An increase of inhibition drives the developmental decorrelation of neural activity

  1. Mattia Chini  Is a corresponding author
  2. Thomas Pfeffer
  3. Ileana Hanganu-Opatz
  1. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
  2. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain

Abstract

Throughout development, the brain transits from early highly synchronous activity patterns to a mature state with sparse and decorrelated neural activity, yet the mechanisms underlying this process are poorly understood. The developmental transition has important functional consequences, as the latter state is thought to allow for more efficient storage, retrieval and processing of information. Here, we show that, in the mouse medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), neural activity during the first two postnatal weeks decorrelates following specific spatial patterns. This process is accompanied by a concomitant tilting of excitation-inhibition (E-I) ratio towards inhibition. Using optogenetic manipulations and neural network modeling, we show that the two phenomena are mechanistically linked, and that a relative increase of inhibition drives the decorrelation of neural activity. Accordingly, in mice mimicking the etiology of neurodevelopmental disorders, subtle alterations in E-I ratio are associated with specific impairments in the correlational structure of spike trains. Finally, capitalizing on EEG data from newborn babies, we show that an analogous developmental transition takes place also in the human brain. Thus, changes in E-I ratio control the (de)correlation of neural activity and, by these means, its developmental imbalance might contribute to the pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental disorders.

Data availability

LFP and SUA data that were newly generated for this study are available at the following open-access repository: https://gin.g-node.org/mchini/development_EI_decorrelation.Code supporting the findings of this study is available at the following open-access repository: https://github.com/mchini/Chini_et_al_EI_decorrelation.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mattia Chini

    Institute of Developmental Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
    For correspondence
    mattia.chini@zmnh.uni-hamburg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5782-9720
  2. Thomas Pfeffer

    Center for Brain and Cognition, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9561-3085
  3. Ileana Hanganu-Opatz

    Institute of Developmental Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

European Research Council (ERC-2015-CoG 681577)

  • Ileana Hanganu-Opatz

Marie Curie Training Network euSNN (MSCA-ITN-H2020-860563)

  • Ileana Hanganu-Opatz

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (DEEPER 101016787)

  • Ileana Hanganu-Opatz

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (437610067,178316478 and 302153259)

  • Ileana Hanganu-Opatz

Landesforschungsfoerderung Hamburg (LFF76,LFF73)

  • Ileana Hanganu-Opatz

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Liset M de la Prida, Instituto Cajal, Spain

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were performed in compliance with the German laws and following the European Community guidelines regarding the research animals use. All experiments were approved by the local ethical committee (G132/12, G17/015, N18/015).

Human subjects: No new human data was collected for this study, only open-access datasets were used.

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: July 6, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: March 21, 2022
  3. Accepted: August 16, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: August 17, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: September 6, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Chini et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,163
    views
  • 675
    downloads
  • 51
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mattia Chini
  2. Thomas Pfeffer
  3. Ileana Hanganu-Opatz
(2022)
An increase of inhibition drives the developmental decorrelation of neural activity
eLife 11:e78811.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78811

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78811

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Kenneth Chiou, Noah Snyder-Mackler
    Insight

    Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the extent to which marmosets carry genetically distinct cells from their siblings.

    1. Neuroscience
    Flavio J Schmidig, Simon Ruch, Katharina Henke
    Research Article

    We are unresponsive during slow-wave sleep but continue monitoring external events for survival. Our brain wakens us when danger is imminent. If events are non-threatening, our brain might store them for later consideration to improve decision-making. To test this hypothesis, we examined whether novel vocabulary consisting of simultaneously played pseudowords and translation words are encoded/stored during sleep, and which neural-electrical events facilitate encoding/storage. An algorithm for brain-state-dependent stimulation selectively targeted word pairs to slow-wave peaks or troughs. Retrieval tests were given 12 and 36 hr later. These tests required decisions regarding the semantic category of previously sleep-played pseudowords. The sleep-played vocabulary influenced awake decision-making 36 hr later, if targeted to troughs. The words’ linguistic processing raised neural complexity. The words’ semantic-associative encoding was supported by increased theta power during the ensuing peak. Fast-spindle power ramped up during a second peak likely aiding consolidation. Hence, new vocabulary played during slow-wave sleep was stored and influenced decision-making days later.