Over the past two decades, a surge in political will and financial resources has been directed toward reducing the burden of schistosomiasis and other neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) (World Health Organization, 2012; World Health Organization, 2020; Uniting to Combat Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2022). NTDs affect approximately 1 billion people globally, largely the poor, including over 200 million people with schistosomiasis (World Health Organization, 2020). In the case of schistosomiasis, efforts have primarily focused on expanding treatment coverage through mass drug administration (MDA). MDA programs can achieve reductions in morbidity and infection intensity, but these reductions can be transient, and the outcomes have fallen short of World Health Organization (WHO) control and elimination targets (Deol et al., 2019). The disappointing reality is that across geographic regions, schistosomiasis persists despite aggressive treatment programs, and has reemerged in areas where it was previously controlled for reasons not fully understood (Wiegand et al., 2017; Kittur et al., 2019; Knopp et al., 2019; Liang et al., 2006). This has led the WHO to call for scientific advances and new tools to accelerate progress in reducing the substantial burden of schistosomiasis and other NTDs (World Health Organization, 2020).

Genomic surveillance is commonly employed as an important tool to understand the sources of viral and bacterial infection outbreaks (Köser et al., 2014; Kao et al., 2014; Quainoo et al., 2017; Pillay et al., 2020; Deurenberg et al., 2017; Popovich and Snitkin, 2017). For example, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of clinical samples has been used to monitor drug resistance and investigate transmission clusters of Mycobacteria tuberculosis (Meehan et al., 2019; Satta et al., 2018). Genomic sequencing has also been used to improve surveillance of food-borne outbreaks of bacterial pathogens (Jenkins et al., 2019), to distinguish nosocomial from community-acquired Clostridium difficile infections (Lim et al., 2020), and to document reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 (Tillett et al., 2021). Genomic techniques are, however, still in the early stages of development for complex eukaryotic pathogens such as schistosomes. This is partly due to technical limitations caused by the greater size of eukaryotic genomes, which are more difficult and expensive to sequence than prokaryotes (Camus et al., 2002; Luo et al., 2019). Additionally, the complex reproductive life cycles of eukaryotic pathogens, including Schistosoma, involve both asexual and sexual reproductive phases, which requires high-resolution analytical approaches to infer patterns of relatedness and ancestry (Steinauer et al., 2010).

Advances in sequencing technologies and corresponding reductions in costs have recently made it feasible to generate whole-genome scale data on individual eukaryotic pathogens, including those that that cause schistosomiasis (Rey et al., 2021b; Nikolakis et al., 2021; Le Clec’h et al., 2018). Work to date on the genomics of schistosomes has primarily focused on developing reference genome resources for key pathogen species (Han et al., 2009; Berriman et al., 2009; Zhou et al., 2009; Young et al., 2012), which has enabled further studies of population structure, pathogen evolution, and drug response (Chevalier et al., 2014; Crellen et al., 2016; Berger et al., 2021). These advances have created new opportunities to use genomic data in population-based research and surveillance of schistosomiasis.

While the application of WGS technologies to schistosome genomics has been limited to date (Crellen et al., 2016; Berger et al., 2021; Kincaid-Smith et al., 2021; Rey et al., 2021a), recent population-level genomic studies of other eukaryotic pathogens with both sexual and asexual reproduction illustrate the potential value of integrating genomic data with epidemiological studies. Genomic data played an important role in identifying dogs as a reservoir of Dracunculus medinensis, the nematode that causes Guinea worm disease (Eberhard et al., 2014; Durrant et al., 2020). An investigation of the spatial scale of D. medinensis transmission using geocoded samples and genomic data shed light on the area that should be investigated when cases are detected (~20 km) – key information for efforts to eliminate the disease (Ribado et al., 2021). Genomic data are also being integrated into malaria surveillance and control programs to monitor drug resistance in Plasmodium parasites and insecticide resistance in Anopheles vectors (Neafsey et al., 2021) For example, surveillance for genomic signatures of resistance to artemisinin, a key malaria drug, informs regionally tailored treatment guidelines (Hupalo et al., 2016). Genomic data have been used to identify the diversity of adaptations to mosquito-control strategies, highlighting the need for whole-genome data to monitor insecticide resistance in Anopheles (Neafsey et al., 2021). These studies point to the broad potential for genomic data to enhance understanding of current transmission dynamics and inform infectious disease-control programming, especially in regions approaching elimination (Dalmat et al., 2019).

Similarly, population-level genomic studies of schistosomiasis can shed new light on the processes that drive schistosome infections in different social and ecological contexts, facilitating the design of tailored, region-specific control programs. Schistosome infections are acquired through dermal contact with fresh water contaminated with the larval stage of the parasite, whose life cycle requires the presence of intermediate snail hosts that live in or around freshwater bodies including laks, streams, reservoirs, and irrigation ditches. Infected humans and other mammalian hosts shed schistosomes in their urine (Schistosoma haematobium) or stool (Schistosoma japonicum, Schistosoma mansoni, Schistosoma mekongi, Schistosoma intercalatum, and Schistosoma guineensis). Contact rates between humans and schistosome parasites vary depending on the seasonality, composition of, and distance to aquatic habitats, the definitive host range of the pathogen species, as well as the movement patterns of humans and other mammalian hosts. Due to the aforementioned factors, the pathways driving schistosome transmission can vary regionally.

We argue that accelerating progress in control of schistosomiasis requires the ability to define context-specific drivers of infections in ways that can be effectively translated to intervention strategies. Two interrelated questions are key to inform the design of interventions tailored to distinct eco-epidemiological circumstances: (1) how often do non-human host species contribute to human infection? and (2) what is the importance of locally acquired versus imported infections in driving transmission at different stages of elimination? (Figure 1). As we discuss below, population genomic-scale approaches integrated with epidemiological and ecological studies provide high-resolution answers to these questions, offering a level of precision that is actionable from a public health perspective, such that schistosomiasis-control programming can be tailored to region-specific contexts.

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

In this review, we outline how whole-genome sequence data can be embedded into research and surveillance of schistosomes to bridge gaps in our understanding of schistosomiasis and to advance progress in control and elimination efforts. We provide an overview of historical, current, and emerging genomic approaches for studying schistosomiasis, including a critical review of key studies over the last two decades. Looking forward, we describe the advances that make it increasingly feasible to integrate genomic data into epidemiological studies of schistosomiasis. We then summarize two decades of research on schistosome epidemiology, ecology, and population genetics relevant to our priority questions, highlighting what is known and what knowledge gaps remain, and how the integration of genome-scale information can help fill these gaps. We consider how intervention strategies can be driven by high-resolution genomic inferences about the extent of non-human mammalian host involvement and the importance of imported infections in driving local transmission. We also consider how the relative importance of pathogen importation and different mammalian hosts may shift over time due to the success of control programs and selective pressure on the schistosome genome, and discuss how genomic surveillance can provide early warnings of biologically relevant shifts. We conclude by discussing key considerations and challenges for applying genomic data to schistosomiasis surveillance, including the trade-offs between cost and sampling breadth with respect to the use of genomic data in population-based studies, and the ongoing efforts to build capacity for the generation and analysis of genomic data in schistosomiasis-endemic countries. Throughout we aim to show how including genomic approaches in schistosomiasis research and surveillance can enable strategic data-driven interventions that effectively address local infection and transmission contexts.

To catalog how genetic data have been used to inform our understanding of human schistosomiasis to date, we critically reviewed a representative, non-exhaustive set of 47 studies that have used molecular methods to study human schistosomiasis since 2005 (search terms are provided in Appendix 1). These studies are compared in terms of the research questions investigated, spatial scale, and data generation methods (Table 1, summary of full list of studies provided in Supplementary file 1). In doing so, we update a 12-year-old foundational review on the topic (Steinauer et al., 2010) and build on recent work highlighting how population genetics can shed light on schistosome evolution and adaptation (Rey et al., 2021b). Below, we review the early challenges in generating genetic data, the widespread adoption of microsatellite (MSAT) loci for genetic studies, and the more recent application of newer sequencing technologies. We provide a primer describing the approaches that have been used over the past two decades, along with their strengths and weaknesses, in Box 1.

Until recently, concern about which mammalian species may contribute to the transmission of schistosomiasis focused on S. japonicum in Asia, a known zoonosis with over 40 wild and domesticated animal species identified as competent reservoirs (Liu et al., 2016). By contrast, the contribution of non-human mammals to the transmission of the human schistosomes S. mansoni and S. haematobium was considered negligible (Bustinduy and King, 2014). However, this assumption was challenged by recent work in West Africa that has demonstrated the potential for other mammalian hosts to play a role in transmission cycles when schistosomes use animals as non-human mammalian reservoirs or through the hybridization of human and animal schistosome species (Boon et al., 2018; Catalano et al., 2018). As control progresses in human populations, even infrequent animal involvement has the potential to perpetuate the transmission cycle and impede elimination targets (Colley and Loker, 2018). Moreover, as we discuss below, evolutionary pressures, particularly in later stages of control efforts, may lead to new adaptations such as shifts in host range that circumvent constraints imposed by control measures.

As we highlighted in Figure 1, when non-human reservoirs serve as sources of human schistosome infections, schistosomiasis control strategies should address that route of infection. Below, we review a diverse evidence base, including epidemiological and ecological studies, mathematical modeling simulations, and studies using genetic and genomic approaches, to evaluate the role of non-human definitive hosts in the transmission of the three major human schistosomes. The evidence indicates that the contributions of non-human mammalian hosts are context specific, and the extent of the involvement of various potential hosts and their relevance to control may shift over time. We demonstrate how high-resolution genomic approaches, when paired with epidemiological and ecological assessments, can be used to discern the extent to which zoonotic hosts contribute to human schistosomiasis in areas of persistent, reemerging, or newly emerged schistosomiasis and to resolve current gaps in the scientific knowledge.

Another key area where high-resolution genomics approaches can provide valuable insights is in addressing whether schistosome infections are being acquired locally or are imported. Importation, which we define as the introduction of schistosomes from outside a catchment of control effort, may occur as an isolated event or a regular flow of parasites. Schistosomes may be imported by the movement of infected humans, infected non-human mammals, or the dispersal of infected snails, miracidia, or cercariae through hydrological networks. The importation of schistosomes can lead to the establishment of new transmission foci in naïve populations living in environments with suitable conditions for transmission (e.g., Boissier et al., 2016; Oleaga et al., 2019). Importation may also maintain transmission in endemic areas, compromising locally targeted control programs (Gurarie and Seto, 2009; Perez-Saez et al., 2015). Even rare occurrences of parasite importation into suitable habitat could undermine elimination targets if a few founding schistosomes rapidly expand to establish a new population. In this section, we review what is known about schistosome importation, including the relative importance of local versus imported infections and the pathways of importation. We describe the how genomic approaches can be used with epidemiological methods to assess the frequency of importation events, identify their origins, determine what types of host movement matter, and characterize recent population bottlenecks and expansions. This information can help to determine whether environmental interventions are warranted, and if so, at what scale (Figure 1).

The importation of schistosomes has been responsible for the establishment of new foci of transmission in a variety of geographic settings. Population genetic and genomic data has played an important role in identifying probable importation routes for these new foci and was a key tool used to investigate a recent outbreak. The investigation of the 2014 outbreak of autochthonous schistosomiasis in Corsica, France, incorporated genomic methods, first to identify the infecting schistosome species (S. haematobium, S. bovis, and hybrids of the two species) and then to detect the likely source of imported schistosomes (human movement from West Africa) (Boissier et al., 2016; Berry et al., 2014). Similarly, the introduction of S. mansoni to northern Senegal after dam construction in the 1980s was also attributed to the arrival of agricultural workers from other parts of West Africa using phylogeographic analysis of mtDNA sequences (Van den Broeck et al., 2015). Perhaps the most consequential case of schistosome importation is the introduction of S. mansoni to the western hemisphere. This was long hypothesized to be related to movement of people through the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade, and is now corroborated by whole-genome evidence (Crellen et al., 2016). These examples provide a template for future investigations of novel foci of transmission, which may become more common as climate change continues to alter intermediate host range (De Leo et al., 2020).

In endemic areas, the importation of schistosome parasites may help sustain transmission and contribute to reemergence following the implementation of control programs. Importation events may also represent sources of new parasite genomic variation that may influence biologically and epidemiologically relevant traits in local parasite populations. Modeling simulations suggest that both social and hydrological connectivity can sustain transmission, even in regions that would not support ongoing transmission in the absence of importation (Gurarie and Seto, 2009), that human movement may delay the interruption of transmission (Perez-Saez et al., 2015), and that infection risk is strongly influenced by snail dispersal (Ciddio et al., 2017). Models parameterized with field data from Sichuan, China, were consistent with these conclusions, indicating that most villages received parasite inputs from outside the village, either through hydrological or social connectivity (Spear, 2012). However, a study that used genomic approaches (ddRADseq) in the same region demonstrated that transmission tends to be local (occurring primarily within villages with relative temporal stability), with occasional importation of cases whose impact on transmission is not well understood (Shortt et al., 2017). A review of genetic studies across the African continent similarly estimated that gene flow among schistosome populations was confined to local scales (Rey et al., 2021b). The distinct conclusions of the population genomic and modeling analyses described above highlight the importance of genomic approaches as they can resolve the extent to which importation is contributing to local transmission in a given context. The use of genomic approaches to monitor the relative importance of parasite importation may justify a phased approach to schistosomiasis control, focusing on local sources of infection when they predominate and transitioning to a control strategy that addresses potential geographic sources of infection when and if importation is shown to contribute meaningfully to local infections, as may be anticipated when approaching elimination targets.

There are two plausible routes of parasite importation: movement of the snail and larval schistosomes via hydrological networks, and movement of definitive hosts. Empirical studies on snail dispersal use a variety of ecological and population genomic methods in diverse geographic settings and have demonstrated the plausibility of parasite importation through hydrological transport of intermediate hosts. Genotyping of snails from all three genera that transmit human schistosomes (Bulinus, Biomphalaria and Oncomelania in Egypt, East Africa, and China, respectively) using MSATs revealed gene flow among snail populations and indicated that snail movement can introduce schistosomes from other villages kilometers away (Zein-Eddine et al., 2017; Standley et al., 2014; Head et al., 2016). Using remotely sensed data, Bulinus snails with a strong propensity for aestivation were also found to readily disperse from ephemeral habitats in coastal Kenya, even during a drought (Clennon et al., 2007). Ecological field studies in Sichuan, China, indicated that both S. japonicum cercariae and Oncomelania hupensis snails are capable of dispersing through irrigation networks and reaching new sites or villages (Lowe et al., 2005; Akullian et al., 2012). In contrast to Sichuan-based field studies, analysis of MSATs from snail populations in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River indicated relatively low levels of gene flow among snail populations (Guan et al., 2016). Together, these studies demonstrate the possibility of importation via hydrological transport of snails, but further investigation of how often and under what circumstances this occurs is warranted for effectively targeting – both spatially and temporally – environmental interventions to mitigate the public health impact of importation events.

The movement of infected people and animals is another potentially important source of imported schistosomes. While the modeling studies mentioned above indicate that human population movement can maintain transmission in endemic areas, the results of empirical studies highlight the gaps in our understanding of which types of human movement matter for the spread of schistosomiasis. A genetic study using MSAT markers compared parasite diversity among urban migrants and urban-born people in Brazil and inferred that migration contributed little to cases of urban schistosomiasis (Blanton et al., 2015). An epidemiological study found rural residents in Sichuan, China, were less likely to be infected with S. japonicum if they engaged in circular labor migration to urban areas, suggesting travel (and decreased time spent in endemic villages) is protective against infection (Buchwald et al., 2021). In contrast, migrants to three villages in Hunan province accounted for over half of all observed S. japonicum infections (Cao et al., 2015). This evidence highlights how diverse human movement patterns can be: whether origins and destinations are rural or urban influence if parasites are transported by host movement and if ecological conditions in a destination can even support transmission. Even less is known about the role that non-human mammalian hosts may play in the transport of schistosomes across landscapes.

To understand the role of human and other definitive host population movement in schistosome importation, we need to identify the types of movement that are most epidemiologically relevant. The ecological requirements of the parasites mean that, with few exceptions, human movement between rural areas is arguably most relevant to schistosome transmission. However, movement between rural areas is poorly accounted for in popular modeling frameworks that are well suited to capture urban migration and commuting patterns (Meredith et al., 2021; Wesolowski et al., 2015). An additional challenge is the disconnect between human and pathogen movement: a person’s potential exposure to or emission of schistosomes can seldom be discerned from their movement data alone, making it difficult to determine which movements are epidemiologically meaningful. This is a key area for the contribution of genome-scale data. Integration of genomic data from parasites with candidate measures of host movement would provide the means to evaluate the importance of different types of movement in the importation of infections as has been done with malaria (Wesolowski et al., 2018). The high resolution of genomic approaches can also reveal source-sink scenarios between hosts (human or otherwise) and geographic locations.

We suspect the risk of importation depends on context, ranging from the hydrological environment through which snails disperse to the prevailing patterns of human and animal movement. Because population genomic analyses previously indicated that infections are primarily acquired locally, it is crucial to characterize how often importation events occur and whether the importance of social and environmental connectivity changes over time, either with seasons or as regions approach elimination targets. Indeed, genomic data, coupled with human and ecological data, has an important role to play in quantifying how often importation occurs and which types of movement by which hosts drive importation events. For elimination programs to be successful, control efforts should consider the spatial extent of parasite gene flow through all hosts involved in transmission, which requires data to describe spatial scales and host diversity relevant to a particular context (Figure 1).

Substantial challenges remain for the effective integration of genomic workflows into schistosomiasis population-based research and surveillance systems. Chief among these challenges is the generation and analysis of genomic data relevant for operational decision-making, which will require addressing interrelated issues of cost, timescales of analysis, and local infrastructure. For example, the current pattern of shipping samples from endemic regions to laboratories in high-income countries means that potentially actionable insight from genomic data is available months, if not years, after collection, which reduces the practical value of this information. Building capacity for the generation and analysis of genomic data in schistosomiasis-endemic countries is crucial to narrow this gap. Existing institutions, such as The Pathogen Genomics Institute and the African Centre of Excellence for Genomics of Infectious Disease, both affiliated with the African Centers for Disease Control, have laid important groundwork for prioritizing capacity building and in-country leadership of genomic research, as have other programs including MalariaGEN and H3Africa (Parker and Kwiatkowski, 2016). Development of standard analytical packages responsive to programmatic needs can further accelerate the integration of genomic data into programmatic decision-making. Researchers focused on schistosomiasis can also benefit from pioneering advances incorporating genomic data in Guinea Worm disease surveillance (Ribado et al., 2021) and malaria elimination programming (Dalmat et al., 2019), as well as those in rabies elimination (Brunker et al., 2020) and antimicrobial stewardship programs (Nielsen et al., 2005) operating in low- and middle-income countries.

A major impetus for writing this review was the realization that, with the declining costs and increased feasibility of WGS approaches, the costs, benefits, and trade-offs involved in the use of traditional approaches (e.g., MSATs) and reduced-representation sequencing approaches (e.g., exome sequencing, ddRADseq) have shifted. It is easy to assume that because so much more data is produced by WGS approaches that it is necessarily considerably more expensive. However, in our experience actual differences in cost per sample can be small. Considering genomes the size of schistosomes (<400 Mbp), at present, a minimal WGS study (run efficiently with 50–100 samples in parallel on a high-throughput Illumina sequencer) might be approximately 10 times the cost of an MSAT study with 10 loci. A more comprehensive MSAT study with a more statistically reliable number of loci (~100–200) would incur similar costs as the genome study but would still provide far less useful data. MSAT studies also have larger up-front costs, including design, purchase, and testing of amplification primer pairs and technical training of laboratory personnel. These cost calculations will differ for established laboratories than those getting started. Similarly, RR and exome capture approaches currently cost more (per sample as well as in terms of up-front costs) than MSATs and less than WGS. Because these approaches require less sequencing than WGS, they may only be two to five times more expensive than a small MSAT study. Up-front costs for RR approaches include experimentation with restriction enzyme pairs and digest size filtering for ddRADseq to control the fraction of the genome that is usually sequenced, while exome capture requires the design and generation of specific capture probes. Cost calculations for any laboratory will also depend on the relative availability and cost of labor, whether access to efficient sequencing is limited or involves undue delay, and the laboratory’s capability to analyze the data.

In addition to cost, additional benefits of WGS should be considered. In contrast to other types of data, WGS data is highly replicable across laboratories and technologies, giving it greater long-term comparative value. The ability to combine sequencing data across laboratories and over time expands the set of questions that can be addressed, including some that may not have been apparent when the data were first collected. However, when accuracy, replicability, long-term value, and less complex sample processing procedures are not a priority, assessing more samples with lower-resolution methods may be an appropriate choice over WGS, especially if results can be obtained more rapidly. Non-WGS methods may also be useful for preliminary or screening studies, although the extra sample handling and re-handling costs mentioned above should be considered when assessing feasibility.

We suggest that low-resolution methods in the genomic age be used within surveillance systems to detect coarse-scale genetic patterns that may represent ‘red-flags’ for further investigation. For example, they might be used for preliminary assessments related to our questions of interest: (1) evidence of hybridization between schistosome species; (2) evidence that non-human definitive hosts share a similar parasite population with humans; and (3) evidence of transmission between geographically well-separated and divergent parasite populations. Large-scale sampling to detect these phenomena may identify regions where follow-up WGS studies are warranted to investigate the biology of novel recombinants, contributions of non-human definitive hosts, and patterns of parasite import. WGS can also be done with strategic sampling across populations worldwide to detect, for example, phylogenetic histories, past geographic movement, and selected genomic variants that may have important implications for drug resistance or shifts in parasite biology relevant for control.

In the long term, standardized genomic sampling approaches (e.g., WGS) and centralized organization of publicly accessible databases will lead to compounding utility of genomic data in schistosomiasis research and surveillance. This is particularly true for questions of parasite importation, as such analyses require sampling of schistosomes from the location of interest as well as from a range of possible source populations. Like MalariaGEN, public genomic data repositories such as the Schistosomiasis Collection at the Natural History Museum (SCAN) can be leveraged for these types of analyses (Emery et al., 2012). However, available comparative datasets are limited at present, which highlights the importance of prioritizing efforts to expand the representation of schistosome sequences from a range of endemic sites. This would greatly expand the utility of genomic resources, particularly as it relates to tracking parasite spread among remaining transmission foci and for expanding genomic surveillance to inform shifts in epidemiologically relevant characteristics such as host specificity and drug resistance. The curation of such resources should be undertaken with care to ensure that endemic countries and their public health authorities benefit through data access agreements and consent procedures that adequately represent potential future use and safeguard protections for individuals against stigma and discrimination, especially as the time between data collection and phylogenetic analysis shrinks (Parker and Kwiatkowski, 2016; Johnson and Parker, 2019; Johnson and Parker, 2020).

In the near term, the incorporation of genomic data into outbreak investigations can help identify key sources of infection in residual transmission hotspots, including non-human hosts and imported infections, and help expand the geographic coverage of genomic resources. For example, China’s strategy for investigating schistosomiasis outbreaks includes surveys of human, domestic animal, and snail populations (Chen et al., 2022). Adding the collection of schistosomes to such protocols to generate genomic data can help us better identify what processes drive such outbreaks and contribute to the development of genomic data resources. An important practical challenge to such investigations is the collection of schistosomes, particularly from non-human mammalian hosts and snails (Liang et al., 2022; Kamel et al., 2021). Sensitive and efficient methods to identify and sample snail infections, which are uncommon even in high-prevalence settings, or cercariae in water would enable studies of genomic diversity of schistosomes in intermediate hosts in low-prevalence areas approaching elimination. Similarly, development of guidelines for surveying non-human mammalian hosts for schistosomiasis and collecting schistosomes will enhance the probability that infection reservoirs are identified and samples from all relevant definitive hosts are included in genomic studies.

1. 1. Akullian AN
   2. Lu D
   3. McDowell JZ
   4. Davis GM
   5. Spear RC
   6. Remais JV

   (2012) Modeling the combined influence of host dispersal and waterborne fate and transport on pathogen spread in complex landscapes

   Water Quality, Exposure, and Health 4:159–168.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-012-0074-y

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Allendorf FW
   2. Hohenlohe PA
   3. Luikart G

   (2010) Genomics and the future of conservation genetics

   Nature Reviews. Genetics 11:697–709.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2844

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Altshuler D
   2. Pollara VJ
   3. Cowles CR
   4. Van Etten WJ
   5. Baldwin J
   6. Linton L
   7. Lander ES

   (2000) An SNP map of the human genome generated by reduced representation shotgun sequencing

   Nature 407:513–516.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/35035083

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Barbosa LM
   2. Silva LK
   3. Reis EA
   4. Azevedo TM
   5. Costa JM
   6. Blank WA
   7. Reis MG
   8. Blanton RE

   (2013) Characteristics of the human host have little influence on which local schistosoma mansoni populations are acquired

   PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 7:12.

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002572

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Berger DJ
   2. Crellen T
   3. Lamberton PHL
   4. Allan F
   5. Tracey A
   6. Noonan JD
   7. Kabatereine NB
   8. Tukahebwa EM
   9. Adriko M
   10. Holroyd N
   11. Webster JP
   12. Berriman M
   13. Cotton JA

   (2021) Whole-genome sequencing of schistosoma mansoni reveals extensive diversity with limited selection despite mass drug administration

   Nature Communications 12:4776.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24958-0

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Berriman M
   2. Haas BJ
   3. LoVerde PT
   4. Wilson RA
   5. Dillon GP
   6. Cerqueira GC
   7. Mashiyama ST
   8. Al-Lazikani B
   9. Andrade LF
   10. Ashton PD
   11. Aslett MA
   12. Bartholomeu DC
   13. Blandin G
   14. Caffrey CR
   15. Coghlan A
   16. Coulson R
   17. Day TA
   18. Delcher A
   19. DeMarco R
   20. Djikeng A
   21. Eyre T
   22. Gamble JA
   23. Ghedin E
   24. Gu Y
   25. Hertz-Fowler C
   26. Hirai H
   27. Hirai Y
   28. Houston R
   29. Ivens A
   30. Johnston DA
   31. Lacerda D
   32. Macedo CD
   33. McVeigh P
   34. Ning Z
   35. Oliveira G
   36. Overington JP
   37. Parkhill J
   38. Pertea M
   39. Pierce RJ
   40. Protasio AV
   41. Quail MA
   42. Rajandream MA
   43. Rogers J
   44. Sajid M
   45. Salzberg SL
   46. Stanke M
   47. Tivey AR
   48. White O
   49. Williams DL
   50. Wortman J
   51. Wu W
   52. Zamanian M
   53. Zerlotini A
   54. Fraser-Liggett CM
   55. Barrell BG
   56. El-Sayed NM

   (2009) The genome of the blood fluke schistosoma mansoni

   Nature 460:352–358.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08160

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Berry A
   2. Moné H
   3. Iriart X
   4. Mouahid G
   5. Aboo O
   6. Boissier J
   7. Fillaux J
   8. Cassaing S
   9. Debuisson C
   10. Valentin A
   11. Mitta G
   12. Théron A
   13. Magnaval JF

   (2014) Schistosomiasis haematobium, corsica, france

   Emerging Infectious Diseases 20:1595–1597.

   https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2009.140928

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Blair C
   2. Campbell CR
   3. Yoder AD

   (2015) Assessing the utility of whole genome amplified DNA for next-generation molecular ecology

   Molecular Ecology Resources 15:1079–1090.

   https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12376

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Blanton RE
   2. Blank WA
   3. Costa JM
   4. Carmo TM
   5. Reis EA
   6. Silva LK
   7. Barbosa LM
   8. Test MR
   9. Reis MG

   (2011) Schistosoma mansoni population structure and persistence after praziquantel treatment in two villages of bahia, brazil

   International Journal for Parasitology 41:1093–1099.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.06.002

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Blanton RE
    2. Barbosa LM
    3. Reis EA
    4. Carmo TM
    5. Dos Santos CRA
    6. Costa JM
    7. Aminu PT
    8. Blank WA
    9. Reis RB
    10. Guimarães IC
    11. Silva LK
    12. Reis MG

    (2015) The relative contribution of immigration or local increase for persistence of urban schistosomiasis in salvador, bahia, brazil

    PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 9:e0003521.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003521

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Boissier J
    2. Grech-Angelini S
    3. Webster BL
    4. Allienne JF
    5. Huyse T
    6. Mas-Coma S
    7. Toulza E
    8. Barré-Cardi H
    9. Rollinson D
    10. Kincaid-Smith J
    11. Oleaga A
    12. Galinier R
    13. Foata J
    14. Rognon A
    15. Berry A
    16. Mouahid G
    17. Henneron R
    18. Moné H
    19. Noel H
    20. Mitta G

    (2016) Outbreak of urogenital schistosomiasis in corsica (france): an epidemiological case study

    The Lancet. Infectious Diseases 16:971–979.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00175-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Boon NAM
    2. Van Den Broeck F
    3. Faye D
    4. Volckaert FAM
    5. Mboup S
    6. Polman K
    7. Huyse T

    (2018) Barcoding hybrids: heterogeneous distribution of schistosoma haematobium × schistosoma bovis hybrids across the senegal river basin

    Parasitology 145:634–645.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182018000525

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Bradbury IR
    2. Hamilton LC
    3. Dempson B
    4. Robertson MJ
    5. Bourret V
    6. Bernatchez L
    7. Verspoor E

    (2015) Transatlantic secondary contact in atlantic salmon, comparing microsatellites, a single nucleotide polymorphism array and restriction-site associated DNA sequencing for the resolution of complex spatial structure

    Molecular Ecology 24:5130–5144.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13395

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Brumfield RT
    2. Beerli P
    3. Nickerson DA
    4. Edwards SV

    (2003) The utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms in inferences of population history

    Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18:249–256.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00018-1

    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Brunker K
    2. Jaswant G
    3. Thumbi SM
    4. Lushasi K
    5. Lugelo A
    6. Czupryna AM
    7. Ade F
    8. Wambura G
    9. Chuchu V
    10. Steenson R
    11. Ngeleja C
    12. Bautista C
    13. Manalo DL
    14. Gomez MRR
    15. Chu M
    16. Miranda ME
    17. Kamat M
    18. Rysava K
    19. Espineda J
    20. Silo EAV
    21. Aringo AM
    22. Bernales RP
    23. Adonay FF
    24. Tildesley MJ
    25. Marston DA
    26. Jennings DL
    27. Fooks AR
    28. Zhu W
    29. Meredith LW
    30. Hill SC
    31. Poplawski R
    32. Gifford RJ
    33. Singer JB
    34. Maturi M
    35. Mwatondo A
    36. Biek R
    37. Hampson K

    (2020) Rapid in-country sequencing of whole virus genomes to inform rabies elimination programmes

    Wellcome Open Research 5:3.

    https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15518.2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Buchwald AG
    2. Grover E
    3. Van Dyke J
    4. Kechris K
    5. Lu D
    6. Liu Y
    7. Zhong B
    8. Carlton EJ

    (2021) Human mobility associated with risk of schistosoma japonicum infection in sichuan, china

    American Journal of Epidemiology 190:1243–1252.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaa292

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. Book

    1. Bustinduy AL
    2. King CH

    (2014)

    Schistosomiasis. in: Manson’s Tropical Diseases (23rd ed)

    Elsevier Saunders.

    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Camus JC
    2. Pryor MJ
    3. Médigue C
    4. Cole ST

    (2002) Re-annotation of the genome sequence of mycobacterium tuberculosis h37rv

    Microbiology 148:2967–2973.

    https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-148-10-2967

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Cao C
    2. Bao Z
    3. Li S
    4. Wei W
    5. Yi P
    6. Yu Q
    7. Zhu H
    8. Xu J
    9. Guo J
    10. Feng Z

    (2015) Schistosomiasis in a migrating population in the lake region of china and its potential impact on control operation

    Acta Tropica 145:88–92.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.02.009

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Catalano S
    2. Sène M
    3. Diouf ND
    4. Fall CB
    5. Borlase A
    6. Léger E
    7. Bâ K
    8. Webster JP

    (2018) Rodents as natural hosts of zoonotic schistosoma species and hybrids: an epidemiological and evolutionary perspective from west africa

    The Journal of Infectious Diseases 218:429–433.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiy029

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Catalano S
    2. Léger E
    3. Fall CB
    4. Borlase A
    5. Diop SD
    6. Berger D
    7. Webster BL
    8. Faye B
    9. Diouf ND
    10. Rollinson D
    11. Sène M
    12. Bâ K
    13. Webster JP

    (2020) Multihost transmission of schistosoma mansoni in senegal, 2015-2018

    Emerging Infectious Diseases 26:1234–1242.

    https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2606.200107

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Chapuis MP
    2. Estoup A

    (2007) Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation

    Molecular Biology and Evolution 24:621–631.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msl191

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Chen L
    2. Cao CL
    3. Liu Y
    4. Zhong B

    (2022) Emergency responses to schistosomiasis outbreak during the stage moving towards elimination in china

    Zhongguo Xue Xi Chong Bing Fang Zhi Za Zhi Chin J Schistosomiasis Control 33:570–574.

    https://doi.org/10.16250/j.32.1374.2021148

    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Chevalier FD
    2. Valentim CLL
    3. LoVerde PT
    4. Anderson TJC

    (2014) Efficient linkage mapping using exome capture and extreme QTL in schistosome parasites

    BMC Genomics 15:617.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-617

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Ciddio M
    2. Mari L
    3. Sokolow SH
    4. De Leo GA
    5. Casagrandi R
    6. Gatto M

    (2017) The spatial spread of schistosomiasis: A multidimensional network model applied to saint-louis region, senegal

    Advances in Water Resources 108:406–415.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.10.012

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Clennon JA
    2. King CH
    3. Muchiri EM
    4. Kitron U

    (2007) Hydrological modelling of snail dispersal patterns in msambweni, kenya and potential resurgence of schistosoma haematobium transmission

    Parasitology 134:683–693.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182006001594

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Colley DG
    2. Loker ES

    (2018) New tools for old questions: how strictly human are “human schistosomes”-and does it matter?

    The Journal of Infectious Diseases 218:344–346.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiy030

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Combes C
    2. Fournier A
    3. Moné H
    4. Théron A

    (1994) Behaviours in trematode cercariae that enhance parasite transmission: patterns and processes

    Parasitology 109 Suppl:S3–S13.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000085048

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Crellen T
    2. Allan F
    3. David S
    4. Durrant C
    5. Huckvale T
    6. Holroyd N
    7. Emery AM
    8. Rollinson D
    9. Aanensen DM
    10. Berriman M
    11. Webster JP
    12. Cotton JA

    (2016) Whole genome resequencing of the human parasite schistosoma mansoni reveals population history and effects of selection

    Scientific Reports 6:20954.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20954

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Dalmat R
    2. Naughton B
    3. Kwan-Gett TS
    4. Slyker J
    5. Stuckey EM

    (2019) Use cases for genetic epidemiology in malaria elimination

    Malaria Journal 18:163.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2784-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. De Leo GA
    2. Stensgaard AS
    3. Sokolow SH
    4. N’Goran EK
    5. Chamberlin AJ
    6. Yang GJ
    7. Utzinger J

    (2020) Schistosomiasis and climate change

    BMJ 371:m4324.

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4324

    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Deol AK
    2. Fleming FM
    3. Calvo-Urbano B
    4. Walker M
    5. Bucumi V
    6. Gnandou I
    7. Tukahebwa EM
    8. Jemu S
    9. Mwingira UJ
    10. Alkohlani A
    11. Traoré M
    12. Ruberanziza E
    13. Touré S
    14. Basáñez M-G
    15. French MD
    16. Webster JP

    (2019) Schistosomiasis - assessing progress toward the 2020 and 2025 global goals

    The New England Journal of Medicine 381:2519–2528.

    https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1812165

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Deurenberg RH
    2. Bathoorn E
    3. Chlebowicz MA
    4. Couto N
    5. Ferdous M
    6. García-Cobos S
    7. Kooistra-Smid AMD
    8. Raangs EC
    9. Rosema S
    10. Veloo ACM
    11. Zhou K
    12. Friedrich AW
    13. Rossen JWA

    (2017) Application of next generation sequencing in clinical microbiology and infection prevention

    Journal of Biotechnology 243:16–24.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.12.022

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Durrant C
    2. Thiele EA
    3. Holroyd N
    4. Doyle SR
    5. Sallé G
    6. Tracey A
    7. Sankaranarayanan G
    8. Lotkowska ME
    9. Bennett HM
    10. Huckvale T
    11. Abdellah Z
    12. Tchindebet O
    13. Wossen M
    14. Logora MSY
    15. Coulibaly CO
    16. Weiss A
    17. Schulte-Hostedde AI
    18. Foster JM
    19. Cleveland CA
    20. Yabsley MJ
    21. Ruiz-Tiben E
    22. Berriman M
    23. Eberhard ML
    24. Cotton JA

    (2020) Population genomic evidence that human and animal infections in africa come from the same populations of dracunculus medinensis

    PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 14:e0008623.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008623

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Eberhard ML
    2. Ruiz-Tiben E
    3. Hopkins DR
    4. Farrell C
    5. Toe F
    6. Weiss A
    7. Withers PC
    8. Jenks MH
    9. Thiele EA
    10. Cotton JA
    11. Hance Z
    12. Holroyd N
    13. Cama VA
    14. Tahir MA
    15. Mounda T

    (2014) The peculiar epidemiology of dracunculiasis in chad

    The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 90:61–70.

    https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.13-0554

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Emery AM
    2. Allan FE
    3. Rabone ME
    4. Rollinson D

    (2012) Schistosomiasis collection at nhm (scan)

    Parasites & Vectors 5:185.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-185

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Faust CL
    2. Crotti M
    3. Moses A
    4. Oguttu D
    5. Wamboko A
    6. Adriko M
    7. Adekanle EK
    8. Kabatereine N
    9. Tukahebwa EM
    10. Norton AJ
    11. Gower CM
    12. Webster JP
    13. Lamberton PHL

    (2019) Two-year longitudinal survey reveals high genetic diversity of schistosoma mansoni with adult worms surviving praziquantel treatment at the start of mass drug administration in uganda

    Parasites & Vectors 12:607.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3860-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Fischer MC
    2. Rellstab C
    3. Leuzinger M
    4. Roumet M
    5. Gugerli F
    6. Shimizu KK
    7. Holderegger R
    8. Widmer A

    (2017) Estimating genomic diversity and population differentiation - an empirical comparison of microsatellite and SNP variation in arabidopsis halleri

    BMC Genomics 18:69.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3459-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Gower CM
    2. Shrivastava J
    3. Lamberton PHL
    4. Rollinson D
    5. Webster BL
    6. Emery A
    7. Kabatereine NB
    8. Webster JP

    (2007) Development and application of an ethically and epidemiologically advantageous assay for the multi-locus microsatellite analysis of schistosoma mansoni

    Parasitology 134:523–536.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182006001685

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Gower CM
    2. Gouvras AN
    3. Lamberton PHL
    4. Deol A
    5. Shrivastava J
    6. Mutombo PN
    7. Mbuh JV
    8. Norton AJ
    9. Webster BL
    10. Stothard JR
    11. Garba A
    12. Lamine MS
    13. Kariuki C
    14. Lange CN
    15. Mkoji GM
    16. Kabatereine NB
    17. Gabrielli AF
    18. Rudge JW
    19. Fenwick A
    20. Sacko M
    21. Dembelé R
    22. Lwambo NJS
    23. Tchuem Tchuenté L-A
    24. Rollinson D
    25. Webster JP

    (2013) Population genetic structure of schistosoma mansoni and schistosoma haematobium from across six sub-saharan african countries: implications for epidemiology, evolution and control

    Acta Tropica 128:261–274.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.09.014

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Gower CM
    2. Vince L
    3. Webster JP

    (2017) Should we be treating animal schistosomiasis in africa? the need for a one health economic evaluation of schistosomiasis control in people and their livestock

    Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 111:244–247.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trx047

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Gray DJ
    2. Williams GM
    3. Li Y
    4. Chen H
    5. Forsyth SJ
    6. Li RS
    7. Barnett AG
    8. Guo J
    9. Ross AG
    10. Feng Z
    11. McManus DP

    (2009) A cluster-randomised intervention trial against schistosoma japonicum in the peoples’ republic of china: bovine and human transmission

    PLOS ONE 4:e5900.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005900

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Guan W
    2. Li SZ
    3. Abe EM
    4. Webster BL
    5. Rollinson D
    6. Zhou XN

    (2016) The genetic diversity and geographical separation study of oncomelania hupensis populations in mainland china using microsatellite loci

    Parasites & Vectors 9:28.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1321-z

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Guo JG
    2. Ross AG
    3. Lin DD
    4. Williams GM
    5. Chen HG
    6. Li Y
    7. Davis GM
    8. Feng Z
    9. McManus DP
    10. Sleigh AC

    (2001) A baseline study on the importance of bovines for human schistosoma japonicum infection around poyang lake, china

    The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 65:272–278.

    https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2001.65.272

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Gurarie D
    2. Seto EYW

    (2009) Connectivity sustains disease transmission in environments with low potential for endemicity: modelling schistosomiasis with hydrologic and social connectivities

    Journal of the Royal Society, Interface 6:495–508.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2008.0265

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Han ZG
    2. Brindley PJ
    3. Wang SY
    4. Chen Z

    (2009) Schistosoma genomics: new perspectives on schistosome biology and host-parasite interaction

    Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 10:211–240.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-082908-150036

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Hansson B
    2. Westerberg L

    (2002) On the correlation between heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations

    Molecular Ecology 11:2467–2474.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01644.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Head JR
    2. Chang H
    3. Li Q
    4. Hoover CM
    5. Wilke T
    6. Clewing C
    7. Carlton EJ
    8. Liang S
    9. Lu D
    10. Zhong B
    11. Remais JV

    (2016) Genetic evidence of contemporary dispersal of the intermediate snail host of schistosoma japonicum: movement of an NTD host is facilitated by land use and landscape connectivity

    PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 10:e0005151.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005151

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Hupalo DN
    2. Luo Z
    3. Melnikov A
    4. Sutton PL
    5. Rogov P
    6. Escalante A
    7. Vallejo AF
    8. Herrera S
    9. Arévalo-Herrera M
    10. Fan Q
    11. Wang Y
    12. Cui L
    13. Lucas CM
    14. Durand S
    15. Sanchez JF
    16. Baldeviano GC
    17. Lescano AG
    18. Laman M
    19. Barnadas C
    20. Barry A
    21. Mueller I
    22. Kazura JW
    23. Eapen A
    24. Kanagaraj D
    25. Valecha N
    26. Ferreira MU
    27. Roobsoong W
    28. Nguitragool W
    29. Sattabonkot J
    30. Gamboa D
    31. Kosek M
    32. Vinetz JM
    33. González-Cerón L
    34. Birren BW
    35. Neafsey DE
    36. Carlton JM

    (2016) Population genomics studies identify signatures of global dispersal and drug resistance in plasmodium vivax

    Nature Genetics 48:953–958.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3588

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Huyse T
    2. Webster BL
    3. Geldof S
    4. Stothard JR
    5. Diaw OT
    6. Polman K
    7. Rollinson D

    (2009) Bidirectional introgressive hybridization between a cattle and human schistosome species

    PLOS Pathogens 5:e1000571.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000571

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Jenkins C
    2. Dallman TJ
    3. Grant KA

    (2019) Impact of whole genome sequencing on the investigation of food-borne outbreaks of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli serogroup O157:H7, england, 2013 to 2017

    Euro Surveillance 24:1800346.

    https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.4.1800346

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Jiz M
    2. Mingala C
    3. Fu ZQ
    4. Adriatico M
    5. Lu K
    6. Jarilla B
    7. Sagliba M
    8. Moreno A
    9. Park S
    10. Lin JJ
    11. Olveda R
    12. Kurtis JD
    13. Wu HW

    (2021) High prevalence of schistosoma japonicum by perfusion in naturally exposed water buffalo in a region of the philippines endemic for human schistosomiasis

    PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 15:e0009796.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009796

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Johnson SB
    2. Parker M

    (2019) The ethics of sequencing infectious disease pathogens for clinical and public health

    Nature Reviews. Genetics 20:313–315.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-019-0109-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Johnson S
    2. Parker M

    (2020) Ethical challenges in pathogen sequencing: A systematic scoping review

    Wellcome Open Research 5:119.

    https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15806.1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Kamel B
    2. Laidemitt MR
    3. Lu L
    4. Babbitt C
    5. Weinbaum OL
    6. Mkoji GM
    7. Loker ES

    (2021) Detecting and identifying schistosoma infections in snails and aquatic habitats: A systematic review

    PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 15:e0009175.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009175

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Kao RR
    2. Haydon DT
    3. Lycett SJ
    4. Murcia PR

    (2014) Supersize me: how whole-genome sequencing and big data are transforming epidemiology

    Trends in Microbiology 22:282–291.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2014.02.011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Kebede T
    2. Bech N
    3. Allienne JF
    4. Olivier R
    5. Erko B
    6. Boissier J

    (2020) Genetic evidence for the role of non-human primates as reservoir hosts for human schistosomiasis

    PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 14:0008538.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008538

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Kim S
    2. Plagnol V
    3. Hu TT
    4. Toomajian C
    5. Clark RM
    6. Ossowski S
    7. Ecker JR
    8. Weigel D
    9. Nordborg M

    (2007) Recombination and linkage disequilibrium in Arabidopsis thaliana

    Nature Genetics 39:1151–1155.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ng2115

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Kincaid-Smith J
    2. Tracey A
    3. de Carvalho Augusto R
    4. Bulla I
    5. Holroyd N
    6. Rognon A
    7. Rey O
    8. Chaparro C
    9. Oleaga A
    10. Mas-Coma S
    11. Allienne JF
    12. Grunau C
    13. Berriman M
    14. Boissier J
    15. Toulza E

    (2021) Morphological and genomic characterisation of the schistosoma hybrid infecting humans in europe reveals admixture between schistosoma haematobium and schistosoma bovis

    PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 15:e0010062.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010062

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Kittur N
    2. King CH
    3. Campbell CH
    4. Kinung’hi S
    5. Mwinzi PNM
    6. Karanja DMS
    7. N’Goran EK
    8. Phillips AE
    9. Gazzinelli-Guimaraes PH
    10. Olsen A
    11. Magnussen P
    12. Secor WE
    13. Montgomery SP
    14. Utzinger J
    15. Walker JW
    16. Binder S
    17. Colley DG

    (2019) Persistent hotspots in schistosomiasis consortium for operational research and evaluation studies for gaining and sustaining control of schistosomiasis after four years of mass drug administration of praziquantel

    The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 101:617–627.

    https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.19-0193

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Knopp S
    2. Person B
    3. Ame SM
    4. Ali SM
    5. Hattendorf J
    6. Juma S
    7. Muhsin J
    8. Khamis IS
    9. Mohammed KA
    10. Utzinger J
    11. Hollenberg E
    12. Kabole F
    13. Rollinson D

    (2019) Evaluation of integrated interventions layered on mass drug administration for urogenital schistosomiasis elimination: a cluster-randomised trial

    The Lancet. Global Health 7:e1118–e1129.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30189-5

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Köser CU
    2. Ellington MJ
    3. Peacock SJ

    (2014) Whole-genome sequencing to control antimicrobial resistance

    Trends in Genetics 30:401–407.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2014.07.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Krawczak M

    (1999) Informativity assessment for biallelic single nucleotide polymorphisms

    Electrophoresis 20:1676–1681.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990101)20:8<1676::AID-ELPS1676>3.0.CO;2-D

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Le Clec’h W
    2. Chevalier FD
    3. McDew-White M
    4. Allan F
    5. Webster BL
    6. Gouvras AN
    7. Kinunghi S
    8. Tchuem Tchuenté L-A
    9. Garba A
    10. Mohammed KA
    11. Ame SM
    12. Webster JP
    13. Rollinson D
    14. Emery AM
    15. Anderson TJC

    (2018) Whole genome amplification and exome sequencing of archived schistosome miracidia

    Parasitology 145:1739–1747.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182018000811

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Le Clec’h W
    2. Chevalier FD
    3. Mattos ACA
    4. Strickland A
    5. Diaz R
    6. McDew-White M
    7. Rohr CM
    8. Kinung’hi S
    9. Allan F
    10. Webster BL
    11. Webster JP
    12. Emery AM
    13. Rollinson D
    14. Djirmay AG
    15. Al Mashikhi KM
    16. Al Yafae S
    17. Idris MA
    18. Moné H
    19. Mouahid G
    20. LoVerde P
    21. Marchant JS
    22. Anderson TJC

    (2021) Genetic analysis of praziquantel response in schistosome parasites implicates a transient receptor potential channel

    Science Translational Medicine 13:eabj9114.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abj9114

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Leger E
    2. Webster JP

    (2017) Hybridizations within the genus schistosoma: implications for evolution, epidemiology and control

    Parasitology 144:65–80.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182016001190

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Liang S
    2. Yang C
    3. Zhong B
    4. Qiu D

    (2006) Re-emerging schistosomiasis in hilly and mountainous areas of sichuan, china

    Bulletin of the World Health Organization 84:139–144.

    https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.05.025031

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Liang S
    2. Ponpetch K
    3. Zhou YB
    4. Guo J
    5. Erko B
    6. Stothard JR
    7. Murad MH
    8. Zhou XN
    9. Satrija F
    10. Webster JP
    11. Remais JV
    12. Utzinger J
    13. Garba A

    (2022) Diagnosis of schistosoma infection in non-human animal hosts: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 16:e0010389.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010389

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Lim SC
    2. Knight DR
    3. Riley TV

    (2020) Clostridium difficile and one health

    Clinical Microbiology and Infection 26:857–863.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2019.10.023

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Liu Y
    2. Zhou YB
    3. Li RZ
    4. Wan JJ
    5. Yang Y
    6. Qiu DC
    7. Zhong B

    (2016) Epidemiological features and effectiveness of schistosomiasis control programme in mountainous and hilly region of the people’s republic of china

    Advances in Parasitology 92:73–95.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2016.02.019

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Liu Y
    2. Zhong B
    3. Wu ZS
    4. Liang S
    5. Qiu DC
    6. Ma X

    (2017) Interruption of schistosomiasis transmission in mountainous and hilly regions with an integrated strategy: a longitudinal case study in sichuan, china

    Infectious Diseases of Poverty 6:79.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-017-0290-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Lowe D
    2. Xi J
    3. Meng X
    4. Wu Z
    5. Qiu D
    6. Spear R

    (2005) Transport of schistosoma japonicum cercariae and the feasibility of niclosamide for cercariae control

    Parasitology International 54:83–89.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2004.12.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Lowry DB
    2. Hoban S
    3. Kelley JL
    4. Lotterhos KE
    5. Reed LK
    6. Antolin MF
    7. Storfer A

    (2017) Breaking RAD: an evaluation of the utility of restriction site-associated DNA sequencing for genome scans of adaptation

    Molecular Ecology Resources 17:142–152.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12635

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Lozier JD

    (2014) Revisiting comparisons of genetic diversity in stable and declining species: assessing genome-wide polymorphism in north american bumble bees using RAD sequencing

    Molecular Ecology 23:788–801.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12636

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Lu DB
    2. Wang TP
    3. Rudge JW
    4. Donnelly CA
    5. Fang GR
    6. Webster JP

    (2009) Evolution in a multi-host parasite: chronobiological circadian rhythm and population genetics of schistosoma japonicum cercariae indicates contrasting definitive host reservoirs by habitat

    International Journal for Parasitology 39:1581–1588.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.06.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Lu DB
    2. Rudge JW
    3. Wang TP
    4. Donnelly CA
    5. Fang GR
    6. Webster JP
    7. Zhou XN

    (2010a) Transmission of schistosoma japonicum in marshland and hilly regions of china: parasite population genetic and sibship structure

    PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 4:e781.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000781

    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Lu DB
    2. Wang TP
    3. Rudge JW
    4. Donnelly CA
    5. Fang GR
    6. Webster JP

    (2010b) Contrasting reservoirs for schistosoma japonicum between marshland and hilly regions in anhui, china--a two-year longitudinal parasitological survey

    Parasitology 137:99–110.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S003118200999103X

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Luo F
    2. Yin M
    3. Mo X
    4. Sun C
    5. Wu Q
    6. Zhu B
    7. Xiang M
    8. Wang J
    9. Wang Y
    10. Li J
    11. Zhang T
    12. Xu B
    13. Zheng H
    14. Feng Z
    15. Hu W

    (2019) An improved genome assembly of the fluke schistosoma japonicum

    PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 13:e0007612.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007612

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Luo F
    2. Yang W
    3. Yin M
    4. Mo X
    5. Pang Y
    6. Sun C
    7. Zhu B
    8. Zhang W
    9. Yi C
    10. Li Z
    11. Wang J
    12. Xu B
    13. Feng Z
    14. Huang Y
    15. Lu Y
    16. Hu W

    (2022) A chromosome-level genome of the human blood fluke schistosoma japonicum identifies the genomic basis of host-switching

    Cell Reports 39:110638.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110638

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Meehan CJ
    2. Goig GA
    3. Kohl TA
    4. Verboven L
    5. Dippenaar A
    6. Ezewudo M
    7. Farhat MR
    8. Guthrie JL
    9. Laukens K
    10. Miotto P
    11. Ofori-Anyinam B
    12. Dreyer V
    13. Supply P
    14. Suresh A
    15. Utpatel C
    16. van Soolingen D
    17. Zhou Y
    18. Ashton PM
    19. Brites D
    20. Cabibbe AM
    21. de Jong BC
    22. de Vos M
    23. Menardo F
    24. Gagneux S
    25. Gao Q
    26. Heupink TH
    27. Liu Q
    28. Loiseau C
    29. Rigouts L
    30. Rodwell TC
    31. Tagliani E
    32. Walker TM
    33. Warren RM
    34. Zhao Y
    35. Zignol M
    36. Schito M
    37. Gardy J
    38. Cirillo DM
    39. Niemann S
    40. Comas I
    41. Van Rie A

    (2019) Whole genome sequencing of mycobacterium tuberculosis: current standards and open issues

    Nature Reviews. Microbiology 17:533–545.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0214-5

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Meredith HR
    2. Giles JR
    3. Perez-Saez J
    4. Mande T
    5. Rinaldo A
    6. Mutembo S
    7. Kabalo EN
    8. Makungo K
    9. Buckee CO
    10. Tatem AJ
    11. Metcalf CJE
    12. Wesolowski A

    (2021) Characterizing human mobility patterns in rural settings of sub-saharan africa

    eLife 10:e68441.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68441

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Morin PA
    2. Martien KK
    3. Taylor BL

    (2009) Assessing statistical power of snps for population structure and conservation studies

    Molecular Ecology Resources 9:66–73.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02392.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Neafsey DE
    2. Taylor AR
    3. MacInnis BL

    (2021) Advances and opportunities in malaria population genomics

    Nature Reviews. Genetics 22:502–517.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-021-00349-5

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Nielsen R

    (2000) Estimation of population parameters and recombination rates from single nucleotide polymorphisms

    Genetics 154:931–942.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/154.2.931

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Nielsen R
    2. Bustamante C
    3. Clark AG
    4. Glanowski S
    5. Sackton TB
    6. Hubisz MJ
    7. Fledel-Alon A
    8. Tanenbaum DM
    9. Civello D
    10. White TJ
    11. J Sninsky J
    12. Adams MD
    13. Cargill M

    (2005) A scan for positively selected genes in the genomes of humans and chimpanzees

    PLOS Biology 3:e170.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030170

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
86. 1. Nikolakis ZL
    2. Hales NR
    3. Perry BW
    4. Schield DR
    5. Timm LE
    6. Liu Y
    7. Zhong B
    8. Kechris KJ
    9. Carlton EJ
    10. Pollock DD
    11. Castoe TA

    (2021) Patterns of relatedness and genetic diversity inferred from whole genome sequencing of archival blood fluke miracidia (schistosoma japonicum)

    PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 15:e0009020.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009020

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
87. 1. Norton AJ
    2. Gower CM
    3. Lamberton PHL
    4. Webster BL
    5. Lwambo NJS
    6. Blair L
    7. Fenwick A
    8. Webster JP

    (2010) Genetic consequences of mass human chemotherapy for schistosoma mansoni: population structure pre- and post-praziquantel treatment in tanzania

    The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 83:951–957.

    https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0283

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
88. 1. Oleaga A
    2. Rey O
    3. Polack B
    4. Grech-Angelini S
    5. Quilichini Y
    6. Pérez-Sánchez R
    7. Boireau P
    8. Mulero S
    9. Brunet A
    10. Rognon A
    11. Vallée I
    12. Kincaid-Smith J
    13. Allienne J-F
    14. Boissier J
    15. Webster JP

    (2019) Epidemiological surveillance of schistosomiasis outbreak in corsica (france): are animal reservoir hosts implicated in local transmission?

    PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 13:e0007543.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007543

    • Google Scholar
89. 1. Parker M
    2. Kwiatkowski DP

    (2016) The ethics of sustainable genomic research in africa

    Genome Biology 17:44.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-0914-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
90. 1. Perez-Saez J
    2. Mari L
    3. Bertuzzo E
    4. Casagrandi R
    5. Sokolow SH
    6. De Leo GA
    7. Mande T
    8. Ceperley N
    9. Froehlich JM
    10. Sou M
    11. Karambiri H
    12. Yacouba H
    13. Maiga A
    14. Gatto M
    15. Rinaldo A

    (2015) A theoretical analysis of the geography of schistosomiasis in burkina faso highlights the roles of human mobility and water resources development in disease transmission

    PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 9:e0004127.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004127

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
91. 1. Peterson BK
    2. Weber JN
    3. Kay EH
    4. Fisher HS
    5. Hoekstra HE

    (2012) Double digest radseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species

    PLOS ONE 7:e37135.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037135

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
92. 1. Pillay S
    2. Giandhari J
    3. Tegally H
    4. Wilkinson E
    5. Chimukangara B
    6. Lessells R
    7. Moosa Y
    8. Mattison S
    9. Gazy I
    10. Fish M
    11. Singh L
    12. Khanyile KS
    13. San JE
    14. Fonseca V
    15. Giovanetti M
    16. Alcantara LC Jr
    17. de Oliveira T

    (2020) Whole genome sequencing of SARS-cov-2: adapting illumina protocols for quick and accurate outbreak investigation during a pandemic

    Genes 11:E949.

    https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11080949

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
93. 1. Platt RN
    2. McDew-White M
    3. Le Clec’h W
    4. Chevalier FD
    5. Allan F
    6. Emery AM
    7. Garba A
    8. Hamidou AA
    9. Ame SM
    10. Webster JP
    11. Rollinson D
    12. Webster BL
    13. Anderson TJC

    (2019) Ancient hybridization and adaptive introgression of an invadolysin gene in schistosome parasites

    Molecular Biology and Evolution 36:2127–2142.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz154

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
94. 1. Pool JE
    2. Hellmann I
    3. Jensen JD
    4. Nielsen R

    (2010) Population genetic inference from genomic sequence variation

    Genome Research 20:291–300.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.079509.108

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
95. 1. Popovich KJ
    2. Snitkin ES

    (2017) Whole genome sequencing-implications for infection prevention and outbreak investigations

    Current Infectious Disease Reports 19:15.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-017-0570-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
96. 1. Prugnolle F
    2. Théron A
    3. Pointier JP
    4. Jabbour-Zahab R
    5. Jarne P
    6. Durand P
    7. de Meeûs T

    (2005)

    Dispersal in a parasitic worm and its two hosts: consequence for local adaptation

    Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 59:296–303.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
97. 1. Quainoo S
    2. Coolen JPM
    3. van Hijum SAFT
    4. Huynen MA
    5. Melchers WJG
    6. van Schaik W
    7. Wertheim HFL

    (2017) Whole-genome sequencing of bacterial pathogens: the future of nosocomial outbreak analysis

    Clinical Microbiology Reviews 30:1015–1063.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00016-17

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
98. 1. Rey O
    2. Toulza E
    3. Chaparro C
    4. Allienne JF
    5. Kincaid-Smith J
    6. Mathieu-Begné E
    7. Allan F
    8. Rollinson D
    9. Webster BL
    10. Boissier J

    (2021a) Diverging patterns of introgression from schistosoma bovis across S. haematobium african lineages

    PLOS Pathogens 17:e1009313.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009313

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
99. 1. Rey O
    2. Webster BL
    3. Huyse T
    4. Rollinson D
    5. Van den Broeck F
    6. Kincaid-Smith J
    7. Onyekwere A
    8. Boissier J

    (2021b) Population genetics of african schistosoma species

    Infection, Genetics and Evolution 89:104727.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2021.104727

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
100. 1. Ribado JV
     2. Li NJ
     3. Thiele E
     4. Lyons H
     5. Cotton JA
     6. Weiss A
     7. Tchindebet Ouakou P
     8. Moundai T
     9. Zirimwabagabo H
     10. Guagliardo SAJ
     11. Chabot-Couture G
     12. Proctor JL

     (2021) Linked surveillance and genetic data uncovers programmatically relevant geographic scale of guinea worm transmission in chad

     PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 15:e0009609.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009609

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
101. 1. Rudge JW
     2. Carabin H
     3. Balolong E
     4. Tallo V
     5. Shrivastava J
     6. Lu DB
     7. Basáñez MG
     8. Olveda R
     9. McGarvey ST
     10. Webster JP

     (2008) Population genetics of schistosoma japonicum within the philippines suggest high levels of transmission between humans and dogs

     PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2:e340.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000340

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
102. 1. Rudge JW
     2. Lu DB
     3. Fang GR
     4. Wang TP
     5. Basáñez MG
     6. Webster JP

     (2009) Parasite genetic differentiation by habitat type and host species: molecular epidemiology of schistosoma japonicum in hilly and marshland areas of anhui province, china

     Molecular Ecology 18:2134–2147.

     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04181.x

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
103. 1. Rudge JW
     2. Webster JP
     3. Lu DB
     4. Wang TP
     5. Fang GR
     6. Basáñez MG

     (2013) Identifying host species driving transmission of schistosomiasis japonica, a multihost parasite system, in china

     PNAS 110:11457–11462.

     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221509110

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
104. 1. Satta G
     2. Lipman M
     3. Smith GP
     4. Arnold C
     5. Kon OM
     6. McHugh TD

     (2018) Mycobacterium tuberculosis and whole-genome sequencing: how close are we to unleashing its full potential?

     Clinical Microbiology and Infection 24:604–609.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2017.10.030

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
105. 1. Savassi B
     2. Mouahid G
     3. Lasica C
     4. Mahaman SDK
     5. Garcia A
     6. Courtin D
     7. Allienne JF
     8. Ibikounlé M
     9. Moné H

     (2020) Cattle as natural host for schistosoma haematobium (bilharz, 1852) weinland, 1858 x schistosoma bovis sonsino, 1876 interactions, with new cercarial emergence and genetic patterns

     Parasitology Research 119:2189–2205.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-020-06709-0

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
106. 1. Shortt JA
     2. Card DC
     3. Schield DR
     4. Liu Y
     5. Zhong B
     6. Castoe TA
     7. Carlton EJ
     8. Pollock DD

     (2017) Whole genome amplification and reduced-representation genome sequencing of schistosoma japonicum miracidia

     PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 11:e0005292.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005292

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
107. 1. Shortt JA
     2. Timm LE
     3. Hales NR
     4. Nikolakis ZL
     5. Schield DR
     6. Perry BW
     7. Liu Y
     8. Zhong B
     9. Castoe TA
     10. Carlton EJ
     11. Pollock DD

     (2021) Population genomic analyses of schistosome parasites highlight critical challenges facing endgame elimination efforts

     Scientific Reports 11:6884.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86287-y

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
108. 1. Shrivastava J
     2. Qian BZ
     3. Mcvean G
     4. Webster JP

     (2005) An insight into the genetic variation of schistosoma japonicum in mainland china using DNA microsatellite markers

     Molecular Ecology 14:839–849.

     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02443.x

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
109. 1. Spear RC

     (2012) Internal versus external determinants of schistosoma japonicum transmission in irrigated agricultural villages

     Journal of the Royal Society, Interface 9:272–282.

     https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0285

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
110. 1. Standley CJ
     2. Goodacre SL
     3. Wade CM
     4. Stothard JR

     (2014) The population genetic structure of biomphalaria choanomphala in lake victoria, east africa: implications for schistosomiasis transmission

     Parasites & Vectors 7:524.

     https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-014-0524-4

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
111. 1. Steinauer ML
     2. Blouin MS
     3. Criscione CD

     (2010) Applying evolutionary genetics to schistosome epidemiology

     Infection, Genetics and Evolution 10:433–443.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2010.02.007

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
112. 1. Theron A
     2. Pointier JP

     (1995)

     Ecology, dynamics, genetics and divergence of trematode population in heterogeneous environments: the model of schistosoma mansoni in the insular focus of guadeloupe

     Res Rev Parastiology 55:49–64.

     • Google Scholar
113. 1. Théron A

     (2015) Chronobiology of trematode cercarial emergence: from data recovery to epidemiological, ecological and evolutionary implications

     Advances in Parasitology 88:123–164.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2015.02.003

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
114. 1. Tillett RL
     2. Sevinsky JR
     3. Hartley PD
     4. Kerwin H
     5. Crawford N
     6. Gorzalski A
     7. Laverdure C
     8. Verma SC
     9. Rossetto CC
     10. Jackson D
     11. Farrell MJ
     12. Van Hooser S
     13. Pandori M

     (2021) Genomic evidence for reinfection with SARS-cov-2: a case study

     The Lancet. Infectious Diseases 21:52–58.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30764-7

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
115. Website

     1. Uniting to Combat Neglected Tropical Diseases

     (2022) Kigali Declaration on Neglected Tropical Diseaess [Internet]

     Accessed January 31, 2022.

     https://unitingtocombatntds.org/kigali-declaration/the-declaration/
116. 1. Valentim CLL
     2. LoVerde PT
     3. Anderson TJC
     4. Criscione CD

     (2009) Efficient genotyping of schistosoma mansoni miracidia following whole genome amplification

     Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 166:81–84.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molbiopara.2009.02.010

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
117. 1. Väli U
     2. Einarsson A
     3. Waits L
     4. Ellegren H

     (2008) To what extent do microsatellite markers reflect genome-wide genetic diversity in natural populations?

     Molecular Ecology 17:3808–3817.

     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03876.x

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
118. 1. Van den Broeck F
     2. Maes GE
     3. Larmuseau MHD
     4. Rollinson D
     5. Sy I
     6. Faye D
     7. Volckaert FAM
     8. Polman K
     9. Huyse T

     (2015) Reconstructing colonization dynamics of the human parasite schistosoma mansoni following anthropogenic environmental changes in northwest senegal

     PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 9:e0003998.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003998

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
119. Preprint

     1. Vianney TJ
     2. Berger DJ
     3. Doyle SR
     4. Sankaranarayanan G
     5. Serubanja J
     6. Nakawungu PK
     7. Besigye F
     8. Sanya RE
     9. Holroyd N
     10. Allan F
     11. Webb EL
     12. Elliott AM
     13. Berriman M
     14. Cotton JA

     (2021) Genome-Wide Analysis of Schistosoma Mansoni Reveals Population Structure and Praziquantel Drug Selection Pressure within Ugandan Hot-Spot Communities

     bioRxiv.

     https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.25.477652

     • Google Scholar
120. 1. Wang TP
     2. Vang Johansen M
     3. Zhang SQ
     4. Wang FF
     5. Wu WD
     6. Zhang GH
     7. Pan XP
     8. Ju Y
     9. Ørnbjerg N

     (2005) Transmission of schistosoma japonicum by humans and domestic animals in the yangtze river valley, anhui province, china

     Acta Tropica 96:198–204.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2005.07.017

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
121. 1. Wang TP
     2. Shrivastava J
     3. Johansen MV
     4. Zhang SQ
     5. Wang FF
     6. Webster JP

     (2006) Does multiple hosts mean multiple parasites? population genetic structure of schistosoma japonicum between definitive host species

     International Journal for Parasitology 36:1317–1325.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.06.011

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
122. 1. Webster BL
     2. Diaw OT
     3. Seye MM
     4. Webster JP
     5. Rollinson D

     (2013) Introgressive hybridization of schistosoma haematobium group species in senegal: species barrier break down between ruminant and human schistosomes

     PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 7:e2110.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002110

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
123. 1. Webster JP
     2. Neves MI
     3. Webster BL
     4. Pennance T
     5. Rabone M
     6. Gouvras AN
     7. Allan F
     8. Walker M
     9. Rollinson D

     (2020) Parasite population genetic contributions to the schistosomiasis consortium for operational research and evaluation within sub-saharan africa

     The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103:80–91.

     https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.19-0827

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
124. 1. Wesolowski A
     2. O’Meara WP
     3. Eagle N
     4. Tatem AJ
     5. Buckee CO

     (2015) Evaluating spatial interaction models for regional mobility in sub-saharan africa

     PLOS Computational Biology 11:e1004267.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004267

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
125. 1. Wesolowski A
     2. Taylor AR
     3. Chang HH
     4. Verity R
     5. Tessema S
     6. Bailey JA
     7. Alex Perkins T
     8. Neafsey DE
     9. Greenhouse B
     10. Buckee CO

     (2018) Mapping malaria by combining parasite genomic and epidemiologic data

     BMC Medicine 16:190.

     https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1181-9

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
126. 1. Wiegand RE
     2. Mwinzi PNM
     3. Montgomery SP
     4. Chan YL
     5. Andiego K
     6. Omedo M
     7. Muchiri G
     8. Ogutu MO
     9. Rawago F
     10. Odiere MR
     11. Karanja DMS
     12. Secor WE

     (2017) A persistent hotspot of schistosoma mansoni infection in A five-year randomized trial of praziquantel preventative chemotherapy strategies

     The Journal of Infectious Diseases 216:1425–1433.

     https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jix496

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
127. 1. Williams GM
     2. Sleigh AC
     3. Li Y
     4. Feng Z
     5. Davis GM
     6. Chen H
     7. Ross AGP
     8. Bergquist R
     9. McManus DP

     (2002) Mathematical modelling of schistosomiasis japonica: comparison of control strategies in the people’s republic of china

     Acta Tropica 82:253–262.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-706x(02)00017-7

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
128. 1. Wit J
     2. Gilleard JS

     (2017) Resequencing helminth genomes for population and genetic studies

     Trends in Parasitology 33:388–399.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2017.01.009

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
129. Website

     1. World Health Organization

     (2012) Accelerating work to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical diseases: A roadmap for implementation

     Accessed May 19, 2019.

     https://unitingtocombatntds.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/who_ntd_roadmap.pdf
130. Website

     1. World Health Organization

     (2020) Ending the neglect to attain the sustainable development goals: a road map for neglected tropical diseases 2021-2030

     Accessed September 8, 2021.

     http://apps.who.int/bookorders
131. 1. Wu HW
     2. Qin YF
     3. Chu K
     4. Meng R
     5. Liu Y
     6. McGarvey ST
     7. Olveda R
     8. Acosta L
     9. Ji MJ
     10. Fernandez T
     11. Friedman JF
     12. Kurtis JD

     (2010) High prevalence of schistosoma japonicum infection in water buffaloes in the philippines assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction

     The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 82:646–652.

     https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0638

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
132. 1. Xiao N
     2. Remais JV
     3. Brindley PJ
     4. Qiu DC
     5. Carlton EJ
     6. Li RZ
     7. Lei Y
     8. Blair D

     (2013) Approaches to genotyping individual miracidia of schistosoma japonicum

     Parasitology Research 112:3991–3999.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-013-3587-9

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
133. Preprint

     1. Xu X
     2. Wang Y
     3. Guan Q
     4. Guo G
     5. Yu X
     6. Dai Y
     7. Liu Y
     8. Wei G
     9. Wang C
     10. He X
     11. Ge J
     12. Zhang Z
     13. Pain A
     14. Wang S
     15. Wang W
     16. Young ND
     17. Gasser R
     18. McManus DP
     19. Cao J
     20. Zhou Q
     21. Zhang Q

     (2014) Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly Reveals Female-Biased Genes for Sex Determination and Differentiation in the Human Blood Fluke Schistosoma Japonicum

     Preprints.

     https://doi.org/10.22541/au.163632841.12699383/v1

     • Google Scholar
134. 1. Young ND
     2. Jex AR
     3. Li B
     4. Liu S
     5. Yang L
     6. Xiong Z
     7. Li Y
     8. Cantacessi C
     9. Hall RS
     10. Xu X
     11. Chen F
     12. Wu X
     13. Zerlotini A
     14. Oliveira G
     15. Hofmann A
     16. Zhang G
     17. Fang X
     18. Kang Y
     19. Campbell BE
     20. Loukas A
     21. Ranganathan S
     22. Rollinson D
     23. Rinaldi G
     24. Brindley PJ
     25. Yang H
     26. Wang J
     27. Wang J
     28. Gasser RB

     (2012) Whole-genome sequence of schistosoma haematobium

     Nature Genetics 44:221–225.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.1065

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
135. 1. Zein-Eddine R
     2. Djuikwo-Teukeng FF
     3. Dar Y
     4. Dreyfuss G
     5. Van den Broeck F

     (2017) Population genetics of the schistosoma snail host bulinus truncatus in egypt

     Acta Tropica 172:36–43.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.04.002

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
136. 1. Zhou Y
     2. Zheng H
     3. Chen X
     4. Zhang L
     5. Wang K
     6. Guo J
     7. Huang Z
     8. Zhang B
     9. Huang W
     10. Jin K
     11. Tonghai D
     12. Hasegawa M
     13. Wang L
     14. Zhang Y
     15. Zhou J
     16. Tao L
     17. Cao Z
     18. Li Y
     19. Vinar T
     20. Brejova B
     21. Brown D
     22. Li M
     23. Miller DJ
     24. Blair D
     25. Zhong Y
     26. Chen Z
     27. Liu F
     28. Hu W
     29. Wang ZQ
     30. Zhang QH
     31. Song HD
     32. Chen S
     33. Xu X
     34. Xu B
     35. Ju Z
     36. Cheng Y
     37. Brindley PJ
     38. McManus DP
     39. Feng Z
     40. Han ZG
     41. Lu G
     42. Ren S
     43. Wang Y
     44. Gu W
     45. Kang H
     46. Chen J
     47. Chen X
     48. Chen S
     49. Wang L
     50. Yan J
     51. Wang B
     52. Lv X
     53. Jin L
     54. Wang B
     55. Pu S
     56. Zhang X
     57. Zhang W
     58. Hu Q
     59. Zhu G
     60. Wang J
     61. Yu J
     62. Wang J
     63. Yang H
     64. Ning Z
     65. Beriman M
     66. Wei CL
     67. Ruan Y
     68. Zhao G
     69. Wang S

     (2009) The schistosoma japonicum genome reveals features of host-parasite interplay

     Nature 460:345–351.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08140

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
137. 1. Zou HY
     2. Yu QF
     3. Qiu C
     4. Webster JP
     5. Lu DB

     (2020) Meta-analyses of schistosoma japonicum infections in wild rodents across china over time indicates a potential challenge to the 2030 elimination targets

     PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 14:e0008652.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008652

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Andrea J Lund

   Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0880-310X

2. Kristen J Wade

   Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States

   Contribution

   Writing – original draft

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Zachary L Nikolakis

   Department of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, United States

   Contribution

   Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Kathleen N Ivey

   Department of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, United States

   Contribution

   Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Blair W Perry

   Department of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, United States

   Contribution

   Writing – original draft

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

6. Hamish NC Pike

   Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States

   Contribution

   Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

7. Sara H Paull

   Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

8. Yang Liu

   Sichuan Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chengdu, China

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

9. Todd A Castoe

   Department of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Contributed equally with

   David D Pollock and Elizabeth J Carlton

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

10. David D Pollock

    Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States

    Contribution

    Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

    Contributed equally with

    Todd A Castoe and Elizabeth J Carlton

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared

    "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7627-4214

11. Elizabeth J Carlton

    Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, United States

    Contribution

    Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

    Contributed equally with

    Todd A Castoe and David D Pollock

    For correspondence

    elizabeth.carlton@cuanschutz.edu

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared

    "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8664-9606

• 893

  views

• 180

  downloads

• 4

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.