Monkeys exhibit human-like gaze biases in economic decisions
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, United States
Abstract
In economic decision-making individuals choose between items based on their perceived value. For both humans and nonhuman primates, these decisions are often carried out while shifting gaze between the available options. Recent studies in humans suggest that these shifts in gaze actively influence choice, manifesting as a bias in favor of the items that are viewed first, viewed last, or viewed for the overall longest duration in a given trial. This suggests a mechanism that links gaze behavior to the neural computations underlying value-based choices. In order to identify this mechanism, it is first necessary to develop and validate a suitable animal model of this behavior. To this end, we have created a novel value-based choice task for macaque monkeys that captures the essential features of the human paradigms in which gaze biases have been observed. Using this task, we identified gaze biases in the monkeys that were both qualitatively and quantitatively similar to those in humans. In addition, the monkeys' gaze biases were well-explained using a sequential sampling model framework previously used to describe gaze biases in humans-the first time this framework has been used to assess value-based decision mechanisms in nonhuman primates. Together, these findings suggest a common mechanism that can explain gaze-related choice biases across species, and open the way for mechanistic studies to identify the neural origins of this behavior.
Data availability
All data and code used for the analyses and figures included in the present manuscript have been uploaded as an Open Science Framework project (and a linked GitHub account). These files can be accessed at: https://osf.io/hkgmn/
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (Deans Dissertation Fellowship)
- Shira M Lupkin
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (Academic Advancement Fund)
- Shira M Lupkin
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (Graduate Assistantship through the Behavioral and Neural Sciences Graduate Program)
- Shira M Lupkin
Whitehall Foundation
- Vincent B McGinty
Biomedical Research Foundation (Busch Biomedical Research Foundation)
- Vincent B McGinty
National Institute on Drug Abuse (K01-DA-036659-01)
- Vincent B McGinty
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: All procedures were in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (2011)and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of both Stanford University (APLAC Protocol #9720) and Rutgers University-Newark (PROTO999900861). Surgeries to implant orthopedic head restraints were conducted using full surgical anesthesia using aseptic techniques and instruments, and with analgesics and antibiotics given pre-, intra-, and post-operatively as appropriate.
Copyright
© 2023, Lupkin & McGinty
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 781
- views
-
- 111
- downloads
-
- 4
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Monkeys exhibit human-like gaze biases in economic decisions
eLife 12:e78205.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78205
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Locomotion is controlled by spinal circuits that interact with supraspinal drives and sensory feedback from the limbs. These sensorimotor interactions are disrupted following spinal cord injury. The thoracic lateral hemisection represents an experimental model of an incomplete spinal cord injury, where connections between the brain and spinal cord are abolished on one side of the cord. To investigate the effects of such an injury on the operation of the spinal locomotor network, we used our computational model of cat locomotion recently published in eLife (Rybak et al., 2024) to investigate and predict changes in cycle and phase durations following a thoracic lateral hemisection during treadmill locomotion in tied-belt (equal left-right speeds) and split-belt (unequal left-right speeds) conditions. In our simulations, the ‘hemisection’ was always applied to the right side. Based on our model, we hypothesized that following hemisection the contralesional (‘intact’, left) side of the spinal network is mostly controlled by supraspinal drives, whereas the ipsilesional (‘hemisected’, right) side is mostly controlled by somatosensory feedback. We then compared the simulated results with those obtained during experiments in adult cats before and after a mid-thoracic lateral hemisection on the right side in the same locomotor conditions. Our experimental results confirmed many effects of hemisection on cat locomotion predicted by our simulations. We show that having the ipsilesional hindlimb step on the slow belt, but not the fast belt, during split-belt locomotion substantially reduces the effects of lateral hemisection. The model provides explanations for changes in temporal characteristics of hindlimb locomotion following hemisection based on altered interactions between spinal circuits, supraspinal drives, and somatosensory feedback.
-
- Neuroscience
Reversing opioid overdoses in rats using a drug that does not enter the brain prevents the sudden and severe withdrawal symptoms associated with therapeutics that target the central nervous system.
