Pinpointing the tumor-specific T-cells via TCR clusters

  1. Mikhail M Goncharov
  2. Ekaterina A Bryushkova
  3. Nikita I Sharaev
  4. Valeria D Skatova
  5. Anastasiya M Baryshnikova
  6. George V Sharonov
  7. Vadim Karnaukhov
  8. Maria T Vakhitova
  9. Igor V Samoylenko
  10. Lev V Demidov
  11. Sergey Lukyanov
  12. Dmitriy M Chudakov  Is a corresponding author
  13. Ekaterina O Serebrovskaya
  1. Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Russian Federation
  2. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Russian Federation
  3. Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Federation
  4. NN Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Russian Federation

Abstract

Adoptive T cell transfer (ACT) is a promising approach to cancer immunotherapy, but its efficiency fundamentally depends on the extent of tumor-specific T-cell enrichment within the graft. This can be estimated via activation with identifiable neoantigens, tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), or living or lyzed tumor cells, but these approaches remain laborious, time-consuming, and functionally limited, hampering clinical development of ACT. Here, we demonstrate that homology cluster analysis of T cell receptor (TCR) repertoires efficiently identifies tumor-reactive TCRs allowing to: 1) detect their presence within the pool of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs); 2) optimize TIL culturing conditions, with IL-2low/IL-21/anti-PD-1 combination showing increased efficiency; 3) investigate surface marker-based enrichment for tumor-targeting T cells in freshly-isolated TILs (enrichment confirmed for CD4+ and CD8+ PD-1+/CD39+ subsets), or re-stimulated TILs (informs on enrichment in 4-1BB-sorted cells). We believe that this approach to the rapid assessment of tumor-specific TCR enrichment should accelerate T cell therapy development.

Data availability

TCR repertoires have been deposited on:https://figshare.com/projects/Pinpointing_the_tumor-specific_T-cells_via_TCR_clusters/125284

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mikhail M Goncharov

    Center of Life Sciences, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ekaterina A Bryushkova

    Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Nikita I Sharaev

    Center of Life Sciences, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Valeria D Skatova

    Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Anastasiya M Baryshnikova

    Genomics of Adaptive Immunity Department, Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. George V Sharonov

    Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Vadim Karnaukhov

    Center of Life Sciences, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Maria T Vakhitova

    Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Igor V Samoylenko

    Oncodermatology Department, NN Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Lev V Demidov

    Oncodermatology Department, NN Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Sergey Lukyanov

    Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Dmitriy M Chudakov

    Department of genomics of adaptive immunity, Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russian Federation
    For correspondence
    chudakovdm@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0430-790X
  13. Ekaterina O Serebrovskaya

    Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (075-15-2020-807)

  • Dmitriy M Chudakov

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Armita Nourmohammad, University of Washington, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: All clinical samples were acquired from the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology in accordance with protocol MoleMed-0921, approved by the ethical committee on 30 Jan 2020. All patients involved in the study were diagnosed with metastatic melanoma and signed an informed consent prior to collection of their biomaterial.

Version history

  1. Received: January 22, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: January 30, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: April 4, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: April 4, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: April 8, 2022 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record published: April 21, 2022 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2022, Goncharov et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,083
    views
  • 513
    downloads
  • 15
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mikhail M Goncharov
  2. Ekaterina A Bryushkova
  3. Nikita I Sharaev
  4. Valeria D Skatova
  5. Anastasiya M Baryshnikova
  6. George V Sharonov
  7. Vadim Karnaukhov
  8. Maria T Vakhitova
  9. Igor V Samoylenko
  10. Lev V Demidov
  11. Sergey Lukyanov
  12. Dmitriy M Chudakov
  13. Ekaterina O Serebrovskaya
(2022)
Pinpointing the tumor-specific T-cells via TCR clusters
eLife 11:e77274.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77274

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77274

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Mark S Lee, Peter J Tuohy ... Michael S Kuhns
    Research Advance

    CD4+ T cell activation is driven by five-module receptor complexes. The T cell receptor (TCR) is the receptor module that binds composite surfaces of peptide antigens embedded within MHCII molecules (pMHCII). It associates with three signaling modules (CD3γε, CD3δε, and CD3ζζ) to form TCR-CD3 complexes. CD4 is the coreceptor module. It reciprocally associates with TCR-CD3-pMHCII assemblies on the outside of a CD4+ T cells and with the Src kinase, LCK, on the inside. Previously, we reported that the CD4 transmembrane GGXXG and cytoplasmic juxtamembrane (C/F)CV+C motifs found in eutherian (placental mammal) CD4 have constituent residues that evolved under purifying selection (Lee et al., 2022). Expressing mutants of these motifs together in T cell hybridomas increased CD4-LCK association but reduced CD3ζ, ZAP70, and PLCγ1 phosphorylation levels, as well as IL-2 production, in response to agonist pMHCII. Because these mutants preferentially localized CD4-LCK pairs to non-raft membrane fractions, one explanation for our results was that they impaired proximal signaling by sequestering LCK away from TCR-CD3. An alternative hypothesis is that the mutations directly impacted signaling because the motifs normally play an LCK-independent role in signaling. The goal of this study was to discriminate between these possibilities. Using T cell hybridomas, our results indicate that: intracellular CD4-LCK interactions are not necessary for pMHCII-specific signal initiation; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs are key determinants of CD4-mediated pMHCII-specific signal amplification; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs exert their functions independently of direct CD4-LCK association. These data provide a mechanistic explanation for why residues within these motifs are under purifying selection in jawed vertebrates. The results are also important to consider for biomimetic engineering of synthetic receptors.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Jean-David Larouche, Céline M Laumont ... Claude Perreault
    Research Article

    Transposable elements (TEs) are repetitive sequences representing ~45% of the human and mouse genomes and are highly expressed by medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs). In this study, we investigated the role of TEs on T-cell development in the thymus. We performed multiomic analyses of TEs in human and mouse thymic cells to elucidate their role in T-cell development. We report that TE expression in the human thymus is high and shows extensive age- and cell lineage-related variations. TE expression correlates with multiple transcription factors in all cell types of the human thymus. Two cell types express particularly broad TE repertoires: mTECs and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). In mTECs, transcriptomic data suggest that TEs interact with transcription factors essential for mTEC development and function (e.g., PAX1 and REL), and immunopeptidomic data showed that TEs generate MHC-I-associated peptides implicated in thymocyte education. Notably, AIRE, FEZF2, and CHD4 regulate small yet non-redundant sets of TEs in murine mTECs. Human thymic pDCs homogenously express large numbers of TEs that likely form dsRNA, which can activate innate immune receptors, potentially explaining why thymic pDCs constitutively secrete IFN ɑ/β. This study highlights the diversity of interactions between TEs and the adaptive immune system. TEs are genetic parasites, and the two thymic cell types most affected by TEs (mTEcs and pDCs) are essential to establishing central T-cell tolerance. Therefore, we propose that orchestrating TE expression in thymic cells is critical to prevent autoimmunity in vertebrates.