Abstract

Tissue-resident macrophages represent a group of highly responsive innate immune cells that acquire diverse functions by polarizing towards distinct subpopulations. The subpopulations of macrophages that reside in skeletal muscle (SKM) and their changes during aging are poorly characterized. By single-cell transcriptomic analysis with unsupervised clustering, we found eleven distinct macrophage clusters in male mouse SKM with enriched gene expression programs linked to reparative, proinflammatory, phagocytotic, proliferative, and senescence-associated functions. Using a complementary classification, membrane markers LYVE1 and MHCII identified four macrophage subgroups: LYVE1-/MHCIIhi (M1-like, classically activated), LYVE1+/MHCIIlo (M2-like, alternatively activated), and two new subgroups, LYVE1+/MHCIIhi and LYVE1-/MHCIIlo. Notably, one new subgroup, LYVE1+/MHCIIhi, had traits of both M2 and M1 macrophages, while the other new subgroup, LYVE1-/MHCIIlo, displayed strong phagocytotic capacity. Flow cytometric analysis validated the presence of the four macrophage subgroups in SKM, and found that LYVE1- macrophages were more abundant than LYVE1+ macrophages in old SKM. A striking increase in proinflammatory markers (S100a8 and S100a9 mRNAs) and senescence-related markers (Gpnmb and Spp1 mRNAs) was evident in macrophage clusters from older mice. In sum, we have identified dynamically polarized SKM macrophages and propose that specific macrophage subpopulations contribute to the proinflammatory and senescent traits of old SKM.

Data availability

The single-cell RNA-seq analysis was uploaded to GEO with identifier GSE195507.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Linda K Krasniewski

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Papiya Chakraborty

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Chang-Yi Cui

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    cuic@grc.nia.nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Krystyna Mazan-Mamczarz

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Christopher Dunn

    Flow Cytometry Core, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7899-0110
  6. Yulan Piao

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jinshui Fan

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Changyou Shi

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Tonya Wallace

    Flow Cytometry Unit, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Cuong Nguyen

    Flow Cytometry Unit, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Isabelle A Rathbun

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Rachel Munk

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Dimitrios Tsitsipatis

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Supriyo De

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Payel Sen

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2809-0901
  16. Luigi Ferrucci

    Translational Gerentology Branch, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6273-1613
  17. Myriam M Gorospe

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    myriam-gorospe@nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5439-3434

Funding

National Institutes of Health (Z01-AG000511)

  • Linda K Krasniewski
  • Papiya Chakraborty
  • Chang-Yi Cui
  • Krystyna Mazan-Mamczarz
  • Christopher Dunn
  • Yulan Piao
  • Jinshui Fan
  • Changyou Shi
  • Tonya Wallace
  • Cuong Nguyen
  • Isabelle A Rathbun
  • Rachel Munk
  • Dimitrios Tsitsipatis
  • Supriyo De
  • Payel Sen
  • Luigi Ferrucci
  • Myriam M Gorospe

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal study protocols were approved by the NIA Institutional Review Board (Animal Care and Use Committee). (ASP #476-LGG-2023)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 5,431
    views
  • 702
    downloads
  • 47
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Linda K Krasniewski
  2. Papiya Chakraborty
  3. Chang-Yi Cui
  4. Krystyna Mazan-Mamczarz
  5. Christopher Dunn
  6. Yulan Piao
  7. Jinshui Fan
  8. Changyou Shi
  9. Tonya Wallace
  10. Cuong Nguyen
  11. Isabelle A Rathbun
  12. Rachel Munk
  13. Dimitrios Tsitsipatis
  14. Supriyo De
  15. Payel Sen
  16. Luigi Ferrucci
  17. Myriam M Gorospe
(2022)
Single-cell analysis of skeletal muscle macrophages reveals age-associated functional subpopulations
eLife 11:e77974.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77974

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77974

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Jingjing Li, Xinyue Wang ... Vincent Archambault
    Research Article

    In animals, mitosis involves the breakdown of the nucleus. The reassembly of a nucleus after mitosis requires the reformation of the nuclear envelope around a single mass of chromosomes. This process requires Ankle2 (also known as LEM4 in humans) which interacts with PP2A and promotes the function of the Barrier-to-Autointegration Factor (BAF). Upon dephosphorylation, BAF dimers cross-bridge chromosomes and bind lamins and transmembrane proteins of the reassembling nuclear envelope. How Ankle2 functions in mitosis is incompletely understood. Using a combination of approaches in Drosophila, along with structural modeling, we provide several lines of evidence that suggest that Ankle2 is a regulatory subunit of PP2A, explaining how it promotes BAF dephosphorylation. In addition, we discovered that Ankle2 interacts with the endoplasmic reticulum protein Vap33, which is required for Ankle2 localization at the reassembling nuclear envelope during telophase. We identified the interaction sites of PP2A and Vap33 on Ankle2. Through genetic rescue experiments, we show that the Ankle2/PP2A interaction is essential for the function of Ankle2 in nuclear reassembly and that the Ankle2/Vap33 interaction also promotes this process. Our study sheds light on the molecular mechanisms of post-mitotic nuclear reassembly and suggests that the endoplasmic reticulum is not merely a source of membranes in the process, but also provides localized enzymatic activity.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bhumil Patel, Maryke Grobler ... Needhi Bhalla
    Research Article

    Meiotic crossover recombination is essential for both accurate chromosome segregation and the generation of new haplotypes for natural selection to act upon. This requirement is known as crossover assurance and is one example of crossover control. While the conserved role of the ATPase, PCH-2, during meiotic prophase has been enigmatic, a universal phenotype when pch-2 or its orthologs are mutated is a change in the number and distribution of meiotic crossovers. Here, we show that PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation. This antagonism produces different effects at different stages of meiotic prophase: early in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 prevents double-strand breaks from becoming crossover-eligible intermediates, limiting crossover formation at sites of initial double-strand break formation and homolog interactions. Later in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 winnows the number of crossover-eligible intermediates, contributing to the designation of crossovers and ultimately, crossover assurance. We also demonstrate that PCH-2 accomplishes this regulation through the meiotic HORMAD, HIM-3. Our data strongly support a model in which PCH-2’s conserved role is to remodel meiotic HORMADs throughout meiotic prophase to destabilize crossover-eligible precursors and coordinate meiotic recombination with synapsis, ensuring the progressive implementation of meiotic recombination and explaining its function in the pachytene checkpoint and crossover control.