Abstract

Tissue-resident macrophages represent a group of highly responsive innate immune cells that acquire diverse functions by polarizing towards distinct subpopulations. The subpopulations of macrophages that reside in skeletal muscle (SKM) and their changes during aging are poorly characterized. By single-cell transcriptomic analysis with unsupervised clustering, we found eleven distinct macrophage clusters in male mouse SKM with enriched gene expression programs linked to reparative, proinflammatory, phagocytotic, proliferative, and senescence-associated functions. Using a complementary classification, membrane markers LYVE1 and MHCII identified four macrophage subgroups: LYVE1-/MHCIIhi (M1-like, classically activated), LYVE1+/MHCIIlo (M2-like, alternatively activated), and two new subgroups, LYVE1+/MHCIIhi and LYVE1-/MHCIIlo. Notably, one new subgroup, LYVE1+/MHCIIhi, had traits of both M2 and M1 macrophages, while the other new subgroup, LYVE1-/MHCIIlo, displayed strong phagocytotic capacity. Flow cytometric analysis validated the presence of the four macrophage subgroups in SKM, and found that LYVE1- macrophages were more abundant than LYVE1+ macrophages in old SKM. A striking increase in proinflammatory markers (S100a8 and S100a9 mRNAs) and senescence-related markers (Gpnmb and Spp1 mRNAs) was evident in macrophage clusters from older mice. In sum, we have identified dynamically polarized SKM macrophages and propose that specific macrophage subpopulations contribute to the proinflammatory and senescent traits of old SKM.

Data availability

The single-cell RNA-seq analysis was uploaded to GEO with identifier GSE195507.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Linda K Krasniewski

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Papiya Chakraborty

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Chang-Yi Cui

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    cuic@grc.nia.nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Krystyna Mazan-Mamczarz

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Christopher Dunn

    Flow Cytometry Core, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7899-0110
  6. Yulan Piao

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jinshui Fan

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Changyou Shi

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Tonya Wallace

    Flow Cytometry Unit, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Cuong Nguyen

    Flow Cytometry Unit, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Isabelle A Rathbun

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Rachel Munk

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Dimitrios Tsitsipatis

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Supriyo De

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Payel Sen

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2809-0901
  16. Luigi Ferrucci

    Translational Gerentology Branch, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6273-1613
  17. Myriam M Gorospe

    Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    myriam-gorospe@nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5439-3434

Funding

National Institutes of Health (Z01-AG000511)

  • Linda K Krasniewski
  • Papiya Chakraborty
  • Chang-Yi Cui
  • Krystyna Mazan-Mamczarz
  • Christopher Dunn
  • Yulan Piao
  • Jinshui Fan
  • Changyou Shi
  • Tonya Wallace
  • Cuong Nguyen
  • Isabelle A Rathbun
  • Rachel Munk
  • Dimitrios Tsitsipatis
  • Supriyo De
  • Payel Sen
  • Luigi Ferrucci
  • Myriam M Gorospe

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal study protocols were approved by the NIA Institutional Review Board (Animal Care and Use Committee). (ASP #476-LGG-2023)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 5,515
    views
  • 709
    downloads
  • 47
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Linda K Krasniewski
  2. Papiya Chakraborty
  3. Chang-Yi Cui
  4. Krystyna Mazan-Mamczarz
  5. Christopher Dunn
  6. Yulan Piao
  7. Jinshui Fan
  8. Changyou Shi
  9. Tonya Wallace
  10. Cuong Nguyen
  11. Isabelle A Rathbun
  12. Rachel Munk
  13. Dimitrios Tsitsipatis
  14. Supriyo De
  15. Payel Sen
  16. Luigi Ferrucci
  17. Myriam M Gorospe
(2022)
Single-cell analysis of skeletal muscle macrophages reveals age-associated functional subpopulations
eLife 11:e77974.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77974

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77974

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Chengfang Pan, Ying Liu ... Changlong Hu
    Research Article

    Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is an endogenous inhibitor of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) and plays an important role in pancreatic β-cell dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aimed to explore the underlying mechanism by which PGE2 inhibits GSIS. Our results showed that PGE2 inhibited Kv2.2 channels via increasing PKA activity in HEK293T cells overexpressed with Kv2.2 channels. Point mutation analysis demonstrated that S448 residue was responsible for the PKA-dependent modulation of Kv2.2. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of PGE2 on Kv2.2 was blocked by EP2/4 receptor antagonists, while mimicked by EP2/4 receptor agonists. The immune fluorescence results showed that EP1–4 receptors are expressed in both mouse and human β-cells. In INS-1(832/13) β-cells, PGE2 inhibited voltage-gated potassium currents and electrical activity through EP2/4 receptors and Kv2.2 channels. Knockdown of Kcnb2 reduced the action potential firing frequency and alleviated the inhibition of PGE2 on GSIS in INS-1(832/13) β-cells. PGE2 impaired glucose tolerance in wild-type mice but did not alter glucose tolerance in Kcnb2 knockout mice. Knockout of Kcnb2 reduced electrical activity, GSIS and abrogated the inhibition of PGE2 on GSIS in mouse islets. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that PGE2 inhibits GSIS in pancreatic β-cells through the EP2/4-Kv2.2 signaling pathway. The findings highlight the significant role of Kv2.2 channels in the regulation of β-cell repetitive firing and insulin secretion, and contribute to the understanding of the molecular basis of β-cell dysfunction in diabetes.

    1. Cell Biology
    Ryan M Finnerty, Daniel J Carulli ... Wipawee Winuthayanon
    Research Article

    The oviduct is the site of fertilization and preimplantation embryo development in mammals. Evidence suggests that gametes alter oviductal gene expression. To delineate the adaptive interactions between the oviduct and gamete/embryo, we performed a multi-omics characterization of oviductal tissues utilizing bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq), and proteomics collected from distal and proximal at various stages after mating in mice. We observed robust region-specific transcriptional signatures. Specifically, the presence of sperm induces genes involved in pro-inflammatory responses in the proximal region at 0.5 days post-coitus (dpc). Genes involved in inflammatory responses were produced specifically by secretory epithelial cells in the oviduct. At 1.5 and 2.5 dpc, genes involved in pyruvate and glycolysis were enriched in the proximal region, potentially providing metabolic support for developing embryos. Abundant proteins in the oviductal fluid were differentially observed between naturally fertilized and superovulated samples. RNA-seq data were used to identify transcription factors predicted to influence protein abundance in the proteomic data via a novel machine learning model based on transformers of integrating transcriptomics and proteomics data. The transformers identified influential transcription factors and correlated predictive protein expressions in alignment with the in vivo-derived data. Lastly, we found some differences between inflammatory responses in sperm-exposed mouse oviducts compared to hydrosalpinx Fallopian tubes from patients. In conclusion, our multi-omics characterization and subsequent in vivo confirmation of proteins/RNAs indicate that the oviduct is adaptive and responsive to the presence of sperm and embryos in a spatiotemporal manner.