Computationally defined and in vitro validated putative genomic safe harbour loci for transgene expression in human cells

Abstract

Selection of the target site is an inherent question for any project aiming for directed transgene integration. Genomic safe harbour (GSH) loci have been proposed as safe sites in the human genome for transgene integration. Although several sites have been characterised for transgene integration in the literature, most of these do not meet criteria set out for a GSH and the limited set that do have not been characterised extensively. Here, we conducted a computational analysis using publicly available data to identify 25 unique putative GSH loci that reside in active chromosomal compartments. We validated stable transgene expression and minimal disruption of the native transcriptome in three GSH sites in vitro using human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and their differentiated progeny. Furthermore, for easy targeted transgene expression, we have engineered constitutive landing pad expression constructs into the three validated GSH in hESCs.

Data availability

Unprocessed RNAseq FASTQ files generated for this study will be available from ENA: PRJEB49564 accession numbers: ERS16364945-ERS16364998.Custom computational scripts used for the GSH search will be available from https://github.com/foo-labHigh content imaging data will be available on Dryad.All other data generated during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Matias I Autio

    Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
    For correspondence
    autiomi@gis.a-star.edu.sg
    Competing interests
    Matias I Autio, Patent application PCT/SG2022/050888.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9579-9617
  2. Efthymios Motakis

    Cardiovascular Disease Translational Research Programme, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    Efthymios Motakis, Patent application PCT/SG2022/050888.
  3. Arnaud Perrin

    Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    Arnaud Perrin, Patent application PCT/SG2022/050888.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3545-5470
  4. Talal Bin Amin

    Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Zenia Tiang

    Cardiovascular Disease Translational Research Programme, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Dang Vinh Do

    Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Jiaxu Wang

    Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Joanna Kia Min Tan

    Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Shirley Suet Lee Ding

    Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Wei Xuan Tan

    Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Chang Jie Mick Lee

    Cardiovascular Disease Translational Research Programme, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Adrian KK Teo

    Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5901-7075
  13. Roger Foo

    Cardiovascular Disease Translational Research Programme, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    For correspondence
    roger.foo@nus.edu.sg
    Competing interests
    Roger Foo, Patent application PCT/SG2022/050888.

Funding

Biomedical Research Council (1610851033)

  • Matias I Autio

Agency for Science, Technology and Research (202D8020)

  • Matias I Autio

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were reviewed and approved ethics and animal care committees (IRB approval: A*STAR IRB 2020-096 & IACUC: 181366 and 221660).

Copyright

© 2024, Autio et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,273
    views
  • 337
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Matias I Autio
  2. Efthymios Motakis
  3. Arnaud Perrin
  4. Talal Bin Amin
  5. Zenia Tiang
  6. Dang Vinh Do
  7. Jiaxu Wang
  8. Joanna Kia Min Tan
  9. Shirley Suet Lee Ding
  10. Wei Xuan Tan
  11. Chang Jie Mick Lee
  12. Adrian KK Teo
  13. Roger Foo
(2024)
Computationally defined and in vitro validated putative genomic safe harbour loci for transgene expression in human cells
eLife 13:e79592.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79592

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79592

Further reading

    1. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Syeda Nayab Fatima Abidi, Sara Chan ... Christian W Siebel
    Research Article

    The sebaceous gland (SG) is a vital appendage of the epidermis, and its normal homeostasis and function is crucial for effective maintenance of the skin barrier. Notch signaling is a well-known regulator of epidermal differentiation, and has also been shown to be involved in postnatal maintenance of SGs. However, the precise role of Notch signaling in regulating SG differentiation in the adult homeostatic skin remains unclear. While there is evidence to suggest that Notch1 is the primary Notch receptor involved in regulating the differentiation process, the ligand remains unknown. Using monoclonal therapeutic antibodies designed to specifically inhibit of each of the Notch ligands or receptors, we have identified the Jag2/Notch1 signaling axis as the primary regulator of sebocyte differentiation in mouse homeostatic skin. Mature sebocytes are lost upon specific inhibition of the Jag2 ligand or Notch1 receptor, resulting in the accumulation of proliferative stem/progenitor cells in the SG. Strikingly, this phenotype is reversible, as these stem/progenitor cells re-enter differentiation when the inhibition of Notch activity is lifted. Thus, Notch activity promotes correct sebocyte differentiation, and is required to restrict progenitor proliferation.

    1. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Corentin Bernou, Marc-André Mouthon ... François Dominique Boussin
    Research Article

    The lateral wall of the mouse subventricular zone harbors neural stem cells (NSC, B cells) which generate proliferating transient-amplifying progenitors (TAP, C cells) that ultimately give rise to neuroblasts (NB, A cells). Molecular profiling at the single-cell level struggles to distinguish these different cell types. Here, we combined transcriptome analyses of FACS-sorted cells and single-cell RNAseq to demonstrate the existence of an abundant, clonogenic and multipotent population of immature neuroblasts (iNB cells) at the transition between TAP and migrating NB (mNB). iNB are reversibly engaged in neuronal differentiation. Indeed, they keep molecular features of both undifferentiated progenitors, plasticity and unexpected regenerative properties. Strikingly, they undergo important progressive molecular switches, including changes in the expression of splicing regulators leading to their differentiation in mNB subdividing them into two subtypes, iNB1 and iNB2. Due to their plastic properties, iNB could represent a new target for regenerative therapy of brain damage.