The generation of HepG2 transmitochondrial cybrids to reveal the role of mitochondrial genotype in idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury: a translational in vitro study

  1. Amy Louise Ball
  2. Carol Elizabeth Jolly
  3. Mark G Lennon
  4. Jonathan J Lyon
  5. Ana Alfirevic
  6. Amy E Chadwick  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background: Evidence supports an important link between mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variation and adverse drug reactions such as idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI). Here, we describe the generation of HepG2-derived transmitochondrial cybrids, to investigate the impact of mtDNA variation on mitochondrial (dys)function and susceptibility to iDILI. This study created 10 cybrid cell lines, each containing distinct mitochondrial genotypes of haplogroup H or haplogroup J backgrounds.

Methods: HepG2 cells were depleted of mtDNA to make rho zero cells, before the introduction of known mitochondrial genotypes using platelets from healthy volunteers (n=10), thus generating 10 transmitochondrial cybrid cell lines. The mitochondrial function of each was assessed at basal state and following treatment with compounds associated with iDILI; flutamide, 2-hydroxyflutamide, and tolcapone, and their less toxic counterparts bicalutamide and entacapone utilising ATP assays and extracellular flux analysis.

Findings: Whilst only slight variations in basal mitochondrial function were observed between haplogroups H and J, haplogroup-specific responses were observed to the mitotoxic drugs. Haplogroup J showed increased susceptibility to inhibition by flutamide, 2-hydroxyflutamide and tolcapone, via effects on selected mitochondrial complexes (I and II), and an uncoupling of the respiratory chain.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that HepG2 transmitochondrial cybrids can be created to contain the mitochondrial genotype of any individual of interest. This provides a practical and reproducible system to investigate the cellular consequences of variation in the mitochondrial genome, against a constant nuclear background. Additionally, the results show that inter-individual variation in mitochondrial haplogroup may be a factor in determining sensitivity to mitochondrial toxicants.

Funding: This work was supported by the Centre for Drug Safety Science supported by the Medical Research Council, United Kingdom (Grant Number G0700654); and GlaxoSmithKline as part of an MRC-CASE studentship (grant number MR/L006758/1).

Data availability

Source Data files have been provided for Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and supplementary figures s1, s3, s4, s5, s6

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Amy Louise Ball

    Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Amy Louise Ball, holds a grant from GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) for this work. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  2. Carol Elizabeth Jolly

    Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Carol Elizabeth Jolly, salary funded by Janssen Pharmaceutical, paid to University of Liverpool. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  3. Mark G Lennon

    GlaxoSmithKline, Ware, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Mark G Lennon, is an employee of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)..
  4. Jonathan J Lyon

    GlaxoSmithKline, Ware, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Jonathan J Lyon, is an employee of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). Unpaid role as a member of the Investigative Toxicology Leaders Forum (ITLF) representing GSK on this group. Provides unpaid consultation to Cambridge University in areas of drug development. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  5. Ana Alfirevic

    Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Ana Alfirevic, holds a grant from GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) for this work. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  6. Amy E Chadwick

    Department Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    Aemercer@liverpool.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    Amy E Chadwick, holds a grant from GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) for this work and received other funding from Janssen in 2017-2020 (paid directly to University of Liverpool). The author has no other competing interests to declare..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7399-8655

Funding

Medical Research Council (Centre for Drug Safety Science,G0700654)

  • Carol Elizabeth Jolly
  • Amy E Chadwick

GlaxoSmithKline (MRC-CASE studentship,grant number MR/L006758/1))

  • Amy Louise Ball

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Ilse S Daehn, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: This work with human material in this project was approved by the North West of England Research Ethics Committee and all participants gave written informed consent and consent to publish. All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the North West of England Research Ethics Committee (Cell Archive of HLA Typed Healthy Volunteers (HLA), CRN ID 7787, IRAS ID: 15623) with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Version history

  1. Received: February 25, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: March 22, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: June 5, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: June 6, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: June 15, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Ball et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 654
    views
  • 108
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Amy Louise Ball
  2. Carol Elizabeth Jolly
  3. Mark G Lennon
  4. Jonathan J Lyon
  5. Ana Alfirevic
  6. Amy E Chadwick
(2023)
The generation of HepG2 transmitochondrial cybrids to reveal the role of mitochondrial genotype in idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury: a translational in vitro study
eLife 12:e78187.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78187

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78187

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Yi-Shin Chang, Kai Huang ... David L Perkins
    Research Article

    Background:

    End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients experience immune compromise characterized by complex alterations of both innate and adaptive immunity, and results in higher susceptibility to infection and lower response to vaccination. This immune compromise, coupled with greater risk of exposure to infectious disease at hemodialysis (HD) centers, underscores the need for examination of the immune response to the COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccines.

    Methods:

    The immune response to the COVID-19 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine was assessed in 20 HD patients and cohort-matched controls. RNA sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was performed longitudinally before and after each vaccination dose for a total of six time points per subject. Anti-spike antibody levels were quantified prior to the first vaccination dose (V1D0) and 7 d after the second dose (V2D7) using anti-spike IgG titers and antibody neutralization assays. Anti-spike IgG titers were additionally quantified 6 mo after initial vaccination. Clinical history and lab values in HD patients were obtained to identify predictors of vaccination response.

    Results:

    Transcriptomic analyses demonstrated differing time courses of immune responses, with prolonged myeloid cell activity in HD at 1 wk after the first vaccination dose. HD also demonstrated decreased metabolic activity and decreased antigen presentation compared to controls after the second vaccination dose. Anti-spike IgG titers and neutralizing function were substantially elevated in both controls and HD at V2D7, with a small but significant reduction in titers in HD groups (p<0.05). Anti-spike IgG remained elevated above baseline at 6 mo in both subject groups. Anti-spike IgG titers at V2D7 were highly predictive of 6-month titer levels. Transcriptomic biomarkers after the second vaccination dose and clinical biomarkers including ferritin levels were found to be predictive of antibody development.

    Conclusions:

    Overall, we demonstrate differing time courses of immune responses to the BTN162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in maintenance HD subjects comparable to healthy controls and identify transcriptomic and clinical predictors of anti-spike IgG titers in HD. Analyzing vaccination as an in vivo perturbation, our results warrant further characterization of the immune dysregulation of ESRD.

    Funding:

    F30HD102093, F30HL151182, T32HL144909, R01HL138628. This research has been funded by the University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) award UL1TR002003.

    1. Medicine
    Marco Bergamini, Alberto Dalla Volta ... Alfredo Berruti
    Research Article

    Background:

    Among its extragonadal effects, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) has an impact on body composition and bone metabolism. Since androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has a profound impact on circulating FSH concentrations, this hormone could potentially be implicated in the changes of fat body mass (FBM), lean body mass (LBM), and bone fragility induced by ADT. The objective of this study is to correlate FSH serum levels with body composition parameters, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone turnover markers at baseline conditions and after 12 months of ADT.

    Methods:

    Twenty-nine consecutive non-metastatic prostate cancer (PC) patients were enrolled from 2017 to 2019 in a phase IV study. All patients underwent administration of the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonist degarelix. FBM, LBM, and BMD were evaluated by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 12 months of ADT. FSH, alkaline phosphatase, and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen were assessed at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. For outcome measurements and statistical analysis, t-test or sign test and Pearson or Spearman tests for continuous variables were used when indicated.

    Results:

    At baseline conditions, a weak, non-significant, direct relationship was found between FSH serum levels and FBM at arms (r = 0.36) and legs (r = 0.33). Conversely, a stronger correlation was observed between FSH and total FBM (r = 0.52, p = 0.006), fat mass at arms (r = 0.54, p = 0.004), and fat mass at trunk (r = 0.45, p = 0.018) assessed after 12 months. On the other hand, an inverse relationship between serum FSH and appendicular lean mass index/FBM ratio was observed (r = −0.64, p = 0.001). This is an ancillary study of a prospective trial and this is the main limitation.

    Conclusions:

    FSH serum levels after ADT could have an impact on body composition, in particular on FBM. Therefore, FSH could be a promising marker to monitor the risk of sarcopenic obesity and to guide the clinicians in the tailored evaluation of body composition in PC patients undergoing ADT.

    Funding:

    This research was partially funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals. The funder had no role in design and conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data and in preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

    Clinical trial number:

    clinicalTrials.gov NCT03202381, EudraCT Number 2016-004210-10.