proteins. This release contributes to the DNA damage recognition step during TC-NER, as in the absence of XAB2, RNAP2 is blocked longer on UV lesions. Moreover, we also demonstrate that XAB2 has a role in retaining RNAP2 on its substrate without any DNA damage.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lise-Marie Donnio

    Institut NeuroMyogène (INMG), CNRS UMR 5310, INSERM U1217, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
    For correspondence
    lise-marie.donnio@live.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2414-6034
  2. Elena Cerutti

    Institut NeuroMyogène (INMG), CNRS UMR 5310, INSERM U1217, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4644-4817
  3. Charlene Magnani

    Institut NeuroMyogène (INMG), CNRS UMR 5310, INSERM U1217, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Damien Neuillet

    Institut NeuroMyogène (INMG), CNRS UMR 5310, INSERM U1217, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Pierre-Olivier Mari

    Institut NeuroMyogène (INMG), CNRS UMR 5310, INSERM U1217, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Giuseppina Giglia-Mari

    Institut NeuroMyogène (INMG), CNRS UMR 5310, INSERM U1217, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
    For correspondence
    ambra.mari@univ-lyon1.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2001-1965

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-14-CE10-0009)

  • Giuseppina Giglia-Mari

Institut National Du Cancer (PLBIO17-043)

  • Giuseppina Giglia-Mari

Institut National Du Cancer (PLBIO19-126)

  • Giuseppina Giglia-Mari

Ligue Contre le Cancer (218398)

  • Giuseppina Giglia-Mari

Electricité de France (218398)

  • Giuseppina Giglia-Mari

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Donnio et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 984
    views
  • 226
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lise-Marie Donnio
  2. Elena Cerutti
  3. Charlene Magnani
  4. Damien Neuillet
  5. Pierre-Olivier Mari
  6. Giuseppina Giglia-Mari
(2022)
XAB2 dynamics during DNA damage-dependent transcription inhibition
eLife 11:e77094.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77094

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77094

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Surya Bansi Singh, Shatruhan Singh Rajput ... Deepa Subramanyam
    Research Article

    Aggregation of mutant forms of Huntingtin is the underlying feature of neurodegeneration observed in Huntington's disorder. In addition to neurons, cellular processes in non-neuronal cell types are also shown to be affected. Cells expressing neurodegeneration-associated mutant proteins show altered uptake of ligands, suggestive of impaired endocytosis, in a manner as yet unknown. Using live cell imaging, we show that clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) is affected in Drosophila hemocytes and mammalian cells containing Huntingtin aggregates. This is also accompanied by alterations in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton resulting in increased cellular stiffness. Further, we find that Huntingtin aggregates sequester actin and actin-modifying proteins. Overexpression of Hip1 or Arp3 (actin-interacting proteins) could restore CME and cellular stiffness in cells containing Huntingtin aggregates. Neurodegeneration driven by pathogenic Huntingtin was also rescued upon overexpression of either Hip1 or Arp3 in Drosophila. Examination of other pathogenic aggregates revealed that TDP-43 also displayed defective CME, altered actin organization and increased stiffness, similar to pathogenic Huntingtin. Together, our results point to an intimate connection between dysfunctional CME, actin misorganization and increased cellular stiffness caused by alteration in the local intracellular environment by pathogenic aggregates.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Evgenia Leikina, Jarred M Whitlock ... Leonid Chernomordik
    Research Article

    The bone-resorbing activity of osteoclasts plays a critical role in the life-long remodeling of our bones that is perturbed in many bone loss diseases. Multinucleated osteoclasts are formed by the fusion of precursor cells, and larger cells – generated by an increased number of cell fusion events – have higher resorptive activity. We find that osteoclast fusion and bone resorption are promoted by reactive oxygen species (ROS) signaling and by an unconventional low molecular weight species of La protein, located at the osteoclast surface. Here, we develop the hypothesis that La’s unique regulatory role in osteoclast multinucleation and function is controlled by an ROS switch in La trafficking. Using antibodies that recognize reduced or oxidized species of La, we find that differentiating osteoclasts enrich an oxidized species of La at the cell surface, which is distinct from the reduced La species conventionally localized within cell nuclei. ROS signaling triggers the shift from reduced to oxidized La species, its dephosphorylation and delivery to the surface of osteoclasts, where La promotes multinucleation and resorptive activity. Moreover, intracellular ROS signaling in differentiating osteoclasts oxidizes critical cysteine residues in the C-terminal half of La, producing this unconventional La species that promotes osteoclast fusion. Our findings suggest that redox signaling induces changes in the location and function of La and may represent a promising target for novel skeletal therapies.