Integrative dynamic structural biology unveils conformers essential for the oligomerization of a large GTPase

  1. Thomas O Peulen
  2. Carola S Hengstenberg
  3. Ralf Biehl
  4. Mykola Dimura
  5. Charlotte Lorenz
  6. Alessandro Valeri
  7. Julian Folz
  8. Christian A Hanke
  9. Semra Ince
  10. Tobias Vöpel
  11. Bela Farago
  12. Holger Gohlke
  13. Johann P Klare  Is a corresponding author
  14. Andreas M Stadler  Is a corresponding author
  15. Claus AM Seidel  Is a corresponding author
  16. Christian Herrmann  Is a corresponding author
  1. Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany
  2. Ruhr University Bochum, Germany
  3. Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany
  4. Institut Laue-Langevin, France
  5. University of Osnabrück, Germany

Abstract

Guanylate binding proteins (GBPs) are soluble dynamin-like proteins. They undergo a conformational transition for GTP-controlled oligomerization and disrupt membranes of intra-cellular parasites to exert their function as part of the innate immune system of mammalian cells. We apply neutron spin echo, X-ray scattering, fluorescence, and EPR spectroscopy as techniques for integrative dynamic structural biology to study the structural basis and mechanism conformational transitions in the human GBP1 (hGBP1). We mapped hGBP1’s essential dynamics from nanoseconds to milliseconds by motional spectra of sub-domains. We find a GTP-independent flexibility of the C-terminal effector domain in the μs-regime and resolve structures of two distinct conformers essential for an opening of hGBP1 like a pocketknife and oligomerization. Our results show that an intrinsic flexibility, a GTP-triggered association of the GTPase-domains, and the assembly-dependent GTP-hydrolysis are functional design principles that control hGBP1’s reversible oligomerization.

Data availability

Data availabilityThe following material is available at Zenodo in two locations: Experimental data (doi 10.5281/zenodo.6534557): (i) fluorescence decays recorded by eTCSPC used to compute the distance restraints in Supp. Tab. 3A, (ii) single-molecule multiparameter fluorescence data: all raw data, burst selection and calibration measurements, fFCS (filters and generated correlation curves) (iii) double electron-electron resonance (DEER) EPR data used for structural modeling, (iv) neutron spin-echo data and SAXS structure factor of hGBP1. Scripts for structural modeling of conformational ensembles through integrative/hybrid methods using FRET, DEER and SAXS together with the initial and selected structural ensembles (10.5281/zenodo.6565895). The experimental SAXS data and the ab initio analysis thereof are available in the SASBDB (ID SASDDD6). Structure models of hGBP1 based on experimental restraints were deposited to PDB-Dev (PDB-Dev ID: PDBDEV_00000088) using the FLR-dictionary extension (developed by PDB and the Seidel group) available on the IHM working group GitHub site (https://github.com/ihmwg/FLR-dictionary). Further data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.Code availabilityMost general custom-made software is directly available from http://www.mpc.hhu.de/en/software. General algorithms and source code are published under https://github.com/Fluorescence-Tools. Additional computer code custom-made for this publication is available upon request from the corresponding authors.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Thomas O Peulen

    Chair for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Carola S Hengstenberg

    Physical Chemistry I, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ralf Biehl

    Jülich Centre for Neutron Science, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Mykola Dimura

    Chair for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9462-0264
  5. Charlotte Lorenz

    Jülich Centre for Neutron Science, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3614-341X
  6. Alessandro Valeri

    Chair for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Julian Folz

    Chair for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Christian A Hanke

    Chair for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4826-4908
  9. Semra Ince

    Physical Chemistry I, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Tobias Vöpel

    Physical Chemistry I, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Bela Farago

    Institut Laue-Langevin, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Holger Gohlke

    Institut für Pharmazeutische und Medizinische Chemie, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8613-1447
  13. Johann P Klare

    Department of Physics, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
    For correspondence
    jklare@uos.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5761-5968
  14. Andreas M Stadler

    Jülich Centre for Neutron Science, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
    For correspondence
    a.stadler@fz-juelich.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2272-5232
  15. Claus AM Seidel

    Institute for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    For correspondence
    cseidel@hhu.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5171-149X
  16. Christian Herrmann

    Physical Chemistry I, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
    For correspondence
    Chr.Herrmann@rub.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC 2033 - 390677874 - RESOLV)

  • Christian Herrmann

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (HE 2679/6-1)

  • Christian Herrmann

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SE 1195/17-1)

  • Claus AM Seidel

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (STA 1325/2-1)

  • Andreas M Stadler

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KL2077/1-2)

  • Johann P Klare

European Research Council (Advanced Grant 2014 hybridFRET (671208))

  • Claus AM Seidel

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (project no. 267205415 / CRC 1208,subproject A03)

  • Holger Gohlke

Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf (Zentrum für Informations- und Medientechnologie (ZIM)")

  • Holger Gohlke

Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Forschungszentrum Jülich (user ID: HKF7,VSK33)

  • Holger Gohlke

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Hannes Neuweiler, University of Würzburg, Germany

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: April 8, 2020 (view preprint)
  2. Received: April 18, 2022
  3. Accepted: June 2, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: June 14, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: July 27, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Peulen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 731
    views
  • 97
    downloads
  • 5
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Thomas O Peulen
  2. Carola S Hengstenberg
  3. Ralf Biehl
  4. Mykola Dimura
  5. Charlotte Lorenz
  6. Alessandro Valeri
  7. Julian Folz
  8. Christian A Hanke
  9. Semra Ince
  10. Tobias Vöpel
  11. Bela Farago
  12. Holger Gohlke
  13. Johann P Klare
  14. Andreas M Stadler
  15. Claus AM Seidel
  16. Christian Herrmann
(2023)
Integrative dynamic structural biology unveils conformers essential for the oligomerization of a large GTPase
eLife 12:e79565.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79565

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79565

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Marco van den Noort, Panagiotis Drougkas ... Bert Poolman
    Research Article

    Bacteria utilize various strategies to prevent internal dehydration during hypertonic stress. A common approach to countering the effects of the stress is to import compatible solutes such as glycine betaine, leading to simultaneous passive water fluxes following the osmotic gradient. OpuA from Lactococcus lactis is a type I ABC-importer that uses two substrate-binding domains (SBDs) to capture extracellular glycine betaine and deliver the substrate to the transmembrane domains for subsequent transport. OpuA senses osmotic stress via changes in the internal ionic strength and is furthermore regulated by the 2nd messenger cyclic-di-AMP. We now show, by means of solution-based single-molecule FRET and analysis with multi-parameter photon-by-photon hidden Markov modeling, that the SBDs transiently interact in an ionic strength-dependent manner. The smFRET data are in accordance with the apparent cooperativity in transport and supported by new cryo-EM data of OpuA. We propose that the physical interactions between SBDs and cooperativity in substrate delivery are part of the transport mechanism.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Xiao-Ru Chen, Karuna Dixit ... Tatyana I Igumenova
    Research Article

    Regulated hydrolysis of the phosphoinositide phosphatidylinositol(4,5)-bis-phosphate to diacylglycerol and inositol-1,4,5-P3 defines a major eukaryotic pathway for translation of extracellular cues to intracellular signaling circuits. Members of the lipid-activated protein kinase C isoenzyme family (PKCs) play central roles in this signaling circuit. One of the regulatory mechanisms employed to downregulate stimulated PKC activity is via a proteasome-dependent degradation pathway that is potentiated by peptidyl-prolyl isomerase Pin1. Here, we show that contrary to prevailing models, Pin1 does not regulate conventional PKC isoforms α and βII via a canonical cis-trans isomerization of the peptidyl-prolyl bond. Rather, Pin1 acts as a PKC binding partner that controls PKC activity via sequestration of the C-terminal tail of the kinase. The high-resolution structure of full-length Pin1 complexed to the C-terminal tail of PKCβII reveals that a novel bivalent interaction mode underlies the non-catalytic mode of Pin1 action. Specifically, Pin1 adopts a conformation in which it uses the WW and PPIase domains to engage two conserved phosphorylated PKC motifs, the turn motif and hydrophobic motif, respectively. Hydrophobic motif is a non-canonical Pin1-interacting element. The structural information combined with the results of extensive binding studies and experiments in cultured cells suggest that non-catalytic mechanisms represent unappreciated modes of Pin1-mediated regulation of AGC kinases and other key enzymes/substrates.