A mosaic-type trimeric RBD-based COVID-19 vaccine candidate induces potent neutralization against Omicron and other SARS-CoV-2 variants

  1. Jing Zhang
  2. Zi Bo Han
  3. Yu Liang
  4. Xue Feng Zhang
  5. Yu Qin Jin
  6. Li Fang Du
  7. Shuai Shao
  8. Hui Wang
  9. Jun Wei Hou
  10. Ke Xu
  11. Wenwen Lei
  12. Ze Hua Lei
  13. Zhao Ming Liu
  14. Jin Zhang
  15. Ya Nan Hou
  16. Ning Liu
  17. Fu Jie Shen
  18. Jin Juan Wu
  19. Xiang Zheng
  20. Xin Yu Li
  21. Xin Li
  22. Wei Jin Huang  Is a corresponding author
  23. Gui Zhen Wu  Is a corresponding author
  24. Ji Guo Su  Is a corresponding author
  25. Qi Ming Li  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Sixth Laboratory, National Vaccine and Serum Institute (NVSI), China
  2. National Engineering Center for New Vaccine Research, China
  3. Beijing Institute of Biological Products Company Limited, China
  4. National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC), China
  5. National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (NIFDC), China
6 figures, 2 tables and 1 additional file

Figures

Design, expression and characterization of the mosaic-type trimeric form of RBD (mos-tri-RBD).

(A) Schematic illustration of the designed mos-tri-RBD. In mos-tri-RBD, three heterologous RBDs were connected end to end into a single chain and co-assembled into a trimeric structure. For the three RBDs, one was derived from the Omicron (BA.1) variant (green color), and the other two were artificially designed harboring the key immune-evasion-related mutations that emerged in SARS-CoV-2 variants, in which one contained the mutations of K417N, L452R, T478K, F490S, and N501Y (cyan color), and the other one contained K417T, S477N, and E484K (blue color). These mutations are highlighted in the red ball-and-stick model in the figure. Each RBD subunit in mos-tri-RBD was composed of the residues 319–537 from the spike protein. The dotted curves in the figure represent the direct connection between the C-terminus of the former RBD and the N-terminus of the latter RBD. The schematic structure of mos-tri-RBD was drawn by Chimera software (Pettersen et al., 2004) based on the PDB file with accession number 6zgi. (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of the recombinant mos-tri-RBD. (C) Concentration-dependent binding ability of mos-tri-RBD with an RBD-specific monoclonal neutralizing antibody MM117 tested using ELISA. (D) Binding avidity of mos-tri-RBD with the receptor hACE2 measured using SPR assay. In this figure, different curves represent different concentrations of analyte (top to bottom: 263.70 ng/ml, 131.85 ng/ml, 65.93 ng/ml, 32.96 ng/ml, and 16.48 ng/ml). Both the original (color curves) and fitted (black curves) data are displayed.

Figure 1—source data 1

The raw files of SDS-PAGE results.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/78633/elife-78633-fig1-data1-v2.zip
Figure 1—source data 2

Concentration-dependent binding ability of mos-tri-RBD with the antibody MM117.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/78633/elife-78633-fig1-data2-v2.xlsx
Evaluation of the cross-reactive immunogenicity of mos-tri-RBD against multiple SARS-CoV-2 strains, including prototype, Omicron, Beta and Delta strains, using live-virus neutralization assay.

(A) Timeline of rat immunization and serum collections. A group of Wistar rats (n=10 with half male and half female) were immunized intramuscularly with two doses of mos-tri-RBD with three weeks apart. Another three groups of rats received two doses of homo-tri-RBD, BBIBP-CorV and adjuvant, respectively, were used for comparison (n=10 rats per group with half male and half female). Sera from all the immunized rats were collected on day 7 after the last vaccination. (B) The reciprocal neutralizing ID50 titers in the sera elicited by mos-tri-RBD compared with those elicited by homo-tri-RBD and BBIBP-CorV against the live-viruses of SARS-CoV-2 prototype strain, and Omicron, Beta, and Delta variants. The quantification limit of the live-virus neutralization assay was 20, and the ID50 titers below the limit of quantification (LOQ) were set to 20. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA followed by the LSD t-test was used for the comparison of data between different groups. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001. GMT values are displayed in the lower part of the figure.

Figure 2—source data 1

Individual data of live-virus neutralizing ID50 titers against several SARS-CoV-2 circulating strains in the sera elicited by mos-tri-RBD compared with those elicited by homo-tri-RBD and BBIBP-CorV.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/78633/elife-78633-fig2-data1-v2.xlsx
Evaluation of the cross-reactive immunogenicity of mos-tri-RBD as a booster shot against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron as well as other VOCs and VOIs using pseudo-virus neutralization assays.

(A) Timeline of rat immunization and serum collections. Three groups of Wistar rats (n=10 rats per group with half male and half female) were primed with a dose of BBIBP-CorV and boosted by mos-tri-RBD, homo-tri-RBD or BBIBP-CorV with three weeks apart. Another group of rats (n=10 with half male and half female) vaccinated with two doses of adjuvant served as control. The sera of all the immunized rats were collected on day 7 post-boosting immunization. (B) The reciprocal neutralizing ID50 titers in the sera elicited by ‘BBIBP-CorV +mos-tri-RBD’ vaccination compared with those elicited by ‘BBIBP-CorV +homo-tri-RBD’ and ‘BBIBP-CorV +BBIBP-Corv’ vaccinations against the pseudo-viruses of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron as well as other VOCs and VOIs. The quantification limit of the pseudo-virus neutralization assay was 40, and the ID50 titers below the LOQ were set to 40. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA followed by the LSD t-test was used for the comparison of data between different groups. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001. GMT values are displayed in the lower part of the figure.

Figure 3—source data 1

Individual data of pseudo-virus neutralizing ID50 titers against various SARS-CoV-2 circulating strains in the sera elicited by ‘BBIBP-CorV +mos-tri-RBD’ vaccination compared with those elicited by ‘BBIBP-CorV +homo-tri-RBD’ and ‘BBIBP-CorV +BBIBP-CorV’ vaccinations.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/78633/elife-78633-fig3-data1-v2.xlsx
Evaluation of the cross-reactive immunogenicity of mos-tri-RBD as a booster shot against multiple SARS-CoV-2 strains, including prototype, Omicron, Beta, and Delta strains, using live-virus neutralization assay.

The reciprocal neutralizing ID50 titers in the sera elicited by ‘BBIBP-CorV +mos-tri-RBD’ vaccination compared with those elicited by ‘BBIBP-CorV +homo-tri-RBD’ and ‘BBIBP-CorV +BBIBP-Corv’ vaccinations against the live-viruses of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron as well as other immune-evasive variants. The quantification limit of the live-virus neutralization assay was 20, and the ID50 titers below the LOQ were set to 20. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA followed by the LSD t-test was used for the comparison of data between different groups. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001. GMT values are displayed in the lower part of the figure.

Figure 4—source data 1

Individual data of live-virus neutralizing antibody ID50 titers against several SARS-CoV-2 circulating strains in the sera elicited by ‘BBIBP-CorV +mos-tri-RBD’ vaccination compared with those elicited by ‘BBIBP-CorV +homo-tri-RBD’ and ‘BBIBP-CorV +BBIBP-CorV’ vaccinations.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/78633/elife-78633-fig4-data1-v2.xlsx
Appendix 1—figure 1
The gene sequence of the spike region of the Omicron BA.1.1 virus used in the live virus neutralization assay.
Appendix 1—figure 2
The amino acid sequence of the spike region of the Omicron BA.1.1 virus used in the live virus neutralization assay aligned with that of the prototype virus.

The sequence alignment result shows that there are 40 residue mutations, deletions or insertions in the spike region compared to that of the prototype virus, including A67V, del69-70, T95I, G142D, del143-145, N211I, del212, insert EPE, G339D, R346K, S371L, S373P, S375F, K417N, N440K, G446S, S477N, T478K, E484A, Q493R, G496S, Q498R, N501Y, Y505H, T547K, D614G, H655Y, N679K, P681H, N764K, D796Y, N856K, Q954H, N969K and L981F.

Tables

Table 1
The details on the eight selected mutations integrated into the two artificially designed RBDs.
MutationsRank of the observed frequencyVOCs and VOIs carrying the mutations
L452R1Delta
T478K2Delta, Omicron
N501Y3Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Omicron, Mu
E484K4Beta, Gamma, Mu
K417T5Gamma
S477N6Omicron
K417N8Beta, Omicron
F490S10Lambda
Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Strain, strain background (SARS-CoV-2 virus)Live SARS-CoV-2 prototype virus (QD-01 strain)National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, China CDC
Strain, strain background (SARS-CoV-2 virus)Live SARS-CoV-2 Omicron virus (NPRC 2.192100005 strain)National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, China CDC
Strain, strain background (SARS-CoV-2 virus)Live SARS-CoV-2 Beta virus (GD84 strain)National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, China CDC
Strain, strain background (SARS-CoV-2 virus)Live SARS-CoV-2 Delta virus (GD96 strain)National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, China CDC
Strain, strain background (SARS-CoV-2 pseudo-virus)SARS-CoV-2 prototype, Omicron (BA.1), Omicron (BA.2), Omicron (BA.3), Alpha, Beta, Delta, Gamma, Lambda and Mu pseudo-virusesWang et al., 2021; Li et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021; Nie et al., 2020
Cell line (CHO)CHO-K1 cell lineATCCCat#CCL-61, RRID:CVCL_0214
Cell line (Homo-sapiens)Huh-7 cellsJCRBCat#JCRB0403; RRID: CVCL_0336
Cell line (Chlorocebus sabaeus)Vero cellsNational Institute for Food and Drug Control (NIFDC), Beijing, China
Biological sample (Wistar rats)Serum samples from immunized Wistar ratsThis paperFreshly isolated from immunized rats
AntibodyMouse monoclonal anti-RBDSino Biological Inc, ChinaCat#40592-MM117ELISA (1 µg/mL)
AntibodyGoat polyclonal anti-mouse IgG-HRPZSGB-BIOCat#ZB-2305; RRID: AB_2747415ELISA (1:10000)
Recombinant DNA reagentPlasmid-SARS-CoV-2-mos-tri-RBDThis paperReference to “protein expression and purification” section
Peptide, recombinant proteinRecombinant mos-tri-RBD protein (mammalian cell-expressed)This paperReference to “protein expression and purification” section
Peptide, recombinant proteinRecombinant monomeric his-tagged RBD of the prototype SARS-CoV-2 strain (Baculovirus-insect cell-expressed)Sino Biological Inc, ChinaCat#40592-V08B
Peptide, recombinant proteinRecombinant monomeric his-tagged RBD of the Omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 strain (HEK 293 cell-expressed)Sino Biological Inc, ChinaCat#40592-V08H121
Peptide, recombinant proteinRecombinant hACE2 protein (mammalian cell-expressed)Sino Biological Inc, ChinaCat#10108-H08H
Commercial assay or kitSPRBIAcore 8 k, GE HealthcareN/A
Chemical compound, drugAluminum hydroxide adjuvantThis paperN/AProduced by the reaction of aluminum chloride and sodium hydroxide
Software, algorithmUCSF ChimeraChimera team at University of Californiahttps://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/
Software, algorithmBIAcore Insight Evaluation SoftwareGE Healthcare
Software, algorithmGraphPad Prism version 8GraphPad Softwarehttps://www.graphpad.com/

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jing Zhang
  2. Zi Bo Han
  3. Yu Liang
  4. Xue Feng Zhang
  5. Yu Qin Jin
  6. Li Fang Du
  7. Shuai Shao
  8. Hui Wang
  9. Jun Wei Hou
  10. Ke Xu
  11. Wenwen Lei
  12. Ze Hua Lei
  13. Zhao Ming Liu
  14. Jin Zhang
  15. Ya Nan Hou
  16. Ning Liu
  17. Fu Jie Shen
  18. Jin Juan Wu
  19. Xiang Zheng
  20. Xin Yu Li
  21. Xin Li
  22. Wei Jin Huang
  23. Gui Zhen Wu
  24. Ji Guo Su
  25. Qi Ming Li
(2022)
A mosaic-type trimeric RBD-based COVID-19 vaccine candidate induces potent neutralization against Omicron and other SARS-CoV-2 variants
eLife 11:e78633.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78633