Human WDR5 promotes breast cancer growth and metastasis via KMT2-independent translation regulation

  1. Wesley L Cai
  2. Jocelyn Fang-Yi Chen
  3. Huacui Chen
  4. Emily Wingrove
  5. Sarah J Kurley
  6. Lok Hei Chan
  7. Meiling Zhang
  8. Anna Arnal-Estape
  9. Minghui Zhao
  10. Amer Balabaki
  11. Wenxue Li
  12. Xufen Yu
  13. Ethan D Krop
  14. Yali Dou
  15. Yansheng Liu
  16. Jian Jin
  17. Thomas F Westbrook
  18. Don X Nguyen  Is a corresponding author
  19. Qin Yan  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States
  2. Yale University, United States
  3. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  4. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States
  5. University of Southern California, United States

Abstract

Metastatic breast cancer remains a major cause of cancer related deaths in women and there are few effective therapies against this advanced disease. Emerging evidence suggests that key steps of tumor progression and metastasis are controlled by reversible epigenetic mechanisms. Using an in vivo genetic screen, we identified WDR5 as an actionable epigenetic regulator that is required for metastatic progression in models of triple-negative breast cancer. We found that knockdown of WDR5 in breast cancer cells independently impaired their tumorigenic as well as metastatic capabilities. Mechanistically, WDR5 promotes cell growth by increasing ribosomal gene expression and translation efficiency in a KMT2-independent manner. Consistently, pharmacological inhibition or degradation of WDR5 impedes cellular translation rate and the clonogenic ability of breast cancer cells. Furthermore, combination of WDR5-targeting with mTOR inhibitors leads to potent suppression of translation and proliferation of breast cancer cells. These results reveal novel therapeutic strategies to treat metastatic breast cancer.

Data availability

RNA-seq data have been deposited into the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus database under GSE196666. Reviewer token: qhqpeackxnebvqn.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Wesley L Cai

    Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Jocelyn Fang-Yi Chen

    Department of Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7281-8686
  3. Huacui Chen

    Department of Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Emily Wingrove

    Department of Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Sarah J Kurley

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Lok Hei Chan

    Department of Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Meiling Zhang

    Department of Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Anna Arnal-Estape

    Department of Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0490-7040
  9. Minghui Zhao

    Department of Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Amer Balabaki

    Department of Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1509-886X
  11. Wenxue Li

    Department of Pharmacology, Yale University, West Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Xufen Yu

    Mount Sinai Center for Therapeutics Discovery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7794-7890
  13. Ethan D Krop

    Department of Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Yali Dou

    Department of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Yansheng Liu

    Department of Pharmacology, Yale University, West Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2626-3912
  16. Jian Jin

    Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    Jian Jin, . The Jin laboratory received research funds un-related to this study from Celgene Corporation, Levo Therapeutics, Inc., Cullgen, Inc. and Cullinan Oncology, Inc. J.J. is a cofounder, scientific advisory board member and equity shareholder in Cullgen, Inc. and a consultant for Cullgen, Inc., EpiCypher, Inc. and Accent Therapeutics, Inc..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2387-3862
  17. Thomas F Westbrook

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Don X Nguyen

    Department of Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    don.nguyen@yale.edu
    Competing interests
    Don X Nguyen, has received research funding un-related to this study from AstraZeneca Inc..
  19. Qin Yan

    Department of Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    qin.yan@yale.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4077-453X

Funding

National Science Foundation (Graduate Research FellowshipDGE-1122492)

  • Wesley L Cai

National Cancer Institute (F31CA243295)

  • Jocelyn Fang-Yi Chen

Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (W81XWH-15-1-0117 and W81XWH-21-1-0411)

  • Qin Yan

National Cancer Institute (R01CA237586)

  • Qin Yan

National Cancer Institute (R01CA166376)

  • Don X Nguyen

National Cancer Institute (P30CA016359)

  • Qin Yan

Yale Cancer Center (Class of '61 Cancer Research Award)

  • Qin Yan

Yale Cancer Center (Class of '61 Cancer Research Award)

  • Don X Nguyen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal procedures have been approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Yale University under animal protocol 2021-11286.

Copyright

© 2022, Cai et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,576
    views
  • 553
    downloads
  • 16
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Wesley L Cai
  2. Jocelyn Fang-Yi Chen
  3. Huacui Chen
  4. Emily Wingrove
  5. Sarah J Kurley
  6. Lok Hei Chan
  7. Meiling Zhang
  8. Anna Arnal-Estape
  9. Minghui Zhao
  10. Amer Balabaki
  11. Wenxue Li
  12. Xufen Yu
  13. Ethan D Krop
  14. Yali Dou
  15. Yansheng Liu
  16. Jian Jin
  17. Thomas F Westbrook
  18. Don X Nguyen
  19. Qin Yan
(2022)
Human WDR5 promotes breast cancer growth and metastasis via KMT2-independent translation regulation
eLife 11:e78163.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78163

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78163

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Alison G Barber, Cynthia M Quintero ... Tannishtha Reya
    Research Article

    Despite advances in therapeutic approaches, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. To understand the molecular programs underlying lung cancer initiation and maintenance, we focused on stem cell programs that are normally extinguished with differentiation but can be reactivated during oncogenesis. Here, we have used extensive genetic modeling and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) to identify a dual role for Msi2: as a signal that acts initially to sensitize cells to transformation, and subsequently to drive tumor propagation. Using Msi reporter mice, we found that Msi2-expressing cells were marked by a pro-oncogenic landscape and a preferential ability to respond to Ras and p53 mutations. Consistent with this, genetic deletion of Msi2 in an autochthonous Ras/p53-driven lung cancer model resulted in a marked reduction of tumor burden, delayed progression, and a doubling of median survival. Additionally, this dependency was conserved in human disease as inhibition of Msi2 impaired tumor growth in PDXs. Mechanistically, Msi2 triggered a broad range of pathways critical for tumor growth, including several novel effectors of lung adenocarcinoma. Collectively, these findings reveal a critical role for Msi2 in aggressive lung adenocarcinoma, lend new insight into the biology of this disease, and identify potential new therapeutic targets.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Rui Vasco Simoes, Rafael Neto Henriques ... Noam Shemesh
    Research Article

    Glioblastomas are aggressive brain tumors with dismal prognosis. One of the main bottlenecks for developing more effective therapies for glioblastoma stems from their histologic and molecular heterogeneity, leading to distinct tumor microenvironments and disease phenotypes. Effectively characterizing these features would improve the clinical management of glioblastoma. Glucose flux rates through glycolysis and mitochondrial oxidation have been recently shown to quantitatively depict glioblastoma proliferation in mouse models (GL261 and CT2A tumors) using dynamic glucose-enhanced (DGE) deuterium spectroscopy. However, the spatial features of tumor microenvironment phenotypes remain hitherto unresolved. Here, we develop a DGE Deuterium Metabolic Imaging (DMI) approach for profiling tumor microenvironments through glucose conversion kinetics. Using a multimodal combination of tumor mouse models, novel strategies for spectroscopic imaging and noise attenuation, and histopathological correlations, we show that tumor lactate turnover mirrors phenotype differences between GL261 and CT2A mouse glioblastoma, whereas recycling of the peritumoral glutamate-glutamine pool is a potential marker of invasion capacity in pooled cohorts, linked to secondary brain lesions. These findings were validated by histopathological characterization of each tumor, including cell density and proliferation, peritumoral invasion and distant migration, and immune cell infiltration. Our study bodes well for precision neuro-oncology, highlighting the importance of mapping glucose flux rates to better understand the metabolic heterogeneity of glioblastoma and its links to disease phenotypes.